Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: IEP seats in 2025 In "Across the West" [368940/29826/26] Posted by Mark A at 13:38, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
I never thought that photos of decayed upholstery stuffing could qualify as astonishing and then... these photos of yours.
Totally guessing here: that looks to be a polyurethane ether foam that's suffered chemical instability. Specifically, it has oxidised, and the changes in its chemistry have destroyed the physical integrity of the material. Perhaps the material was defective from the time it was manufactured, or it's possible that it's not withstood whatever cleaning regime is used on the seats - this might involve steam cleaning + chemicals that have oxidised the padding.
Comfort aside, there's the DVT risk (something that is real even if the airlines have successfully batted away several legal cases brought by passengers). For good measure, some of the decay products of this sort of foam are toxic.
Mark
| Re: New station at Ashley Down, Bristol In "Bristol (WECA) Commuters" [368939/24045/21] Posted by WelshBluebird at 13:27, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
So station usage estimates are out (already a thread about it in the other section here). Roughly 50k for Ashley Down based on what is probably around half a year of it being open, so ~100k if you were to assume the same usage patterns over a full year period. Do we know how that compares to the estimates and business case prior to opening?
Initially it sounds a bit low to me (especially when compared to Montpellier a 20 minute walk away at over 300k), but then in that comparison Ashley Down has a much less frequent service, with much later first trains and earlier last trains, a Sunday service may aswell not exist half the time given GWR's Sunday issues and of course it is still a new station so people will be finding out about it etc. So maybe its actually doing well considering all that!
| Looking to reopen the spur to Falmouth docks In "Media about railways, and other means of transport" [368938/31206/49] Posted by old original at 13:11, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
Stronger than a rumour so I thought I'd put it here....
https://www.falmouthpacket.co.uk/news/25669640.agenda-reopening-branch-line-spur-falmouth-docks/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1764828103
| Re: Coffeeshop Map 4-12-25 In "The Lighter Side" [368937/31199/30] Posted by Mark A at 12:57, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
Ah, it *is* a portent then, and a terrible one. At least, it is if the 'Flooding' is tidal.
Mark
| Re: Cars getting bigger - is this a concern? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [368936/31190/5] Posted by CyclingSid at 12:39, 4th December 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
Yes it is a concern for vulnerable road users and young people
https://bsky.app/profile/canseengland.bsky.social/post/3m72vixwln226
Surprisingly most of the research supporting this has been done in America. Don't tell King Donald, or maybe that is why he has a down on universities.
| Two Swindon Borough Council-owned vans clamped in £138,000 permit mix-up In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368935/31205/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 12:06, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
From the BBC:

Swindon Borough Council-owned vans were clamped in the authority's own car park
Two council vans were clamped after the local authority failed to secure the correct parking permits for them.
Swindon Borough Council had to spend £138,000 to cover County Court Judgements as a result of the mistake, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
The two vans were clamped while parked outside the council-owned Civic Offices on Euclid Street.
Emma Bushell, deputy leader at the council, said: "Clearly, this has not been the council's finest hour. We regret this has happened, and will strive to ensure it doesn't happen again."
Ms Bushell was speaking to councillors as part of a debate on a motion put forward by the Conservative group's deputy leader councillor Dale Heenan.
He told the chamber he did some digging and found the authority had been issued fines between March and August totalling £138,000. He added: "This is not normal. It does not normally happen in this authority."
Councillor Bushell said the fines, which caused the action taken by bailiffs, were paid "immediately, and the vehicles were unclamped". She explained that the incident occurred because the staff member responsible for handling permits had been unwell for an extended period. She added: "Absolutely the council's mistake, our fault entirely."
Councillor Bushell said the council's chief executive and its head of finance had already instructed the internal audit team to conduct an investigation into the matter, to ensure it could not happen again.
| Re: ORR station usage data In "Across the West" [368934/31203/26] Posted by John D at 11:56, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
As for Bath Spa? 77th busiest station in the whole country. I can only see one busier one (outside of central London) with only two platforms...can anyone guess which it is?
