This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [366899/29726/18]
Posted by Timmer at 22:23, 14th October 2025
 

Makes sense - 20:07 arrival from Paddington ; connection left at 20:10.   The 18:36 from Paddington is due into Westbury at 19:58 - an official connection with some good advance fares, but all too often leads to a long wait at at Westbury.
The 18:36 made an additional stop at Kintbury because the 18:08 Pad to Frome was cancelled hence the slight delay arriving into Westbury.

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [366898/29726/18]
Posted by grahame at 20:41, 14th October 2025
 
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06

20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06 will be starting late from Westbury.
This is due to the train departing late to maintain customer connections.


Makes sense - 20:07 arrival from Paddington ; connection left at 20:10.   The 18:36 from Paddington is due into Westbury at 19:58 - an official connection with some good advance fares, but all too often leads to a long wait at at Westbury.

Re: Dropped city 'circle line' train plan revived
In "Bristol (WECA) Commuters" [366897/30913/21]
Posted by johnneyw at 20:37, 14th October 2025
 
Bristol Live is carrying the story too, much of it saying the same things but it also goes on to talk about possible resistance from the Port of Bristol.  Councillor Weston observed that there needs to be some give and take and in that respect the balance is somewhat one sided.  Here's the link to the story.

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/two-parts-bristol-could-connected-10569881



Dropped city 'circle line' train plan revived
In "Bristol (WECA) Commuters" [366896/30913/21]
Posted by grahame at 19:42, 14th October 2025
 
Round and round?  - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwypj9le4j7o

Plans to create a railway "loop" connecting two growing parts of Bristol are to be looked at again despite originally being deemed too risky.

Plans are currently in place for a passenger train service between Bristol Temple Meads and Henbury, where the service will terminate.

But campaigners have long been calling for the reopening of the Henbury Loop line, to link Henbury to Avonmouth and the Severn Beach line, to create a circle line around the city,.

Despite the idea being dropped a decade ago, Stephen Peacock, chief executive of West of England Combined Authority (Weca), said they "will be looking at it" again as part of their overall delivery planning.

Re: Blyth's Northumberland Line train station bus stop snub 'madness'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [366895/30912/51]
Posted by FarWestJohn at 19:04, 14th October 2025
 
St.Erth is like that now. It takes ages for buses to pull off the A30 and back on via the traffic lights and road junction even worse in the summer.
Before the large station car park bus stops were on the A30 with a short walk for the few people that transferred to the train. Buses very rarely needed to stop.

Re: Choice of time and place for meetings - some thoughts / issues
In "Diary - what's happening when?" [366894/30902/34]
Posted by grahame at 18:53, 14th October 2025
 
Good stuff, BobM ... and I totally agree with there being too many meetings for - err - meetings sake, and too many people not as prepared as they should be for meetings.  The ease of calling an online meeting and the lack of investment in travel time to get there, perhaps, tend to make people not prepare as seriously as they should.

But - there are meetings, and then there are meetings.  I am going along on Thursday evening to a meeting of the Melksham Historical Association which apart from a few announcements will be a talk on "The Trials of the Revd Barnwell". I have done minimal/no preps and don't expect or think I need to. But then Lisa, who is giving the talk, has been building up to it and preparing for a - err - very long time.

Perhaps meetings are like trains - they all have more or less the same basics, but the character varied hugely




Re: Blyth's Northumberland Line train station bus stop snub 'madness'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [366893/30912/51]
Posted by grahame at 17:40, 14th October 2025
 
I can understand both "sides" of this ... it sounds depressingly familiar.  It feels like madness but yet when you talk to the bus companies, you can understand why - at least we can / could locally where we have a similar situation.  That's a bus stop at the station, but it's only used for rail replacement services.  Service buses pass by 150 metres away at the top of Station Approach, though it is 450 metres to the nearest stop (271/2/3) and 550 metres to the stop on the x34. And it's about 650 metres to the Town Bridge.

Diverting the 271/2/3 via the station bus stop would cost somewhere from 3 to 5 minutes. The x34 would be 3 minutes northbound and twice that southbound. And that would mean not only would through passenger journeys be slowed down, but also that an extra vehicle would be needed for the 27x, and an extra vehicle for the x34 - or frequencies reduced and no longer would the services run clockface.

