Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Refund Rules for walk-up tickets are changing from April 1st In "Fare's Fair" [372700/31662/4] Posted by PhilWakely at 11:57, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
I understand that this is to counter ticket fraud, where unchecked tickets or tickets not put through an automatic barrier have been submitted for refunds, despite the ticket holder having travelled.
I'm guessing that the 'certain exceptional conditions' will include (but not necessarily limited to).... Disruption resulting in the ticket holder not starting or abandoning the journey; health conditions where the holder is unable to travel, etc. Whether guidelines will be published or the decision left to the discretion of the retailer, I do not know.
I'm guessing that the 'certain exceptional conditions' will include (but not necessarily limited to).... Disruption resulting in the ticket holder not starting or abandoning the journey; health conditions where the holder is unable to travel, etc. Whether guidelines will be published or the decision left to the discretion of the retailer, I do not know.
I have only (personally) made use of it once that I can recall - having bought a ticket for someone staying with us, but on the morning she was headed for Manchester, plans were changed on a family crisis. I was actually pleasantly surprised I could get my money back, even though validity had started.
I guess (or would hope!), that this falls within 'exceptional circumstances' after 1st April
| Re: Refund Rules for walk-up tickets are changing from April 1st In "Fare's Fair" [372699/31662/4] Posted by grahame at 11:32, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
I understand that this is to counter ticket fraud, where unchecked tickets or tickets not put through an automatic barrier have been submitted for refunds, despite the ticket holder having travelled.
I'm guessing that the 'certain exceptional conditions' will include (but not necessarily limited to).... Disruption resulting in the ticket holder not starting or abandoning the journey; health conditions where the holder is unable to travel, etc. Whether guidelines will be published or the decision left to the discretion of the retailer, I do not know.
I'm guessing that the 'certain exceptional conditions' will include (but not necessarily limited to).... Disruption resulting in the ticket holder not starting or abandoning the journey; health conditions where the holder is unable to travel, etc. Whether guidelines will be published or the decision left to the discretion of the retailer, I do not know.
The reasoning is logical in terms of ticket fraud - though it does tell us something about the system which does not routinely check ticket validity when travelling, and leaves space for such fraud. Mind you, there are other countries where ticket checking is not routine, but where people tend to follow the rules because either they are more law abiding, or more afraid of being putatively caught.
Whether the old refund-even-when-validity-started was correct is a different and interesting discussion. I have only (personally) made use of it once that I can recall - having bought a ticket for someone staying with us, but on the morning she was headed for Manchester, plans were changed on a family crisis. I was actually pleasantly surprised I could get my money back, even though validity had started.
| Re: Travel to the USA - risks of being detained, even as a tourist In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [372698/31660/52] Posted by grahame at 11:00, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
My message would be don't write off travelling to any country simply because you don't care for the incumbent regime. If I had, my horizons would have been considerably reduced.
Agreed - and I *have* travelled to countries (and will be doing so later this year, I expect) where the regime isn't to my care. In the case of the USA, our family links are rather closer, and our visibility rather greater, than being tourists - a more complex set of decisions, and a deeper one too which effects family visits in the event of births, marriages, deaths, and seeing the son and grandkids.
Americans generally speaking are very well disposed to the British and your chances of coming to harm are minimal - probably safer there than in many parts of Europe in all honesty.
You are totally correct, where "your" refers to the general visitor. The current president is not doing very well, as I understand it, in the popularity stakes over there. The USA culture does differ from the UK one - I've had a gun waved at me twice, and also had a family meeting sorting out custody issues where the person across the table came along armed. Those are the sort of things that won't happen to most people going to the USA.
| Re: Photographers asked to tell story of rail travel In "Media about railways, and other means of transport" [372697/30829/49] Posted by grahame at 10:39, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
Not long to wait for the results.
The TransWilts/Arts Society photography competition attracted 200 entries with a wide variety of subjects.
The judges are now working on an initial shortlist with the aim of whittling it down to the final 50 prize winners. The images will then be specially printed on weatherproof board and displayed at our seven local stations.
The successful winners will be contacted in early March. It is planned the displays will be in place on the platforms by Easter.
The judges are now working on an initial shortlist with the aim of whittling it down to the final 50 prize winners. The images will then be specially printed on weatherproof board and displayed at our seven local stations.
The successful winners will be contacted in early March. It is planned the displays will be in place on the platforms by Easter.
| Refund Rules for walk-up tickets are changing from April 1st In "Fare's Fair" [372696/31662/4] Posted by PhilWakely at 09:45, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
If you purchase a walk-up ticket (from any retailer) on or after 1st April 2026, you will no longer be able to submit it for a refund once the ticket becomes valid for travel - although 'certain exceptional conditions' will still allow you to do so.
Just to complicate matters - if you purchase a walk-up ticket before 1st April for travel after that date, then you will still be able to submit the ticket for a refund after 1st April under the current conditions.
I understand that this is to counter ticket fraud, where unchecked tickets or tickets not put through an automatic barrier have been submitted for refunds, despite the ticket holder having travelled.
I'm guessing that the 'certain exceptional conditions' will include (but not necessarily limited to).... Disruption resulting in the ticket holder not starting or abandoning the journey; health conditions where the holder is unable to travel, etc. Whether guidelines will be published or the decision left to the discretion of the retailer, I do not know.
| Warning of nine-day rail closure between Ashford and Borough Green in May In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [372695/31661/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 09:42, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Advance warning for nine-day rail closure in May

