Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Clockface timetables - a good idea? In "Across the West" [372132/31583/26] Posted by bobm at 16:30, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
Ignore the dash in the rain, where the D1 moves by a few minutes on some hours it can make the connection to the London trains at Bath Spa uncomfortably tight.
| Re: Clockface timetables - a good idea? In "Across the West" [372131/31583/26] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 16:27, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
That all seems perfectly clear to me. [Image from here is not available to guests]
| Clockface timetables - a good idea? In "Across the West" [372130/31583/26] Posted by grahame at 16:17, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
Many public transport services run to what we call a "clock face" timetable - the train or bus goes the same number of minutes after each (or sometime alternate) hour. But some service don't follow that pattern - here's an example

Do members think that clock face timetables are a good idea?
From the BBC:
Petition for rail investment handed to Parliament
[Image from here is not available to guests]
The Tarka Line remains closed after Storm Chandra brought heavy rain last month
A petition calling for investment in a railway line that has been closed since extreme weather damaged tracks has been presented to Parliament.
Ian Roome, the Liberal Democrat MP for North Devon, presented the petition signed by more than 3,000 people calling for action to improve the Tarka Line, which links Barnstaple with Exeter.
Problems on the line included repeated flooding and cancellations - it is currently closed "until further notice" after Storm Chandra brought heavy rain last month. Great Western Railway (GWR) said the line was "at capacity". A Network Rail spokesperson said it had carried out £19m worth of upgrades to the line, but said there was more to be done.
Roome told MPs passengers had "suffered overcrowding and repeated service disruption due to flooding despite a record-breaking one million rail journeys".
"Following Storm Chandra all trains have been cancelled. North Devon's rail link has been shut for over a week and will not resume for several more days," he said. "The petitioners request that the House of Commons urge the government to ask Network Rail and Great Western Railway to prioritise the Tarka Line for improvements and to work together to make rail travel in north Devon more resilient."
He urged residents affected by disruption to continue sharing their experiences to strengthen the case for investment. "Demand for the service has continually grown and it's one of the busiest branch lines anywhere in the South West - it's a lifeline for commuters getting to work, students travelling to college, people attending appointments," he said.
North Devon Council's deputy leader Peter Leaver said the authority was working closely with operators and partners to improve reliability, but it was "increasingly clear" major investment was needed to keep up with demand and make the line more resilient in extreme weather. "That's why this petition really matters, and we hope it builds on the case we've been making for investment."
Tim Steer, the Devon and Cornwall chairman of campaigning group Railfuture, said those relying on the line to get to work, school or health appointments were being "thrown into chaos". "Prolonged disruption is thwarting the continued success of the line," he added.
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Network Rail and GWR said engineers had been "working tirelessly" to fix the issues
Network Rail said upgrades over the last decade included 7.4 miles (12km) of track renewal, bridge replacements, and improvements to the drainage. "Major flood resilience work was carried out at Cowley Junction, where we installed a flood defence barrier that can be deployed when heavy rain is expected," it said. "Prior to the installation of the barrier, we installed large flood drains in this area to allow water to safely drain underneath the railway. While this has improved the resilience of the line, we know that with the increasing frequency of severe weather, there's still more to be done." It said it was trialing new technology to monitor for potential scour damage to bridges and said more work would take place in the spring.
Great Western Railway (GWR) said capacity issues on the line tended to occur at the start of the academic year but it hoped larger Class 175 trains would provide some respite in the short term. "Unfortunately, we can't run more trains because the branch line is at capacity, and we can't run longer trains at the moment because the platforms are not long enough, which is a really expensive solution we would need funding for," a spokesman said. "We are however supportive of campaigns to upgrade the infrastructure of the north Devon line."
[Image from here is not available to guests]
The Tarka Line remains closed after Storm Chandra brought heavy rain last month
A petition calling for investment in a railway line that has been closed since extreme weather damaged tracks has been presented to Parliament.
Ian Roome, the Liberal Democrat MP for North Devon, presented the petition signed by more than 3,000 people calling for action to improve the Tarka Line, which links Barnstaple with Exeter.
