I completely understand that it costs more to provide a more intense service. What I don't understand (though you tell me it's obvious, I think) why it costs more per journey made ... if the trains were as heavily loaded (and, goodness, the TV pictures of the UK▸ show heavily loaded trains) then why should doubling the service cost more than twice as much?
There's hire of extra stock, plus staff wages, of course (now, comparison of staff wages across the
EU» , did anyone do that comparison? I'd strongly suggest that the UKs wages are higher...but whether the UKs standard of living is higher is a very moot point, which might suggest our staff are overpaid in comparison, discuss), plus extrainfrastructure to get 3-minute headways. I'm sure I've missed other costs too, like running Network Rail & the
ORR»