Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 04:55 04 Jun 2025
 
- IDF says roads to Gaza aid centres are 'combat zones' as sites close for day
* Chancellor to announce £15bn for transport projects
- Train firms must stop criminalising 'innocent errors', report says
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 13/06/25 - EPF Conference, Swindon (TWSW)
18/06/25 - Rail Live 2025
24/06/25 - GWR Community Rail Conf
26/06/25 - TWNW conference

On this day
4th Jun (1962)
Great Western Preservation Society launched

Train RunningCancelled
05:05 London Paddington to Oxford
04/06/25 06:28 Penzance to Plymouth
07:00 Oxford to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
June 04, 2025, 04:56:21 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[129] Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and even...
[119] ITV West feature on West Somerset railway
[56] East - West Rail update (Oxford to Bedford) - ongoing discussi...
[54] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[53] Some thoughts and questions on the high finances of nationslis...
[49] Shipping services across the Severn Estuary and Bristol Channe...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The left hand and the right hand  (Read 4777 times)
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2153


View Profile
« on: December 10, 2022, 09:34:31 »

I travelled from Paddington to Foregate Street yesterday, Friday December 9, on the 13:50 from Paddington to Great Malvern.

We left Paddington 9 late - there had been problems inbound to Paddington between Reading and Slough and everything was running late.

We're 10 late at Charlbury and we get stopped at an intermediate signal to warn the driver to run cautiously near Kingham - the previous train had reported a potential track defect.

We're 19 late at Evesham. After which the train manager announces that he's just been told that we will terminate at Foregate Street.

We get held before Norton Junction because another train has been allowed to precede us.

At Foregate Street (arrive 23 late at 16:24) it turns out that West Midlands Trains have cancelled their 16:36 to Great Malvern and Hereford; the next departure is at 17:24.

And the train we got held for at Norton? That was GWR (Great Western Railway)'s Warminster - Great Malvern, running on time. If only that could have been held so that we preceded it through Norton, our Great Malvern passengers could have used it...

Or am I expecting too much from GWR's Control office?



Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13388


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2022, 10:44:55 »

They would both have used Pl 1 at WOF. Letting the IET (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) through first wiould have blocked Pl 1 until it recommenced its inward journey restarting at WOF. Waa the turn back already full perhaps & it was going to delay the Warminster such that also would need caping at WOF?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10477


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2022, 11:05:30 »

It would certainly have delayed the Warminster>Malvern service by enough that it would have had a late start on the return journey as it has a very tight turnround.  But if the turnback was empty at Henwick then I think on balance it would have been best to have held it at Norton for the delayed Paddington>Malvern train.

My only question would be how much notice was given for the cancellation of the following Hereford WMT service?  Realtimetrains doesn't help much, but the lack of reports and a cancellation note perhaps hints that it wasn't much!

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:P96074/2022-12-09/detailed
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7440


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2022, 11:28:07 »

My only question would be how much notice was given for the cancellation of the following Hereford WMT service?  Realtimetrains doesn't help much, but the lack of reports and a cancellation note perhaps hints that it wasn't much!

I did check in Liverail, which has mere detail including the time a message is posted, but I think that relies on TRUST (Train Running System TOPS) alone. And, as openraildata.com says:
Quote
If a train is to be cancelled en-route, although the cancellation can be entered in to TRUST in advance, no cancellation message will be generated until the train has arrived at the point from which it is cancelled
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2153


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2022, 14:31:10 »

The 13:50 was a 5-car train. Could the Warminster - Great Malvern have been held in P1a of Shrub Hill, and the Paddington come into P1b behind it? There's a signal that I've always assumed controls this just by the footbridge.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10477


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2022, 12:37:08 »

Potentially it could have, yes.  The IET (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) would have not been able to open all its doors, so not ideal, but possible.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page