Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: New Year's Day - journey log and "State of transport" observations In "Introductions and chat" [370533/31379/1] Posted by bobm at 13:50, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
Sounds like my kind of day out. Travelling solo and free to change plans on the hoof, as it were.
Regarding the canopies at Chippenham. A lot of them were removed last summer after concern at the amount of corrosion in the metalwork holding them up. Network Rail do plan to replace them when funds allow. I am not sure if they are still there, but the removed woodwork was neatly stacked at the country end of the disused platform.
| Re: New Year's Day - journey log and "State of transport" observations In "Introductions and chat" [370532/31379/1] Posted by grahame at 13:48, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
Part 3 - Homeward Bound. The timetable suggested buses home from Glastonbury Town Hall at 14:14, 14:44, 15:14 and final bus of the day at 15:44 - but as I walked down Glastonbury High Street towards the Town Hall, one passed my headed where I wanted to go, at around 14:30. Odd - 15 minutes late, perhaps?
This was where I felt the real lack of a tracker - no way to know what was going on / whether the 14:44 would be on time. I got to the designated stop for the 14:44 some 5 to 10 minutes before it was due. The Town Hall clock suggested I had 15 minutes to wait - turns out to have been significantly slow (can't rely even on official clocks these days!). The bus stop looked uncared for; some dusty posters including departures of 373, 374, 375 and 376 to Bristol no indication of different routes, and three columns of data - "Monday to Friday", "Saturday" and "Sunday and Bank Holidays". Times clear enough.
A chap with a small (day) rucksack comes along and looks at the Sunday column, and I take it upon myself to tell him that the only bus running today is the heritage bus; he thanks me for the information I give him from the Facebook page I had printed before the trip. "That will do then"; I ask him if he wants to get back from Wells, and when he confirms that he does I tell him that last bus is 15:05 - leaving before he will get there. He decides to postpone his trip to the next day.
A lady with a large double buggie and two children running around comes and looks at the timetable. Again, I take it upon myself to tell her that it's only the heritage bus today. She thinks - "Oh good - that will be an adventure for them". By that time, the bus going the other way to Street had passed, on time at 14:53, and I knew it was the same vehicle due to return at 15:14. "Will I be able to get the buggie on" she asked nervously - "I really don't want to have to walk all the way back up to the top of town". I re-assured her that there probably would be no level access, but I'm sure a way would be found.
And indeed - at 15:14 - up rolls the bus. Steps up! For, I suspect, the first time in its life the pushchair is folded, lifted up, and stacked awkwardly in the luggage, with the driver asking it not lean against the window. Mum, sheepdog-like encourages her two little lambs onto the bus, we grab seats and off we go. Conductress comes along with a box of sweets. (Why can't we have sweets given out to passengers on our local bus). But then "how do I stop the bus to get off" and I suggest having a word with the conductress who's standing with the driver. Mum goes up, asks for her stop by name and I hear a slightly tetchy comment from the driver "I don't known the route - you'll have to tell me where that is". And indeed she does, bus stops, mum and children get off.
It's very interesting to observe that even with prior publicity from bus operators, there were multiple assumption they were running - and that was just one stop. Others were looking for regular buses at Bristol before we left, and also at Wells bus station. Probably a pattern the region over!

15:14 back to Wells - "Everyone off - we terminate here" at 15:29 ... and it turns out to be the same vehicle at 15:47 for Bristol. Different crew. And a pretty much uneventful run, getting dark along the way. Arrived 16:45 - so about 15 late - at the bottom of Temple Meads station approach; not sure why we late - probably the older bus being driven gently; no great issue as I came towards the final part of the journey.

My plan had been to catch the 17:00 to Chippenham, arrive around 17:30, change to the 17:50 to Melksham, arrive 18:00. I had already noted than the following option - change at Trowbridge - was bustituted from Trowbridge and I was not keen on that option, as waiting around at an unstaffed station for rail replacement isn't my idea of fun.
But then, due to a safety check at Oldfield Park, the 17:00 was going to run without calls at Bath and Chippenham, and it was far from clear to me that the train via Trowbridge would actually be running, and if it did whether the rail replacement bus would be caught. No Faresaver buses from Bath to Melksham on New Year's day - so no safety net.