Part of the line had to close in 2021 after a landslip near Bearsted
Rail passengers in Kent are being asked to plan ahead as a nine-day closure of a route is scheduled for May.
The line between Borough Green & Wrotham and Ashford International, via Maidstone East, will be closed from Saturday 23 May to Sunday 31 May inclusive.
During the closure, buses will replace trains, with services running from Borough Green to London and also from Ashford. Stations that will have no service include West Malling, Maidstone East, Bearsted and Lenham.
Network Rail said it needed to carry out essential upgrades to improve the long‑term reliability of the line, after the route had to close near Bearsted in 2021 due to a landslip.
Works will include improving drainage in the Wheeler Street tunnel between Maidstone East and Bearstead, replacing nearly 2,500 yards of track between Harrietsham and Charing, and the replacement of the level crossing at Ryarsh Lane near West Malling.
David Davidson, chief operating officer for Southeastern Railway, said: "The Ashford to Maidstone East line is an extremely busy part of our railway, but the rock cuttings here are more than 150 years old. As a result, we are seeing an increasing number of weather and ground movement related incidents which cause delays to our customers. We want to fix this, and we need to do the work as quickly as possible over the nine-day closure rather than during a series of disruptive weekends."
Network Rail said detailed travel advice, including ticket acceptance, would be provided before the closure begins.

Part of the line had to close in 2021 after a landslip near Bearsted
Rail passengers in Kent are being asked to plan ahead as a nine-day closure of a route is scheduled for May.
The line between Borough Green & Wrotham and Ashford International, via Maidstone East, will be closed from Saturday 23 May to Sunday 31 May inclusive.
During the closure, buses will replace trains, with services running from Borough Green to London and also from Ashford. Stations that will have no service include West Malling, Maidstone East, Bearsted and Lenham.
Network Rail said it needed to carry out essential upgrades to improve the long‑term reliability of the line, after the route had to close near Bearsted in 2021 due to a landslip.
Works will include improving drainage in the Wheeler Street tunnel between Maidstone East and Bearstead, replacing nearly 2,500 yards of track between Harrietsham and Charing, and the replacement of the level crossing at Ryarsh Lane near West Malling.
David Davidson, chief operating officer for Southeastern Railway, said: "The Ashford to Maidstone East line is an extremely busy part of our railway, but the rock cuttings here are more than 150 years old. As a result, we are seeing an increasing number of weather and ground movement related incidents which cause delays to our customers. We want to fix this, and we need to do the work as quickly as possible over the nine-day closure rather than during a series of disruptive weekends."
Network Rail said detailed travel advice, including ticket acceptance, would be provided before the closure begins.
| Re: Travel to the USA - risks of being detained, even as a tourist In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [372694/31660/52] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 09:20, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
Regarding the USofA, my view is recorded at https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=31237.msg369290#msg369290

