Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Visually-impaired woman 'had to cross track alone' at Yeovil Pen Mill - Aug 2024 In "Heart of Wessex" [366714/30883/19] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:39, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nailsea and Backwell station, which has steps to one platform and a very steep slope to the other, was due to have had ramps installed at both platforms more than 10 years ago but £1m funding was withdrawn in 2014 after a deadline to start the work was missed.
Picking up on a couple of points there:
1. I would have rephrased that, in that there are very steep steps to one platform (Platform 1) and a reasonable slope to the other (Platform 2). I do know, I've used them both, many times; it's my local station.
2. The £1 million plus price tag put on improvements did include provision for lifts. In my personal opinion, that would be inappropriate expenditure for just the few passengers who would actually benefit from them at NLS. The provision of an access ramp to platform 1 would be appropriate, but it, too, wouldn't be cheap: the platforms are built on top of a Victorian embankment, which was basically piled up with rubble from elsewhere. It's dimensions mean that it is perfectly stable for mainline railway purposes, but the outside edges are effectively a scree slope. When I did some work with the Severnside Community Rail Partnership, we were told not to allow any of our Community Payback workers up onto the embankments, to cut back undergrowth, for those safety reasons.
Just as an aside, there is no possibility of a foot crossing on the railway lines at NLS: the line speed here is 100mph and not all trains stop.
Chris from Nailsea.

Visually-impaired woman 'had to cross track alone' at Yeovil Pen Mill - Aug 2024 In "Heart of Wessex" [366707/30883/19] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 17:47, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From the BBC:

A severely visually-impaired woman said she crossed railway tracks alone to catch a train, after station staff she had booked to help her did not turn up.
Kath Vickery has now started a petition to improve assistance arrangements after feeling "too anxious" to use her local station - Yeovil Pen Mill in Somerset - following the "really scary experience".
Great Western Railway (GWR) apologised and said it was exploring how to "deliver more robust staffing".
Figures show 10 out of 62 stations (16%) across the West of England have either no step-free access or issues with at least one platform. The Department for Transport said improving accessibility is "at the centre" of its decision-making.
Ms Vickery uses a cane and needs assistance when navigating railway stations. She said the incident happened in August 2024 - although she only started her petition recently after other more minor incidents.
Yeovil Pen Mill has a stepped footbridge to get to one of its platforms, but staff are able to help people across the tracks using a private level crossing reached by a ramp, if needed.
"When I got there I was a bit stuck because the ticket office was shut and that's usually where I find staff," she said. "I didn't feel comfortable going across the bridge on my own. I walked down to the track crossing in the hope someone would help. I rang the passenger assist call centre, I had a 13-minute conversation with them - they accidentally cut me off transferring me to someone - in the end I managed to attract the attention of someone at the station who told me I could cross, so then I had to run across the track crossing and up the platform to get my train. It was a really scary experience for me and obviously not great for safety, and still really affects me now."

Passenger assistance can be booked in advance for rail journeys - by phone, online or using an app - and is confirmed with the passenger. When assistance has been booked, if staff are then unable to fulfil that, the passenger is meant to be informed and GWR said it offers alternatives including a free taxi to the nearest accessible station.
Staff are meant to be available at Yeovil Pen Mill from 07:20 to 18:25 on weekdays, other than a lunch break, with shorter hours at weekends.
Ms Vickery used to use the station every week or two to get to medical appointments and ad hoc self-employed work in Bristol and Weymouth. She said she has recently had to turn down work in Weymouth as she felt unable to rely on the assistance she would receive at Yeovil Pen Mill.
Ms Vickery said losing the option of using the railway station long-term would be a "disaster" for her, with the only alternative to Bristol being a three-hour bus journey. "It's not like I've got the choice between driving and catching a train - the choices I have are very, very limited and that's why making sure the station is staffed its scheduled hours is so very important to me," she said.
She said she had two cancellations of assistance in the last year in addition to the experience in August 2024 when she was not informed the station would be unstaffed. "I think it's really important that disabled people have equal opportunity to use services and that includes train stations - and in order to use the train station I need there to be staff there," Ms Vickery said.
A spokesperson for GWR said: "We recognise that staffing gaps during holiday periods have impacted advertised opening hours at Yeovil Pen Mill, and we apologise for any inconvenience this causes passengers like Kath who rely on staff assistance. While our dedicated team works hard to maintain coverage, we know that we need to increase the staff relief pool to consistently staff all stations during peak leave periods, and we're exploring opportunities to deliver more robust staffing."