A mixture of broken down train and lack of staff reasons were being given for the Swindon to Westbury shuttles being cancelled - and indeed the 17:50 connection I wanted from Chippenham had also just flashed up "cancelled" on journey check as the bus reached Bristol. So - plan "D" or was it "E"? - the 17:00 nonstop to Swindon, then the 18:44 to Melksham - still running and a physically different train to the one broken down, 19:10 into Melksham and a lot more assured than a dubious train and a bus/taxi that was only due in about 19:00 anyway.
I asked the guy on the BRI gateline for his advice, and the look it up and suggested train to Trowbridge and train to Melksham. I queried this, as I understood it to be a bus from Trowbridge and he looked again and confirmed that to be the case. I asked him if I could go via Swindon and he confirmed that I could; I pointed out my ticket was "via Bath Spa" but he assured me it would be accepted via Swindon in the circumstances.
And so I joined the 17:00 - "this train will not call at Bath Spa or Chippenham this evening". We pulled out a couple of minutes late. On board announcement -"sorry we're a couple of minutes late, but a late change of plan, we're going via Bath and Chippenham after all". Further announcement as we approached Bath - "sorry we're been running a bit slower than normal - but we've been on the other track that's normally used for trains headed to Bristol". And indeed we crossed over, normal platform at, no-one got off (I wonder why!) but some go on. And so on to Chippenham.
At Chippenham ... screen shown 17:50 to Westbury cancelled (and also the 17:37 to Taunton cancelled which would have been alternative for Trowbridge and beyond via a change at Bath). Once 17:37 had passed, the display changed to show the first train, cancelled, being the Westbury, and there was an announcement that "The 17:50 to Westbury has been cancelled and your next fastest train is the 19:00 from platform 1". Nothing incorrect there - 19:00 WAS the next train - but no suggestion made to seek assistance if you didn't want to wait for over an hour.

I went over to the gateline - manned with two staff in addition to the dispatcher on the platform - and asked for their advise for Melksham. They are clearly well used to this. Another couple waiting too. Taxi came in from Trowbridge - must have been substituted for the train due in the other direction at 16:48, and the driver stated that his instructions were to go on to Swindon and then return vi Chippenham and Melksham to Trowbridge. Staff pointed out that he wasn't carrying anyone and some trains were running to Swindon so he could turn round, but he declined; I think he carried on as he had been booked. Another taxi arrived, this time a local Chippenham one ordered by the GWR central team, and after checking that it was after 17:50, us three passengers got in and we were taken to Melksham - arrival 18:14 at the station. With all that was going on, not too bad an outcome.
For locals to Melksham, I was amused that the driver's Satnav took him down Dunch Lane and then Southbrook road to get him to the station. And I was please to see that he stopped at the station and checked on the platform for onward passengers to Trowbridge. Being a Bank Holiday and on the meter, GWR will be invoiced for £44.25 just for that one leg. I don't know how much the other couple had paid but they were on their way home from Bath / usually bus users and I suspect the man had gone along to support his wife who had to work the day. My ticket from Melksham - Melksham to Avonmouth off peak return with disabled rail card - had cost me £8.70, and I suspect the couple had each paid £10.70 for an undiscounted off peak return, so that taxi fare alone put GWR into a loss. Shows the cost of rail replacement; but really GWR should have enough train crew and enough operational trains to make this sort of thing a rarity!

In Summary - 3 trains, 4 bus rides (3 different vehicles), one rail replacement taxi. 15 minutes late into Melksham. Many "state of public transport" experiences shared above, many learning points; while some were specific to New Years Day, others certainly were not.
| Re: Binned sausage rolls served to rail passengers In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [370531/31380/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 13:39, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
Hmm.
At no stage in this BBC report, nor associated local news reports, is there any explanation as to why those sausage rolls had been consigned to the food waste bin.
If they were 'outside date', no excuses - even homeless charities wouldn't want them.
| Re: Christmas and New Year holidays 2025/26 on the Coffee Shop In "News, Help and Assistance" [370529/31311/29] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 13:27, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
That's exactly how I would have explained it.

I confess to enjoying both the technical challenge of updating all of our pages as seamlessly as possible, and of explaining it.

That's how the admin / moderator team seems to work very well, here on the Coffee Shop forum.
Graham does the (to me, scary) 'back of house' work on the servers and databases, and I do the rather easier 'front of house' work on splitting, moving and merging topics.
To reiterate: if anyone has an issue with posts I've moved or merged (they won't have been deleted!), please do contact me - details are all available in my profile here.
Chris from Nailsea.