Turning to South Africa, my own family experience there was brilliant: the politics and economy were rubbish, but we had a great time and met some lovely people.
CfN.

| Re: Travel to the USA - risks of being detained, even as a tourist In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [372693/31660/52] Posted by TaplowGreen at 09:11, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
I travelled fairly extensively through Eastern Europe with a friend in the dying days of communism, it was difficult at times and some of the regimes were pretty appalling, and border crossings were quite an experience.
I'm really glad I did it though as the people were invariably friendly, interested/interesting although often cautious as they were wary of the authorities, although starting to assert themselves as a new wind was blowing through.
The history was fascinating and the natural scenery undiminished by whoever happened to be General Secretary/Dear Leader at the time.
I also spent time in South Africa during the apartheid years as I have family there.
My message would be don't write off travelling to any country simply because you don't care for the incumbent regime. If I had, my horizons would have been considerably reduced.
Americans generally speaking are very well disposed to the British and your chances of coming to harm are minimal - probably safer there than in many parts of Europe in all honesty.
My "keyhole" picture was taken at Chippenham Station ...
I was completely wrong in my guess - and completely relieved that I didn't embarrass myself (yet again) by naming the wrong station here.
And, no - I'm not going to tell you where I thought it was.

CfN.

| Re: Travel to the USA - risks of being detained, even as a tourist In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [372691/31660/52] Posted by PhilWakely at 09:01, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
I was lucky enough to be able to take (very-)early retirement from my job with a finance company. In the following few years, I treated myself to some of the notable trans-continental rail journeys, including the Trans-Siberian and USA Coast-to-Coast.
In both cases, though widely different experiences, I would not have hesitated in recommending them. However, in today's political climate I would steer well clear for the foreseeable future.
| Re: Delay / Repay - to be less generous In "Fare's Fair" [372690/31626/4] Posted by TaplowGreen at 08:55, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
• The number of times I've had a 15 minute delay but it's been logged as 14 minute so not payable, or 30 minute logged as 29 minute. Sometimes it genuinely just missed the threshold; other times I've had the claim rejected because it was so close.
A really difficult one - where there's a "hard line" between two categories in a continuum, and where you have such a hard line there will always be issues - and temptation by the arbiters to push the decision in the way that favours them.
1. Why set the cut off points at 30 and 60 minutes - they could almost have been designed to cause problems on "clock face" services where people drop back through a cancellation or a missed connection into the following train. Why not 25 or 35, 55 or 65 minutes?
2. With modern electronics and calculations, why not a sliding scale? Up to 25 minutes, no delay / repay, then a sliding scale up to 65 minutes after which full single journey refund is due. Perhaps with a minimum refund of 2 pounds to avoid the overhead of "pence" claims? And, yes, I am aware that will give rise to anomalies such as parent getting a payment back, and son/daughter not.
Rather than fiddling/penny pinching and making an already mediocre customer experience even worse, instead of working on ways of reducing compensation for poor performance, why doesn't the industry focus on reducing the root cause? (ie delays)?
Reduce delays, improve customer satisfaction and the cost of delay/repay falls.
| Re: Scope to increase Bristol suburban services? In "Bristol (WECA, now WEMCA) Commuters" [372689/29232/21] Posted by grahame at 08:43, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
Last weekend in The Marches and Wales, I was struck by the number of class 197s around and they are replacing classes 150, 153 and 158 aren't they? ... just asking.
I suspect that the older Welsh stock is largely held together with duck tape, baler twine and livery vinyl by now.
You could be right about the 150s and 153s. In Shrewsbury last week, I asked the train manager about the 150 we were about to travel on to Swansea, wondering as to why it was that rather than a pair or 153s, and he told me that they get whatever's in working order on the day.
My understanding is that the 158s are aluminium rather than steel, and don't need to be stuck together in the same way. [[ Teak and other wooden carriages long since gone ]]
| Re: Travel to the USA - risks of being detained, even as a tourist In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [372688/31660/52] Posted by PrestburyRoad at 08:42, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
