Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Sewweb - South East Wales and West of England Business link In "Bristol (WECA, now WEMCA) Commuters" [372212/19596/21] Posted by grahame at 08:09, 10th February 2026 | ![]() |
I have posted a very brief review in another thread and added a patch to the SEWWEB site pointing people to https://grahamellis.uk/blog1866.html which is a somewhat broader review of Pilning station as it was, is and could be.
A handful of people have fought over the years to retain Pilning station, as a latent opportunity. Within the residents of the parish there have been calls for much better services, but at the exclusion of development opportunities which would fund and support that service.
My personal view is that a resited station, served by local trains from Cardiff to Bristol and situated on the boundary of village / parish would provide extra mobility, reduced journey times and congestion, bolster business and help controlled and supportive business growth, and would raise the affluence and values locally, including those of existing owners.
My personal view is that a resited station, served by local trains from Cardiff to Bristol and situated on the boundary of village / parish would provide extra mobility, reduced journey times and congestion, bolster business and help controlled and supportive business growth, and would raise the affluence and values locally, including those of existing owners.



| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [372211/31359/18] Posted by grahame at 06:50, 10th February 2026 | ![]() |
07:45 Westbury to Swindon due 08:34
08:44 Swindon to Westbury due 09:26
09:46 Westbury to Swindon due 10:28
12:17 Westbury to Swindon due 12:59
13:14 Swindon to Westbury due 13:57
14:18 Westbury to Swindon due 15:00
15:15 Swindon to Westbury due 15:58
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:06
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19
18:37 Westbury to Swindon due 19:21
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56
21:16 Westbury to Swindon due 21:58
22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12
Facilities on the 22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12
Will be formed of 3 coaches instead of 2.
08:44 Swindon to Westbury due 09:26
09:46 Westbury to Swindon due 10:28
12:17 Westbury to Swindon due 12:59
13:14 Swindon to Westbury due 13:57
14:18 Westbury to Swindon due 15:00
15:15 Swindon to Westbury due 15:58
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:06
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:19
18:37 Westbury to Swindon due 19:21
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56
21:16 Westbury to Swindon due 21:58
22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12
Facilities on the 22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12
Will be formed of 3 coaches instead of 2.
AOK ... though there are likely to have been seats for everyone in a 2 car train even on the 07:45, 09:46, 15:15 and 17:35 which are the busiest trains.
| Re: East West Rail Timetable In "Chiltern Railways services" [372210/29004/44] Posted by Oxonhutch at 22:25, 9th February 2026 Already liked by Bob_Blakey, grahame | ![]() |
I consider myself to be a socially progressive professional, but thankfully no longer fear losing my job, being recently retired. I am a strong supporter of unions in jobs that invite exploitation and abuse - the sacked London bus driver is a case in point. I have willing been a union member in my past.
But this is beyond the pale.
Holding me, the general public hostage to their broader squabbles is outrageous, and I - a previous supporter - am incensed that this 1970's 'demarkation' is allowed to persist.
More train services mean more trains; and more trains mean more train staff. For goodness sake, climb out of your 70's militant mind set and embrace a new way forward where modern public transport is the norm, not a legacy item for those that can't afford, or care to use, a private car.
| Re: East West Rail Timetable In "Chiltern Railways services" [372209/29004/44] Posted by ChrisB at 21:27, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
They're not - and that's the problem.
The RMT require Chiltern to employ a second safety-critical trained person on each train in passenger service., effectively doubling the staff costs for each train. The DfT refuse to pay.
| Re: Clockface timetables - a good idea? In "Across the West" [372208/31583/26] Posted by Ralph Ayres at 21:02, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
I can see that train times may need to vary by the odd minute here and there, and passengers often do need to know about such variations if they are not to miss that train or a connecting service. Sometimes I'd still argue that they could be hidden in the public timetable if a minor variation would have no noticeable impact.
On buses where precise timekeeping is at the mercy of so many external factors, tiny variations between hours such as those Sunday times for the D1 at variously 10, 11 and 12 minutes past the hour really are a nonsense given how unlikely it is that the bus will leave at that exact minute, even the 15 and 16 timings possibly being a moot point. It makes the whole thing over-complicated for no real benefit.
I am about to start the "Save Arran" campaign.