Appears to be Moorfields in Liverpool
| with a Melksham bias - Office of Road and Rail - station use stats 2024/5 In "TransWilts line" [368933/31204/18] Posted by grahame at 11:50, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
So passenger numbers at Melksham Station have dropped from 63,350 in the year 2023/24 to 60,930 in the year 2024/25.
Disappointing when passenger numbers across the UK have increase by 7% over the year.
Why might the Melksham figure have fallen?
1. Trains were good as suspended during engineering works at Westbury from 24th December 2024 to 24th January 2025. Without that suspension, passenger journeys would have been just over 66,000. Replacement buses ran well in the circumstances, but a bus service taking several times as long as the train is no substitute, and only a tiny proportion of people used them.
2. When the services did run, they were very much prone to cancellation. If you look at ((this thread)) where we kept an eye on performance you'll find no less that 808 posts for 2024 - and we are up to 772 already this year. This reflects an ongoing issue with cancellations, and it's little wonder that people don't buy tickets for trains that aren't running. The cancellation rate on-the-day is in excess of 10%, and that does not take into account the engineering works mentions in (1) just above
3. Community promotion of Melksham’s train service has been muted last year and this. Whilst the service has been useable for regular passengers who know what they are doing and have a “Plan B” and understanding boss, we at MTUG have been very limited is suggesting try-it-out trips with the risk of people being disappointed and put off for years. And I have not seen any general promotions in our area from Community Rail. In hindsight, the sad decisions not to market were correct, bearing in mind some of the stories I have heard.
I am actually amazed at how robust the figures are. That's probably because Melksham's train service provides a lifeline to many of its users - it is nothing like as much a leisure / optional market here as it is in so many other places.
From April this year until November, reliability issues were serious with far too many cancellations, and with trains declared as cancelled but then re-instated - sometimes with little or no notice, and running nearly empty. So the figures we see next year are also likely to be disappointing. However, the problems are at long last being noticed, it appears, by people who have some ability to give us a level playing field and I would hope to see them improve. Having said which, 60,000 journeys is still twenty times the numbers given to me of around 3,000 when I first asked "how many people use Melksham Station". We are up from ten to two hundred journeys a day.
Numbers should be far higher. And there is opportunity. Once people have a product that is useful and they can rely on. At 9 trains a day each way, it is useful but thin. It's the reliability that's needed back - with the provision of an appropriate alternative on the very rare occasions when things go wrong. I hope we don't hear "oops - we've not got a driver" or "oops - we've not actually got a working train" in 2026!

From a Facebook post:
From the Office of Rail and Road, published 4 December 2025
"Estimates of station usage April 2024 to March 2025"
"In Great Britain, 2,589 stations were served by mainline rail services as at 31 March 2025, including six new stations which opened during the year."
"A total of 1,730 million passenger rail journeys were made between April 2024 and March 2025. This is an increase of 7% from the 1,610 million journeys made in the previous year (April 2023 to March 2024)."
What do the statistics show for our home town of Melksham? Here are the figures published for the last 28 years to those just published for the year from April 2024 to March 2025, showing a fall of 3000 journeys. Analysis to follow
Melksham - station code MKM - Wiltshire
1997 to 2000 3868 3388 3635
2000 to 2005 3266 13695 19143 23294e 27446
2005 to 2010 24426 22001 38081 27656 10028
2010 to 2015 11046 11326 12080 23930 51858
2015 to 2020 60676 74666 74220 74534 75292
2020 to 2025 18800 52342 64206 63350 60930
e - estimated by myself not the ORR
https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/media/msigcn24/station-usage-2024-25-statistical-release.pdf
"Estimates of station usage April 2024 to March 2025"
"In Great Britain, 2,589 stations were served by mainline rail services as at 31 March 2025, including six new stations which opened during the year."
"A total of 1,730 million passenger rail journeys were made between April 2024 and March 2025. This is an increase of 7% from the 1,610 million journeys made in the previous year (April 2023 to March 2024)."
