This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Sunday 23/08/26 - No Crosscountry services
In "Cross Country services" [378609/32397/43]
Posted by eightonedee at 16:55, 23rd August 2026
 
Out of curiosity, I checked the "south-eastern" leg (Birmingham to Oxford, Reading and the South Coast) on their website which showed only an apology for reduced catering on most trains due to unavailability of staff. So perhaps "No trains on Cross-Country" is a bit of an exaggeration?

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Salisbury" [378608/31359/18]
Posted by grahame at 16:50, 23rd August 2026
 
Also learned - somewhat though not sharing more about fellow passengers arriving into Melksham / taxi sharing - travelling from Oxford (that flow again!) on personal / family business, and headed for a location in Melksham that's a significant walk from the station there.

Trying to understand you here - are you saying that Oxford City Centre is like Melksham centre, some way from he station? It's about a 10 minute walk.

No - I was simply saying what an important source / destination is for journeys to / from Melksham.  In terms of ticket sales, it's only 17th but that feels like it's because it's been two train changes and the homeword journey onto a thin service has to be correographed well ahead.

Re: NPPF revisions - more homes can be built near stations?
In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [378607/32385/40]
Posted by eightonedee at 16:35, 23rd August 2026
Already liked by ChrisB
 
Quote
Mayors to get powers to overrule local councils on planning decisions

Mayors across England will be given new powers to overrule local councils on some planning decisions.

The change would apply to proposals with more than 150 homes, more than 15,000 square metres of commercial space or buildings over 30 metres.

Mayors in 13 areas including Manchester, Liverpool, the West of England and the West Midlands will gain similar powers to Sir Sadiq Khan in London, who is already able to "call in" planning decisions.

Housing minister Matthew Pennycook said the powers were an "essential part of the toolkit that mayors need to effectively deliver new homes and regeneration".

The Conservatives questioned whether it was right for councils to lose the "ability to make planning decisions in their own communities".

The powers will also be available to mayors in the Combined Authorities in North East England, South Yorkshire, West Yorkshire, York and North Yorkshire, Hull and East Yorkshire, Greater Lincolnshire, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, East Midlands, and Tees Valley.

Housebuilding has fallen in London in recent years, but Pennycook insisted the "call in" powers had helped the mayor "unblock strategic growth sites" in the capital.

In the 2024 general election, the Labour government promised to build 1.5 million homes in England by the end of the decade but housebuilders have warned the target could be missed.

Pennycook said the government was "absolutely determined to stick with that ambition".  He acknowledged the target was "really stretching" but said nearly 180,000 children were in temporary accommodation and "any smaller target wouldn't be commensurate with the scale of the challenge".

In addition to gaining the new "call-in" powers, mayors are set to be able to grant "up-front permission", which the government says will allow building to begin "without a developer having to apply".

A consultation on how the powers will work is due to be published next week.

The government has sought to stress that local councils will continue to decide the majority of applications and that all decisions must still follow planning rules.  It has also said mayors will get a "bigger say" over how housing funding is spent in their area, with the government directing national agency Homes England to focus on local mayors' priorities.

New Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who served as mayor for Greater Manchester for nearly a decade, has repeatedly expressed his desire to transfer more powers to local mayors.  "Challenge does need to be made to local decision-making and actually it cuts both ways," he told the Sunday Times.  "Sometimes it's the other way round. It's the local authority putting forward something that's unacceptable in terms of the impact on the community. It's a two-way street."

Last month, Burnham promised to give all mayors a share of income tax revenue, saying he wanted to "bring power home" to "every postcode".  Earlier this week, he announced a secondment programme to send high-performing civil servants to work in mayoral offices.

The approach has faced criticism from some in his own party and the Liberal Democrats, who fear it could create a "two-tier system" that discriminates against those areas that do not have an elected mayor.

Responding to the new powers for mayors, Sir James Cleverly, the shadow housing secretary, said the government was "simultaneously stripping councils across the country of their ability to make planning decisions in their own communities, while making it easier to build traveller sites against local wishes".

Sir James also suggested Labour mayors had failed to meet housing targets, adding: "The Conservatives are the only party with a plan to get Britain building and moving again with our plan to scrap stamp duty on the family home."