Problems on the line included repeated flooding and cancellations - it is currently closed "until further notice" after Storm Chandra brought heavy rain last month. Great Western Railway (GWR) said the line was "at capacity". A Network Rail spokesperson said it had carried out £19m worth of upgrades to the line, but said there was more to be done.
Roome told MPs passengers had "suffered overcrowding and repeated service disruption due to flooding despite a record-breaking one million rail journeys".
"Following Storm Chandra all trains have been cancelled. North Devon's rail link has been shut for over a week and will not resume for several more days," he said. "The petitioners request that the House of Commons urge the government to ask Network Rail and Great Western Railway to prioritise the Tarka Line for improvements and to work together to make rail travel in north Devon more resilient."
He urged residents affected by disruption to continue sharing their experiences to strengthen the case for investment. "Demand for the service has continually grown and it's one of the busiest branch lines anywhere in the South West - it's a lifeline for commuters getting to work, students travelling to college, people attending appointments," he said.
North Devon Council's deputy leader Peter Leaver said the authority was working closely with operators and partners to improve reliability, but it was "increasingly clear" major investment was needed to keep up with demand and make the line more resilient in extreme weather. "That's why this petition really matters, and we hope it builds on the case we've been making for investment."
Tim Steer, the Devon and Cornwall chairman of campaigning group Railfuture, said those relying on the line to get to work, school or health appointments were being "thrown into chaos". "Prolonged disruption is thwarting the continued success of the line," he added.
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Network Rail and GWR said engineers had been "working tirelessly" to fix the issues
Network Rail said upgrades over the last decade included 7.4 miles (12km) of track renewal, bridge replacements, and improvements to the drainage. "Major flood resilience work was carried out at Cowley Junction, where we installed a flood defence barrier that can be deployed when heavy rain is expected," it said. "Prior to the installation of the barrier, we installed large flood drains in this area to allow water to safely drain underneath the railway. While this has improved the resilience of the line, we know that with the increasing frequency of severe weather, there's still more to be done." It said it was trialing new technology to monitor for potential scour damage to bridges and said more work would take place in the spring.
Great Western Railway (GWR) said capacity issues on the line tended to occur at the start of the academic year but it hoped larger Class 175 trains would provide some respite in the short term. "Unfortunately, we can't run more trains because the branch line is at capacity, and we can't run longer trains at the moment because the platforms are not long enough, which is a really expensive solution we would need funding for," a spokesman said. "We are however supportive of campaigns to upgrade the infrastructure of the north Devon line."
This topic has been moved to Buses and other ways to travel, where other ferry issues are being discussed.
https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=27000.0
| Re: Changes to services at Maidenhead In "London to Reading" [372127/31563/7] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:25, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
[Image from here is not available to guests]
| MOVED: WEMCA to improve Bristol-Bath cycle path In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [372126/31581/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:18, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
This topic has been moved to Bristol (WECA, now WEMCA) Commuters and merged with an existing topic there.
https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=31452.msg372107#msg372107
| Re: Leicestershire councillor says bid to restore Ivanhoe rail line is 'dead' In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [372125/31575/28] Posted by Mark A at 15:18, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
The text from a recent debate at Westminster.
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2026-01-28a.450.0
A conversation elsewhere recently raised the potential of a flyover at that missing junction to take trains off the branch & above the industrial units - and the MML running lines - dropping down and be plumbed into the slow line(s) for onward travel to Leicester. There's several factors that work in favour of this, even if it's a bit like borrowing 'LSWR best practice'.
Back-of-the-envelope calculations indicate that in terms of distances and gradients, the space is available, the overhead constraints allow for a flyover**, much of the land is in railway ownership, and this would even improve on the vanished 1960s arrangement which dropped the branch trains into the fast lines of what was a four track railway.
Mark
** On the approach from Leicester, unless I have it completely wrong, a 1:50 gradient from the exit to the tunnel would be needed to give the flyover, at a distance of 0.2Km a 5 metre clearance above the current railway. The western flyover approach, with no existing overbridges, is more straigntforward.
[Edit to add the distance that that 1:50 gradient would need to run.]
| Re: Changes to services at maidenhead In "London to Reading" [372124/31563/7] Posted by NickB at 14:52, 6th February 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
I’ve received a reply from GWR confirming the same.