| A visit to Pilning - looking at the past, present and future In "Bristol (WECA, now WEMCA) Commuters" [372205/31596/21] Posted by grahame at 18:31, 9th February 2026 Already liked by Western Pathfinder | ![]() |
I have written up my promised article at https://grahamellis.uk/blog1866.html
Section headers:
* Old History
* Recent History
* The Station today
* Local use of the station
* National what the future many bring
* So what the future may bring for Pilning
* Opinion
The opinion piece is a personal one - and some may disagree with me ...
| Re: "The Loop" - the architect as crayonistissimo In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [372204/31595/40] Posted by eightonedee at 18:26, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
Looks like April 1st has come early this year!
| "The Loop" - the architect as crayonistissimo In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [372203/31595/40] Posted by stuving at 18:05, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
Chris Williamson, president of the RIBA, has come up with a proposal which - while totally mad - does have style (as an architect should, of course). I'm not sure where it was published, but this is from Dezeen:

Chris Williamson proposes Neom-informed Loop to connect northern British and Irish cities
Tom Ravenscroft | 6 February 2026
RIBA president Chris Williamson has proposed linking nine northern cities in Britain and Ireland with The Loop – a raised high-speed railway informed by Neom's megacity The Line.
Described by Williamson as a manifesto to "inspire" and "provoke", The Loop would connect the English cities of Newcastle, Leeds, Manchester and Liverpool, with Edinburgh and Glasgow in Scotland, Bangor in Wales, Dublin in Ireland and Belfast in Northern Ireland.

The Loop would connect nine cities
According to Williamson, who is the co-founder of UK studio WW+P, connecting the nine cities would create a northern powerhouse with a population of around 10 million that is "comparable with other major global cities".
Williamson was inspired by the ambition of The Line, a 170-kilometre-long megacity planned in Saudi Arabia, in his design for the scheme, which he estimates will cost £130 billion to construct.

The high-speed railway would be raised on stone viaducts
"Maybe I have been too influenced by the scale, the vision and the ambition of Neom The Line in Saudi Arabia, having worked on the high-speed stations running alongside the one hundred and seventy kilometre long city for the last few years," Williamson said.
"But we in the British Isles should be equally ambitious about our future," he continued. "At present, the government seems to expect each city to compete for the same investment funding, when we need to encourage connectivity and collaboration."

The Loop is estimated to cost £130 billion
The concept for The Loop was developed in collaboration with UK engineering studio Elliott Wood and would see high-speed tracks raised on an elevated stone viaduct.
According to the proposal, the viaduct arches would be made from pre-tensioned stone beams to create "a vernacular that sits comfortably within the landscape".
Trains would travel on the viaduct at speeds of up to 300 miles per hour, meaning that all the cities would be within 90 minutes of each other.
"Travel from Edinburgh to Manchester would take less time than crossing Los Angeles," said the proposal. "It would allow people to live in Newcastle and work in Glasgow."
...
The visuals are courtesy of Chris Williamson.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2e18dgvrp4o
**snip**
The Department for Transport said it was "determined" to make travel easier for everyone, including by improving step-free access at stations.
*snip**
The Department for Transport said it was "determined" to make travel easier for everyone, including by improving step-free access at stations.
*snip**
The DfT predictably exhibits cognitive dissonance here, as it's the organisation that perceives infrequent direct trains as being suitable targets for cost-cutting, thus making train travel harder for people with disabilities (and everyone else).
Mark
Oh dear ...
at least they have added "at the earliest" into the detailed text. But, agreed, it is not clever passenger information to leave it until the last minute to give the bad news of a delay in re-opening.
I wonder - realistically - if and when we'll next see passenger trains at all three of Looe, Okehampton and Barnstaple
at least they have added "at the earliest" into the detailed text. But, agreed, it is not clever passenger information to leave it until the last minute to give the bad news of a delay in re-opening.
I wonder - realistically - if and when we'll next see passenger trains at all three of Looe, Okehampton and Barnstaple
A bit of improved weather would help, but there's no sign of it in the next few days.
If it keeps on raining, the levee's going to break.
| Re: Split tickets - rule details In "Fare's Fair" [372199/31593/4] Posted by grahame at 16:52, 9th February 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
(I have refrained from copying any detail from the post which contains information from a Staff Brief)
There is some concern over tickets being changed which will be less of an enhancement and more of a refund and rebook - which might to serious things to passenger's cash flow and result in a higher total price paid in the end.
As an example, I sometimes buy a super-off-peak Melksham to London return via Swindon, but on my return find that either I want to come back off-peak, or via Westbury. In the past, I have been able to excess my ticket - pay just the difference. What for the future?
I notes this comment that I will share. Very true.
I agree, this is the big problem with changes to the NRCoT, in that they are totally unadvertised. While I suspect that most people are totally unaware of the NRCoT in the first place, they will expect to be treated the same as in the past. Even those who are aware of the NRCoT, won't be reading them every time they purchase a ticket, and so may get caught out.
| Re: East West Rail Timetable In "Chiltern Railways services" [372198/29004/44] Posted by ray951 at 16:25, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
They need union sign off in order to operate. The depot that the DfT want Chiltern to use is currently NOT DOO, hence using DOO at Bletchley depot will mean that the RMT will be in dispute at that depot & will likely call out their members there.
