Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Diary Of A Reasonably Frequent Rail User In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [362614/17250/51] Posted by Bob_Blakey at 09:58, 24th June 2025 Already liked by PrestburyRoad, Witham Bobby | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19-21/06/2025 - A Quick Family Visit For A Day At The Cricket
Including many of the usual rail service issues and failures.
Tickets
2 x Senior Railcard (SR) Off-Peak Day Singles DIG>PIN £5.70 (£2.85 each)
2 x SR Advance Singles PIN>LON £41.80 (£20.90 each)
2 x SR TfL Off-Peak Singles WAT>KGX £3.70 (£1.85 each)
2 x SR 1st Class Advance Singles KGX>WAK £78.00 (£39.00 each)
2 x SR Anytime Day Singles WAK>PFM £5.40 (£2.70 each)
1 x SR Anytime Day Return POF>HDY £6.05
2 x SR Anytime Day Singles PFM>WAK £5.40 (£2.70 each)
2 x SR Advance Singles WAK>KGX £31.40 (£15.70 each)
2 x SR TfL Off-Peak Singles KGX>PAD £3.70 (£1.85 each)
2 x SR Advance Singles LON>DIG £53.90 (£26.95 each)
Station group codes: WAK = Wakefield Westgate/Kirkgate - we changed at WKF in both directions.
LON - WAT outbound & PAD return.
POF = Pontefract Monkhill/Tanshelf
Outward - 19/06/25
DIG 0913 (OT)>EXC 0922 (OT): 2T11 EXM>PGN : 1 x 166/2 (3 Cars)
EXC 0930 (OT)>WAT 1249 (1303) : 1L36 EXD>WAT: 2 x 159/0 (6 Cars)
TfL Underground WAT>Warren Street (Northern Line)+Warren Street>KGX (Victoria Line)
KGX 1403 (1417)>WKF 1558 (1619) : 1D17 KGX>LDS : 1 x IC225 (9 Cars)
WKF 1642 (1643)>PFM 1705 (1706) : 2A23 LDS>KNO : 1 x 150/2 (2 Cars)
As seems to be increasingly common on the route there were no ticket checks on 2T11 between DIG & EXC.
1L36 was initially delayed by 8 minutes at PIN waiting for the late running 1L09 to clear the single line. 1L09 (SAL>EXD) left Salisbury on schedule, lost time after AXM, was 7 late at HON and got to PIN 9 minutes down. No idea why. Our train lost a little more time up to GIL where it was further delayed, to +24, waiting for 1L21 (OT) to clear the section from TIS. These two trains should have passed at the Tisbury Loop. Shortly after leaving GIL the TM announced that the ADV, WOK & CLJ scheduled stops would be skipped and passengers for those stations should change at either SAL or BSK as necessary. This enabled 1L36 to reach WAT only 14 minutes late (bit of a saving on Delay Repay!)
Tickets / railcards were checked.
Of the 6 carriages only 2 had working air conditioning.
It is episodes such as this which reinforces my view that some more of the line should be restored to double track as a matter of urgency; it takes very little to throw the timetable out of kilter. Not surprisingly the TfL journey was somewhat toasty.
The delayed departure of 1D17 was announced as a power supply train fault. Given that these units are all at least 34 years old, and are due to be replaced by 10 CAF trains in 2027, the occasional glitch is probably to be expected. The LNER 1st class service was, as usual, very good. Also, as per normal, there was a full ticket / railcard check shortly after leaving KGX.
Unusually for Northern there was no ticket check on 2A23.
Possibly slightly off topic but nobody could miss that the viaduct immediately south of WKF, to/from Doncaster, seems to have more vegetation growing on it than Kew Gardens and Network Rail should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves for allowing it to get into such a state.
20/06/25 - Cricket England v India Ist Test Day 1 At Headingley
PFM 0845 (OT)>LDS 0925 (0927) : 2A04 KNO>LDS : 1 x 158/7 (2 Cars)
LDS 0959 (0953)>HDY 1006 (1007) : 2C30 LDS>YRK : 1 x 170/4 (3 Cars)
HDY 1943 (1953)>LDS 1953 (2001) : 2C67 YRK>LDS : 1 x 170/4 (3 Cars)
LDS 2029 (2030)>PFM 2104 (2113) : 2A31 LDS>KNO : 2 x 150/2 (4 Cars)
Slight delay on 2A04 at Whitehall Junction; most passengers familiar with the area would be surprised if this didn’t happen.
Yes, you read it correctly, as soon as they could cram no more pax onto 2C30 it was permitted to depart from LDS 6 minutes early. Operational common sense. Where possible more of this please. Obviously no onboard ticket check but revenue protection were in attendance at HDY. When asked one of the team said very little ticketless travel was being detected.
After play had finished for the day we decamped to the Headingley Taps pub rather than join the inevitable scrum. Good call - on 2C67 there were almost more Northern Trains Travel Safe officers than paying passengers.
2A31 is formed of the 2 x 150/2 stock from 2L28 (SHF 1902>LDS 2024) so wasn’t exactly overcrowded.
Return - 21/06/25
PFM 1245 (OT)>WKF 1309 (1312) : 2A12 KNO>LDS : 1 x 150/2 (2 Cars)
WKF 1329 (OT)>KGX 1530 (1535) : 1A31 LDS>KGX : 1 x 801/2 (9 Cars)
TfL Underground KGX>PAD (H&C Line)
PAD 1703 (1704)>EXD 1910 (1914) : 1C90 PAD>PNZ : 2 x 802/0 (10 Cars)
EXD 1946 (1947)>DIG 1959 (2000) : 2F31 PGN>EXM : 1 x 166/2 (3 Cars)
The trains between Pontefract and Leeds via Wakefield are frequently subject to minor delays due to poor quality track, conflicts with a significant number of non-passenger services, and especially the absence of a fourth platform at Kirkgate (WKK).
1A31 proceeded normally until between New Southgate and Alexandra Palace where the service was temporarily switched to the slow line. A number of the ‘Orange Army’ team were observed trackside.
During the journey south perusal of the TfL website indicated that the Underground had suffered a serious meltdown; just before our arrival at KGX 7 lines were shown as having ‘severe delays’. On arrival at the Circle / H&C / Metropolitan Lines westbound platform we waited 1 minute for an H&C train to PAD. Reggie Perrin (actually his brother-in-law Jimmy) syndrome - bit of a cock-up on the information delivery front?