Gideon Amos, the Liberal Democrat housing and planning spokesperson, said "taking powers away from communities and local councillors is taking powers away from local people.  Instead of silencing residents and handing mayors a blank cheque, the government should be empowering local councils with the resources to deliver genuinely affordable homes alongside the infrastructure to support them," he added.

Mothin Ali, deputy leader of the Greens, said "more powers for mayors to direct local councils" was "more tinkering from the Labour government when local authorities continue to be forced by government into austerity budgets".

Reform UK accused Labour of "centralisation in disguise", saying: "Westminster is stretching its tentacles outward instead of giving real power, resources and decision-making capabilities to devolved authorities."

That'll generate a huge "Hurrah" at the Planning Bar. A whole new source of work. In addition to court challenges to council's planning decisions, and to appeal decisions from them by inspectors and ministers, there will now be court challenges to mayoral decisions to overturn council decisions (which are as likely to be made by disappointed applicants or councils whose decisions have been overturned). This is not going to deliver a single additional housing unit. It's simply going to make it even more expensive and uncertain to pursue planning applications on major sites.

Re: Sunday 23/08/26 - No Crosscountry services
In "Cross Country services" [378606/32397/43]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 16:34, 23rd August 2026
 
Not to weigh in on the criticism... but to ask why "XC control" has become vital to the running of trains? Isn't the signalling and NR control function capable of meeting all the operational and safety requirements?

The XC Control Room duty manager would be needed to deal with incident management.  That could be something quite small such as dealing with a driver who has had a SPAD, to something more serious like stranded train scenarios, to something very serious such as an accident or derailment.  So I can understand why them being contactable and in contact with everyone is essential these days. 

Each TOC having back up facilities that can be fully operational within a couple of hours could also be regarded as essential.

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Salisbury" [378605/31359/18]
Posted by ChrisB at 16:19, 23rd August 2026
 
Also learned - somewhat though not sharing more about fellow passengers arriving into Melksham / taxi sharing - travelling from Oxford (that flow again!) on personal / family business, and headed for a location in Melksham that's a significant walk from the station there.

Trying to understand you here - are you saying that Oxford City Centre is like Melksham centre, some way from he station? It's about a 10 minute walk.

Re: Derailment, Wickford,14th August 2026
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [378604/32365/51]
Posted by Trowres at 15:47, 23rd August 2026
 
Still ongoing, no reopening date yet available.

Normal services still not expected before 26th August. (1st September for the Haywards Heath and Lewes service affected by a more severe derailment).

Coincidentally, I came across a report from 1966 referring to a derailment of a Glasgow-London sleeper train on the Kilmarnock Line. The train, 22:10 from Glasgow on 13th August, consisted of a class 40 diesel, 13 coaches and 2 vans.
In really foul weather, overflowing streams had covered the rails with rubble. The train was proceeding with caution, but the loco and carriages were derailed and ran for about 200 yards, with loco and several carriages ending up leaning against the cutting walls.

This was early hours of a Sunday morning. In the days before GSM-R radio, the crew had to protect the train and eventually find a phone to summon help. [In the prevailing weather this was a horrendous task].

At 03:00, the area manager arrived (on a loco commandeered from a circus train  ). Buses and a 2 car DMU arrived at 06:00-ish and 06:25 to provide transport for the passengers (unclear how many, but the passengers were taken to Dumfries "where hotels in the area had been asked to provide 300 breakfasts".

So that was the first 6 hours of 14th August. The report continued:

"The train was back on the rails early on August 15th, and the line was reopened to traffic the following day. Over 300 tons of stones and rubble were cleared from the line".

[Accompanying photos showed two large rail-mounted cranes lifting the class 40; also 6 of the coaches, of which 5 were leaning by various angles]

Re: Sunday 23/08/26 - No Crosscountry services
In "Cross Country services" [378603/32397/43]
Posted by Trowres at 15:10, 23rd August 2026
 
If this had been GWR then I'm sure some of our regular posters would have quite rightly been all over it.  Strange that it's only generated a handful of replies.

OK I'll bite.

Not to weigh in on the criticism... but to ask why "XC control" has become vital to the running of trains? Isn't the signalling and NR control function capable of meeting all the operational and safety requirements?