What do the statistics show for our home town of Melksham? Here are the figures published for the last 28 years to those just published for the year from April 2024 to March 2025, showing a fall of 3000 journeys. Analysis to follow
Melksham - station code MKM - Wiltshire
1997 to 2000 3868 3388 3635
2000 to 2005 3266 13695 19143 23294e 27446
2005 to 2010 24426 22001 38081 27656 10028
2010 to 2015 11046 11326 12080 23930 51858
2015 to 2020 60676 74666 74220 74534 75292
2020 to 2025 18800 52342 64206 63350 60930
e - estimated by myself not the ORR
https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/media/msigcn24/station-usage-2024-25-statistical-release.pdf
| Re: Cardiff Central station - redevelopments and improvements In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368932/30018/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 11:31, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Major revamp of Wales' busiest station gets go-ahead

Plans for a major revamp of Wales' busiest railway station have received final approval.
The £140m upgrades to Cardiff Central - including a new brick arch rear entrance, larger concourse and improved waiting areas - aim to support passenger growth and reduce overcrowding.
Better accessibility for people with reduced mobility and additional retail and cycle facilities are also among the changes.
Work is due to start in the middle of next year with the aim of completing most of it within three years. The station will remain open during the works.
Around 35,000 passengers a day use the station, which increases during concerts and rugby internationals, the Department for Transport said.
The scheme is being led by Transport for Wales, with the funding made up of £78m from the UK Department for Transport (DfT), £40m from the Cardiff Capital Region City Deal and £21m from the Welsh government.
The DfT money is part of £445m for rail improvements across Wales announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves' spending review in June.
UK Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the changes would "transform the experience of the millions of passengers who use the station every year", while also improving connectivity with "the rest of Wales and beyond".

Welsh government Transport Secretary Ken Skates welcomed a "major milestone" to upgrade the station, which he said was a "key hub" on the South Wales Metro, which includes a promise to provide twice the number of services, as well as new stations.
He said the investment would "modernise and enhance the station, benefitting passengers and accommodating our ambitions for long term growth".
Skates added that the newly revamped Wales Rail Board would also meet for the first time on Thursday to "discuss future projects such as this and relevant funding".
Cardiff Central station opened in 1850 as Cardiff station, was renamed Cardiff General in 1924 and was given its current name in 1973.
(BBC article continues)

Plans for a major revamp of Wales' busiest railway station have received final approval.
The £140m upgrades to Cardiff Central - including a new brick arch rear entrance, larger concourse and improved waiting areas - aim to support passenger growth and reduce overcrowding.
Better accessibility for people with reduced mobility and additional retail and cycle facilities are also among the changes.
Work is due to start in the middle of next year with the aim of completing most of it within three years. The station will remain open during the works.
Around 35,000 passengers a day use the station, which increases during concerts and rugby internationals, the Department for Transport said.
The scheme is being led by Transport for Wales, with the funding made up of £78m from the UK Department for Transport (DfT), £40m from the Cardiff Capital Region City Deal and £21m from the Welsh government.
The DfT money is part of £445m for rail improvements across Wales announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves' spending review in June.
UK Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the changes would "transform the experience of the millions of passengers who use the station every year", while also improving connectivity with "the rest of Wales and beyond".

Welsh government Transport Secretary Ken Skates welcomed a "major milestone" to upgrade the station, which he said was a "key hub" on the South Wales Metro, which includes a promise to provide twice the number of services, as well as new stations.
He said the investment would "modernise and enhance the station, benefitting passengers and accommodating our ambitions for long term growth".
Skates added that the newly revamped Wales Rail Board would also meet for the first time on Thursday to "discuss future projects such as this and relevant funding".
Cardiff Central station opened in 1850 as Cardiff station, was renamed Cardiff General in 1924 and was given its current name in 1973.
(BBC article continues)
| Re: ORR station usage data In "Across the West" [368931/31203/26] Posted by grahame at 11:29, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
Some very impressive (and slightly surprising) leaps.