From a quote within one of my previous posts on this subject:
The Liskeard to Looe branch line will be closed during New Year until the track can be safety checked by a team of specialised divers.
The branch line has been closed since Saturday 20th December because of floodwater although a replacement minibus service has been in operation.
The dive team arrived on site on Monday 22nd December but Network Rail said the water was still too deep and running too fast for the divers to be able to safely carry out the necessary inspections.
A Network Rail spokesperson said "The earliest that a dive team can attend the area again will be on Sunday 4 January. The line will remain closed until the divers have been able to check that it's safe to open."
If I were a professional diver, looking down into that mess, I too would be politely reluctant to enter that floodwater, into the unknown.

| Binned sausage rolls served to rail passengers In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [370526/31380/51] Posted by grahame at 12:25, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
From The BBC
A train worker who was sacked after first class passengers were served sausage rolls from a bin has said he was going "over and beyond for the customer".
Peter Duffy, who worked for London North Eastern Railway (LNER), was accused of preparing sausage rolls he had "retrieved from a bin", which were then served to passengers by a colleague.
Another member of train crew reported hearing laughter from the kitchen before the food was served and made a complaint after noticing sausage rolls that were in the bin had disappeared.
Mr Duffy was sacked by the rail firm, but later claimed unfair dismissal and discrimination. However, at a tribunal in Newcastle, a judge concluded LNER had acted reasonably.
Peter Duffy, who worked for London North Eastern Railway (LNER), was accused of preparing sausage rolls he had "retrieved from a bin", which were then served to passengers by a colleague.
Another member of train crew reported hearing laughter from the kitchen before the food was served and made a complaint after noticing sausage rolls that were in the bin had disappeared.
Mr Duffy was sacked by the rail firm, but later claimed unfair dismissal and discrimination. However, at a tribunal in Newcastle, a judge concluded LNER had acted reasonably.
| Re: Christmas and New Year holidays 2025/26 on the Coffee Shop In "News, Help and Assistance" [370525/31311/29] Posted by grahame at 12:19, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
That's exactly how I would have explained it.


I confess to enjoying both the technical challenge of updating all of our pages as seamlessly as possible, and of explaining it.
Going quite well - here is a log of 25 seconds of requests for flow pages a couple of minutes ago
tlc_new,66.249.74.129,PTG:10:0,1767528516
tlc_cached,66.249.73.227,SHM:50:0,1767528521
tlc_new,44.223.116.149,NFA:10:5,1767528524
tlc_cached,66.249.73.227,NBE:10:0,1767528525
tlc_botlimit,100.28.118.16,RUG:10:4,1767528530
tlc_new,52.167.144.218,BES:10:0,1767528531
tlc_new,66.249.73.227,FRI:50:4,1767528533
tlc_botlimit,44.212.145.46,OXT:10:4,1767528538
tlc_cached,114.119.141.34,FRB:10:0,1767528540
tlc_botlimit,44.206.65.8,FOR:50:999,1767528542
tlc_cached,66.249.73.227,SHM:50:0,1767528521
tlc_new,44.223.116.149,NFA:10:5,1767528524
tlc_cached,66.249.73.227,NBE:10:0,1767528525
tlc_botlimit,100.28.118.16,RUG:10:4,1767528530
tlc_new,52.167.144.218,BES:10:0,1767528531
tlc_new,66.249.73.227,FRI:50:4,1767528533
tlc_botlimit,44.212.145.46,OXT:10:4,1767528538
tlc_cached,114.119.141.34,FRB:10:0,1767528540
tlc_botlimit,44.206.65.8,FOR:50:999,1767528542
So that is - already 3 cached, 4 pages newly generated and when called up again will come from the cache, and 3 pages where the requester was a robot and it was asked to try again later. There are no tic_busy lines which is what would be logged (and was sometimes in the first hour or two) if the worker could not cope.
tic_cached will become a far higher proportion over coming hours and days as our receptionist says "someone asked me that earlier, and here is the answer"
| Re: Llangollen Canal - Whitchurch, Shropshire canal breach: 22 Dec 2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [370524/31316/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 12:12, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
For the canals, that's the equivalent of the 2014 Dawlish sea wall railways incident.

| Re: Contactless - not always the cheapest In "Fare's Fair" [370523/31297/4] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 12:05, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
Thanks, TaplowGreen.
I am a self-avowed Luddite - I don't understand how the new technology works, so I'm inclined to distrust it. However, my home IT department (daughter) has shown me how it works, and I have begun to trust it.
Agreed, contactless is the future for rail - and bus - travel. I am becoming a fan, once I begin to understand it. Contactless provides an audit trail, electronically, as to which 'ticket' was used where. This is better than a 'paper trail' of manual tickets, which can be rather more difficult to replicate, in case of any dispute, for example.
CfN.