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [378602/31163/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 14:05, 23rd August 2026
 
From National Rail......

Route(s) affected
Great Western Railway between London Paddington and Didcot Parkway / Oxford / Swindon / Worcester Foregate Street / Bristol Parkway / Bristol Temple Meads / Weston-super-Mare / Great Malvern / Hereford / Cardiff Central / Plymouth / Swansea / Carmarthen / Penzance, and between Marlow and Maidenhead

Elizabeth line between Abbey Wood and Maidenhead / Reading

Description

A fault with the signalling system between Slough and Maidenhead means that some lines towards Reading are closed. As a result, trains running between these stations may be delayed.

Disruption expected until 15:00.

Re: Sunday 23/08/26 - No Crosscountry services
In "Cross Country services" [378601/32397/43]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 13:43, 23rd August 2026
 
Good old CrossCountry - forever hopeless.

If this had been GWR then I'm sure some of our regular posters would have quite rightly been all over it.  Strange that it's only generated a handful of replies.

Re: NPPF revisions - more homes can be built near stations?
In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [378600/32385/40]
Posted by REVUpminster at 13:21, 23rd August 2026
 
Torbay had a mayor under the existing unitary system, but after a referendum the position was abolished and went back to a ceremonial mayor. No mention of a mayor under Torbay and South Devon unitary authority.

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [378599/3662/5]
Posted by Bob_Blakey at 13:21, 23rd August 2026
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butts_Ferry

I suspect passenger numbers on this ferry have been higher after the wooden Mallison bridge, in the upper centre of the above article's image, was condemned (2018) and demolished (2020) as being structurally unsafe. Obviously much better than the 0.3 mile walking detour!

Re: Sunday 23/08/26 - No Crosscountry services
In "Cross Country services" [378598/32397/43]
Posted by Mark A at 12:45, 23rd August 2026
 
Northbound from Cheltenham a bit grim.

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/search/detailed/gb-nr:CNM/to/gb-nr:BHM/2026-08-23/0000-2359?stp=WVS&show=pax-calls&order=wtt

Also Bristol to Exeter, were it not for the GWR Cardiff to Exeter service - but, that service has its last train at around 6:30pm - today flagged in the national rail site as both 'Fastest' and 'Slower journey'. With the Crosscountry services withdrawn, that site indicates a sole opportunity for Exeter later in the evening a bit before 9pm, with a change at Taunton.

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/search/detailed/gb-nr:BRI/to/gb-nr:EXD/2026-08-23/0000-2359?stp=WVS&show=pax-calls&order=wtt

Mark

Re: The unlikely vineyard inside a London railway station
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [378596/32401/31]
Posted by Bob_Blakey at 11:26, 23rd August 2026
 
I first heard about this on the Green Signals podcast last Thursday (20/08/26). The BBC article seems only to have been posted today. 

Re: IET's question
In "Your rights and redress" [378595/32398/6]
Posted by grahame at 11:21, 23rd August 2026
 
apart from the normal timetable for IET's,are they passed on other routes,

like beyond Westbury to Portsmouth and Brighton.

Milford haven and Pembroke

Worcester heading North   

Relatively uninformed answer here, but they do use a handful of routes outside the normal timetable from time to time already. For example, Bradford Junction to Thingley junction, the Rhubarb Loop, and I think via an alternative route when Bridgend to Cardiff  normal route is not available. Also into Euston, and I think, and haven't I seen IETs from other operators getting to Eastleigh?

Westbury to Brighton presents various gauging issues to some trains - platform 3 at Salisbury, the tunnels at Southampton, and the Hamble / Swanwick bridge, and I suspect that the platforms at Brighton from the west would boo short.  I also know that some 3rd rail clearance issues have arisen.   They already go to Pembroke on summer Saturdays.  In passenger use, except for emergencies, the stations for stopping need to be programmed in too.

Re: Sunday 23/08/26 - No Crosscountry services
In "Cross Country services" [378594/32397/43]
Posted by Bob_Blakey at 11:15, 23rd August 2026
Already liked by Mark A
 
I find myself wondering how many other vital rail industry support services are there that do not have:

The service split over (at least) two geographically separate locations which have the ability to deal with all (or increased) comms traffic in the event of one site suffering a catastrophic failure
or
A single site which has duplicate power supply routes, UPS infrastructure, and back-up generators

I suspect quite a few. 