I guess the combination of the return of many office workers, the continued explosion of leisure travel and other more minor factors such as the end of industrial action have all played their part?
Imagine how the numbers would stack up if the railway were providing a better and more consistent service - cue Graham to talk about the slight drop at Melksham, but there are other examples too, such as the generally 'meh' service Chiltern now provide leading to stagnat figures at Oxford Parkway.
As for Bath Spa? 77th busiest station in the whole country. I can only see one busier one (outside of central London) with only two platforms...can anyone guess which it is?
I guess the combination of the return of many office workers, the continued explosion of leisure travel and other more minor factors such as the end of industrial action have all played their part?
Imagine how the numbers would stack up if the railway were providing a better and more consistent service - cue Graham to talk about the slight drop at Melksham, but there are other examples too, such as the generally 'meh' service Chiltern now provide leading to stagnat figures at Oxford Parkway.
As for Bath Spa? 77th busiest station in the whole country. I can only see one busier one (outside of central London) with only two platforms...can anyone guess which it is?
Separate thread ... in preparation
for local circulation| Re: Passengers locked inside Hartlepool station In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368930/31200/51] Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:28, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
Yes, commendable actions from the train crew.
| Re: ORR station usage data In "Across the West" [368929/31203/26] Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:26, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
Some very impressive (and slightly surprising) leaps.
I guess the combination of the return of many office workers, the continued explosion of leisure travel and other more minor factors such as the end of industrial action have all played their part?
Imagine how the numbers would stack up if the railway were providing a better and more consistent service - cue Graham to talk about the slight drop at Melksham, but there are other examples too, such as the generally 'meh' service Chiltern now provide leading to stagnat figures at Oxford Parkway.
As for Bath Spa? 77th busiest station in the whole country. I can only see one busier one (outside of central London) with only two platforms...can anyone guess which it is?
| Re: ORR station usage data In "Across the West" [368928/31203/26] Posted by Red Squirrel at 10:48, 4th December 2025 Already liked by lympstone_commuter | ![]() |
Yes - looking pretty good in the Bristol area too!
| Re: Traffic delays in Bristol as bus gets stuck on tight bend - December 2025 In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368927/31192/31] Posted by rogerw at 10:29, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
I think that the bus driver had attempted to turn his vehicle, realising he had gone the wrong way. Cleeve Wood Road is wide enough for a bus.
| Re: ORR station usage data In "Across the West" [368926/31203/26] Posted by lympstone_commuter at 10:21, 4th December 2025 Already liked by IndustryInsider, John D | ![]() |
I have just used the fresh data to update the maps of station usage here: https://timjupp.github.io/stations.html
"Map 1" gives the long-term trend since 1998.
"Map 2" shows (as black dots) the stations for which 2024 - 25 was their best ever year. There are a lot of them, especially in our region.
| ORR station usage data In "Across the West" [368925/31203/26] Posted by John D at 10:17, 4th December 2025 Already liked by lympstone_commuter, GBM | ![]() |
ORR has just published station usage data, and at the end has regional busiest stations
Bristol Temple Meads 10.9m
Bath Spa 9.5m
Swindon 3.2m
Exeter Central 3.0m
Exeter St Davids 2.9m
Others not in South West top 5
London Paddington 69.9m
Reading 14.3m
Cardiff Central 12.5m
https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/media/msigcn24/station-usage-2024-25-statistical-release.pdf
For those who like to do pre-covid comparisons, the 2018-2019 report is here
https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/media/1668/estimates-of-station-usage-2018-19-factsheet.pdf
The link to ORR data page with links to to the data spreadsheets is here (not yet looked) but could check rank of your local station or its change
https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/usage/estimates-of-station-usage
Edit : just looked up some figures from 2018-19 which shows big jump on some stations eg
Bath Spa was 6.538m
Exeter St Davids 2.619m
But others less important eg
Reading was 17.08m
Swindon was 3.75m
(perhaps few more trains need to skip these if usage down)
| Re: Historic black and white pictures - where were they taken? - 3.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [368924/31189/30] Posted by grahame at 09:44, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