Of no importance whatsoever but 1C90 left PAD slightly late whereas the TM decided a specific PA announcement of an on-time departure was necessary. Odd.
IC90 arrived at RDG to time but was then held for no apparent reason - it certainly wasn’t anything to do with passenger numbers - and departed west 6 minutes late.
A little later when the TM appeared to perform a ticket check I asked him whether he could enquire about the possibility of the Exmouth train (a 6 minute connection) waiting for a short while. Computer said ‘No’ but he expressed the hope/expectation that the delay would be recovered en-route, and he also explained to me how such an action would delay loads of other services and cause absolute chaos. Given that a self-contained ‘dead-end’ branch line would have been involved this was of course absolute cobblers.
The train arrived at 1914 on EXD P4 and we got to P1 to see our intended connection depart. System still being run to suit the staff rather than for the benefit of the paying passengers?
One slight oddity I noticed at EXD was that our train to EXM used P3, and P2 at EXC, whilst the 1L49 from Waterloo used EXC P2 as normal but then ran down the hill into EXD P1 the reverse of the normal arrangement. RTT indicates that this is a Saturdays-only job. Anybody out there knows why this is done?
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [362613/29726/18] Posted by grahame at 09:36, 24th June 2025 Already liked by Witham Bobby | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Perhaps questions for the GWR "VIPs" at the Community event tonight - along with asking why we are now moving from a situation where they don't provide sufficient staff to run their services at weekends, to a place where we have weekday, peak services regularly cancelled for the same reason, and what are they doing to address it?
Looks like the train has been uncancelled ... let's see what's said today - mind you, I have heard so much on the topic of cancellations in past years that I'll only believe that they are down to an reasonable level when we actually see trains on the line, consistently, at all the times in the timetable, week in and week out. Words are cheap - "you can fool all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time - but you can't fool all of the people all of the time".
By the way - there will be rare occasions when a train is logged as cancelled but then re-instated, but they should be rare. This is a major disruption to people who have replanned their day based on the initial report - they have cancelled / reformed their plans.
Re: Weymouth SWR services 23/6/25 In "South Western services" [362612/30394/42] Posted by Mark A at 09:32, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thankfully the booking office was staffed and also the passenger assistance cave, with two or three staff from that also out and about being proactive. It's fortunate though that they didn't seem to have many passengers to deal with, and the lack of on train loos (cos, no trains) was an issue. There were also three police at the station, mainly dealing with one of the three alcohol / mental health I'd encountered on the 100 metre walk up the road to the station from the beach. Oh, and parts of the pavement on that road have their width massively comprimised by scaffolding, including a generous helping on both ends of the pelican crossing close to the station - something that contributed to one of said incidents.
To answer Infoman's query about Castle Cary - the station had all three platforms occupied so the train to London was in its usual place and around 20 people took the footbridge. Not sure what the provision is for wheelchair users at that station, perhaps there's a barrow crossing for accompanied use only. If not, it would have been on to Westbury... but are the lifts out of use at Westbury?
Mark
PS The lifts at Bath Spa are fully operational again now and not constrained to 2 people only.
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [362611/29711/14] Posted by Witham Bobby at 09:09, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
08:18 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington due 10:25
Facilities on the 08:18 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington due 10:25.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Additional Information
Please use any available seat according to the class of travel on your ticket. If no seats are available, we would be grateful if you could make sure that those who need them most are able to use them.
-
Alternatively, you can travel on either of the two GWR services that are immediately before or after this one. Your ticket will be valid for travel on these GWR services at no additional cost. You can see how many coaches our services have with the 'Live Times' feature on the GWR app, or speak to staff for further information.
Last Updated:24/06/2025 06:00
Facilities on the 08:18 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington due 10:25.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Additional Information
Please use any available seat according to the class of travel on your ticket. If no seats are available, we would be grateful if you could make sure that those who need them most are able to use them.
-
Alternatively, you can travel on either of the two GWR services that are immediately before or after this one. Your ticket will be valid for travel on these GWR services at no additional cost. You can see how many coaches our services have with the 'Live Times' feature on the GWR app, or speak to staff for further information.