There is - err - some confusion locally about how far from the station it's realistic to have a bus stop / walk.  A Wiltshire Councillor who represents a ward on the 271/2/3 route that's on the opposite side of Melksham to the station tells me that the 450 metre walk from the station to the bus stop is reasonable and should not put anyone off, but the 650 metres to the town bridge and town centre is not a reasonable walk.  My own view is that for a transfer from the bus, this is really too far - especialy as it involves crossing a busy A road at a point that there's no crossing and traffic appears quick and blind, but then the distance to the Town Bridge, which does not involve crossing any roads on the level isn't a problem if you're headed to the Town Centre.

Of course, the look is for solutions. 

* The local authorities (ours, and up north) could cross palms with silver - or perhaps it would need to be gold - to make it commercially worthwhile. 

* A bus service could run that actually terminates at the station, and indeed this is a solution for Melksham.  We lost our 2nd town bus vehicle during covid - "driver shortage" and it never came back - it could so usefully now fill the gap with an hourly route leaving the station just after the train calls, and gettig back there just before the next train.

* Bus stops could be added at the top of Station Approach. Very easy in the x34 both ways, and inbound on the 271/2/3 - in all three cases two traffic lanes, and no need for pedestrians to cross on the level. The fourth is a bit of a problem, and perhaps the outbound bus towards Bath COULD divert down Station Approach at the request of passengers onboard.

I hope and expect that Newsham has various options such as these; I also hope that they can get them sorted in a tiny fraction of the time that we have been pushing, nagging, campaigning for an attractive bus <-> train solution


Re: Cross Country - serious concerns
In "Cross Country services" [366892/28989/43]
Posted by Timmer at 17:34, 14th October 2025
 
Cross Country is an absolute basket case of a TOC and I’m sure the government is only too happy that it’s one of the last to come back to public ownership so Arriva can continue to carry the can for the absolute state that it’s in.

Re: Plan to protect Stonehenge from developments agreed
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [366891/30901/31]
Posted by matth1j at 16:34, 14th October 2025
 
In the 1930s there was a cafe by the fork in the road, ‘a cheap flashy little building'. See here.
Love the road sign!

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [366890/29726/18]
Posted by grahame at 16:31, 14th October 2025
 
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06

17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06 will be terminated at Westbury.
It will no longer call at Dilton Marsh, Warminster and Salisbury.
This is due to a fault with barriers at a level crossing.

Re: Plan to protect Stonehenge from developments agreed
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [366889/30901/31]
Posted by Marlburian at 16:30, 14th October 2025
 
So no Premier Inn on the old visitors' car park !

In the 1930s there was a cafe by the fork in the road, ‘a cheap flashy little building'. See here.

Re: Chiltern Railways: an update on rolling stock / services
In "Chiltern Railways services" [366888/30206/44]
Posted by Mark A at 16:09, 14th October 2025

Blyth's Northumberland Line train station bus stop snub 'madness'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [366887/30912/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 13:45, 14th October 2025
 
From the BBC:



A mayor has said it is "madness" buses have not been stopping outside a newly opened train station to collect passengers.

Newsham Station on the Northumberland Line in Blyth opened earlier this year but Arriva bus services are not calling at its new bus stop by the eastern car park.

North East Mayor Kim McGuinness said buses "absolutely should be stopping" at Newsham so people can "get from A to B without any unnecessary hassle."

An Arriva North East spokesperson said its buses already stop "within a short walk of the station", and that moving their pick up points would add more time to journeys "without much benefit".

The Arriva X8 service stops at the nearby Blagdon Driver bus stop, while the X30 to Newcastle stops at Park Farm Villas, but neither take the short detour to the station itself, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. While both stops are relatively close to the railway line, the distance can pose a problem for passengers with mobility issues.

Alistair Ford, chairman of the North East Public Transport Users Group (NEPTUG), called the situation "frustrating". He said the situation was "a barrier for people who don't have cars."

"Nobody has control but the bus companies, and they do what is in their interests, not what is in peoples' interest, or the planet," he added. "This doesn't provide an integrated transport system for people who want it. A lot of the decisions that are made assume that everyone is coming by car, this is a railway, clearly the best thing to do is make sure people can reach it by public transport."

Labour's McGuinness has made the creation of an integrated public transport system one of the main aims of her administration, as well as taking buses into public ownership. She said she is committed to working with the bus companies to ensure the railway is accessible to all. "We need to ensure local bus services connect with the line as much as possible," she added.

An Arriva North East spokesperson said: "Our buses already stop within a short walk of Newsham Station on both sides of the line, so passengers can easily connect with train services. The new stop in the eastern car park was mainly designed for rail replacement use, so it's not part of our regular routes. Diverting buses across the bridge and into the car park would add time to existing journeys without offering much extra benefit. The current stop locations strike the right balance between convenience for rail users and keeping services running efficiently."