Sorry, it’s still not clear to me. I understood that the drivers are employed by Chiltern and are typically ASLEF members, so which employees at Bletchley — who are RMT members — are being asked to operate DOO?
| Re: Split tickets - rule details In "Fare's Fair" [372197/31593/4] Posted by Fourbee at 16:19, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
On 4. - What if you book and then find that the conditions have changed? Yes - a little more unlikely that questions 1 and 2 which will (1) and have (2) been pertinent to my own journeys.
There is some explanation of that here https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/forthcoming-changes-to-national-rail-conditions-of-travel.293598/page-19#post-7661681(I have refrained from copying any detail from the post which contains information from a Staff Brief)
| Re: Split tickets - rule details In "Fare's Fair" [372196/31593/4] Posted by Mark A at 15:31, 9th February 2026 Already liked by Witham Bobby | ![]() |
Splitting at a request stop versus a set down / pick up only stop. A request stop is a stop, I'd imagine that to be fine. Despite the train not stopping at them, pick up / set down only are not 'Stops' so it makes sense that they do not count as far as split ticketing goes.
(And now for some reason I'm thinking of the mailbag pickup/set down apparatus for a travelling post office, can't help it, sorry...)
Mark
| Re: Split tickets - rule details In "Fare's Fair" [372195/31593/4] Posted by grahame at 14:50, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
1. Sorry, your 'either' is correct - you are changing onto a rover ticket, STJ being a station that it is valid at?.
Thank you - I was having trouble working out what "first" and "last" stations meant on a rover ticket at a junction.
| Re: Split tickets - rule details In "Fare's Fair" [372194/31593/4] Posted by ChrisB at 14:22, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
1. Sorry, your 'either' is correct - you are changing onto a rover ticket, STJ being a station that it is valid at?.
| Re: East West Rail Timetable In "Chiltern Railways services" [372193/29004/44] Posted by John D at 12:49, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
They need union sign off in order to operate. The depot that the DfT want Chiltern to use is currently NOT DOO, hence using DOO at Bletchley depot will mean that the RMT will be in dispute at that depot & will likely call out their members there.
East West rail has proposed a new depot (which is still going through planning and consultation) north of Newton Longville, north of the east-West railway, west of Bletchley, near Whaddon Road.
This will be for whole line so will have 20 sidings for 5car trains plus a maintenance depot.
But the complication is in short term, wanted to use existing non DOO depot at Bletchley in interim, and union sees it as slippery slope to converting existing Bletchley depot to DOO.
| Re: Split tickets - rule details In "Fare's Fair" [372192/31593/4] Posted by grahame at 12:45, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
1. yes
2. Not all stations are splitting stations, so unless you find one, don't worry about it.
2. Not all stations are splitting stations, so unless you find one, don't worry about it.
Question 1 was an "either / or" - good to have a positive answer Chris, but which of the alternatives I asked about was it "yes" to?
Question 2 I HAVE previously found - at the example I used (Sugar Loaf) and the train crew were less than amused.
3. Probably there for future use too enable a ticket T&Cs 'simplification'
4. Looking for them on the National Rail website - only the current version will feature
4. Looking for them on the National Rail website - only the current version will feature
On 4. - What if you book and then find that the conditions have changed? Yes - a little more unlikely that questions 1 and 2 which will (1) and have (2) been pertinent to my own journeys.
| Re: East West Rail Timetable In "Chiltern Railways services" [372191/29004/44] Posted by ChrisB at 12:21, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
They need union sign off in order to operate. The depot that the DfT want Chiltern to use is currently NOT DOO, hence using DOO at Bletchley depot will mean that the RMT will be in dispute at that depot & will likely call out their members there.
| Re: Split tickets - rule details In "Fare's Fair" [372190/31593/4] Posted by ChrisB at 12:18, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
1. yes
2. Not all stations are splitting stations, so unless you find one, don't worry about it.
3. Probably there for future use too enable a ticket T&Cs 'simplification'
4. Looking for them on the National Rail website - only the current version will feature
| Re: East West Rail Timetable In "Chiltern Railways services" [372189/29004/44] Posted by ray951 at 12:13, 9th February 2026 Already liked by Witham Bobby | ![]() |
This whole situation is incredibly frustrating and feels like yet another example of money being wasted on the railways.
I’m struggling to understand why the RMT are involved at all — if there are no guards on the trains, who exactly are they negotiating on behalf of?
| Re: Wheelchair user (from Melksham) calls for better travel facilities (BBC) In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [372188/31594/28] Posted by ChrisB at 12:11, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
In my experience, black cabs are a]only designed to take manual wheelchairs. I cannot get my powerchair into a diesel black cab although the electric ones are slightly bigger & will squeeze me in. Also you have to travel sideways in a 'traditional' diesel black cab which can be unpleasant for any distance.
| Re: East West Rail Timetable In "Chiltern Railways services" [372186/29004/44] Posted by ChrisB at 11:46, 9th February 2026 | ![]() |
Chiltern was announced nearly 18 months ago (and probably had Heads Up many weeks before that), so why starting a service is still being discussed with DfT is a mystery to me
Your answer is in the article....DOO/DCO argument with the RMT & DfT don't want to pay any more.....