| Re: Christmas and New Year holidays 2025/26 on the Coffee Shop In "News, Help and Assistance" [370522/31311/29] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 11:44, 4th January 2026 Already liked by grahame | ![]() |
That's exactly how I would have explained it.

| Re: Why can't we have trains at Christmas? In "Railway History and related topics" [370521/27018/55] Posted by froome at 11:28, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
Do any freight trains run on Christmas or Boxing days?
Part 2 - And so onward ... from the bus station in Wells on the Lodekka that claimed to be the "23A to Imber" but really was headed for Street via Glastonbury. Ticket, free of charge, issued by the conductress as we joined this back entrance bus. Big step up - these were vehicles from before the days of universal access and that's probably why they can't make it a chargeable public service. Lovely old bus - seems to be in better condition and cleaner than modern ones. Old feature like cigarette stubbers remain. Bus dates, I think I saw, from 1959. Not full, but pleasantly enough room for everyone.


Glastonbury was on my list of places to (re)visit after many years, Street less so so I bailed at the Town Hall - don't think anyone else got off or on; very much a bus on this leg of the journey for the ride.
Like at Wells, I decided not to spend money looking around the Abbey; something for a different time of year, and on a more relaxed schedule. Plan was an hour in Glastonbury, looking in shop windows and taking in the Bohemian vibes of the place. The organic food supermarket. The clothes shops for the camping and outdoor life. The tarot card readers, the witchcraft shop and the natural birthing centre. Many of the things we lack in Melksham, even though Melksham has twice the population.





Glastonbury Tor is a conical hill about a mile from the town, set in the Somerset Levels. I climbed the 500 feet via the "back way" - public footpath from the town to the roofless tower of St Michael's church on the top. It's so steep that there are steps, and the even then the path needs to zigzag back and forth as it wraps around the hill.
Not really much "public transport" connection here. I met a Scotsman from London as we walked up, both stopping to admire the view and recover our breaths. I asked him how he came to be in Glastonbury. "How did you get here?" "I drove - wouldn't trust public transport" and he looked at me as if I was wildly brave by doing so. "Too unreliable" he told me.


The top of Glastonbury Tor is lovely - and was also crowded out crowded - to the extent that it reminded me of pictures I've seen of Ayers Rock where the public have now been restricted / banned because of wear. And this was 1st January - I don't think it's a "special" day there, and certainly not the holiday season. Many people probably local - lots of families. But also a noticeable load of accents which suggested to me that there are many people around who were not raised locally.

Back down the "front way" - standing aside to let people up, and faster people downhill pass. Everyone very positive. I did wonder as we got towards the bottom whether everyone would have time to get up and back before dark, but I am aware there's a full moon at present.

There sheer numbers of people and - I suspect - I was the only one to arrive in Glastonbury that day by public transport and walk up to the Tor - says volumes to me. The car park at the bottom of the tour was jammed and doing a roaring trade at £4 (3 hours) or £6 (all day) and the coffee van was doing a roaring trade to warm up people as they came off the hill. I walked on into town - other pedestrians traffic down to a handful again. Journey home post to follow.