Re: Train service reliability (or lack thereof) at Melksham - letter to MP
In "TransWilts line" [366886/30874/18]
Posted by grahame at 13:44, 14th October 2025
 
Sorry Graham, I didn't mean to imply that your considerable and much appreciated efforts won't produce results.

I hadn't read it like that ... and there is absolutely no guarantee of results!   Just making it clear to all readers (including perhaps those who have received a copy of the letter in the process of their work) that this isn't a matter they can defuse with just words, or just by letting time pass and the complaint about the horrendous service they are providing at the moment fading away.

Interesting that as I write this, the 12:17 round trip from Westbury has been cancelled.  The previous train at 09:46 ran, and we'll see about the next train at 14:16.   

Re: Train service reliability (or lack thereof) at Melksham - letter to MP
In "TransWilts line" [366885/30874/18]
Posted by matth1j at 13:12, 14th October 2025
 
Sorry Graham, I didn't mean to imply that your considerable and much appreciated efforts won't produce results.

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [366884/29726/18]
Posted by grahame at 12:39, 14th October 2025
 
12:17 Westbury to Swindon due 12:59
13:14 Swindon to Westbury due 13:57

13:14 Swindon to Westbury due 13:57 will be cancelled.
This is due to a broken down train earlier today.

Re: Train service reliability (or lack thereof) at Melksham - letter to MP
In "TransWilts line" [366883/30874/18]
Posted by grahame at 11:49, 14th October 2025
 
We can always hope

Yes, we can hope. But "we" can (and are) looking to do rather more than just hoping - suggesting, informing, and looking to help oil the wheels to get the Transport Secretary's intention of providing a reliable service [across the rail network] to be reflected and implemented on individual services such as ours.

Re: Plan to protect Stonehenge from developments agreed
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [366882/30901/31]
Posted by John D at 11:48, 14th October 2025
Already liked by GBM, PrestburyRoad, LiskeardRich, Witham Bobby, PhilWakely, johnneyw
 
It was A bit silly building Stonehenge so close to the main road.

This reminds me of the infamous American who asked why did they build a Windsor castle under Heathrow's flight path

Re: Cross Country - serious concerns
In "Cross Country services" [366881/28989/43]
Posted by John D at 11:44, 14th October 2025
 
The mayor of WECA has laid into the poor experience of XC Cross country trains.

Per Bristol Post article (quote)
The mayor of the West of England region has complained about having a miserable experience catching CrossCountry trains. The operator runs services from Bristol Temple Meads up to Birmingham and Manchester and down to Devon and Cornwall.

Helen Godwin said the customer experience is 'incredibly poor' on CrossCountry services. Passengers will be all too familiar with delays, overcrowding and cancellations, while people travelling for work can struggle to get any work done without connecting to the internet.

She told councillors on the overview and scrutiny committee that she drafted an angry email to the managing director of CrossCountry, but has not yet sent it. The company was owned by Deutsche Bahn, but was recently bought out by a private equity firm.

She said: “I had to travel on the CrossCounty line five times last month and every single time I was either delayed or it was cancelled. You can’t make a phone call, you can’t send a text, let alone do any business on those trains. They are hot and it’s miserable. The customer experience is incredibly poor.

“Prior to this role I was travelling to Manchester and Leeds for work, I was losing six hours a day of work time because I wasn’t able to connect on those trains. I have an email drafted in my phone which was probably written in anger and it’s a good job I didn’t have the managing director’s email on me at the time.”

The Labour mayor sat next to the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, on a CrossCountry train recently, and has already discussed the issues with her. CrossCountry is owned by Arriva, which itself is owned by I Squared Capital, an American private equity company. The operator’s franchise runs out in 2027, when the government plans to take it back into public ownership.

Ms Godwin added: “I’ll reach out to the other mayors to discuss this as well. I had the pleasure of sitting with the Secretary of State for Transport on a CrossCountry train a few weeks ago. So we have discussed this informally. But I’m really happy to reach out to the government.”

A huge focus for the new mayor is improving suburban trains within the wider Bristol region. Several new stations are planned, including at Portishead, Pill, Henbury and Charfield. Services should also start running more frequently too. But for many people travelling further afield, catching the train can still be an arduous and exorbitantly expensive experience.