I enjoyed my previous visits to the USA. But now that the unpredictable psychopath is in charge I have put the USA on my blacklist of countries that I will not visit. I fear that I would be picked up by the thought police at the border; and moreover the nation contains a lot of his supporters and I think they are people that I would not want to meet.
| Re: Delay / Repay - to be less generous In "Fare's Fair" [372687/31626/4] Posted by grahame at 08:37, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
• The number of times I've had a 15 minute delay but it's been logged as 14 minute so not payable, or 30 minute logged as 29 minute. Sometimes it genuinely just missed the threshold; other times I've had the claim rejected because it was so close.
A really difficult one - where there's a "hard line" between two categories in a continuum, and where you have such a hard line there will always be issues - and temptation by the arbiters to push the decision in the way that favours them.
1. Why set the cut off points at 30 and 60 minutes - they could almost have been designed to cause problems on "clock face" services where people drop back through a cancellation or a missed connection into the following train. Why not 25 or 35, 55 or 65 minutes?
2. With modern electronics and calculations, why not a sliding scale? Up to 25 minutes, no delay / repay, then a sliding scale up to 65 minutes after which full single journey refund is due. Perhaps with a minimum refund of 2 pounds to avoid the overhead of "pence" claims? And, yes, I am aware that will give rise to anomalies such as parent getting a payment back, and son/daughter not.
| Re: GWR web app update: be aware In "Across the West" [372686/31648/26] Posted by Surrey 455 at 08:05, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
I was under the impression that the SWR app was the same / similar as GWR just with different branding. That was when they were both under majority First Group control. I haven't seen any changes to the SWR app since nationalisation so I wonder if that's also going to change.
From The Guardian
‘Don’t go to the US – not with Trump in charge’: the UK tourist with a valid visa detained by ICE for six weeks
Karen Newton was in America on the trip of a lifetime when she was shackled, transported and held for weeks on end. With tourism to the US under increasing strain, she says, ‘If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone’
Karen Newton was in America on the trip of a lifetime when she was shackled, transported and held for weeks on end. With tourism to the US under increasing strain, she says, ‘If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone’
From Facebook
BREAKING: WTF? Trump's ICE goons shackled and threw a British grandma on a tourist visa in their gulag for SIX WEEKS!
Karen Newton, a 65-year-old grandmother from Hertfordshire, England with a clean record and a valid B2 tourist visa, thought she was heading for a dream two-month road trip through four Western states and Canada with her husband Bill.
What she got instead was a nightmare: six weeks in ICE detention after being shackled, sleeping on the floor, and locked in a windowless cell with no end date in sight.
Karen Newton, a 65-year-old grandmother from Hertfordshire, England with a clean record and a valid B2 tourist visa, thought she was heading for a dream two-month road trip through four Western states and Canada with her husband Bill.
What she got instead was a nightmare: six weeks in ICE detention after being shackled, sleeping on the floor, and locked in a windowless cell with no end date in sight.
I won't be travelling to the USA any time soon. Both Lisa and I have family in the USA, but stories like the above, the overall political situation there, and our dislike of flying all combine into three strikes and we're out. There is little doubt in my mind that their current president is having a far greater changing effect on their country and the world as a whole than any previous president, but I feel he's doing so in a morally broken way, and the changes we hear about are far removed from being good ones for the most part.
My "keyhole" picture was taken at Chippenham Station - and I suspect that Chippenham / Wiltshire would not be regarded as "Central England". I do wonder at the idea of 1 in 10 of the population annually visiting a model village (about a third of the visitor numbers to Alton Towers) - I am probably being unfair in how I read that, and who's putting in the funding to get this off the ground.
| Re: Squirrels - red, grey or albino, on the railways or otherwise: merged topic, ongoing discussion In "The Lighter Side" [372683/5560/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 03:27, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
Encouraged by the facts that we are now on 14 pages of posts, with 199 replies and 83,114 views of this particular topic (as I write): I have now expanded the heading slightly.