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Salisbury" [378593/31359/18]
Posted by Mark A at 10:31, 23rd August 2026
Already liked by grahame
 
I estimate around 150 people left Swindon on the 08:44 this morning - and it looked like a good proportion were headed for the seaside.   Hope they all get home OK.

Leaving aside some that will travel earlier, it's a couple of buses/coaches. Hopefully booked them as soon as the staff shortage was noted

It would be good to hear about the experience from someone on the ground, mind.

Mark

The unlikely vineyard inside a London railway station
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [378592/32401/31]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 10:28, 23rd August 2026
Already liked by PrestburyRoad
 
From the BBC:

The unlikely vineyard inside a London railway station


The vines are just metres from rail station platforms and passing trains - Image © BBC News

There are few places you would expect to stumble across a vineyard in inner London and a sunny railway embankment in south London is probably not high on the list.

Yet just metres from the tracks at Denmark Hill station, a small group of volunteers is growing grapes to turn into wine.

The aptly named Château Denmark Hill Station vineyard is the work of Camberwell Society members Nick Mair and Tony Coleman, who saw a neglected patch of land as a place with the potential for making wine.

"We had this beautiful, south-facing slope covered in brambles, bindweed and stuff like that," says Tony. "And Nick said 'this could be a vineyard'. And we thought, 'wow, wouldn't that be an amazing thing to do?'"

(BBC article continues)


Re: Hastings diesel on the Bluebell - August 2026 - visit and report
In "Introductions and chat" [378591/32308/1]
Posted by grahame at 10:18, 23rd August 2026
Already liked by PrestburyRoad, bradshaw
 
13 trains and a taxi.  Melksham (08:02) - Swindon - Paddington - Farringdon - East Croydon - East Grinstead - Sheffield Park - East Grinstead - East Croydon - London Bridge - Charing Cross - Paddington - Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham (20:05). 

Metrics
- longest delay - 10 minutes, GWR Swindon to Paddington
- cancellations - just one, that final train back into Melksham
- longest intermediate station stops - Melksham to load and Chippenham to then unload a wheelchair, and Horsted Keynes to pass another train
- traction 3 x diesel, 1 x switched underway electric to diesel, rest electric.
- smallest profile train - Charing Cross to Paddington
- only full-and-standing trains - Charing Cross to Paddington and Paddington to Swindon
- quietest train - East Grinstead to East Croydon
- longest wait - in London when headed home; I killed time there to connect with a Melksham train
- shortest wait - London Bridge, where a Charing Cross train pulled in as I reached the platform
- longest train - Thamelink or Elizabeth line?
- shortest train used - Melksham to Swindon (3 carriages)
- shortest train seen - brake van rides at Sheffield Park
- most irritating fellow passengers - children who had been bought whistles by their access-weekend (?) dad
- most polite staff - all of them; no exceptions
- least helpful staff - [name redacted] at Swindon who had I followed advise would have delayed me by hours.
- least comfortable seating - between Swindon and Paddington
- most expensive fare per mile - East Grinstead to Sheffield Park and back
- greatest sadness - just how hard and difficult that final leg into Melksham can be
- best scenery - the wealds of Sussex and Kent, south from Oxted
- longest queue - ticket barriers, Paddington (into Elizabeth line)
- ungated platforms - Melksham and 2 x Paddington main line
- fondest memories rekindled - travelling in a Hastings Diesel power car.
- best historic station used - Sheffield Park
- best modern station used - there are lots; no single choice
- most impressive high utilisation of station - East Croydon
- worst modern station used - Swindon
- greatest love - being home after a fantastic day and waking up here the next morning
- enjoyment factor - 90% plus plus

9.4kms walked in three big batches - Home to Melksham Station, in London on my return journey, and Melksham Station home. 12 flights of stairs climbed. The specialist doctor on Thursday confirmed that walking helps lower blood pressure and indeed the reading he took on the 4th floor of the GW hospital (I had walked up) confirmed that - but I digress.








Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [378590/3662/5]
Posted by Mark A at 10:02, 23rd August 2026
 
Upward-only rent reviews more generally and the frankly feudal nature of landlord-tenant law. *Shakes head*.

Mark

Re: Ferries across waterways - whether by vehicle, foot or both (merged posts)
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [378589/3662/5]
Posted by grahame at 09:26, 23rd August 2026
Already liked by Mark A
 
From The BBC

Over the sea to Skye on the world’s last turntable ferry



This is the Kylerhea to Glenelg ferry, which I also have fond memories of. The location is stunning, high mountains all around and much wildlife in the turbulent waters. The ferry operation is extraordinary to watch as they turn the turntable around in midstream.

To reach it involves climbing over 1,000 feet up narrow mountain passes on both sides. I cycled this route and it was wonderful, as was the b&b in Glenelg which had one of the most helpful landladies I have ever met. From Glenelg there is a 10 mile dead-end road down the loch (well definitely up and down and running roughly parallel with the loch), which reaches a tiny hamlet in the middle of nowhere, where red deer graze on the beach and the very last terraced house does teas. At one point this road crosses a large scree slope on a 3,000 feet mountainside. Absolutely beautiful and remote.

The ferry is reported to be under threat and there's a petition to save it - at 38 degrees
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-the-glenelg-skye-ferry

Friends will know how very, very rarely I sign petitions but I have signed this one and I encourage other to do so.  I have very fond memories of this ferry - "romantic" isn't quite the word; making use of it what must have been around 50 years ago in a long hot summer around 1976, with my grandmother - Gran - who would have been 133 years old today (we made a strange touring couple).

"Over the sea to Skye" has changed with the opening of the bridge near Kyle of Lochalsh, with the ferry there closing and the other ferry routes at Mallaig to Armadale and Glenelg to Kylerhea becoming less significant in terms of connectivity.  The Glenelg ferry is indeed seasonal (was it always?) and I would not like to see a top-weight HGV on it; very much a tourist thing these days as I suspect that the local traffic between residents on both sides of the kyles is minimal.  A very, very long way around if it's not running.  Having said that, the trade and business it brings them is surely significant - important - as is noted by the somewhat overegged talk about the numbers of staff employed on the ferry and at the tearooms.

A petition that vilifies an individual in the way this one does concerns me slightly, and part of me suspects that the bloke probably isn't going to be minded to take actions that eliminate his annual income unless he has other intents - so I partly suspect the petition might be something of a negotiating ploy.  But then I also wonder if the income isn't a significant income to him, and it's more trouble than it's worth.   What price the overrunning of this quiet "Ring of Bright Water" land?  I can't see the area as being ripe for new housing or other development ... but you never know. Anyway - signed though with some concerns; the petition also provides wonderful publicity for the ferry and its operators and may bolster their business so they can afford the fees even if they stay on current terms.

Re: Sunday 23/08/26 - No Crosscountry services
In "Cross Country services" [378588/32397/43]
Posted by John D at 09:18, 23rd August 2026
 
Seems to be lack of contingency plan at work here.

Staff on the ground have mobile phones, staff at control centre could have emergency contact method if their main building is not available

Very similar to the recent Manchester area disruption, no proper back up power for critical computers, or slower older reserve that can be used instead

Re: Sunday 23/08/26 - No Crosscountry services
In "Cross Country services" [378586/32397/43]
Posted by grahame at 08:37, 23rd August 2026
 
ALL Crosscountry services suspended [removed from timetable] due to a power failure at their control centre.

Several additional calls at Tiverton Parkway by GWR to cover.

09:14 Plymouth to London Paddington due 12:27

09:14 Plymouth to London Paddington due 12:27 will call additionally at Tiverton Parkway.
This is due to the train making extra stops because of service disruption.

"I was going out for the day to Birmingham.  Oh - never mind - I'll go to Reading instead"  ... there will be some slow old journeys, especially north from Cheltenham Spa, won't there?

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Salisbury" [378585/31359/18]
Posted by grahame at 08:29, 23rd August 2026
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, GBM, Mark A
 
18:35 Westbury to Swindon due 19:17
19:44 Swindon to Westbury due 20:29
 
19:44 Swindon to Westbury due 20:29 will be cancelled.
This is due to passengers causing a disturbance on a train.