Last Updated:24/06/2025 06:00
Sardines, anyone?
No reason for the substitution supplied. The appeal to allow those most in need the use of available seats is something I'd not noticed before on JourneyCheck
Re: Fallen tree on tracks at Portchester halts trains - 23 June 2025 In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [362610/30389/20] Posted by matth1j at 08:52, 24th June 2025 Already liked by Witham Bobby | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I guess this could have been a pretty serious incident had it fallen at the wrong time. Is trackside vegetation monitored in any way to check for and prevent this sort of thing? Doesn't look easy along the lines in the picture.
Re: Seagulls, particularly in Cornwall - ongoing discussion In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [362609/29073/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 08:26, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From the BBC:
Woman needs umbrella to fend off seagull attacks
A woman living in Cornwall has said she cannot leave her house without needing to defend herself against seagulls.
Valerie Bannister, from Fowey, said she has been left "feeling scared" after she was knocked to the ground on Friday night.
The 70-year-old said she did not wish to see the animals harmed and explained the birds were trying to protect their chicks which are outside the front and rear door to her house.
However, she admitted she was now fearful of serious injury if something was not done. Discussing Friday's incident, Ms Bannister said: "I was on the floor with these wretched birds circling above me."
She added: "The adult attacked me so badly that I fell over, which to be honest has left me feeling scared. I thought they were going to attack me again. If a young man had hit me like this, the police would probably have arrested him."
Ms Bannister said she only suffered bruising from hitting the floor but said if she had not been carrying an umbrella it would have been much worse.
Asked if she had been able to leave her house since the attack, she said: "I've left the house but I've been on my guard. Yesterday, I was leaving through the back door, going down the side of the house, through the garage and out of the drive but while carrying an umbrella."
The wildlife conservation charity RSPB said the Fowey resident was right to be using an umbrella. A spokesperson said: "When gulls dive-bomb, it's not aggression, just protective parenting. If you are experiencing this, we advise to use an umbrella when entering or leaving a property to deter the parents from getting too close. They'll move on once their chicks can fly, which won't take long once they are out of the nest."
The Fowey resident said she did not see how the issue could be resolved because the animals are protected. "The law was written in 1981 and seagull behaviour was very different then," she said. "I'm in a town now where they are an absolute menace. I just feel the ruling is archaic, it's almost 50 years old."
Cornwall Council have been contacted for comment.
A woman living in Cornwall has said she cannot leave her house without needing to defend herself against seagulls.
Valerie Bannister, from Fowey, said she has been left "feeling scared" after she was knocked to the ground on Friday night.
The 70-year-old said she did not wish to see the animals harmed and explained the birds were trying to protect their chicks which are outside the front and rear door to her house.
However, she admitted she was now fearful of serious injury if something was not done. Discussing Friday's incident, Ms Bannister said: "I was on the floor with these wretched birds circling above me."
She added: "The adult attacked me so badly that I fell over, which to be honest has left me feeling scared. I thought they were going to attack me again. If a young man had hit me like this, the police would probably have arrested him."
Ms Bannister said she only suffered bruising from hitting the floor but said if she had not been carrying an umbrella it would have been much worse.
Asked if she had been able to leave her house since the attack, she said: "I've left the house but I've been on my guard. Yesterday, I was leaving through the back door, going down the side of the house, through the garage and out of the drive but while carrying an umbrella."
The wildlife conservation charity RSPB said the Fowey resident was right to be using an umbrella. A spokesperson said: "When gulls dive-bomb, it's not aggression, just protective parenting. If you are experiencing this, we advise to use an umbrella when entering or leaving a property to deter the parents from getting too close. They'll move on once their chicks can fly, which won't take long once they are out of the nest."
The Fowey resident said she did not see how the issue could be resolved because the animals are protected. "The law was written in 1981 and seagull behaviour was very different then," she said. "I'm in a town now where they are an absolute menace. I just feel the ruling is archaic, it's almost 50 years old."
Cornwall Council have been contacted for comment.
Re: Major fire sees buildings evacuated and trains halted - Manchester, 23 June 2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [362608/30391/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 07:59, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A further update, from the BBC:
Hotspur Press left a smoking ruin by major fire