7 Peter West OBE - named class 150 units - sorry wrong thread!
Right answer .. wrong question
. Peter's role in the DfT was one I do not envy him - I am leaving the double post here though as a "tip of the hat" in respect to a gentleman with whom we didn't / don't always see eye to eye with, but for whom, never the less, I hold a great respect.| John Ingram - chair of WWRUG, 2008-2010, RIP In "Who's who on Western railways" [368923/31202/2] Posted by grahame at 09:11, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
I was sad to learn over the weekend of the passing of John Ingram (at the age of 90), chair of the West Wiltshire Rail Users Group from around 2008 to 2010. John was a gentleman, and a good friend and supporter of public transport in the area.
From April 2009 - a typical practical but positive campaigning contribution to a press release https://www.passenger.chat/r4498.html - "First Great Western have improved many of their services that pass through Wiltshire in the last two year" say John Ingram, Chairman and Warminster Committee representative at the West Wilts Rail Users Group, "but the service linking the main Wiltshire Towns remains unfit for purpose, and dramatically worse than it was three years ago. The proposals are eminently practical and are what are needed to get the service up and running again."
Thank you to John's son Richard for letting me know; the WWRUG committee which met last night passes on it condolences to John's family and friends. Fond memories and John was a rock who will be sorely missed.
| Re: AQ - Which is next in the sequence? In "The Lighter Side" [368922/31198/30] Posted by eightonedee at 09:02, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
Try again, 7 Peter West OBE, named class 150 units.
| Re: Historic black and white pictures - where were they taken? - 3.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [368921/31189/30] Posted by eightonedee at 08:59, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
7 Peter West OBE - named class 150 units - sorry wrong thread!
| Re: AQ - Which is next in the sequence? In "The Lighter Side" [368920/31198/30] Posted by PrestburyRoad at 08:51, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
6. I guess that this this might be Southern Region headcodes
| Re: AQ - Which is next in the sequence? In "The Lighter Side" [368919/31198/30] Posted by matth1j at 08:37, 4th December 2025 Already liked by grahame | ![]() |
4. CM
Objective - to attend a meeting in Trowbridge at 5 p.m. yesterday, lasting just over 2 hours. Google tells me it's 6.8 miles from my home in Melksham to the venue, and will take me 15 minutes. Except, I'm not driving if I can help it. Trowbridge has a population of 46,000 and Melksham 29,000.
How did that work by public transport
Outbound
I left home at 16:00 and walked into the Town Centre (5 minutes) for the 16:18 bus to Trowbridge. This is from one of two bus stops in Melksham that has a real time departure display and it indicated that was expected in 25 minutes (so a bit late). As it's after 09:00 in Wiltshire, I was able to use my senior bus pass; noted that very few passengers were using such cards. Due at the stop at Trowbridge at 16:48, actually pulled up there at 17:00, walked into meeting 5 minutes late. Not a problem being slightly delayed for this particular meeting - if that had been a concern I would have travelled just over half an hour earlier.
The meeting was attended by people from various West Wiltshire towns and finished at 19:15. "What train did you catch to get here" asked H. "I didn't - I came by bus". Oh "When is your next bus back" asked H. "It would be tomorrow morning - I'm going home by train".
Inbound

But the next train after 19:15 wasn't due for almost an hour, and I took myself to the Rose and Crown ... a pint of apple and blackcurrant cider, an exchange of banter with the barmaid, and a warm seat within site of the train departure display they have there while I worked on my laptop.
20:12 to Cheltenham Spa showing on time as I left at 20:00 to walk across to the station. At 20:05, train showing "On Time".
Needed a ticket. Ticket office closed. Warning signs up about this being a penalty fare station. The lowest cost single - £3.30 on a disabled rail card - required 17 button presses (OK - screen touches) with prior knowledge of where to find that fare, and choices like anytime v off peak, even though I know that the last peak train had left 12 hours ago.
Person on platform looks to use loos but finds them locked.