| Re: Looe Branch Line - timetables, cancellations, engineering work, closures and incidents In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [370519/569/25] Posted by grahame at 10:45, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
Latest update;
Even if divers are available on Monday 5th January 2026, it is quite possible that the line may not be safe to reopen.
Even if divers are available on Monday 5th January 2026, it is quite possible that the line may not be safe to reopen.
The caution is reasonable in that the divers don't know what they will find. The use of the words "even if" suggests to me that the divers might not even be booked to come and take a look!!
| Re: Llangollen Canal - Whitchurch, Shropshire canal breach: 22 Dec 2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [370518/31316/51] Posted by grahame at 10:14, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC
Repairing a canal collapse that left boats swallowed up in a deep trench as water poured out could take most of 2026, authorities have said
| Re: Contactless - not always the cheapest In "Fare's Fair" [370517/31297/4] Posted by TaplowGreen at 09:27, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
It's a pity we're seeing these glitches as contactless is definitely the future for rail travel.
Latest update;
We are working with Network Rail to re-open the line. The water levels have now dropped and Network Rail will need to inspect the bridges to make sure that the flooding has not caused any damage to the bridge structures.
As parts of the bridges below the water level need to be inspected, specialist divers are required but none are immediately available. Even if divers are available on Monday 5th January 2026, it is quite possible that the line may not be safe to reopen. Please check your journey as updates to the service may be made at short notice.
| Re: Why can't we have trains at Christmas? In "Railway History and related topics" [370513/27018/55] Posted by Electric train at 07:19, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
... They can also have their entire signal box operated by one shift of signallers (two I think?, but maybe just one for that one line of route) plus the few drivers required all enter a ballot to earn the generous overtime.
Marylebone Panel is split into two desks - North and South. By Princes Risborough it is under the North desk - as I have dealt with them operating PR Middle (North) Box on behalf of the Chinnor Railway. I think the boundary is somewhere around High Wycombe. With low traffic volumes serving only the Oxford Branch it might be able to operated by one signaller for the two desks, but I cannot be sure and somehow I doubt it.
Signalling centres, electrical control rooms, route control etc are all staffed over Christmas. The number of staff working will be small, larger if engineering trains are operating, also when systems testing / commission is being carried out.
| Re: Christmas and New Year holidays 2025/26 on the Coffee Shop In "News, Help and Assistance" [370512/31311/29] Posted by grahame at 06:56, 4th January 2026 | ![]() |
Nothing to be done as mind-blowing as the changes last year, mind for which we had a brief daytime down time. Littler things - but potentially a myriad of them. Some of the items on my list
* Add in the 2024/25 station usage stats and prepare for the ticket flow data that I would expect to be avail mid-January
* Add in the 2024/25 station usage stats and prepare for the ticket flow data that I would expect to be avail mid-January
Ticket Flow data has become available and was uploaded overnight. If you visit a URL such as https://www.passenger.chat/MKM.html you will see the comparison back to the year 2018/19 (the last full year before covid) of the station, split down by destination.
Please bear in mind that this is significant new data and some 25,000 pages are being generated when first asked for from a database of just under 10 million individual flows, and when a particular result is first asked for there is a noticeable lag from the server. The search engines are already indexing these amended pages and until our cache is substantively refreshed, the load on our pair of servers will be significant and you may see slow running - my guesstimate is that this will take a couple of days to fix itself.
| Re: Contactless - not always the cheapest In "Fare's Fair" [370511/31297/4] Posted by ChrisB at 21:35, 3rd January 2026 | ![]() |
From ITV
Southern Railway passengers due refunds because of ongoing 'technical issue'
Southern Railway say some passengers will be receiving refunds after being overcharged because of a 'technical issue'.
The company says a small number of its customers are affected by an ongoing glitch at stations where the option to travel using contactless payments was introduced last month.
From December 14th, the payment method was introduced at an additional 11 stations on the network including East Grinstead, Oxted and Reigate.
The Rail Delivery Group said the expansion of pay-as-you-go technology is designed to make train travel easier and more convenient, aligning it with the Transport for London network.
Refunds for journeys impacted since the middle of last month will be issued automatically by Transport for London from Monday 5th January.
The issue won't be resolved until March when fares are next set, meaning customers who do pay more will receive refunds weekly.
People travelling using paper tickets, Smartcard journeys, or eTickets aren't affected.
In a statement on its website, Southern Railway says, "TfL have begun issuing refunds for affected journeys as part of interim arrangements. Passengers can expect to begin seeing refunds applied to their accounts shortly, and refunds will continue to be processed on a weekly basis while the issue remains in place.
"If you think you may have been overcharged, you can review up to seven days of journey history and charges by setting up an account on the TfL website, which also provides additional useful features. To check the charge applied against the correct fare, you can compare your journey details on National Rail Enquiries.