From the BBC:
Nasa astronauts' moon mission delayed due to rocket issue

Nasa has said that its 6 March launch day for its long-awaited lunar mission is now "out of consideration", after it spotted several last minute issues during routine checks that would prevent lift off.
On Friday, the space agency said that its Artemis II mission, which would see astronauts sent to the moon for the first time in 50 years, would likely have the green light to launch within a matter of weeks.
But NASA administrator Jared Isaacman announced on Saturday that setbacks would mean that further maintenance would have to be carried out.
Four astronauts are preparing to be sent on the 10-day trip to the far side of the Moon and back, marking humanity's furthest ever journey into space.
Isaacman said he understood "that people are disappointed by this development", after almost 50-hours of checks on Thursday revealed no faults.
The agency felt almost certain that its "wet rehearsal" had been a success, leading the team to announce that the launch could take place as soon as 6 March.
But overnight on Friday, engineers observed an interruption in the flow of helium required for launch operations.
Disruption to helium, which is used to pressurise fuel tanks and cool rocket systems, is treated as a serious technical issue, according to Nasa.
(BBC article continues)

Nasa has said that its 6 March launch day for its long-awaited lunar mission is now "out of consideration", after it spotted several last minute issues during routine checks that would prevent lift off.
On Friday, the space agency said that its Artemis II mission, which would see astronauts sent to the moon for the first time in 50 years, would likely have the green light to launch within a matter of weeks.
But NASA administrator Jared Isaacman announced on Saturday that setbacks would mean that further maintenance would have to be carried out.
Four astronauts are preparing to be sent on the 10-day trip to the far side of the Moon and back, marking humanity's furthest ever journey into space.
Isaacman said he understood "that people are disappointed by this development", after almost 50-hours of checks on Thursday revealed no faults.
The agency felt almost certain that its "wet rehearsal" had been a success, leading the team to announce that the launch could take place as soon as 6 March.
But overnight on Friday, engineers observed an interruption in the flow of helium required for launch operations.
Disruption to helium, which is used to pressurise fuel tanks and cool rocket systems, is treated as a serious technical issue, according to Nasa.
(BBC article continues)
"This is due to more rockets than usual needing repairs at the same time."

| Re: This surely has to be a case for 'delay, repay' compensation? In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [372681/29053/52] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 02:02, 22nd February 2026 | ![]() |
An update, from the BBC:
Nasa boss says Boeing Starliner failure one of worst in its history

Nasa astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore were stranded in space for over nine months
Nasa has labelled the botched 2024 Starliner mission, which left two astronauts stranded in space for months, a "Type A" mishap, on par with fatal shuttle disasters of the past, in a newly published report.
The category is the space agency's most severe, reserved for incidents causing more than $2m (£1.49 m) in damage, the loss of a vehicle or its control, or deaths.
On Thursday, Nasa's new boss, Jared Isaacman, blasted Boeing, which built Starliner, and the space agency for poor decision-making and leadership that led to the failed mission.
The incident drew global attention after the pilots were stuck for more than nine months in space before returning home last March.
Isaacman, an amateur jet pilot who was the first non-professional astronaut to conduct a spacewalk, took Nasa's top job in late 2025 after a second nomination by US President Donald Trump. His approval came after a turbulent process in which Trump put forward Isaacman's name for the role but then withdrew it during a public feud with Tesla and SpaceX boss Elon Musk, who is a close ally of Isaacman.
In a statement on Starliner's findings, Isaacman said the spacecraft had faced issues throughout its prior recent missions but had still been accepted for the test. "We are correcting those mistakes. Today, we are formally declaring a Type A mishap and ensuring leadership accountability so situations like this never reoccur."
Nasa's "Type A" grade puts the Starliner incident at the same level assigned to the fatal 2003 Columbia and 1986 Challenger space shuttle disasters.
The agency said in its statement: "While there were no injuries and the mission regained control prior to docking, this highest-level classification designation recognises there was potential for a significant mishap."
Nasa's 312-page report comes after the agency commissioned an independent investigation team to identify the causes behind the troubled mission. Investigators flagged hardware failures, leadership missteps and cultural problems at the organisations that led to conditions that fell short of the space agency's safety standards.
The report also highlighted poor engineering and a lack of oversight at Boeing, which helped turn an eight-to-14-day mission into a months-long ordeal for the test pilots, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore.
The pair waited months on board the International Space Station before getting a lift from a SpaceX flight in March 2025. Both pilots have since retired from the agency.
Nasa said it will accept this as the final report and is taking corrective actions to address the findings.
"While Boeing built Starliner, Nasa accepted it and launched two astronauts to space," Isaacman said. "To undertake missions that change the world, we must be transparent about both our successes and our shortcomings. We have to own our mistakes and ensure they never happen again."

