Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Changes to rail tickets. In "Fare's Fair" [373680/31789/4] Posted by ChrisB at 20:43, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
Indeed, hence holding the new ones back - they come into force on April 1 and are NOT retrospective
| Re: Changes to rail tickets. In "Fare's Fair" [373679/31789/4] Posted by Oxonhutch at 20:41, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
The updated NRCoT will only be released on April 1st, acording to National Rail - I asked.
So if I buy my ticket now for travel in April or May, I am subject to the current Conditions of Travel? After all, the contract between us is subject to the T&Cs at the time of purchase - the time the contract is made.
Article in the Times newspaper.
"We live three minutes from the station — and can’t catch a train"
(The station in question: Wilmslow)
(Paywalled) https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/east-west-rail-winslow-oxford-milton-keynes-002w6bkmq
"We live three minutes from the station — and can’t catch a train"
(The station in question: Wilmslow)
(Paywalled) https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/east-west-rail-winslow-oxford-milton-keynes-002w6bkmq
It's becoming quite an embarrassment, and highlights all the worst aspects of the railway industry as present.
However, that will all soon be forgotten when passenger services do start running and IMHO it will be extremely successful, even more so when the Cambridge link is added. And of course freight has been running along it for over a year so it has already proven useful as a piece of new infrastructure.
| Re: East - West Rail update (Oxford to Bedford) - ongoing discussion In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [373677/1219/28] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:47, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
Years ago, we took our kids (youngest now 40) the the Disney park outside Paris. We They had an excellent time on the many rides. One ride we didn't do was train to the place ...
Many years ago, we (my wife and I) took our then young child to the Disney Park, outside Paris, for a few days. We also took a train into Paris itself from there, so we could go up the eye-full tower. I remember that all of the French railway staff were very helpful - and remarkably fluent in English, if the need arose.

| Re: East - West Rail update (Oxford to Bedford) - ongoing discussion In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [373676/1219/28] Posted by Mark A at 18:54, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
Article in the Times newspaper.
"We live three minutes from the station — and can’t catch a train"
(The station in question: Wilmslow)
Mark
(Paywalled) https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/east-west-rail-winslow-oxford-milton-keynes-002w6bkmq
| Re: Changes to rail tickets. In "Fare's Fair" [373675/31789/4] Posted by ChrisB at 17:54, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
The updated NRCoT will only be released on April 1st, acording to National Rail - I asked.
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [373674/31163/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 17:22, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
Cancellations to services between Reading and London Paddington
Due to trespassers on the railway between Reading and London Paddington trains have to run at reduced speed on all lines.
Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled or delayed. Disruption is expected until 17:45 28/03.
| Re: Caledonian MacBrayne ferries in Scotland In "Buses and other ways to travel" [373673/30034/5] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 16:48, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
... and it gets even worse - from the BBC:
CalMac warns of 'critical shortage' as eight ferries now out of action

MV Lord of the Isles suspended all sailings after an engine problem
Engine problems have put an eighth CalMac ferry out of action, as the operator apologised for a "critical" shortage of ships.
MV Lord of the Isles, which has been sailing the Oban to Mull route, suspended all sailings on Saturday after a "technical issue" with its main engine.
Three other large ferries - including CalMac's troubled Glen Sannox vessel - are already unavailable, while four other ships are undergoing annual maintenance.
The state-owned firm told island communities that the situation was the "most pressing" it had faced and disruption would continue into next week.
CalMac said "virtually every island served by a major vessel" on its west of Scotland network was being affected by the shortage of ships.
(BBC article continues)

