Cutting £10k by withdrawing from the Community Rail Partnership looks like a mean little cut. For you and me, and for the
CRP▸ perhaps, £10k is a lot of money. For Plymouth CC is isn't. I note - just one of many line items
Reduce the use of residential care, increase the use of foster care and work to ensure children in care can return to their families or a connected person in their lives £2.275m
Now I'm no expert in this - but my understanding is that residential care should be a last resort. Irrespective of the financial saving, if the council can get more children SAFELY back with a relative or into foster care they should be being asked routinely why they have not been doing it.
If they can save 227 times the Community Rail Partnership money bu doing the right thing for kids, why are they even wasting time looking at the CRP - unless they're looking at that for political or publicity reasons - so they can give their electorate a long and impressive list of cuts made, even if some are so small as to be irrelevant in "the wash" and will do more harm that good.
This reminds me of a YOP (Youth Opportunities Program) apprentice I had working for me many years ago. We had a piece of software (part of the suite we wrote and sold) that took a long time to run and one day when there was no-one else in the office, our YOP took it upon himself to spend the day speeding this software up. And he got to run in half the time - 20 seconds down to 10 seconds. Very proud of himself he was, too.
"But, Adam, how often do we run that task"
"Oh about once a week"
"How long did you spend yesterday speeding it up"
"Only half the day"
"So at 10 seconds per week it will take us 2400 weeks - 46 years - to get that time back ..."
I would be very interested to hear from our Community Rail members in Devon and Cornwall their thoughts on this ... should we encourage members of the forum to explain via the survey to Plymouth what Community Rail does for them?