According to the disabled-led campaign group Transport for All a quarter (25%) of UK train stations have step-free access with 11% of stations staffed at all times.
Of Somerset's 10 national rail stations, four (40%) do not have step-free access to all platforms, which can be used independently of station staff, according to information listed on the National Rail website.
For example, Castle Cary station, on the Paddington mainline, has a stepped footbridge to the westbound platform meaning passengers need staff available to help them across the tracks.
Across the West of England, 10 out of 62 stations (16%) have either no step-free access, like Avoncliff and Freshford in Wiltshire, or issues with at least one platform.
Nailsea and Backwell station, which has steps to one platform and a very steep slope to the other, was due to have had ramps installed at both platforms more than 10 years ago but £1m funding was withdrawn in 2014 after a deadline to start the work was missed.

A spokesperson for the Department for Transport said it was "taking action to make rail travel easier and more reliable for disabled passengers". They added this included investing more than £10m to upgrade the Passenger Assist scheme, publishing a rail accessibility roadmap and improving information about the facilities available to provide support to passengers at stations.
Re: Templecombe to Swindon, bignosemac & Finn trip report. In "Across the West" [366706/24897/26] Posted by broadgage at 17:11, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
... except, perhaps, that patio heaters now raise ethical issues.
,Isn't that dependent on how cleanly generated the electricity used to power them is?
Only up to a point. Even if the electricity used by the patio heaters is claimed to be 100% green, then I am still rather opposed to such use. There is at any instant in time, only a finite supply of green electricity, any demand in excess of this is met by burning gas. Therefore any EXTRA demand for say electric patio heaters is met by increased gas burning.
Public comment on staff shortages In "Heart of Wessex" [366703/30882/19] Posted by grahame at 16:43, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From Dorset Echo via Facebook yesterday
TRAINS are being cancelled along the Weymouth to Bristol line due to staff shortages.
Lots of public comment - here are those which have 2 or more likes (indication of at least 3 people holding that view:
What staff shortages!! All they need is a driver, ticket inspector! Is that really too much to ask! 2025!! (+5)
Then they wonder why people don't use trains so unreliable can never be sure about your journey departing or arriving. Pathetic .(+4)
Surely a train driver's height had nothing to with their ability to drive a train. (+3)
Next week it will be because there are leaves on the line (+3)
They try to get everyone to ditch their cars, when we have this kind of public transport. (+2)
What's new (+2)
Should be queuing up the amount they get paid (+2)
Don’t they employ ‘standby’ drivers these days? (+2)
I am reporting these comments without expressing a view on any of them.
Re: Buses and coaches bursting into flames - why are they apparently so combustible? (merged topic) In "Buses and other ways to travel" [366702/7528/5] Posted by CyclingSid at 16:17, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The buses between Reading and High Wycombe have history. Why I never sit at the back, there is warm and warm!
Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [366701/26895/7] Posted by CyclingSid at 16:12, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A bridge from the first floor of the extended car park?
Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [366697/29711/14] Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 14:34, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Something broke down in Worcester at a critical moment this morning, with serious knock-on effects over the single track from Shrub Hill through Foregate St to Henwick.
WMT's 11:40 Foregate Street to Stratford : started from Shrub Hill (P1 11:47) +18 "due to a problem with the traction equipment (MD)".
GWR's 10:53 Foregate St to Bristol Temple Meads : departed +20, departed Shrub Hill +51, arrived Bristol Parkway +54 and cancelled thereafter.
1P26 10:59 Great Malvern to London Paddington (13:25) : due Foregate St 11:11-11:12, held Henwick (+22), Foregate St (+39), arrived Reading +53 and cancelled thereafter.
11:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 14:23 will be started from Worcester Shrub Hill.
It will no longer call at Great Malvern, Malvern Link and Worcester Foregate Street.