Last Updated:22/08/2026 18:18



I'm on the 18:18 Paddington to Swansea train and was planning to change into the train GWR have just cancelled at Swindon.  No indication on Journeycheck of alternative arrangements and no staff have passed through to ask (as yet). Will ne interesting to see what happens.

Home - and at about the time I would have been anyway if the train had run.   Catering trolley came through at around Shrivenham.  Chap looked up the train on his phone and confirmed it was cancelled, and also confirmed there was no alternative train; that news seems to surprise him.  Suggested I have a word with the folks on the platform in orange jackets who would be able to help with an alternative.

Chap on platform after dispatching the Swansea told me for Melksham to catch the 19:25 to Bath Spa and change there onto a train there to get to Melksham.  I inwardly rolled my eyes, but then when I heard him repeating that advice to others, I asked if this was something new as there aren't normally trains from Bath to Melksham ... I asked if we would be better getting the 19:25 to Chippenham and whether road transport would be provided, and he felt that was a good idea.

Got to Chippenham at around 19:35 ... train dispatcher tells me to have a word with gateline staff when I ask, and a group of us do.  The departure boards just say "cancelled" without offering an alternative, with screens and facilities with more room say "will call at Melksham, Trowbridge and Westbury" when clearly it won't.   "Thank goodness you know who to ask / where to go" say a couple of folks who are sticking beside me.  Over the bridge, into the station entrance barriers and a chat with the gateline staff there, who are all too familiar with the circumstance.

Cancelled train had been due 19:59. "Can't do anything until the 19:56 arrival from Bristol in case anyone is connecting" which at face value makes sense - except we had a full taxi load already ... and in the end we set off in a full taxi on a "chit" that GWR will pay for the cab a few minutes later and got to Melksham on time.   

As is familiar "territory"/experience, at least two other taxis set off for Melksham at the same time, hired by other groups / people clubbing together and agreeing how they would pay - same experience the world over (St Margreten to Bregenz, for example) and by making private arrangements, some benefit for the passengers gained in that they can ride that final mile home rather than being dropped at the station. But that does men that GWR get off "on the cheap" and the disruption and upset to journeys does not get registered in their pocket.

Into Melksham at around 20:00 to 20:05 / home at 20:45 (having stopped in town to order, await preparation and collect a takeaway).   Taxi driver dropped us off - with our unanimous agreement - at the top of Station Approach, and confirmed he knows the Chippenham to Melksham Station run very well indeed. "Always doing it".



Disruptions are a learning experience.   

Had we gone on to Bath, a train double back via Trowbridge would have got us there to Melksham Station at 21:38 - 90 minutes later than scheduled. That's as per advise from [name redacted] on platform at Swindon.

Or ...  had we waited for the final train of the day from Swindon / Chippenham, we would have got to Melksham Station at 22:42 - 154 minutes later than scheduled.  Had we gone to Bath Spa and the station staff had provided taxis, I guestimate we might have got to Melksham Station around 25 minutes later than scheduled.   Had we gone to Bath Spa, walked up to the Guildhall and caught the next available bus - the 21:00 - it would have passed close to Melksham Station at around 21:40 - again 90 minutes later than scheduled. 

Also learned - somewhat though not sharing more about fellow passengers arriving into Melksham / taxi sharing - travelling from Oxford (that flow again!) on personal / family business, and headed for a location in Melksham that's a significant walk from the station there.

Re: Station fire at Paignton. Footbridge?
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [378584/32262/24]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 08:05, 23rd August 2026
 
Thanks for posting that detailed update here, REVUpminster. 

Re: Station fire at Paignton. Footbridge?
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [378582/32262/24]
Posted by REVUpminster at 07:38, 23rd August 2026
 
Some more photos: Bearing in mind no work takes place at the weekends. Too tiring?

20260815_103715 by Robert, on Flickr
This was after canopy removed. There is very little damage to the shed. The plastic bin bag is untouched, or the ticket machine and advertising panels. The public toilets beyond the main shed have been open since the station first reopened.

Paignton station fire 15 August 2026. by Robert, on Flickr
Metal shutters where the newsagents (closed for more than 15 years) stall was.