At around 20:07, train moves from "On Time" (20:12) to 20:13 and then each minute passing slips a minute later until it shows 20:17. ((a few minutes is no worry to me)). Then it switched to say "Delayed".
Tannoy announcement "We are sorry that the 20:12 to Cheltenham Spa via Melksham is delayed. Your next fastest train will be the 21:22 from Platform 1". Oops
Another passenger looks panicked. I ask her if she's waiting for the Cheltenham Spa train and she confirms that she is, and I re-assure her that the 20:12 (and it's now after that) will probably be along ... probably held up at Westbury awaiting the connection from London.
Screen changes from "Delayed" to 20:17 ... and at around 20:17 it pulls in. Passengers on and off. Train manager walks up outside train to nudge door - perhaps it had not fully closed, and we're off. No ticket check, no sight of train manager who stayed in rear cab. No problem, except the whole experience felt very lonely.
Arrived into Melksham. Four people waiting on platform, four more got off. I had not walked through the 3 carriage train to do a count, but past form suggests that this is the quietest train of the day, and that for each passenger using Melksham station there are two through passengers, suggestion [24/8] on our standard measurement.
No barrier checks at Melksham. One car in the short term pickup at Melksham, everyone else on foot. Six minibuses, a van and a car in the station car park, none of which showed signs of having arrived for this train and none of which left at that point. Real Time Trains shows a 2 minute stop at Melksham with the train leaving 7 minutes late at 20:29.
Walk home, arrived 20:50. The worried passenger from Trowbridge had alighted at Melksham and was walking out a couple of miles to her village.
Why document this? Because it shows some of the challenges of using public transport - some of which really should not be challenges. I know that the bus is a good way to get to Trowbridge for an evening meeting but I need to take the train back. I know the fare base and where the best value is hidden. I know to go to the loo before I leave the Rose and Crown. I know that this train is often delayed as it waits for the connection from London (and, yes, it is right to do so) and that can lead to some off-putting announcements. And I know that I'll be walking through the industrial area in Melksham watching for vehicles as I follow the path painted across the forecourt / turning point at the station.
Apart from the delay and much longer journey, the bus works well during operating hours, and was quite busy - kinda wonder where you’re going when you pass the Red Admiral, go all around a roundabout and the back past it ... and where you the turn right towards Hilperton when the road signs say left for Trowbridge. This is the cost of a local bus servicing all the communities along the way, picking up and dropping off people here and there who together make for a viable opertion.
| Re: Historic black and white pictures - where were they taken? - 3.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [368917/31189/30] Posted by bradshaw at 08:29, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
4 Logging railway in Alaska
Date early, 1920s or 30s perhaps
Pretty poor.
https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/25670532.northern-apologises-passengers-locked-hartlepool-station/
https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/25670532.northern-apologises-passengers-locked-hartlepool-station/
"Horror" story of security company locking the station before the late running last train had arrived.
Operator Northern has apologised and said the error was due to a security guard from a third-party contractor who locked up without checking the last train had arrived.
Claire told The Northern Echo: “We walked to the door and it didn’t open.
“Me and another passenger ran back to tell the driver and conductor that we’d been locked in, because the main ticket stations at Hartlepool closes early in the evening and the last door is locked after the final train.
She added: “They were amazing and stayed for the full 40 minutes.”
Claire also explained that it was “well-documented” the train was running late.
Claire told The Northern Echo: “We walked to the door and it didn’t open.
“Me and another passenger ran back to tell the driver and conductor that we’d been locked in, because the main ticket stations at Hartlepool closes early in the evening and the last door is locked after the final train.
She added: “They were amazing and stayed for the full 40 minutes.”
Claire also explained that it was “well-documented” the train was running late.
I ... highlight ... the quality of care from the train crew. Northern should be proud of them, having said which I find 90% of the time that railway professionals do take that extra care of customers in extraordinary circumstances. Heartening.
| Re: AQ - Which is next in the sequence? In "The Lighter Side" [368915/31198/30] Posted by bradshaw at 08:25, 4th December 2025 Already liked by grahame | ![]() |
2 D804 Avenger
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025 In "London to the Cotswolds" [368914/29711/14] Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 07:48, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
Thursday December 4
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington due 08:24 will no longer call at Honeybourne.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Last Updated:04/12/2025 06:03
This is due to a fault on this train.