A building on the site of what was believed to be Manchester's oldest mill is now a smouldering ruin after a major fire.
The Hotspur Press building on Cambridge Street, close to Manchester Oxford Road railway station, was destroyed by a fire on Monday, leading to its partial collapse.
It resulted in the cancellation of trains through Manchester Oxford Road station with "residual" disruption expected until 09:30 BST, National Rail said.
(Article continues)

A building on the site of what was believed to be Manchester's oldest mill is now a smouldering ruin after a major fire.
The Hotspur Press building on Cambridge Street, close to Manchester Oxford Road railway station, was destroyed by a fire on Monday, leading to its partial collapse.
It resulted in the cancellation of trains through Manchester Oxford Road station with "residual" disruption expected until 09:30 BST, National Rail said.
(Article continues)
Re: Weymouth SWR services 23/6/25 In "South Western services" [362607/30394/42] Posted by grahame at 07:10, 24th June 2025 Already liked by Witham Bobby | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Weymouth today didn't see many South Western Railways services from mid afternoon onwards. I happened to be catching the 17:28 to Bristol and passengers for destinations east were being directed to that & with ticket acceptance in place. For some reason, there weren't many people for the South Western services, perhaps word had got round, so despite this directive, the GWR service wasn't full and standing as it left on time.
A bit of a quandary for the travelling public: with few trains, well, one three carriage one, in the station, and that one locked until a couple of minutes before it departed, the posters at the station to the effect that there were no facilities at the station but said facilities, for the use of railway passengers, were available on the train, rang somewhat hollow.
In due course passengers for London were instructed to transfer to a Paddington train at Castle Cary, said train being held for a few minutes to ease the connection there.
Mark
A bit of a quandary for the travelling public: with few trains, well, one three carriage one, in the station, and that one locked until a couple of minutes before it departed, the posters at the station to the effect that there were no facilities at the station but said facilities, for the use of railway passengers, were available on the train, rang somewhat hollow.
In due course passengers for London were instructed to transfer to a Paddington train at Castle Cary, said train being held for a few minutes to ease the connection there.
Mark
Customer care at Weymouth Station has left something to be desired for a while. I sometimes get the feeling that the railways would run much more smoothly without customers - and indeed that was proven during the earlier part of Covid lockdown. Perhaps, now that there's no financial incentive, we'll continue to see a further reduction to a very basic service indeed in an attempt to reduce complaints and costs, without too much worry about the loss of income. Fares can always be "simplified" up and the taxpayer help. I have my fingers crossed that this is not the nightmare scenario planned.
The other thing of note is that Weymouth is just one station on that line - it isn't hugely busy mid afternoon, with services to London gathering substantial traffic at Dorchester South, Wareham and Poole even before they reach Bournemouth - and for those other stations, GWR services would have been no use.
If the 17:28 was 3 car - probably a turbo. 2+3 seating and plenty of standing room - that should squeeze 'em in!
Re: GWR Community Rail Conference - 24th June 2025 In "Across the West" [362606/30086/26] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 07:07, 24th June 2025 Already liked by matth1j, Witham Bobby | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some pictures I took yesterday ...


