Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: FGW announce link with Singapore Airlines In "Buses and other ways to travel" [359339/13495/5] Posted by grahame at 15:59, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Seven years ago!
and a picture from the publicity video at the time. Came up "on this day"

[snip]
For the record - here is the liveried power car in its proper environment...


and a picture from the publicity video at the time. Came up "on this day"

[snip]
And now from The Mirror
Some airlines are offering combined air-rail tickets which that allow passengers to explore Europe on one booking.
An increasing number of airlines are now letting travellers add a train ticket to their booking, to save them the hassle of trying to work out travel plans. Air-rail tickets allow travellers to arrive at an airport and head straight to a train for their connection. In addition, when booked all together, airlines protect the passenger in case a flight delay means they miss their train.
An increasing number of airlines are now letting travellers add a train ticket to their booking, to save them the hassle of trying to work out travel plans. Air-rail tickets allow travellers to arrive at an airport and head straight to a train for their connection. In addition, when booked all together, airlines protect the passenger in case a flight delay means they miss their train.
Re: Dangers of the underground In "Transport for London" [359338/30013/46] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:48, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hmm.
The King's Cross fire in 1987 showed why you really don't want flammable materials on the London Underground.
Re: Night Riviera - merged posts, ongoing discussion In "London to the West" [359337/489/12] Posted by Witham Bobby at 15:47, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Having lots of locos standing idle at depots is obviously an expensive and bad thing But one or two Thunderbird locos strategically located would be very useful.
I suppose with most passenger trains now being powered by more than a single power unit, the general thought is that even the failure of a couple of its engines would not mean a train cannot limp on
For failures in Cornwall, is there a way to seek assistant locos from the remaining loco pool for the clay traffic?
Re: A move to longer trains? In "Looking forward - the next 5, 10 and 20 years" [359336/30009/40] Posted by grahame at 15:26, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would argue that there is a much greater need for longer trains on lines like the Kyle line. My reasoning is that on what are essentially 'tourist lines' the demand to have a window seat will be much greater than on a commuter line. It can be frustrating to travel up to somewhere scenic, and find you can't get near a window to get the best view possible.
Many services run long trains to stations with platforms that are not long enough for all doors to open, so I don't see why longer platforms per se are necessary before longer trains are introduced.
Many services run long trains to stations with platforms that are not long enough for all doors to open, so I don't see why longer platforms per se are necessary before longer trains are introduced.
Yes, BUT ...
My first argument would be for seats that line up with windows!
And I am very conscious that fares per mile tend to be lower, and fewer trains operating, pushing the economics of these lines into needing far more support per passenger or mile than many other lines. I also thing of the people travelling and they tend to be paired up, so window seat and one looking over that seat past their partner, may not be all that bad.
I do celebrate that the trains that bring commuter into Inverness in the morning are they used for the day trip trains out, then get back into Inverness to take the commuters home.
Longer trains - yes, with through corridors trains (e.g. 158) single-door stations like Conon Bridge and Beauly work. Only up to a certain number of passengers using each train though. Might be fine for a re-opened Holt or Beanacre, but not for a Devizes Gateway
Re: Open top bus service 300 Lands End St Ives In "Buses and other ways to travel" [359335/13913/5] Posted by Sleepy at 15:16, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Re: Dangers of the underground In "Transport for London" [359334/30013/46] Posted by grahame at 15:05, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From The Standard
Tube union threatens strike unless e-bikes are banned from London Underground after platform blaze
The fire at Rayners Lane station sent toxic fumes billowing across the station and caused temporary disruption to the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines
The fire at Rayners Lane station sent toxic fumes billowing across the station and caused temporary disruption to the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines
Small rise in crime at Melksham Station In "TransWilts line" [359333/30014/18] Posted by grahame at 14:48, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
https://melkshamnews.com/small-rise-in-crime-at-melksham-station/
Small rise in crime at Melksham Station
New data has revealed the number of crimes reported at train stations across the UK, showing a small increase in the already low figures reported at Melksham Station.
Melksham Station, which has services to Westbury and Swindon, has seen a slight rise in its already low crime figures. There were four crime reports to the British Transport Police (BTP) between 2024-2025 compared to one crime reported in the 2023-2024 period. This means the rate of all crime incidents per 100,000 passengers has increased from 3.3 to 13.18, although authorities say it is important to view this rise in a wider context.
The BTP emphasised that “every offence is one too many” in relation to the new statistics.
A BTP spokesperson said, “The chance of becoming a victim of crime on the railway remains extremely low, and reports of high harm crime such as robbery and violence remain low at 2.2 incidents per million passenger journeys. It is important to not sensationalise these statistics and view them within their context. For example, at Westbury station, which has around 270,000 passengers per year, there were 23 reported incidents last year.”
Crimes reported at Melksham Station, where the BTP say there are 30,000 passengers a year, in the 2024-2025 period included one bicycle theft and three criminal damage and arson incidents.
New data has revealed the number of crimes reported at train stations across the UK, showing a small increase in the already low figures reported at Melksham Station.