"We are working with TfL on a permanent fix. However, changes to address this issue can only be implemented as part of a wider ‘Fare Setting Round’, with the next one scheduled for March 2026. In the meantime, we are ensuring that all fares data for pay as you go with contactless journeys is accurate and fully verified before release. Additional checks and testing will also be carried out to prevent this issue from recurring.
"Passengers travelling from some stations may currently be undercharged when using pay as you go with contactless. You will not be asked to pay any extra for past or current journeys. From March onwards, fares will be charged at the correct rate."
Southern Railway say some passengers will be receiving refunds after being overcharged because of a 'technical issue'.
The company says a small number of its customers are affected by an ongoing glitch at stations where the option to travel using contactless payments was introduced last month.
From December 14th, the payment method was introduced at an additional 11 stations on the network including East Grinstead, Oxted and Reigate.
The Rail Delivery Group said the expansion of pay-as-you-go technology is designed to make train travel easier and more convenient, aligning it with the Transport for London network.
Refunds for journeys impacted since the middle of last month will be issued automatically by Transport for London from Monday 5th January.
The issue won't be resolved until March when fares are next set, meaning customers who do pay more will receive refunds weekly.
People travelling using paper tickets, Smartcard journeys, or eTickets aren't affected.
In a statement on its website, Southern Railway says, "TfL have begun issuing refunds for affected journeys as part of interim arrangements. Passengers can expect to begin seeing refunds applied to their accounts shortly, and refunds will continue to be processed on a weekly basis while the issue remains in place.
"If you think you may have been overcharged, you can review up to seven days of journey history and charges by setting up an account on the TfL website, which also provides additional useful features. To check the charge applied against the correct fare, you can compare your journey details on National Rail Enquiries.
"We are working with TfL on a permanent fix. However, changes to address this issue can only be implemented as part of a wider ‘Fare Setting Round’, with the next one scheduled for March 2026. In the meantime, we are ensuring that all fares data for pay as you go with contactless journeys is accurate and fully verified before release. Additional checks and testing will also be carried out to prevent this issue from recurring.
"Passengers travelling from some stations may currently be undercharged when using pay as you go with contactless. You will not be asked to pay any extra for past or current journeys. From March onwards, fares will be charged at the correct rate."
| Re: Bristol Airport - proposals for expansion, bus services and infrastructure - ongoing discussion In "Buses and other ways to travel" [370510/22894/5] Posted by TonyK at 20:40, 3rd January 2026 | ![]() |
If you're travelling relatively light then the U2 bus to Airport Tavern is currently £3 each way.
I got the Falcon bus from Cullompton for one holiday, I think early 2023. It cost me £9 return - actually £3 in Tesco vouchers.
| Re: Driving licences and tests - ongoing discussion In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [370509/19893/51] Posted by TonyK at 20:28, 3rd January 2026 | ![]() |
^^^ It used to be Minehead. Not only was there only one roundabout in the town, but if you were lucky enough to have a test that coincided with the end of an long weekend event at Butlins, you probably wouldn't have to do the test at more than 3 mph. The test centre closed when it got out of hand, with learners from distant Scottish islands booking there.
| Re: East West Rail Timetable In "Chiltern Railways services" [370508/29004/44] Posted by ChrisB at 20:18, 3rd January 2026 | ![]() |
RMT Press Release
RMT to demonstrate against Driver Only Operation on East West Rail in New Year
23 December 2025
RMT Press Office:
Rail union RMT, will stage a demonstration at 9am on Monday 5 January outside Marylebone station in opposition to plans to introduce Driver Only Operation (DOO) on the new East West Rail line.
The action follows confirmation from Chiltern Railways that it intends to operate services on the new route without a second safety-critical member of staff, despite RMT’s long-standing opposition to DOO.
RMT is clear that a second safety-critical person onboard trains play a vital role in protecting passengers and workers, including providing reassurance, deterring anti-social behaviour, coordinating responses to incidents, managing emergency evacuations and dealing with fires.
The recent mass stabbing on an LNER service at Huntingdon station has once again highlighted the importance of trained staff being present onboard to react quickly, raise the alarm and ensure effective coordination with control, signallers and the British Transport Police.
The union is demanding clear guarantees that East West Rail services operated by Chiltern will not be DOO and that a second safety-critical member of staff will be a mandatory requirement for trains to run.
RMT General Secretary Eddie Dempsey said: “A guaranteed safety-critical second person onboard trains is essential for carrying out a wide range of duties and responding properly to dangerous and fast-moving situations.
“It is vital that any method of dispatch is agreed with the union and properly reflects the safety-critical skills and responsibilities of the second crew member.
“The horrific incident at Huntingdon showed exactly why having trained staff onboard matters.
"The quick actions of the guard and other crew meant the seriousness of the situation was immediately understood by control, signallers and the British Transport Police, allowing swift and decisive action.
“We need a clear commitment from Chiltern that East West Rail services will not be Driver Only Operation and that a second safety-critical member of staff will be guaranteed.
“Passengers value the reassurance of having staff onboard, and RMT remains totally opposed to DOO.