MV Lord of the Isles suspended all sailings after an engine problem
Engine problems have put an eighth CalMac ferry out of action, as the operator apologised for a "critical" shortage of ships.
MV Lord of the Isles, which has been sailing the Oban to Mull route, suspended all sailings on Saturday after a "technical issue" with its main engine.
Three other large ferries - including CalMac's troubled Glen Sannox vessel - are already unavailable, while four other ships are undergoing annual maintenance.
The state-owned firm told island communities that the situation was the "most pressing" it had faced and disruption would continue into next week.
CalMac said "virtually every island served by a major vessel" on its west of Scotland network was being affected by the shortage of ships.
(BBC article continues)
| Re: Caledonian MacBrayne ferries in Scotland In "Buses and other ways to travel" [373672/30034/5] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:16, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
'Almost every island' facing disruption due to ferry shortage, warns CalMac

CalMac's two newest ships MV Glen Sannox and MV Isle of Islay are both unavailable while faults are investigated
West coast ferry operator CalMac has said "almost every island served by a major vessel" is facing disruption as it grapples with an "unprecedented" shortage of ships.
Three large ferries - including its two newest vessels MV Glen Sannox and MV Isle of Islay - are still unavailable while faults are investigated, and four other ships are away for annual maintenance. But some relief has come to Arran after a fourth major vessel, MV Caledonian Isles, was repaired and resumed services from Ardrossan.
The state-owned firm said it had established an incident management team which would be on hand throughout the weekend to help manage services and repairs.

MV Caledonian Isles is now back in service, restoring sailings from the mainland to Brodick in Arran
CalMac chief executive Duncan Mackison said that despite repairs to Caledonian Isles and a smaller vessel, MV Coruisk, the operator was still dealing with an "unprecedented level of challenges on our network."
"This disruption is affecting virtually every island served by a major vessel and we are profoundly sorry for that," he added. "We are doing what we can to restore these services as quickly as possible."
MV Glen Sannox, which sails to Arran from Troon, developed a problem with a flexible coupling in its exhaust system early on Thursday. A quick repair allowed it to return for one sailing but the problem re-occurred so it has now been withdrawn until Tuesday for a permanent fix and checks to ensure it is available for Easter weekend.
A separate recurring issue with an engine warning light which began shortly after its return from annual maintenance in Merseyside is believed to have been remedied. CalMac suspects it was due to incorrect oil levels and an electrical fault which have now been addressed.

MV Isle of Islay, the first of four new ferries built in Turkey, was meant to enter service on the Islay route on Friday but that has been pushed back until at least Monday. A specialist engineer has been brought in to investigate an engine management system fault and other "snagging issues" are also being looked at.
MV Isle of Arran, a 42-year-old ship affectionately known as the Auld Trooper, has a problem with its fire suppression system. Other faults have since been found with a coupling and a bow thruster, and it is likely to be out of action until early next week.
Four other vessels - MV Hebrides, MV Loch Frisa, MV Isle of Lewis and the chartered catamaran MV Alfred - are all away for scheduled maintenance or repairs.

CalMac's two newest ships MV Glen Sannox and MV Isle of Islay are both unavailable while faults are investigated
West coast ferry operator CalMac has said "almost every island served by a major vessel" is facing disruption as it grapples with an "unprecedented" shortage of ships.
Three large ferries - including its two newest vessels MV Glen Sannox and MV Isle of Islay - are still unavailable while faults are investigated, and four other ships are away for annual maintenance. But some relief has come to Arran after a fourth major vessel, MV Caledonian Isles, was repaired and resumed services from Ardrossan.
The state-owned firm said it had established an incident management team which would be on hand throughout the weekend to help manage services and repairs.

MV Caledonian Isles is now back in service, restoring sailings from the mainland to Brodick in Arran
CalMac chief executive Duncan Mackison said that despite repairs to Caledonian Isles and a smaller vessel, MV Coruisk, the operator was still dealing with an "unprecedented level of challenges on our network."
"This disruption is affecting virtually every island served by a major vessel and we are profoundly sorry for that," he added. "We are doing what we can to restore these services as quickly as possible."
MV Glen Sannox, which sails to Arran from Troon, developed a problem with a flexible coupling in its exhaust system early on Thursday. A quick repair allowed it to return for one sailing but the problem re-occurred so it has now been withdrawn until Tuesday for a permanent fix and checks to ensure it is available for Easter weekend.
A separate recurring issue with an engine warning light which began shortly after its return from annual maintenance in Merseyside is believed to have been remedied. CalMac suspects it was due to incorrect oil levels and an electrical fault which have now been addressed.