Blimey! Did they not have access to a spirit level when they built that?


Re: Major fire sees buildings evacuated and trains halted - Manchester, 23 June 2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [362605/30391/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 06:57, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
An update, from the BBC:
People evacuated from tower after major fire spread

A fire that broke out at a landmark Manchester city centre building - causing it to partly collapse - spread to a neighbouring tower block.
Embers from the blaze at Hotspur House reached 1 Cambridge Street, resulting in the evacuation of residents from the building, Greater Manchester Fire And Rescue Service (GMFRS) told the BBC at the scene. However, it added the fire was no longer being treated as a major incident.
Anyone who has nowhere to go is set to be put up overnight by Manchester City Council.
The fire at the former printing press building broke out at about 17:00 GMT, forcing the cancellation of all trains through Manchester Oxford Road station.
The fire service urged the public to stay away from the area and said 20 fire engines from across Greater Manchester were on the scene.
A spokesperson said the blaze had spread to three floors of Hotspur House, and aerial units had been used to bring the fire under control. The spokesman added: "The two apartment blocks at number 1 Cambridge Street have been evacuated. A cordon is in place on Cambridge Street and we ask that the public stay away from the area. Residents nearby should keep doors and windows closed due to smoke in the area."
Footage taken at the scene showed parts of Hotspur House had collapsed.
National Rail said all lines were blocked and warned that services running through the station may be cancelled or delayed until 21:00 BST. It said rail replacement buses were running for Northern customers from Manchester Oxford Road at 18:20 BST and 18:25, calling at all stops to Warrington Central. There have been no further updates on disruption to rail services.

Buses were also leaving Warrington Central at the same times, calling at all stops to Manchester Oxford Road. A bus will depart Manchester Oxford Road at 19:00, calling at all stops to Earlestown.
TransPennine Express said rail replacement buses had been requested for the following routes:
* Manchester Piccadilly to Liverpool Lime Street in both directions
* Manchester Piccadilly to Preston in both directions
East Midlands Railway said it had bus replacements services on standby at Warrington Central, Stockport and Sheffield.
TransPennine Express said customers at Liverpool Lime Street could use their ticket at no extra cost to travel on TransPennine Express services to Manchester Victoria.
It also advised customers at Manchester Piccadilly and Manchester Oxford Road to use the free Transport for Greater Manchester bus link to Manchester Victoria, where they could change for connecting services towards Liverpool.


A fire that broke out at a landmark Manchester city centre building - causing it to partly collapse - spread to a neighbouring tower block.
Embers from the blaze at Hotspur House reached 1 Cambridge Street, resulting in the evacuation of residents from the building, Greater Manchester Fire And Rescue Service (GMFRS) told the BBC at the scene. However, it added the fire was no longer being treated as a major incident.
Anyone who has nowhere to go is set to be put up overnight by Manchester City Council.
The fire at the former printing press building broke out at about 17:00 GMT, forcing the cancellation of all trains through Manchester Oxford Road station.
The fire service urged the public to stay away from the area and said 20 fire engines from across Greater Manchester were on the scene.
A spokesperson said the blaze had spread to three floors of Hotspur House, and aerial units had been used to bring the fire under control. The spokesman added: "The two apartment blocks at number 1 Cambridge Street have been evacuated. A cordon is in place on Cambridge Street and we ask that the public stay away from the area. Residents nearby should keep doors and windows closed due to smoke in the area."
Footage taken at the scene showed parts of Hotspur House had collapsed.
National Rail said all lines were blocked and warned that services running through the station may be cancelled or delayed until 21:00 BST. It said rail replacement buses were running for Northern customers from Manchester Oxford Road at 18:20 BST and 18:25, calling at all stops to Warrington Central. There have been no further updates on disruption to rail services.

Buses were also leaving Warrington Central at the same times, calling at all stops to Manchester Oxford Road. A bus will depart Manchester Oxford Road at 19:00, calling at all stops to Earlestown.
TransPennine Express said rail replacement buses had been requested for the following routes:
* Manchester Piccadilly to Liverpool Lime Street in both directions
* Manchester Piccadilly to Preston in both directions
East Midlands Railway said it had bus replacements services on standby at Warrington Central, Stockport and Sheffield.
TransPennine Express said customers at Liverpool Lime Street could use their ticket at no extra cost to travel on TransPennine Express services to Manchester Victoria.
It also advised customers at Manchester Piccadilly and Manchester Oxford Road to use the free Transport for Greater Manchester bus link to Manchester Victoria, where they could change for connecting services towards Liverpool.