“If Chiltern management continue to be unreasonable, we cannot rule out Industrial action to defend this safety-critical role.”
END
23 December 2025
RMT Press Office:
Rail union RMT, will stage a demonstration at 9am on Monday 5 January outside Marylebone station in opposition to plans to introduce Driver Only Operation (DOO) on the new East West Rail line.
The action follows confirmation from Chiltern Railways that it intends to operate services on the new route without a second safety-critical member of staff, despite RMT’s long-standing opposition to DOO.
RMT is clear that a second safety-critical person onboard trains play a vital role in protecting passengers and workers, including providing reassurance, deterring anti-social behaviour, coordinating responses to incidents, managing emergency evacuations and dealing with fires.
The recent mass stabbing on an LNER service at Huntingdon station has once again highlighted the importance of trained staff being present onboard to react quickly, raise the alarm and ensure effective coordination with control, signallers and the British Transport Police.
The union is demanding clear guarantees that East West Rail services operated by Chiltern will not be DOO and that a second safety-critical member of staff will be a mandatory requirement for trains to run.
RMT General Secretary Eddie Dempsey said: “A guaranteed safety-critical second person onboard trains is essential for carrying out a wide range of duties and responding properly to dangerous and fast-moving situations.
“It is vital that any method of dispatch is agreed with the union and properly reflects the safety-critical skills and responsibilities of the second crew member.
“The horrific incident at Huntingdon showed exactly why having trained staff onboard matters.
"The quick actions of the guard and other crew meant the seriousness of the situation was immediately understood by control, signallers and the British Transport Police, allowing swift and decisive action.
“We need a clear commitment from Chiltern that East West Rail services will not be Driver Only Operation and that a second safety-critical member of staff will be guaranteed.
“Passengers value the reassurance of having staff onboard, and RMT remains totally opposed to DOO.
“If Chiltern management continue to be unreasonable, we cannot rule out Industrial action to defend this safety-critical role.”
END
| Re: East-West Rail: Bicester residents call for rail crossing update In "Chiltern Railways services" [370506/27304/44] Posted by ChrisB at 20:01, 3rd January 2026 | ![]() |
From Oxford Mail
Bicester to crowdfund to keep London Road Crossing open
A community is launching an initiative to fund an underpass at a level crossing set for closure as the fight to keep it open continues.
The development of East West Rail, linking Oxford with Cambridge via Milton Keynes and Bedford, will mean the closure of Bicester London Road level crossing due to an increase in the frequency of trains passing through it, prompting the need to find alternative routes for motor vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians.
There are fears that closing the crossing to vehicles would cut the town in two and even result in town centre businesses closing.
In November, East West Railway Company published its latest proposals, which revealed updated designs for both an underpass proposal and an alternative footbridge solution at the crossing.
East West Rail said that an underpass - the design for which includes a single-lane road that could be used by vehicles alongside a protected active travel corridor for pedestrians and cyclists - was the more popular of the two options.
However, this would be subject to securing third-party funding contributions.
Local campaigner of more than a decade and chair of the Langford Village Community Association, Carole Hetherington, said the community will crowdfund in 2026 to raise money for the underpass.
She told this newspaper: "We want to show the Treasury that the people of Bicester are serious about the need for the underpass for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists to keep traffic flowing along London Road, when the crossing closes."
In June, MP for Bicester and Woodstock, Calum Miller, formally presented a petition signed by more than 4,500 residents calling for a fully accessible London Road level crossing in Bicester in the House of Commons.
Ms Hetherington said in 2026, the community is hoping to match the amount of signatures in one-pound donations from Bicester residents through the initiative 'Donate a pound to go Underground'.
She added: "We want to show the treasury, that we have had to crowdfund to raise money, which, in the total cost of the Oxford to Cambridge line, the cost of the underpass, is a small amount of money.
"We believe they should fully fund the underpass."
The strength in feeling was made clear by Bicester residents in 2025 as the town came together to fight to keep the crossing open.
In July, dozens of locals - including wheelchair users, parents with prams, cyclists and others - as well as key campaigners joined a rally at London Road Crossing with signs and banners.
The protest followed the Government’s official response to a public petition calling for an underpass, in which the Department for Transport confirmed that no final decision has been made on the future of the crossing.
And in November, more than 100 Bicester businesses and market traders signed a joint letter to the Treasury urging ministers to back an underpass at London Road.
Reflecting on the past year, Ms Hetherington said: "The remaining frustration has been not getting the full funding from the Treasury.
"This is especially frustrating as the Department of Transport and East West Rail agree that the underpass for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists, is the right solution for Bicester.
"The campaign results this year have been amazing, we have succeeded in moving the department of Transport and East West Rail to being totally behind an underpass for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists for London Road.