This is due to a broken down train.
Will be formed of 9 coaches instead of 5.
Additional Facilities Information
Reservations for Coach D in Coach K.
Last Updated:09/10/2025 11:48
It will no longer call at Great Malvern, Malvern Link and Worcester Foregate Street.
This is due to a broken down train.
Will be formed of 9 coaches instead of 5.
Additional Facilities Information
Reservations for Coach D in Coach K.
Last Updated:09/10/2025 11:48
1W17 08:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern (11:14) : due Foregate St 11:02-11:03, cancelled after Worcester Shrub Hill.
1W01 09:52 London Paddington to Hereford (12:46) : held Shrub Hill (+14), arrived +21.
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern due 16:15 will be started from Reading.
It will no longer call at London Paddington.
This is due to a broken down train earlier today.
Last Updated:09/10/2025 11:59
It will no longer call at London Paddington.
This is due to a broken down train earlier today.
Last Updated:09/10/2025 11:59
Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [366696/26895/7] Posted by bobm at 14:04, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Here is the crossing in question.
The track to the left is the connection to the Up Relief for stock to get on and off the Henley branch. The one on the right leads to the bay platform and is used by trains more often.
Re: Mid Cornwall Metro - Newquay, St Austell, Truro & Falmouth In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [366695/27102/25] Posted by grahame at 13:47, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From Cornwall Live:
At a meeting of Cornwall Council's sustainable growth scrutiny committee today (Tuesday, October 7 [2025]), Kevin Towill - Reform UK councillor for Newquay Porth and Tretherras - said: "It was always envisaged from the beginning of the Mid Cornwall Metro project that the train would stop at the villages - including Roche and Bugle - but I've heard a rumour this might not be happening now and the train will be running right through without stopping." He asked Cllr Dan Rogerson, Liberal Democrat cabinet member for transport, to clarify.
Cllr Rogerson said: "It is correct that the hourly service to Newquay will not stop at every station. I think it's more like a two-hourly service to those stations, which is not ideal. We want to encourage people to be able to get to a frequency of travel like perhaps there is on the Truro to Falmouth route which is half-hourly where people don't have to plan ahead quite so much and can hop on.
"There are real opportunities to do better in the future but for now, unfortunately, it will be an hourly service to Newquay and slightly less frequently to some of those clay country stations, which is not what I want to see, but that's where we're starting."
A recent report by the Diocese of Truro and Plymouth Marjon University found that poor transport links are hitting rural areas of Cornwall, particularly in the clay country area.
Cllr Rogerson said: "It is correct that the hourly service to Newquay will not stop at every station. I think it's more like a two-hourly service to those stations, which is not ideal. We want to encourage people to be able to get to a frequency of travel like perhaps there is on the Truro to Falmouth route which is half-hourly where people don't have to plan ahead quite so much and can hop on.
"There are real opportunities to do better in the future but for now, unfortunately, it will be an hourly service to Newquay and slightly less frequently to some of those clay country stations, which is not what I want to see, but that's where we're starting."
A recent report by the Diocese of Truro and Plymouth Marjon University found that poor transport links are hitting rural areas of Cornwall, particularly in the clay country area.
The concerns that a local or regional service that calls only once every 2 hours is so thin that it puts off a substantial proportion of potential users are, in my experience, correct. I do not, however, know the potential user base at Bugle or Roche and cannot quantify / qualify the size of the market it will make a difference to.
Part of the NRM - Station hall - has got a new roof. This is not part of the Vision 2025 project (though it would at least have met that hubristic dateline!). This report is from Buttress, who did the work:
Station Hall at the National Railway Museum reopens following £11million transformation
Restoration and conservation work to refresh the interior and exterior of the Grade II listed Station Hall, including the installation of 632 photovoltaic roofing panels.