MV Isle of Islay, the first of four new ferries built in Turkey, was meant to enter service on the Islay route on Friday but that has been pushed back until at least Monday. A specialist engineer has been brought in to investigate an engine management system fault and other "snagging issues" are also being looked at.
MV Isle of Arran, a 42-year-old ship affectionately known as the Auld Trooper, has a problem with its fire suppression system. Other faults have since been found with a coupling and a bow thruster, and it is likely to be out of action until early next week.
Four other vessels - MV Hebrides, MV Loch Frisa, MV Isle of Lewis and the chartered catamaran MV Alfred - are all away for scheduled maintenance or repairs.
| Re: National Rail Conditions of Travel 2025 - omitted clauses In "Fare's Fair" [373671/31796/4] Posted by grahame at 11:56, 28th March 2026 Already liked by ChrisB | ![]() |
Because they'd want to meet in the middle of the two fares so as not to lose farebox revenue, meaning the cheaper price rises....
I do wonder why the description of "via Taunton" isn't just changed to "any permitted" ... and that could have a lot of re-ticketing when a GWR train gets diverted via Yeovil!
| Re: Request stops - GWR list In "Across the West" [373670/31788/26] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 11:29, 28th March 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
| Re: National Rail Conditions of Travel 2025 - omitted clauses In "Fare's Fair" [373669/31796/4] Posted by ChrisB at 11:18, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
Because they'd want to meet in the middle of the two fares so as not to lose farebox revenue, meaning the cheaper price rises....
| Re: Request stops - GWR list In "Across the West" [373668/31788/26] Posted by grahame at 10:13, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
Babcock, the Devonport Royal Dockyard operator, is actively reducing the amount of on-site car parking for staff. They are paying for an extensive network of bus routes morning and evening.
Maybe this has resulted in an increase in Dockyard Station use? Is there a similar increase at Devonport and Keyham stations?
Maybe this has resulted in an increase in Dockyard Station use? Is there a similar increase at Devonport and Keyham stations?
Thank you for that. Another question if I may - what is visibility like at Dockyard - both for the train driver seeing people on the platform flagging them down, and for people on the platform seeing the train approaching while standing well back from the edge?
| Re: Request stops - GWR list In "Across the West" [373667/31788/26] Posted by Pb_devon at 08:13, 28th March 2026 | ![]() |
Babcock, the Devonport Royal Dockyard operator, is actively reducing the amount of on-site car parking for staff. They are paying for an extensive network of bus routes morning and evening.
Maybe this has resulted in an increase in Dockyard Station use? Is there a similar increase at Devonport and Keyham stations?
| Re: National Rail Conditions of Travel 2025 - omitted clauses In "Fare's Fair" [373666/31796/4] Posted by eightonedee at 21:14, 27th March 2026 Already liked by MVR S&T | ![]() |
I'm afraid my first reaction is "if making fares simpler is a priority, why on earth haven't they made both routes in Oxonhutch's example the same?"
Surely the same fare for all routes between two points cannot be difficult to put in place?
| Re: National Rail Conditions of Travel 2025 - omitted clauses In "Fare's Fair" [373665/31796/4] Posted by Oxonhutch at 20:20, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
13.2 Worries me. And I have to wonder why?
Reading Exeter has two routes, via Honiton or Taunton - there is no 'Any permitted'.
The Man in Seat 61 uses this as an example as an on-train solution - Honiton is cheaper: if routing Taunton - just pay the excess.
If travelling Honiton with a Taunton fare, simply excess the difference - in this case an excess ticket with price £0.00.
The lack of 13.2 makes both ticket invalid. Bad move.
| Re: Connectivity Tool - Department for Transport website In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [373664/31798/40] Posted by Mark A at 18:49, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
Don't know if the following is of relevance of general interest
https://connectivity-tool-lite.dft.gov.uk/index
https://connectivity-tool-lite.dft.gov.uk/index
This DfT tool... does it capture the basics of connectivity? (Which I'd suggest being able to name two localities and reveal data that shows how well said two places are connected using various travel modes. After which it might be able to bring enhancements into the equation such as 'If we added this, what would be the improvement and how big a population would benefit?')
Mark
| Re: Connectivity Tool - Department for Transport website In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [373662/31798/40] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 18:17, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
That needs splitting off to its own thread I think?
Thanks, ChrisB. I have made your suggested adjustments. CfN.