I'm on an experience-gathering mission. Most of the time things run fine, but in every system / on every railway things can go wrong and delays happen. And it's interesting to see how connections work too. I will leave it to the knowledgable reader to contrast and compare to the UK way in such circumstances.
Zilina Station is being rebuilt. There are only half of the tracks in use at present, and access is via a single long subway which is crowded with people as train platforms are only announced a few minutes ahead - standard practise in Slovakia and when you see how narrow the platforms are, you'll understand why you really don't want people waiting on them.
Our 07:44 departure was called a couple of minutes before it was due to leave and it left about 3 minutes late - because of the trek out to the platform, and the incredible crowds - it would appear that all the young people here have broken up from school and parties are being taken for school trips - days and summer camps - and the station and trains were crowded to the extent they added to delays.
A further couple of minutes were lost as we snaked our way east along the remaining operation line through the building site that's the station throat at the moment, and we arrived in Vrutky around 5 minutes late. Oops - "short connection" according to the journey planner, but the onward train to Banska Bystrica was held, people who needed to do so made the connection, and it then left - around 3 minutes late.
A lovely ride to Banska Bystrica, but the beauty is another story. We were due there at 09:25 and can't have been far off that though I did not note the time - I left the station for a cup of coffee and a cake and returned in good time for my next train - the 10:17 diesel service to Margecany.
Arriving back into the station at Banska Bystrica, now caffeined up, an electric train - the 10:15 to Bratislava which starts from there is waiting. The incoming diesel - due at 10:12 - pulls in perhaps 4 minutes late but the Bratislava train waits until passengers have transferred before leaving. Meanwhile another electric train, this from Bratislava pulls in and people come across to the diesel train, a modern 2 carriage train, and we set off a handful of minutes late on the 3 hour 36 minute (scheduled) journey to Margecany. It's a thinly served line - just two trains go the whole way on winter weekdays, boosted to four trains at weekends and in summer.
We toddle along - not part of this story - until we get to Cervena Skala high in the valley we have climbed and just before the watershed into the next valley.
Everyone else is getting off and I do know that some short workings terminate here but, no, the line to the next station is closed for engineering works and we are transferred to a bus. As one of the last people to leave the train (I don't speak Slovak) the staff helped ensure I found the bus, and I got just about the last seat in amongst a typically teenage population in there with bags, cases and camping gear. And we set off.
Not a very long drive - to Telgart where the bus drove up the station approach and parked to allow up off near the platform. No train waiting, but a couple of minutes later one arrived, passenger going the other way got off and transferred to the bus, and our gang joined the train. I would estimate that we pulled out around 15 minutes behind schedule.
Many more stations, little and big, people off and on. I had chosen the opposite carriage to the school parties so I don't know where they left us, and a sparsely occupied carriage got busier as we headed down the next valley, more people getting on than off. We pulled into Margecany - scheduled 13:53 still a little behind schedule. Ongoing passengers for the local train onward to Kosice transferred over (it may have been held a couple of minutes) and the local train to Strba called too a few minutes later, with the return train up the valley picking up its connecting passengers before it left - back on time, I think - certainly a planned connection that made.
I took the express back along the main line to Zilina (it was a loop I had done) and it left on time. We were around 15 minutes late into Zilina - delay caused by some single line working past engineering works; we had to wait for a train coming the other way, and then a very slow approach to Zilina itself as the train snaked in over the few tracks currently in place.
So there you have it - for me as a passenger, it worked as I would have wanted it to. All connections worked and there were no unplanned long waits. Necessary track-work carried on without wholesale closure, bus help was provided where needed and the whole thing was a very pleasant experience. And, no, I really wasn't worried about being 15 minutes or so late back into my digs.
Re: GWR Community Rail Conference - 24th June 2025 In "Across the West" [362603/30086/26] Posted by grahame at 06:47, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Grahame
Can you supply a link to the community rail conference.
Thank you.
Can you supply a link to the community rail conference.
Thank you.
That needs to be a GWR invite I'm afraid as numbers are of necessity limited. I'm pretty sure reports will appear on the Coffee Shop - indeed if I manage to connect (two connects pretty poor here) I'll tell you about it. I have chosen today as a non-travel day for the purpose.
Edit to add - as backup, I should also receive a recording to watch when better connected ... this hostel seems to have WiFi with a traffic limiter, so the Coffee Shop with its "thin" design works well but other things don't!
Re: 175s to GWR In "Across the West" [362602/28982/26] Posted by GBM at 06:37, 24th June 2025 Already liked by RichardB | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
More training runs today between Plymouth and Newton Abbot 5D01, et seq..
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [362601/29726/18] Posted by TaplowGreen at 06:14, 24th June 2025 Already liked by Witham Bobby | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Perhaps questions for the GWR "VIPs" at the Community event tonight - along with asking why we are now moving from a situation where they don't provide sufficient staff to run their services at weekends, to a place where we have weekday, peak services regularly cancelled for the same reason, and what are they doing to address it?
Re: Meeting people on trains In "Introductions and chat" [362600/30388/1] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 06:07, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
... in English.