It only took the full length of the engineering works for GWR to respond
| Re: Leicestershire councillor says bid to restore Ivanhoe rail line is 'dead' In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [372123/31575/28] Posted by Noggin at 14:08, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
To add context, even though it would appear to be a no-brainer at first glance (existing railway, connecting outlying towns to county town, M1 park & ride potential etc), IIRC the problem is that there's no northbound access to the MML.
So as well as the line rebuild, resignalling, stations etc, they'd have to CPO a chunk of industrial estate to build a north-bound chord onto the MML. As if that wasn't enough, I suspect that in order to provide sufficient line capacity, it would be necessary to restore one, if not both of the lines between the junction and Leicester station with a station throat rebuild and all the costs that would entail.
Whilst the line *could perhaps* terminate at Coalville, South Wigston or a new Leicester South station, the reality is that the business case probably doesn't stack up, as the majority of users likely wanting to go to Leicester, with an express bus being faster. Not to mention the negative PR.
If I was Leicester City Council I'd be focusing my energies and political capital on getting Wigston Jcn to Syston Jcn wired plus any MML capacity improvements thet can be eked out. Once that's done, a whole bunch of infill electrification gains a much better BCR, services can be sped up, EMT and XC have a better case for battery-electric units, case for Coventry-Leicester improves etc.
https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/extending-the-ivanhoe-line-restoration-to-leicester-could-cost-additional-271m-09-11-2023/
Luckily two failed 175s are parked up there. Not sure if they have been removed today.
175002 had locked brakes. !75011 sent to rescue but on coupling up developed the same fault.
| Re: Can you find the 40 British railway station names hidden in our puzzle? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [372118/31556/51] Posted by Clan Line at 12:02, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
Strawberry Hill - James Hill plays for Bournemouth FC
| Re: Bristol and Bath Railway Path - incidents In "Bristol (WECA, now WEMCA) Commuters" [372115/31452/21] Posted by johnneyw at 10:43, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
I hope that CCTV along the "Wild West" stretch of the cycle path (as I've heard it described before) will help and not just end up as something vandalized or thieved. The current situation there certainly is of concern to me, although I use that part of the route very rarely anyway.
| Re: Cross-Solent ferries, between Hampshire and the Isle of Wight - merged topics, ongoing discussion In "Buses and other ways to travel" [372111/27000/5] Posted by grahame at 08:49, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
From Facebook
Today I received the following from Red Funnel .
Dear Malcolm,
We wanted to provide you with an important update regarding The Hythe and Southampton Ferry Company.
As you know, the Hythe Ferry is an iconic and historic transport link, and since acquiring the business in September 2023, Red Funnel’s goal has been to maintain this vital service. During this time, we operated over 5,500 sailings and carried more than 70,000 passengers, ensuring connectivity at a time when the route might otherwise have ended.
Significant investment has been made, including a full vessel refit, pontoon repairs and ongoing operational costs. However, despite these efforts and extensive work to secure additional funding, the service has remained suspended since August 2024 due to infrastructure challenges and funding constraints. Added to this, changes in commuter travel patterns and the Government’s bus cap scheme impacted passenger numbers.
Although Njord partners are delighted to have acquired SIOW late September 2025 and recognises The Hythe Ferry as a vital and historic transport link, it does not consider itself as the best suited partner for this operation, moving forward.
Looking ahead, we are now actively seeking a new owner who shares our vision to restore, modernise and unlock the full potential of this historic route. This is an exciting opportunity to bring innovation and technology to a well-established service with strong local heritage and community support.
Interested parties should contact enquiries@hytheferry.co.uk for more information by 19th February 2026. In the interest for all parties, it is expected that this process is completed within a rapid timeline.
We continue to work closely with the Hythe Pier Company during this transition and remain committed to supporting colleagues.
While it is disappointing that more progress could not be made to resume the service, we remain hopeful that, with a new investor, the Hythe Ferry will be preserved and developed for generations to come.
Thank you for your continued support. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Now we know the situation we must work out how to get the ferry back up and running
Dear Malcolm,
We wanted to provide you with an important update regarding The Hythe and Southampton Ferry Company.