| Re: Connectivity Tool - Department for Transport website In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [373661/31798/40] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 18:13, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
From GOV.UK - "Discover connectivity in your local area".
| Re: A very inconsequential chat: Nailsea & Backwell to Bath Spa, return, today In "Introductions and chat" [373660/31797/1] Posted by eXPassenger at 17:26, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
We normally drive and use the Park and Ride which is free with our bus passes.
It should change (eventually) - at the next fares download. Not sure how often the machine connects to do that. It may be that individual machines can be manually done, but otherwise it happens en-bloc (I believe)
Email received at 14:35 confirming "the Melksham TVM should now be updated with an amended set of fares on the front screen." Visited the station at 15:50 just to check before I said "thank you" ... and on the front panel it's unchanged - still selling a £14.40 off peak day return to Trowbridge.
I would have been more inclined to believe the email (and not go and check) if I had been told that it would update overnight ... and still expect it might.
| Re: Connectivity Tool - Department for Transport website In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [373658/31798/40] Posted by ChrisB at 16:23, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
That needs splitting off to its own thread I think?
| Re: Addressing Information - cost - connectivity - comfort - frequency - reliability In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [373657/31748/40] Posted by ChrisB at 16:22, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
It should change (eventually) - at the next fares download. Not sure how often the machine connects to do that. It may be that individual machines can be manually done, but otherwise it happens en-bloc (I believe)
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [373656/28982/26] Posted by REVUpminster at 13:46, 27th March 2026 Already liked by Pb_devon, GBM | ![]() |
175103 and 175105 dragged from Ely today; the ones I presume should have come last Friday
Ely : 4: 175005/008, 175104/109 (175008 is in two halves)
Wolverton :11 : 175004, 175102/103/105/106/107/108/110/113/115/116
Laira : 11: 175002/007/009, 175114 ex Ely; 175001/003/006/011, 175101/111/112 ex Wolverton
Long Rock : 1 : 175010 ex Ely
as of 27 March 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXoiW3fW4yc
| Re: Where have all the cheap "Advanced Fares" gone? In "Fare's Fair" [373655/31786/4] Posted by Witham Bobby at 12:38, 27th March 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
Ughhh! What a horrible experience
Ever since an episode of being stuck on a packed train in a Central Line tunnel, back in August 1995, I have not been able to cope at all well in crowded places, whether on board train, station, airport departure gate or security. Just awful. I would rather wait for the next train than become an airless sardine
The Central Line train was stopped for probably no more than 10 minutes, but it seemed like five or six times that. People were fainting and screaming. I have never been more glad to get onto an escalator out of a tube station than I was that day at Oxford Circus
| Re: National Rail Conditions of Travel 2025 - omitted clauses In "Fare's Fair" [373654/31796/4] Posted by JayMac at 11:45, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
Conditions right, train manager wrong.
14.3 has not been withdrawn.
| Re: Request stops - GWR list In "Across the West" [373653/31788/26] Posted by grahame at 10:07, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
Lympstone Commando numbers are astonishing - would that be because there tend to be whole troups of commandos or recruits arriving at the same time, or is there traffic well spread across trains. Also looking at some the other flow metrics - how peaky are they - right down to Dockyard. With Dockyard, is there still a significantly larger flow to and from the dockyard with certain trains? Thanks for your help on this
| Re: National Rail Conditions of Travel 2025 - omitted clauses In "Fare's Fair" [373652/31796/4] Posted by grahame at 05:48, 27th March 2026 | ![]() |