CfN.

Re: GWR Community Rail Conference - 24th June 2025 In "Across the West" [362599/30086/26] Posted by infoman at 06:02, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Grahame
Can you supply a link to the community rail conference.
Thank you.
Re: Weymouth SWR services 23/6/25 In "South Western services" [362598/30394/42] Posted by bradshaw at 05:57, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Access from the Weymouth line is only from the island platform which means a climb over the bridge.
I saw the carnage first hand at Southampton which also involver GWR on the two trains I used
https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=30393.msg362587#msg362587
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [362597/29726/18] Posted by grahame at 04:53, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[snip]
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
I expect it will run tomorrow to get VIPs home from the GWR community event. That's the train that after the community rail conference in 2018 - also held in Swindon - that was so full and standing the train manager had to walk along the outside and shout to people standing in the aisle to squeeze up. I remember that day and event well.
I stand corrected.
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:06
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Further Information
We're sorry for the disruption to your journey.
-
Taxis (Bath Taxis Limited) have been arranged leaving Chippenham at 18:20 calling at Melksham (18:38), Trowbridge (18:51) and Westbury (19:03 arrival). If you're travelling from Swindon, please join the 17:57 service towards Bristol Temple Meads and change for the taxis at Chippenham.
-
Road transport pick up/drop off points can be found on the Information poster at stations or online at nre.co.uk/stations.
If you arrive at your destination 15 or more minutes late because your GWR train was delayed or cancelled, you can claim Delay Repay compensation. Please keep your ticket and visit GWR.com/DelayRepay
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Further Information
We're sorry for the disruption to your journey.
-
Taxis (Bath Taxis Limited) have been arranged leaving Chippenham at 18:20 calling at Melksham (18:38), Trowbridge (18:51) and Westbury (19:03 arrival). If you're travelling from Swindon, please join the 17:57 service towards Bristol Temple Meads and change for the taxis at Chippenham.
-
Road transport pick up/drop off points can be found on the Information poster at stations or online at nre.co.uk/stations.
If you arrive at your destination 15 or more minutes late because your GWR train was delayed or cancelled, you can claim Delay Repay compensation. Please keep your ticket and visit GWR.com/DelayRepay
The only cancellations in the region - notable that alternative transport is actually flagged up (rare but not unheard of) and the delay stated is 43 minutes.
Passengers onwards toward Weymouth hoping to connect with the 18:50 off Westbury to Frome will have to wait for the 19:45 - a 55 minute late arrival - and for Weymouth the next train isn't until 21:40 as far as I can see
The Journey Planner IS offering you the train-bus combo at £9.80 single Swindon to Westbury and also offering a 17:22 getting to Westbury at 18:34 which will connect with the 18:50 onwards - 13 minutes earlier from Swindon, a useful alternative, and getting there 15 minutes after the cancelled train would have done - but they are pricing a £19.80 - that's right, £10 more. Whatever happened to the promise that if a train via Melksham was cancelled and passengers had to travel via Bath that the via Melksham fare would be honoured?. It feels like an immoral thing to do to commit to providing a train service, cancel it, and then ask people to pay more for the journey because of your failure to deliver.
Re: GWR Community Rail Conference - 24th June 2025 In "Across the West" [362596/30086/26] Posted by grahame at 03:23, 24th June 2025 Already liked by PrestburyRoad | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some pictures I took yesterday showing very clearly what a difference community adoption of stations can make - and young people being encouraged by their communities to use the train.





Re: Meeting people on trains In "Introductions and chat" [362595/30388/1] Posted by grahame at 01:53, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Footnote - both of us two hours late at destination station. Both saying "so what" ...
Re: Modern Day Problems In "The Lighter Side" [362594/30390/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 01:16, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Using your phone as a makeup mirror has become commonplace - I'm sure some of our members do that ...
Gosh - how can I do that?

CfN.