Melksham Station, which has services to Westbury and Swindon, has seen a slight rise in its already low crime figures. There were four crime reports to the British Transport Police (BTP) between 2024-2025 compared to one crime reported in the 2023-2024 period. This means the rate of all crime incidents per 100,000 passengers has increased from 3.3 to 13.18, although authorities say it is important to view this rise in a wider context.
The BTP emphasised that “every offence is one too many” in relation to the new statistics.
A BTP spokesperson said, “The chance of becoming a victim of crime on the railway remains extremely low, and reports of high harm crime such as robbery and violence remain low at 2.2 incidents per million passenger journeys. It is important to not sensationalise these statistics and view them within their context. For example, at Westbury station, which has around 270,000 passengers per year, there were 23 reported incidents last year.”
Crimes reported at Melksham Station, where the BTP say there are 30,000 passengers a year, in the 2024-2025 period included one bicycle theft and three criminal damage and arson incidents.
Dangers of the underground In "Transport for London" [359332/30013/46] Posted by grahame at 14:43, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From The Metro:
Commuters say their last shreds of ‘joy’ were taken away after London Underground station book exchanges suddenly closed.
Tube stations across London were dotted with community bookswaps, where people can drop off and pick up something to read for free.
However, the Tube station bookswaps now face the end of the road after London Fire Brigade told them to close due to safety concerns the ‘combustible material’ poses.
Book lover Ryan Seller, from Clapham, was left confused when he found the shelves stripped empty with a note saying all book exchanges have been ‘forced to close’ with ‘immediate effect.’
Tube stations across London were dotted with community bookswaps, where people can drop off and pick up something to read for free.
However, the Tube station bookswaps now face the end of the road after London Fire Brigade told them to close due to safety concerns the ‘combustible material’ poses.
Book lover Ryan Seller, from Clapham, was left confused when he found the shelves stripped empty with a note saying all book exchanges have been ‘forced to close’ with ‘immediate effect.’
Re: Night Riviera - merged posts, ongoing discussion In "London to the West" [359331/489/12] Posted by grahame at 14:28, 12th March 2025 Already liked by Witham Bobby | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The rescue was carried out by a 4 coach Castle set! Wonder what they will use once the Castle class is retired?
They could use the class 57 off the sleeper as their Thunderbird.
Oh - oops ....

Re: Night Riviera - merged posts, ongoing discussion In "London to the West" [359330/489/12] Posted by RobT at 13:14, 12th March 2025 Already liked by GBM | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The rescue was carried out by a 4 coach Castle set! Wonder what they will use once the Castle class is retired?
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [359328/29726/18] Posted by grahame at 12:39, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:05
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Re: Night Riviera - merged posts, ongoing discussion In "London to the West" [359327/489/12] Posted by GBM at 12:37, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Watching on OTT the rescue loco was 1Z99 which took the sleeper back to Plymouth, then on to Laira.
I'm wondering what the rescue loco would have been? In the past they have used 2 back-to-back HST power cars.
Unfortunately there was no mention of what 1Z99 actually was.I'm wondering what the rescue loco would have been? In the past they have used 2 back-to-back HST power cars.
It delayed 1A78 (Penzance - Paddington) leaving Plymouth whilst waiting for 1Z99 to pull into Laira.
Only by 8 or 9 minutes, but looking at RTT it was delayed further between Cogload Junction and Athelney Crossing, so now 27 minutes down.
Re: A move to longer trains? In "Looking forward - the next 5, 10 and 20 years" [359326/30009/40] Posted by froome at 11:21, 12th March 2025 Already liked by Witham Bobby, GBM, PrestburyRoad | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would argue that there is a much greater need for longer trains on lines like the Kyle line. My reasoning is that on what are essentially 'tourist lines' the demand to have a window seat will be much greater than on a commuter line. It can be frustrating to travel up to somewhere scenic, and find you can't get near a window to get the best view possible.
Many services run long trains to stations with platforms that are not long enough for all doors to open, so I don't see why longer platforms per se are necessary before longer trains are introduced.
Re: Night Riviera - merged posts, ongoing discussion In "London to the West" [359325/489/12] Posted by RobT at 10:42, 12th March 2025 Already liked by GBM | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Watching on OTT the rescue loco was 1Z99 which took the sleeper back to Plymouth, then on to Laira.
I'm wondering what the rescue loco would have been? In the past they have used 2 back-to-back HST power cars.
Re: Night Riviera - merged posts, ongoing discussion In "London to the West" [359324/489/12] Posted by Witham Bobby at 09:44, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Last night's down sleeper has failed at Menheniot and is awaiting rescue.
According to RTT at 0939 today, it's not moved yet. Unless either RTT or I are missing something, there appears to be no rescue locomotive approaching from either direction
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [359323/29711/14] Posted by Witham Bobby at 09:32, 12th March 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So.....aren't the early trains that start at HFD driven by drivers from BPW? If not, how do they get from Hitachi to their starting point? At least one starts at Hitachi....
And 'who' is doing the forcing? GWR? DfT?
And 'who' is doing the forcing? GWR? DfT?
BPW lost Newport Hereford Malvern Wells in May 2022, all ECS moves from Stoke Gifford going via Charfield.