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/miserable-crosscountry-trains-incredibly-poor-10571399

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [366879/29711/14]
Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 11:33, 14th October 2025
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 
The 15:23 arrived Reading +33, was cancelled thereafter, and is now (17:00) running ECS to Shrub Hill (due 18:27).

That ECS was a pretty speedy run via Stroud, arriving at Shrub Hill just after 1800 just in time to start the London-bound journey. I was planning on getting the 1841 from Charlbury, saw that was cancelled, and decided to run for the 1807 rather than assuming the 1909 would turn up on time after its South Cotswolds perambulations.

The (North) Cotswold Line service does seem to fall apart in autumn, year in, year out.

Re: Train service reliability (or lack thereof) at Melksham - letter to MP
In "TransWilts line" [366878/30874/18]
Posted by matth1j at 10:57, 14th October 2025
 
Fingers crossed. I've emailed a short follow up.
Brian has replied:
Yes, my team and I have been in touch with Graham Ellis and I sent a letter to Mark Hopwood, GWR CEO, yesterday about the totally unacceptable rates of train cancellations at Melksham.

GWR has shown positive engagement over campaigns for Devizes Gateway and the Bath & Wiltshire Metro proposal, so I hope they will look seriously at taking steps to address the current poor reliability.

I look forward to working with Melksham Transport User Group to campaign for better services at Melksham.
We can always hope

Re: Choice of time and place for meetings - some thoughts / issues
In "Diary - what's happening when?" [366877/30902/34]
Posted by bobm at 10:39, 14th October 2025
Already liked by PrestburyRoad, grahame, GBM
 
There are a lot of good points here.

Perhaps the most important is "Do we need a meeting?".  Often the answer is yes, but increasingly I find since the advent of online gatherings a lot of meetings are called simply because it is so easy.   Often a five minute phone call or an email exchange would achieve as much if not more.    Internal meetings where people look at a shared calendar and see what they perceive as a gap leave you with little time to do things apart from meetings!

You also run the risk of burnout.  I work with a lot of groups who rely on volunteers and so meetings are held in the evening.  An online meeting for an hour and a half or so starting at 5.30 or 6 virtually writes off the evening.  Do you have your dinner before or after is another issue.  This week I have an evening meeting every night bar Friday.   Three on line and one about 20 minutes away.  Two of those I would classify as worthwhile ahead of them - the others simply because it is the second full week of the month and we "always do".

I also find with online meetings there is an increasing trend of people not preparing properly for them.  I swear often I can see people reading the reports as we reach them on the agenda.  The discipline of physically travelling to a meeting often focuses the mind better.

Re: Plan to protect Stonehenge from developments agreed
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [366876/30901/31]
Posted by LiskeardRich at 10:39, 14th October 2025
Already liked by IndustryInsider, matth1j, GBM, PrestburyRoad, Witham Bobby, Chris from Nailsea, PhilWakely, johnneyw
 
It was A bit silly building Stonehenge so close to the main road.

Re: Railfuture, Severnside - 18th October 2025
In "Diary - what's happening when?" [366874/30845/34]
Posted by grahame at 07:58, 14th October 2025
 
There is an update - speaker announced and now also available on Zoom

Railfuture Severnside is planning a get-together for its members. The meeting will be held at 2pm on Saturday 18th October at The Railway Inn which is right next to Yatton station. Guest speaker will be BBC presenter Luke Knight, who has been working on a rail documentary.

The meeting will be available over Zoom for those who can't attend in person:

Zoom code on the Railfuture page at https://www.railfuture.org.uk/Severnside-Branch

Re: Dilton Marsh - stop orders when the train scheduled to call is cancelled.
In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [366873/30797/20]
Posted by grahame at 07:44, 14th October 2025
Already liked by Timmer
 
Reports from Dilton Marsh suggest that stop orders and being added from time to time, but not consistently.  And its cancellation rate is 9% - the only station worse anywhere around is Melksham at 11%.

Today, the local services to Salisbury are cancelled and it's good to see that the official GWR advise includes a promise to stop the following Portsmouth - Cardiff service at Dilton Marsh where one is cancelled.