Re: Weymouth SWR services 23/6/25 In "South Western services" [362593/30394/42] Posted by infoman at 01:11, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just wondering if the London bound train used the down platform at CC to make it an easier transfer.
Having said that, would that have made it harder for passengers getting off and on at CC having to negotiate the foot bridge?
Suppose its a case damned if you do and damned if you don't
Re: Modern Day Problems In "The Lighter Side" [362591/30390/30] Posted by grahame at 00:42, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It is uncouth to wear a sleeveless vest on it own (i.e. not under a shirt) indoors including on public transport.
An exception could reasonably be made in truly exceptional heat, but normally JUST DONT !
An exception could reasonably be made in truly exceptional heat, but normally JUST DONT !
The weather was exceptionally hot yesterday ... but, yes, people's personal habits can be inconsiderate! Unbuttoning your shirt and spraying de-odourant into your armpits is another "please don't" for me; I was not quite so unhappy with the young lady who laid out a box of false nails on the Paris express the other week and proceeded to glue them all onto her finger nails. Using your phone as a makeup mirror has become commonplace - I'm sure some of our members do that, and there may be some things I do thoughtlessly that irritate others.
Also yesterday - a young lady who was quite pretty (am I allowed to say that?) when she arrived proceeded to "enhance" her lips with some sort of paint-on sickly looking layer that reflected light and left her looking very false indeed and far less pretty in my personal view. She the proceeded to break pieces off a chocolate wafer biscuit and had to open her mouth wide to stuff the pieces in without damaging the work she had done to her lips.
Re: Modern Day Problems In "The Lighter Side" [362590/30390/30] Posted by grahame at 00:31, 24th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2. Strong trackside growth that means pictures taken from trains get blocked by foliage ...

That's a lovely little church overlooking a lake with beautiful hills all around
But then the modern day does allow up to take hundreds of pictures at a sensible price in the hope that some may come out OK ... and I am not averse to selecting the odd frame from a video occasionally.
Re: 175s to GWR In "Across the West" [362589/28982/26] Posted by REVUpminster at 00:09, 24th June 2025 Already liked by GBM | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
https://youtu.be/Or7ht9527LI
175002 at Newton Abbot 23 June 2025 on it's third training run reversing in platform 3. The previous two had reversed in platform 1/
Weymouth SWR services 23/6/25 In "South Western services" [362588/30394/42] Posted by Mark A at 22:36, 23rd June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Weymouth today didn't see many South Western Railways services from mid afternoon onwards. I happened to be catching the 17:28 to Bristol and passengers for destinations east were being directed to that & with ticket acceptance in place. For some reason, there weren't many people for the South Western services, perhaps word had got round, so despite this directive, the GWR service wasn't full and standing as it left on time.
A bit of a quandary for the travelling public: with few trains, well, one three carriage one, in the station, and that one locked until a couple of minutes before it departed, the posters at the station to the effect that there were no facilities at the station but said facilities, for the use of railway passengers, were available on the train, rang somewhat hollow.
In due course passengers for London were instructed to transfer to a Paddington train at Castle Cary, said train being held for a few minutes to ease the connection there.
Mark
Day trip to Southampton 23/06/25 In "South Western services" [362587/30393/42] Posted by bradshaw at 22:21, 23rd June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I chose the wrong day to venture to Southampton to meet a friend. Decided to travel via Crewkerne for old times sake - and because it was slightly cheaper. An off peak day return with railcard came in at £17.88.
The day started well with the 12.19 from Crewkerne on time there and at Salisbury. However the GWR connecting service was 16 running late into Southampton. At least that was a delay repay.
The return was far more difficult. Signalling problems at Wimbledon saw the Exeter service tuning around at Basingstoke and then it seems that lineside vegetation was causing a problem at Portsmouth so the 18.10 from Southampton to Cardiff was turned around at Fratton, arriving 26 late at Southampton. Seemingly too late to connect with the Exeter service at Salisbury. It was held at Salisbury Tunnel Junction for the Exeter service to go in front and, since this had to split a set, caused more delay with the Cardiff service eventually arriving 26 late. With the Exeter service leaving at 1903. This meant a connecting service 60 minutes later. Fine for delay repay but not ideal.
At least I made the right choice of route the only trains to reach Dorcester were the 1755, 2004(1849) and the 2036 and 2103 both running an hour late.
I had hoped that control would have regulated the Exeter service to run behind the GWR into Salisbury.
Re: Modern Day Problems In "The Lighter Side" [362586/30390/30] Posted by broadgage at 21:15, 23rd June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It is uncouth to wear a sleeveless vest on it own (i.e. not under a shirt) indoors including on public transport.
An exception could reasonably be made in truly exceptional heat, but normally JUST DONT !
Re: Major fire sees buildings evacuated and trains halted - Manchester, 23 June 2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [362585/30391/51] Posted by Oxonhutch at 20:09, 23rd June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ouch! That is a seriously intensely used route - akin to Borough Market Jnc in London - and the latter has more than a couple of tracks. Expect severe disruption.