From current conditions of travel:
14. Using a Combination of Tickets
14.1 Some Tickets specifically exclude their use in conjunction with other Tickets. This will be made clear in the terms and conditions when buying such Tickets.
14.2 Unless Condition 14.1 applies, you may use a combination of two or more Tickets to make a journey provided that the train services you use Call at the station(s) where you change from one Ticket to another.
14.3 Unless Condition 14.1 applies, if you are using a Season Ticket, daily Zonal Ticket, or another area based Ticket such as a concessionary pass, ranger, or rover, in conjunction with another Ticket and the last station at which one Ticket is valid and the first station that the other Ticket is valid are the same, then the train does not need to Call at that station for your combination to be valid.
14.1 Some Tickets specifically exclude their use in conjunction with other Tickets. This will be made clear in the terms and conditions when buying such Tickets.
14.2 Unless Condition 14.1 applies, you may use a combination of two or more Tickets to make a journey provided that the train services you use Call at the station(s) where you change from one Ticket to another.
14.3 Unless Condition 14.1 applies, if you are using a Season Ticket, daily Zonal Ticket, or another area based Ticket such as a concessionary pass, ranger, or rover, in conjunction with another Ticket and the last station at which one Ticket is valid and the first station that the other Ticket is valid are the same, then the train does not need to Call at that station for your combination to be valid.
Bolding and capitalisation as per current NRCoT
Announcement by the train manager on the 15:30 ex Paddington on 24th March (2026) which I was travelling on "This train does not call as Didcot and if you are travelling on split tickets changing from one ticket to another there, your tickets will not be valid. There is revenue protection on this train".
Has clause 14.3 been withdrawn? The announcement by the train manager seemed to ignore it.
If making 2 return trips, both at peak times and using trains that do not call at Didcot, from Melksham to Paddington within a week, the lowest cost way has been a single to Didcot, a weekly season to Cholsey, a return from Cholsey to London an a further single Didcot to Melksham. My understanding is that's within 14.3, but is contradicted by what the train manager said.
Yes - revenue protection did come through; I was not making use of this clause and did not feel inclined to raise it with them.
I understand that the £14 return fare (£18 before 09:00 Monday to Friday) from Melksham to Trowbridge exists because the Melksham is a "Chippenham Group" station and Trowbridge is in the Westbury group. The fare is valid via Bath Spa.
I am told that the fare should be overridden on the front of the TVM by the direct fare but due to a "database error" it's the higher fare - £14 or £18 - rather than the fare of around £6 that is offered on the single press "popular destinations" menu on the front panel; the lower price fare can be found if you know to dig in and look for it.
My GWR contact has apologised for how long he has taken to get back to me on this (I heard on 26th), but only explained (no apology) for the database error. He tells me the database was corrected on 19th, but as of 25th when I was last at the station, the change has not percolated through.
I raised this matter with GWR's head of revenue on Tuesday (23rd) at GWR's parliamentary reception, and he assured me that this fare was chosen for the front of the TVM as it's the one that's most sold for the journey. If he's correct in that statement, it illustrates just how many people are being what I regard as overcharged by nearly £10 for a ten minute journey. K-chink - nice money raiser! If he's incorrect in his statement, then can I believe anything else he tells me with an assurance. Just occasionally, "don't know - I'll find out" would be the best answer.
I have gotten back to GWR asking them to changes the offering on the front panel to reflect the fact that most Melksham to Trowbridge passengers take the direct train ...