No idea whether it is DaFT or GWR behind it, or possibly both?
Other losses of route knowledge including BTM HSS saying goodbye to Lydney and Kemble. It has been predicted, the tunnel will shut after a London service has left Newport and when the BTM driver is asked to go the scenic way it will be a "Sorry but no. I could have last week but railway politics trumps common sense".
What a way to run a railroad!
Re: "Mysterious" tunnels at Salisbury Station In "South Western services" [359322/30006/42] Posted by broadgage at 08:29, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Gosh...............any steam locos down there - the famous Strategic Steam Reserve !
The strategic steam reserve has been largely abolished, limitations on water supply, coal stocks, and train crew knowledge mean that steam is no longer a sensible choice for a significant reserve fleet.
The strategic reserve now contains a mixture of HSTs, Thames Turbos, class 158/159s and similar diesel traction. Trains from the reserve fleet are run regularly in normal service, this is achieved by having TWO trains, each bearing the same number, one in use and the other stored. Swapped over regularly.
Re: A move to longer trains? In "Looking forward - the next 5, 10 and 20 years" [359321/30009/40] Posted by rogerpatenall at 08:25, 12th March 2025 Already liked by Witham Bobby, Mark A, eightonedee | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My only trip to Kyle was in the early 1980s, I think, and was. both ways, in the Beaver Tail observation car, added to four Mark 1s.
Re: Night Riviera - merged posts, ongoing discussion In "London to the West" [359320/489/12] Posted by bobm at 06:58, 12th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Last night's down sleeper has failed at Menheniot and is awaiting rescue.
Re: 25th May 2025 - SWR Franchise expires and services Nationalised In "South Western services" [359319/29993/42] Posted by ChrisB at 20:55, 11th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My understanding is that all the TOCs have been identified for this year, at a pace that transfers can be successful.
SWR, GA and C2C (I think) are the 3 for this year.
Next year's are still to be identified & dates given. So unless GWR have been given far more notice than the 3 periods that they have to be given (and that is entirely possible), they haven't yet received notice. But if they have been given many periods additional notice, it doesn't have to become public until those 3 periods of notice are due.
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [359318/29711/14] Posted by UstiImmigrunt at 20:38, 11th March 2025 Already liked by Witham Bobby | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So.....aren't the early trains that start at HFD driven by drivers from BPW? If not, how do they get from Hitachi to their starting point? At least one starts at Hitachi....
And 'who' is doing the forcing? GWR? DfT?
And 'who' is doing the forcing? GWR? DfT?
BPW lost Newport Hereford Malvern Wells in May 2022, all ECS moves from Stoke Gifford going via Charfield.
No idea whether it is DaFT or GWR behind it, or possibly both?
Other losses of route knowledge including BTM HSS saying goodbye to Lydney and Kemble. It has been predicted, the tunnel will shut after a London service has left Newport and when the BTM driver is asked to go the scenic way it will be a "Sorry but no. I could have last week but railway politics trumps common sense".
Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025 In "Across the West" [359317/29650/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 20:36, 11th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
......and again.....
Alterations to services between London Paddington and Reading
Following a points failure at Twyford the line will be reopened shortly. Disruption is expected until 21:30 11/03.
Train services between London Paddington and Reading may be delayed by up to 40 minutes or terminated at Reading.
Customer Advice
Problems caused by a points failure near Twyford have now been resolved, and trains can run normally again. However this has caused significant delays and will take a while for the train service to recover.
Met PC sacked for avoiding train fares In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [359316/30011/51] Posted by Marlburian at 17:47, 11th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
BBC News
A police officer only paid the £34 fare between Axminster in Devon and Salisbury in Wiltshire "around half of the time" as ticket barriers were open and staff allowed him to travel for free on production of a warrant card.
Re: More 4 car 158s for Portsmouth services In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [359315/27229/20] Posted by ChrisB at 17:30, 11th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not another temporary casualty of Cheltenham Festival?
Re: More 4 car 158s for Portsmouth services In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [359314/27229/20] Posted by John D at 17:28, 11th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The idea of 4car 158s has fallen apart.
Today 1F25 16:27 and 1F27 17:27 Cardiff - Portsmouth (the busy peak hour workings) are both reduced to just a 2car unit
Earlier 1F18 from Portsmouth conked out at Fareham and continued to Bristol as empty 5F18
Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [359312/231/28] Posted by TonyK at 16:32, 11th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
He stood as a Liberal Democrat and polled 190 votes, as did the other Lib Dem Laura Barry (no relation). That was a significantly lower number than the Lib Dems managed in the previous election.
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [359311/29711/14] Posted by ChrisB at 16:16, 11th March 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So.....aren't the early trains that start at HFD driven by drivers from BPW? If not, how do they get from Hitachi to their starting point? At least one starts at Hitachi....
And 'who' is doing the forcing? GWR? DfT?
Browsing YouTube, as I do for some light relief, I (metaphorically) stumbled across this item about the Bath Two Tunnels Greenway: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsstz_RdRYA
From the excellent Paul Whitewick, just over 13 minutes: well worth watching.
CfN.