Nasa astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore were stranded in space for over nine months
Nasa has labelled the botched 2024 Starliner mission, which left two astronauts stranded in space for months, a "Type A" mishap, on par with fatal shuttle disasters of the past, in a newly published report.
The category is the space agency's most severe, reserved for incidents causing more than $2m (£1.49 m) in damage, the loss of a vehicle or its control, or deaths.
On Thursday, Nasa's new boss, Jared Isaacman, blasted Boeing, which built Starliner, and the space agency for poor decision-making and leadership that led to the failed mission.
The incident drew global attention after the pilots were stuck for more than nine months in space before returning home last March.
Isaacman, an amateur jet pilot who was the first non-professional astronaut to conduct a spacewalk, took Nasa's top job in late 2025 after a second nomination by US President Donald Trump. His approval came after a turbulent process in which Trump put forward Isaacman's name for the role but then withdrew it during a public feud with Tesla and SpaceX boss Elon Musk, who is a close ally of Isaacman.
In a statement on Starliner's findings, Isaacman said the spacecraft had faced issues throughout its prior recent missions but had still been accepted for the test. "We are correcting those mistakes. Today, we are formally declaring a Type A mishap and ensuring leadership accountability so situations like this never reoccur."
Nasa's "Type A" grade puts the Starliner incident at the same level assigned to the fatal 2003 Columbia and 1986 Challenger space shuttle disasters.
The agency said in its statement: "While there were no injuries and the mission regained control prior to docking, this highest-level classification designation recognises there was potential for a significant mishap."
Nasa's 312-page report comes after the agency commissioned an independent investigation team to identify the causes behind the troubled mission. Investigators flagged hardware failures, leadership missteps and cultural problems at the organisations that led to conditions that fell short of the space agency's safety standards.
The report also highlighted poor engineering and a lack of oversight at Boeing, which helped turn an eight-to-14-day mission into a months-long ordeal for the test pilots, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore.
The pair waited months on board the International Space Station before getting a lift from a SpaceX flight in March 2025. Both pilots have since retired from the agency.
Nasa said it will accept this as the final report and is taking corrective actions to address the findings.
"While Boeing built Starliner, Nasa accepted it and launched two astronauts to space," Isaacman said. "To undertake missions that change the world, we must be transparent about both our successes and our shortcomings. We have to own our mistakes and ensure they never happen again."
Posting personally here:
The pair waited months on board the International Space Station before getting a lift from a SpaceX flight in March 2025. Both pilots have since retired from the agency.
I congratulate both of them for their remarkable patience and apparently continued good-humour throughout their rather extended space adventure.

CfN.

| Re: Delay / Repay - to be less generous In "Fare's Fair" [372680/31626/4] Posted by Hafren at 01:14, 22nd February 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
I'm inclined to think 30 minute threshold could be acceptable if it genuinely helps to manage costs, subject to two things that need to be taken seriously:
• The number of times I've had a 15 minute delay but it's been logged as 14 minute so not payable, or 30 minute logged as 29 minute. Someimtes it genuinely just missed the threshold; other times I've had the claim rejected because it was so close. Train booked to arrive xx:10, let's say, and actually arrived a touch after xx:25, but arrival logged as xx:24 – looking at RTT, it was xx:24:45... because the train approached the terminus more slowly than the 'time in section' calculation assumed. Or the delay was 30 minutes because missed connection was 30 minutes later, but it arrived 30 second early, so it was in the 15-29 bracket, but the actual effect of the delay on my life was to all intents and purposes 30 minutes – especially given it meant I had to leave 30 minutes later for my return journey! So if we're getting rid of hte 15 minute threshold, let's apply the 30 minute one more fairly, and make it at least 'in practice' a 29 minute threshold.
• Let's work on reducing niggly small delays... so trains are only delayed when there's a real problem! Then we might have less need for the 15-29 category!
I was wondering where it might be ...
Milton Keynes
Model Britain is currently in active pre-application dialogue with Milton Keynes Council regarding two potential sites, and with West Northamptonshire Council regarding an additional site located on the Milton Keynes boundary.
From:https://modelbritain.co.uk/investors
| Re: Scope to increase Bristol suburban services? In "Bristol (WECA, now WEMCA) Commuters" [372677/29232/21] Posted by Noggin at 22:19, 21st February 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, rogerw | ![]() |
Last weekend in The Marches and Wales, I was struck by the number of class 197s around and they are replacing classes 150, 153 and 158 aren't they? ... just asking.
I suspect that the older Welsh stock is largely held together with duck tape, baler twine and livery vinyl by now.
| Re: Squirrels - red, grey or albino, on the railways or otherwise: merged topic, ongoing discussion In "The Lighter Side" [372676/5560/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:35, 21st February 2026 | ![]() |
In an interesting variation on the theme of this topic - from the BBC:
Rare albino squirrel spotted in tree by children