Cancellations to services between Salisbury and Westbury
Due to a fault with the signalling system between Salisbury and Westbury fewer trains are able to run on all lines.
Train services running through these stations may be cancelled or delayed by up to 30 minutes. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Customer Advice
What has happened?
-
There is currently a signal issue between Salisbury and Westbury. The track circuit forms part of the broader signalling system, which comprises of many parts to enable trains to move safely around the network and is not working as it should.
-
What are we doing about it?
-
Currently Network Rail are investigating the problem.
-
What is the impact?
-
Trains on the line FROM Salisbury towards Westbury will be delayed.
Some local trains that run between Bristol/Westbury and Salisbury will be cancelled between Westbury and Salisbury in both directions. Where these cancelled trains are booked to call at Dilton Marsh, we will make sure the next train through Dilton Marsh calls there additionally.
-
What are my options?
-
Option 1: Use the National Rail Enquiries real-time journey planner to check if a journey by rail is currently possible. If you are at a station please check the live departure boards or speak to a member of station staff.

-
Option 2 : If you can, you might want to consider postponing your journey until our service returns to normal.
-
Let us help you:
-
Don't worry if you're already travelling when disruption happens, we'll get you where you need to go. If you miss the last train of the day due to cancellation or because another train was delayed, we wont leave you stranded.
-
If you require help, further information or would like to provide feedback, to help us improve in the future:
Speak to staff at the station or on the train. Use the Customer Help Point on the platform.
Message us on X @GWRHelp, Facebook Messenger @gwruk, Instagram @gwruk or WhatsApp 07890 608043. Our team is available daily between 07:00 and 19:00.
Call our Customer Support team on 03457 000 125, who are available between 06:00 and 23:00, or National Rail Enquiries on 03457 484 950, who are available 24 hours a day.
-
Delay Repay:
-
We are sorry for the delay to your journey. If you arrive at your destination 15 or more minutes late because your GWR train was delayed or cancelled, you can apply for Delay Repay compensation. Please keep your ticket and visit GWR.com/DelayRepay
Further Information

If you require further information please speak to our staff at the station or on the train, use the Customer Help Point, tweet us @GWRHelp or call National Rail Enquiries on 03457 484 950.

If you arrive at your destination 15 or more minutes late because your GWR train was delayed or cancelled, you can claim Delay Repay compensation. Please keep your ticket and visit GWR.com/DelayRepay

09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury due 11:05
10:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury due 12:03
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads due 12:31
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury due 13:00
12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads due 13:31
12:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury due 14:01
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads due 14:28
14:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads due 15:30

14:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads due 15:30 will be started from Westbury.
It will no longer call at Salisbury, Warminster and Dilton Marsh.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.

Re: Choice of time and place for meetings - some thoughts / issues
In "Diary - what's happening when?" [366872/30902/34]
Posted by grahame at 07:36, 14th October 2025
Already liked by GBM, rogerw
 
on a personal note I have shares in several large companies,and all of the AGM's are scheduled for day time hours.

Large company's AGMs will attract / are aimed at wealth managers and pension fund admins, run by paid employees and gather attendees from far and wide, and all those factors suggest that a weekday, daytime is logical.

To complete the review for groups where I have a significant ability to place meetings ...

For the Melksham Transport User Group, we hold meetings early in the evening - timed at 18:30 to co-incide with the arrival of the train at 18:00. Meetings for 2026 will be whole group (3 times a year) and committee (six times a year) on a Thursday as our committee includes members from local parish councils who meet regulary on other business on Mondays and Tuesdays, and we chose which Thursday to avoid a clash with the Historic Association with whom we also share members.

Our own Great Western Coffee Shop ... hardly ever meets, or meets continuously whichever way you want to look at it. We have (and should perhaps, for 2026) had an AGM to "checkpoint" ourselves.  In additions, members sometimes arrange to meet each other in places and at times mutually convenient, but without any form of formal agenda from the admin / moderator team.

Re: BTP Officer convicted of assault
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [366871/30896/51]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 06:53, 14th October 2025
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 
The Court considered based on the evidence that it was neither reasonable, proportionate nor necessary for PC Adrian Young to put the child in a headlock or chokehold, and so he was convicted of assault.

Seems pretty clear cut to me.

Agree with a-driver's point about the increasing prevalence of feral children however.




Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [366870/29711/14]
Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 05:37, 14th October 2025
 
19:53 London Paddington to Hereford due 22:57 will be terminated at Oxford.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Last Updated:13/10/2025 20:56
...and the consequence is:

Tuesday October 14

05:23 Hereford to London Paddington due 08:24 will be cancelled.
This is due to a broken down train.
Last Updated:14/10/2025 02:00

And in bad news for tomorrow morning:
Facilities on the 21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill due 00:01.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9.
Last Updated:14/10/2025 06:00

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025