Last Updated:04/12/2025 06:03
| Passengers locked inside Hartlepool station In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368913/31200/51] Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:36, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
Pretty poor.
https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/25670532.northern-apologises-passengers-locked-hartlepool-station/
| Re: Coffeeshop Map 4-12-25 In "The Lighter Side" [368912/31199/30] Posted by grahame at 07:23, 4th December 2025 | ![]() |
The map's drawn a strange glyph over Cornwall. Perhaps it's a portent of some significant event.
Mark

Mark

Alterations to services between Liskeard and Looe
Due to heavy rain flooding the railway between Liskeard and Looe the line is disrupted.
Train services running to and from these stations have been suspended. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Due to heavy rain flooding the railway between Liskeard and Looe the line is disrupted.
Train services running to and from these stations have been suspended. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
06:55 Liskeard to Looe due 07:25
07:33 Looe to Liskeard due 08:02
08:16 Liskeard to Looe due 08:49
09:02 Looe to Liskeard due 09:34
09:37 Liskeard to Looe due 10:07
10:09 Looe to Liskeard due 10:38
10:48 Liskeard to Looe due 11:16
11:18 Looe to Liskeard due 11:43
11:54 Liskeard to Looe due 12:24
12:26 Looe to Liskeard due 12:55
12:57 Liskeard to Looe due 13:27
13:29 Looe to Liskeard due 13:55
13:58 Liskeard to Looe due 14:31
14:34 Looe to Liskeard due 15:06
15:15 Liskeard to Looe due 15:43
15:45 Looe to Liskeard due 16:13
16:18 Liskeard to Looe due 16:48
16:50 Looe to Liskeard due 17:15
17:19 Liskeard to Looe due 17:47
17:49 Looe to Liskeard due 18:18
18:24 Liskeard to Looe due 18:54
19:02 Looe to Liskeard due 19:31
20:05 Liskeard to Looe due 20:35
20:42 Looe to Liskeard due 21:11
21:16 Liskeard to Looe due 21:46
21:55 Looe to Liskeard due 22:24
04/12/25 21:55 Looe to Liskeard due 22:24 will be cancelled.
This is due to flooding.
07:33 Looe to Liskeard due 08:02
08:16 Liskeard to Looe due 08:49
09:02 Looe to Liskeard due 09:34
09:37 Liskeard to Looe due 10:07
10:09 Looe to Liskeard due 10:38
10:48 Liskeard to Looe due 11:16
11:18 Looe to Liskeard due 11:43
11:54 Liskeard to Looe due 12:24
12:26 Looe to Liskeard due 12:55
12:57 Liskeard to Looe due 13:27
13:29 Looe to Liskeard due 13:55
13:58 Liskeard to Looe due 14:31
14:34 Looe to Liskeard due 15:06
15:15 Liskeard to Looe due 15:43
15:45 Looe to Liskeard due 16:13
16:18 Liskeard to Looe due 16:48
16:50 Looe to Liskeard due 17:15
17:19 Liskeard to Looe due 17:47
17:49 Looe to Liskeard due 18:18
18:24 Liskeard to Looe due 18:54
19:02 Looe to Liskeard due 19:31
20:05 Liskeard to Looe due 20:35
20:42 Looe to Liskeard due 21:11
21:16 Liskeard to Looe due 21:46
21:55 Looe to Liskeard due 22:24
04/12/25 21:55 Looe to Liskeard due 22:24 will be cancelled.
This is due to flooding.
| Coffeeshop Map 4-12-25 In "The Lighter Side" [368911/31199/30] Posted by Mark A at 07:09, 4th December 2025 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
The map's drawn a strange glyph over Cornwall. Perhaps it's a portent of some significant event.
Mark