"That is a fantastic achievement, I am so proud of Bicester residents for getting behind the campaign and recognising that we need to keep access along London Road as we all know and experience the chaos that results around town when London Road has been closed.
"Our heartfelt thanks must also go to our local MP Calum Miller who has championed the campaign and done amazing work in Parliament on our behalf.
"We would never have got this far without him."
A spokesperson for the Department for Transport said: “We recognise the importance of this crossing in the town.
"East West Rail Co has put forward options for this crossing and will continue to consult on a final proposal next year
A community is launching an initiative to fund an underpass at a level crossing set for closure as the fight to keep it open continues.
The development of East West Rail, linking Oxford with Cambridge via Milton Keynes and Bedford, will mean the closure of Bicester London Road level crossing due to an increase in the frequency of trains passing through it, prompting the need to find alternative routes for motor vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians.
There are fears that closing the crossing to vehicles would cut the town in two and even result in town centre businesses closing.
In November, East West Railway Company published its latest proposals, which revealed updated designs for both an underpass proposal and an alternative footbridge solution at the crossing.
East West Rail said that an underpass - the design for which includes a single-lane road that could be used by vehicles alongside a protected active travel corridor for pedestrians and cyclists - was the more popular of the two options.
However, this would be subject to securing third-party funding contributions.
Local campaigner of more than a decade and chair of the Langford Village Community Association, Carole Hetherington, said the community will crowdfund in 2026 to raise money for the underpass.
She told this newspaper: "We want to show the Treasury that the people of Bicester are serious about the need for the underpass for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists to keep traffic flowing along London Road, when the crossing closes."
In June, MP for Bicester and Woodstock, Calum Miller, formally presented a petition signed by more than 4,500 residents calling for a fully accessible London Road level crossing in Bicester in the House of Commons.
Ms Hetherington said in 2026, the community is hoping to match the amount of signatures in one-pound donations from Bicester residents through the initiative 'Donate a pound to go Underground'.
She added: "We want to show the treasury, that we have had to crowdfund to raise money, which, in the total cost of the Oxford to Cambridge line, the cost of the underpass, is a small amount of money.
"We believe they should fully fund the underpass."
The strength in feeling was made clear by Bicester residents in 2025 as the town came together to fight to keep the crossing open.
In July, dozens of locals - including wheelchair users, parents with prams, cyclists and others - as well as key campaigners joined a rally at London Road Crossing with signs and banners.
The protest followed the Government’s official response to a public petition calling for an underpass, in which the Department for Transport confirmed that no final decision has been made on the future of the crossing.
And in November, more than 100 Bicester businesses and market traders signed a joint letter to the Treasury urging ministers to back an underpass at London Road.
Reflecting on the past year, Ms Hetherington said: "The remaining frustration has been not getting the full funding from the Treasury.
"This is especially frustrating as the Department of Transport and East West Rail agree that the underpass for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists, is the right solution for Bicester.
"The campaign results this year have been amazing, we have succeeded in moving the department of Transport and East West Rail to being totally behind an underpass for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists for London Road.
"That is a fantastic achievement, I am so proud of Bicester residents for getting behind the campaign and recognising that we need to keep access along London Road as we all know and experience the chaos that results around town when London Road has been closed.
"Our heartfelt thanks must also go to our local MP Calum Miller who has championed the campaign and done amazing work in Parliament on our behalf.
"We would never have got this far without him."
A spokesperson for the Department for Transport said: “We recognise the importance of this crossing in the town.
"East West Rail Co has put forward options for this crossing and will continue to consult on a final proposal next year
| Re: Why can't we have trains at Christmas? In "Railway History and related topics" [370505/27018/55] Posted by Oxonhutch at 20:00, 3rd January 2026 | ![]() |
... They can also have their entire signal box operated by one shift of signallers (two I think?, but maybe just one for that one line of route) plus the few drivers required all enter a ballot to earn the generous overtime.
Marylebone Panel is split into two desks - North and South. By Princes Risborough it is under the North desk - as I have dealt with them operating PR Middle (North) Box on behalf of the Chinnor Railway. I think the boundary is somewhere around High Wycombe. With low traffic volumes serving only the Oxford Branch it might be able to operated by one signaller for the two desks, but I cannot be sure and somehow I doubt it.
| Re: Why can't we have trains at Christmas? In "Railway History and related topics" [370504/27018/55] Posted by ChrisB at 19:20, 3rd January 2026 | ![]() |
Chiltern charge off-peak fares, but I suspect have 'sponsorship' from Bicester Village Outlet that covers costs - they certainly did when they started Boxing Day services, and up to recent years.
They can also have their entire signal box operated by one shift of signallers (two I think?, but maybe just one for that one line of route) plus the few drivers required all enter a ballot to earn the generous overtime.