Paignton station 22 August 2026 by Robert, on Flickr
Frontage boarded off by 21 August 2026

Paignton Station side by Robert, on Flickr
Paignton station new exit 22 August 2026 by Robert, on Flickr
New exit from staff accommodation to side of station.

Re: NPPF revisions - more homes can be built near stations?
In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [378581/32385/40]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 07:29, 23rd August 2026
 
From the BBC:

Mayors to get powers to overrule local councils on planning decisions

Mayors across England will be given new powers to overrule local councils on some planning decisions.

The change would apply to proposals with more than 150 homes, more than 15,000 square metres of commercial space or buildings over 30 metres.

Mayors in 13 areas including Manchester, Liverpool, the West of England and the West Midlands will gain similar powers to Sir Sadiq Khan in London, who is already able to "call in" planning decisions.

Housing minister Matthew Pennycook said the powers were an "essential part of the toolkit that mayors need to effectively deliver new homes and regeneration".

The Conservatives questioned whether it was right for councils to lose the "ability to make planning decisions in their own communities".

The powers will also be available to mayors in the Combined Authorities in North East England, South Yorkshire, West Yorkshire, York and North Yorkshire, Hull and East Yorkshire, Greater Lincolnshire, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, East Midlands, and Tees Valley.

Housebuilding has fallen in London in recent years, but Pennycook insisted the "call in" powers had helped the mayor "unblock strategic growth sites" in the capital.

In the 2024 general election, the Labour government promised to build 1.5 million homes in England by the end of the decade but housebuilders have warned the target could be missed.

Pennycook said the government was "absolutely determined to stick with that ambition".  He acknowledged the target was "really stretching" but said nearly 180,000 children were in temporary accommodation and "any smaller target wouldn't be commensurate with the scale of the challenge".

In addition to gaining the new "call-in" powers, mayors are set to be able to grant "up-front permission", which the government says will allow building to begin "without a developer having to apply".

A consultation on how the powers will work is due to be published next week.

The government has sought to stress that local councils will continue to decide the majority of applications and that all decisions must still follow planning rules.  It has also said mayors will get a "bigger say" over how housing funding is spent in their area, with the government directing national agency Homes England to focus on local mayors' priorities.

New Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who served as mayor for Greater Manchester for nearly a decade, has repeatedly expressed his desire to transfer more powers to local mayors.  "Challenge does need to be made to local decision-making and actually it cuts both ways," he told the Sunday Times.  "Sometimes it's the other way round. It's the local authority putting forward something that's unacceptable in terms of the impact on the community. It's a two-way street."

Last month, Burnham promised to give all mayors a share of income tax revenue, saying he wanted to "bring power home" to "every postcode".  Earlier this week, he announced a secondment programme to send high-performing civil servants to work in mayoral offices.

The approach has faced criticism from some in his own party and the Liberal Democrats, who fear it could create a "two-tier system" that discriminates against those areas that do not have an elected mayor.

Responding to the new powers for mayors, Sir James Cleverly, the shadow housing secretary, said the government was "simultaneously stripping councils across the country of their ability to make planning decisions in their own communities, while making it easier to build traveller sites against local wishes".

Sir James also suggested Labour mayors had failed to meet housing targets, adding: "The Conservatives are the only party with a plan to get Britain building and moving again with our plan to scrap stamp duty on the family home."

Gideon Amos, the Liberal Democrat housing and planning spokesperson, said "taking powers away from communities and local councillors is taking powers away from local people.  Instead of silencing residents and handing mayors a blank cheque, the government should be empowering local councils with the resources to deliver genuinely affordable homes alongside the infrastructure to support them," he added.

Mothin Ali, deputy leader of the Greens, said "more powers for mayors to direct local councils" was "more tinkering from the Labour government when local authorities continue to be forced by government into austerity budgets".

Reform UK accused Labour of "centralisation in disguise", saying: "Westminster is stretching its tentacles outward instead of giving real power, resources and decision-making capabilities to devolved authorities."


Re: Michael Bond CBE - 1926 -2017
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [378580/18405/31]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 07:11, 23rd August 2026
 
Infoman,

See a reply to your previous post on this subject, at https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=29972.msg359862#msg359862

CfN. 

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025