On Friday 26 September, the refurbished Grade II listed Station Hall reopens after an £11m transformation in time to celebrate the National Railway Museum's 50th birthday weekend (27–28 September) and Railway 200, the bicentenary of the modern railway.
As part of the restoration works which started in 2023, Buttress Architects have undertaken a major re-roofing project which saw the entire 6000m² roof come off the Station Hall building, whilst the historic locomotives were left in-situ and shrouded with protective scaffolding to shield them whilst the works were carried out. This is the museum’s biggest structural project since its opening in 1975.
Buttress worked alongside the National Railway Museum team in York to painstakingly ensure that all the historical locomotives and carriages - including Queen Victoria’s train, King Edward’s train Queen Mary’s and the Queen Mother’s train - were protected from the works above...
Restoration and conservation work to refresh the interior and exterior of the Grade II listed Station Hall, including the installation of 632 photovoltaic roofing panels.

On Friday 26 September, the refurbished Grade II listed Station Hall reopens after an £11m transformation in time to celebrate the National Railway Museum's 50th birthday weekend (27–28 September) and Railway 200, the bicentenary of the modern railway.
As part of the restoration works which started in 2023, Buttress Architects have undertaken a major re-roofing project which saw the entire 6000m² roof come off the Station Hall building, whilst the historic locomotives were left in-situ and shrouded with protective scaffolding to shield them whilst the works were carried out. This is the museum’s biggest structural project since its opening in 1975.
Buttress worked alongside the National Railway Museum team in York to painstakingly ensure that all the historical locomotives and carriages - including Queen Victoria’s train, King Edward’s train Queen Mary’s and the Queen Mother’s train - were protected from the works above...
Transport fares to school In "Buses and other ways to travel" [366693/30881/5] Posted by grahame at 12:50, 9th October 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Faresaver buses were set up by John Pickford, he told me, to help in a transport issue getting his own children to school. That was a long time ago - those children now run the company and it's a successful and much more general operation these days. I used "his" buses just yesterday ...
Many or most bus services these days are general public focuses commercial, or are supported by subsidy from the local unitary council, and have a £3 fare cap as part of the government scheme. That applies to Faresaver routes X31/231, X34, 1, 1A, 1C, 10, 33, X33, 44, 60, 63, 65/65A, 66, 67/67A, 68/68A, 69, 76, 77, 87, 91, 95/95A, 228, 3A/3C, 271, 272, 273, 635 and 636. The other Faresaver routes - X10, X37, X83, X86, 287, 555, 49 - are not part of that scheme; the 555 at least remains a commercially based venture run by the company and paid for by the passengers or their parents / guardians. It runs school days only and whilst the public may use it, and indeed it's a useful direct bus from Corsham to Melksham later in the day, it's not really any good as a daily commuter bus because of the long holiday gaps.
The Melksham Oak School - the designate school in our town - is not every parent's choice, and a significant number of children are bussed, or given lifts elsewhere. If the parents choose a school that is not the closest, should they then expect or have a right to free or subsidised transport to the school they have selected, or should they take these costs into consideration when choosing for their children? While I am "at it" ... Mum's / Dad's taxi is also often used to get kiddos to schools when there is a closer / not motorised and practical alternative - should schools charge parking or drop of fees like (but not at the same level) as airports do?
From the Melksham News
FAMILIES in Melksham are raising concerns about the cost of school transport to Corsham School, saying current fares are unaffordable for many households.
A petition has been launched asking Wiltshire Council to review its school transport policy and consider ways to make travel more affordable, particularly for families on lower incomes.
The petition states, “Currently, the fare is £315 per term per child. For many families, especially single-parent households and those already facing rising living costs, this is simply unaffordable. Education should be accessible to all children, and the cost of transport should not be a barrier to attending a school that best meets their needs.”
One parent said, “I recognise that it is my choice to send my child to a secondary school outside of the town, but I do feel that the cost of transport is very high. There are some families whose children’s needs aren’t being met at the local option, but the cost of transport to other schools is so high that they might not have the option to look elsewhere, especially if they have more than one child or are on lower incomes.”
However, Wiltshire Council has explained that under national school transport guidance, children are entitled to free transport only if they live more than three miles from their nearest or designated school. For families in Melksham, this is Melksham Oak Community School.