Albino squirrels are thought to a one-in-100,000 genetic occurrence
Two children have spotted and photographed a rare albino squirrel in a churchyard.
James, 11, and Jennifer, eight, identified the animal on Monday at St Martin's Church in Dorking, Surrey, their mother Abigail told the BBC.
Albino squirrels, thought to a one-in-100,000 genetic occurrence, are identified by their white coat with pink eyes.
"I think the people in the churchyard were quite bemused at what we were looking at but the children were really, really excited, especially my son," Abigail said. She said the family were counting squirrels when daughter Jennifer spotted the animals and her son identified it as albino.
James is "very into his animals so he understood what he was seeing" and was "over the moon" with the find, according to his mother. She said: "He was really keen to take some pictures. He sent it to all his friends. He sent it to some of his friends' mums. He sent it to all our family."

Albino squirrels are thought to a one-in-100,000 genetic occurrence
Two children have spotted and photographed a rare albino squirrel in a churchyard.
James, 11, and Jennifer, eight, identified the animal on Monday at St Martin's Church in Dorking, Surrey, their mother Abigail told the BBC.
Albino squirrels, thought to a one-in-100,000 genetic occurrence, are identified by their white coat with pink eyes.
"I think the people in the churchyard were quite bemused at what we were looking at but the children were really, really excited, especially my son," Abigail said. She said the family were counting squirrels when daughter Jennifer spotted the animals and her son identified it as albino.
James is "very into his animals so he understood what he was seeing" and was "over the moon" with the find, according to his mother. She said: "He was really keen to take some pictures. He sent it to all his friends. He sent it to some of his friends' mums. He sent it to all our family."
Lest my colleague on the administrator team here feel aggrieved that he has thus been upstaged, here is a picture of Red Squirrel:

(From https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/features/how-would-you-improve-transport-bristol/ - in the public domain)
CfN.

| Re: Wells - Bath, from April '26 timetable change (for the worse) In "Buses and other ways to travel" [372675/31621/5] Posted by John D at 21:19, 21st February 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
First Bus have now listed all the changes in Bristol, Bath, North Somerset
listed by area and route
Any route not listed isn't changing
Bristol Routes 16, 17, new 18, 19, 25, 37, 39, x39, 41, 42, 43, N43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 47x, 48, 48x, 49, 49x, 50, 73, 77, 349, 522, A4, M4, SB6, T1, X1, X1s, X4, X6, X6a, X7 withdrawn, X9, Y1, Y2
Bath routes 19, 39, x39, 126, 172, 173, 174, new 175, 374, 375, 376, 376a, 376x, 522, A4
North Somerset routes 1, 6, 7, 9, 20, 126, new A2, A3, X1, X5, X5x, X6, X6a, X7, X9, X11, X11x, X18, X21
https://www.firstbus.co.uk/bristol-bath-and-west/news-and-service-updates/updates/service-changes-5th-april-2026
So, is this announcement a lot of management speak ... ?
Thanks for your post, johnneyw.

What struck me about that announcement was the sheer number of words in it: why sum it up briefly in five words when you can add another twenty and hide the meaning completely?

CfN.

It is written to be intelligible only to academics ... and to go over the heads of the rest of us.