As you know, the Hythe Ferry is an iconic and historic transport link, and since acquiring the business in September 2023, Red Funnel’s goal has been to maintain this vital service. During this time, we operated over 5,500 sailings and carried more than 70,000 passengers, ensuring connectivity at a time when the route might otherwise have ended.
Significant investment has been made, including a full vessel refit, pontoon repairs and ongoing operational costs. However, despite these efforts and extensive work to secure additional funding, the service has remained suspended since August 2024 due to infrastructure challenges and funding constraints. Added to this, changes in commuter travel patterns and the Government’s bus cap scheme impacted passenger numbers.
Although Njord partners are delighted to have acquired SIOW late September 2025 and recognises The Hythe Ferry as a vital and historic transport link, it does not consider itself as the best suited partner for this operation, moving forward.
Looking ahead, we are now actively seeking a new owner who shares our vision to restore, modernise and unlock the full potential of this historic route. This is an exciting opportunity to bring innovation and technology to a well-established service with strong local heritage and community support.
Interested parties should contact enquiries@hytheferry.co.uk for more information by 19th February 2026. In the interest for all parties, it is expected that this process is completed within a rapid timeline.
We continue to work closely with the Hythe Pier Company during this transition and remain committed to supporting colleagues.
While it is disappointing that more progress could not be made to resume the service, we remain hopeful that, with a new investor, the Hythe Ferry will be preserved and developed for generations to come.
Thank you for your continued support. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Now we know the situation we must work out how to get the ferry back up and running
Any interested parties ... to contact the company with a view to helping take it over from a parent that wants to give it up for adoption ... by 19th February
| Re: London bus driver sacked after chasing and punching thief - 25 June 2024 In "Transport for London" [372110/31547/46] Posted by TaplowGreen at 08:47, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
I'm posting here my own personal opinion - not as an administrator, and not representing any official view from the Coffee Shop forum:
As Mark Hehir has been so well supported by members of the public and politicians of all parties, it would be good to see him return to his skilled role as a qualified bus driver - but not with Metroline. 'Other bus company operators are available'.
CfN. [Image from here is not available to guests]
As Mark Hehir has been so well supported by members of the public and politicians of all parties, it would be good to see him return to his skilled role as a qualified bus driver - but not with Metroline. 'Other bus company operators are available'.
CfN. [Image from here is not available to guests]
Excellent suggestion - he'd be an asset to the industry.
That said, the pressure building on Metroline from all quarters to do the right thing is increasing every day.....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c78e2j2n2e9o
| Re: OTD - 6th Feb (2021) - Document Archive added to forum In "News, Help and Assistance" [372108/25986/29] Posted by grahame at 08:24, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
There are - a year on - 1814 searchable .pdf files there, of which 950 are also indexed (that means they come up with a subject and date when they match). 105 of the documents are whitelisted (guests as well as members can read then); most of the rest are available to any logged in member.
See whole whitelist at http://www.passenger.chat/whitelist.html
See whole whitelist at http://www.passenger.chat/whitelist.html
There are now around 1400 (950 reported above) .pdf documents in the searchable archive, and hundreds more locked documents which are read-only and can be found when original web sites go away. Around 200 (105 reported above) documents are whitelisted and available to all comers, with the rest of the archive, and (now) the search facility being here for members only.
The whole white list is now https not http - https://www.passenger.chat/whitelist.html
| Re: Bristol and Bath Railway Path - incidents In "Bristol (WECA, now WEMCA) Commuters" [372107/31452/21] Posted by John D at 08:24, 6th February 2026 | ![]() |
WEMCA to improve Bristol-Bath cycle path, installing some cctv cameras, fixing some pinch points. They have allocated £450,000
The path is along the old Midlands railway route
https://www.westofengland-ca.gov.uk/news/funding-allocated-for-improvements-on-bristol-and-bath-railway-path/
| Re: Can you find the 40 British railway station names hidden in our puzzle? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [372103/31556/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 23:58, 5th February 2026 | ![]() |
Thanks, TonyN. [Image from here is not available to guests]
Having added those, we are now up to 44 of 40 - so clearly a few of them are just 'red herrings'. [Image from here is not available to guests]
Can we identify them?