Cabinet Member for Highways, Cllr Martin Smith, said, “Children from low-income households who qualify for free school meals may be eligible for free transport to one of the three nearest schools, located between two and six miles from their home. In some cases, this may include Corsham School. “Where parents choose a school that is not the closest or designated school, and the child does not qualify under low-income criteria, the responsibility for transport costs lies with the family. While the council does consider individual circumstances, exceptions are unlikely to be granted where the choice of school is based on educational preference or domestic arrangements.”
The 555 bus service to Corsham School is operated independently by Faresaver as a commercial venture, with fares set by the company based on operational costs.
The petition calls on Wiltshire Council to review its school transport policy, seeking a reduction in fares or subsidised travel for families on lower incomes, greater flexibility in providing assistance for children attending schools further afield, and a commitment to ensuring all children have equal access to education.
Faresaver has been contacted for comment
A petition has been launched asking Wiltshire Council to review its school transport policy and consider ways to make travel more affordable, particularly for families on lower incomes.
The petition states, “Currently, the fare is £315 per term per child. For many families, especially single-parent households and those already facing rising living costs, this is simply unaffordable. Education should be accessible to all children, and the cost of transport should not be a barrier to attending a school that best meets their needs.”
One parent said, “I recognise that it is my choice to send my child to a secondary school outside of the town, but I do feel that the cost of transport is very high. There are some families whose children’s needs aren’t being met at the local option, but the cost of transport to other schools is so high that they might not have the option to look elsewhere, especially if they have more than one child or are on lower incomes.”
However, Wiltshire Council has explained that under national school transport guidance, children are entitled to free transport only if they live more than three miles from their nearest or designated school. For families in Melksham, this is Melksham Oak Community School.
Cabinet Member for Highways, Cllr Martin Smith, said, “Children from low-income households who qualify for free school meals may be eligible for free transport to one of the three nearest schools, located between two and six miles from their home. In some cases, this may include Corsham School. “Where parents choose a school that is not the closest or designated school, and the child does not qualify under low-income criteria, the responsibility for transport costs lies with the family. While the council does consider individual circumstances, exceptions are unlikely to be granted where the choice of school is based on educational preference or domestic arrangements.”
The 555 bus service to Corsham School is operated independently by Faresaver as a commercial venture, with fares set by the company based on operational costs.
The petition calls on Wiltshire Council to review its school transport policy, seeking a reduction in fares or subsidised travel for families on lower incomes, greater flexibility in providing assistance for children attending schools further afield, and a commitment to ensuring all children have equal access to education.
Faresaver has been contacted for comment
Re: 175s to GWR In "Across the West" [366692/28982/26] Posted by BBM at 12:30, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Been reported elsewhere that units 175 111 and 175 115 are currently being hauled from storage at Ely to Wolverton works by locos 93006 and 93002
RAIL Magazine has posted a photo of 93006 at the front of the train:
https://x.com/RAIL/status/1976245003006427310
Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [366691/26895/7] Posted by stuving at 12:09, 9th October 2025 Already liked by grahame, IndustryInsider | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes. Or more niche ones like gaining approval to increase the footfall of the unusual and outdated method of getting from the car park to the station by crossing the track.
Mind you, that crossing isn't quite as scary as the National Rail plan would have you believe. Spot the deliberate error!

Re: Photographers asked to tell story of rail travel In "Media about railways, and other means of transport" [366689/30829/49] Posted by grahame at 11:53, 9th October 2025 Already liked by GBM | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Chivied on by an article in the Melksham News, I have submitted a picture entitled "Melksham to Moskosel, all the way by train". Competition close date is 31st December 2025. Competition asks for high res images (makes sense) - if you click on the image below, it will display at higher resolution for you.


Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [366687/26895/7] Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:34, 9th October 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Whether there are other silly little things that might make it more complicated, who knows!
Newts, just for example.



Yes. Or more niche ones like gaining approval to increase the footfall of the unusual and outdated method of getting from the car park to the station by crossing the track.