A local councillor said it had been due to open in the Buckinghamshire town in December 2025 but there had been a "comedy of errors", including a row over who will control the opening and closing of carriage doors.
| Re: East West Rail Timetable In "Chiltern Railways services" [372185/29004/44] Posted by John D at 11:39, 9th February 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
An Update from a local councillor, at Winslow, who has apparently had update from Chiltern.
Chiltern was announced nearly 18 months ago (and probably had Heads Up many weeks before that), so why starting a service is still being discussed with DfT is a mystery to me
Residents of Winslow are frustrated a new railway station completed over a year ago has still not opened.
A local councillor said it had been due to open in the Buckinghamshire town in December 2025 but there had been a "comedy of errors", including a row over who will control the opening and closing of carriage doors.
Diana Blamires, who sits on the town council, said the local community was "obviously furious" and "it makes Winslow station a laughing stock".
In a statement, Chiltern Railways - responsible for operating services between Oxford and Milton Keynes - said no date for the opening had yet been confirmed.
Blamires said: "Now we are told there are no trains and the rolling stock has gone elsewhere.
"And next the platforms are going to have to be rebuilt to make them longer because of Universal Studios coming to the area."
Winslow resident Andy Dyke said the station always came up in conversations between locals.
He said: "It is frustrating for the town."
Natalie Wheble, from the East West Rail project (EWR), told a transport meeting at Buckinghamshire Council longer trains were needed because of the expected increased demand generated by the Universal theme park, due to be built near Bedford.
She said EWR expected to run five-car trains rather than the previously planned four, which meant its plans had changed.
A spokesperson for EWR added: "This uplift in capacity has led to a review of all infrastructure requirements and in the case of Winslow station, a decision has been taken to extend the platforms, so it can accommodate the use of longer trains.
"Any work to extend platforms at Winslow would not affect the introduction of Chiltern's new services."
They said that in March last year, the government had announced that Chiltern Railways would be the operator of services connecting Oxford and Milton Keynes.
"Since then, Chiltern has been working closely with the Department of Transport and industry colleagues with the aim of introducing services on the new line as soon as possible."
A local councillor said it had been due to open in the Buckinghamshire town in December 2025 but there had been a "comedy of errors", including a row over who will control the opening and closing of carriage doors.
Diana Blamires, who sits on the town council, said the local community was "obviously furious" and "it makes Winslow station a laughing stock".
In a statement, Chiltern Railways - responsible for operating services between Oxford and Milton Keynes - said no date for the opening had yet been confirmed.
Blamires said: "Now we are told there are no trains and the rolling stock has gone elsewhere.
"And next the platforms are going to have to be rebuilt to make them longer because of Universal Studios coming to the area."
Winslow resident Andy Dyke said the station always came up in conversations between locals.
He said: "It is frustrating for the town."
Natalie Wheble, from the East West Rail project (EWR), told a transport meeting at Buckinghamshire Council longer trains were needed because of the expected increased demand generated by the Universal theme park, due to be built near Bedford.
She said EWR expected to run five-car trains rather than the previously planned four, which meant its plans had changed.
A spokesperson for EWR added: "This uplift in capacity has led to a review of all infrastructure requirements and in the case of Winslow station, a decision has been taken to extend the platforms, so it can accommodate the use of longer trains.
"Any work to extend platforms at Winslow would not affect the introduction of Chiltern's new services."
They said that in March last year, the government had announced that Chiltern Railways would be the operator of services connecting Oxford and Milton Keynes.
"Since then, Chiltern has been working closely with the Department of Transport and industry colleagues with the aim of introducing services on the new line as soon as possible."
Fairly sure there was a date for opening (in 2025), but just didn't do it then, and appears haven't got a revised date yet. Reminds me of movie Zootropolis where sloths are doing (very slowly) the admin.
https://www.aol.com/articles/delays-opening-makes-station-laughing-061131519.html
Oh dear ...
at least they have added "at the earliest" into the detailed text. But, agreed, it is not clever passenger information to leave it until the last minute to give the bad news of a delay in re-opening.
I wonder - realistically - if and when we'll next see passenger trains at all three of Looe, Okehampton and Barnstaple
No trains to Barnstaple or Okehampton for at least another week
Due to flooding between Exeter St Davids and Crediton the line is closed. Disruption is expected until the end of the day on 16/02/26.
Train services between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple have been suspended.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
Flooding brought on by Storm Chandra and subsequent rain on saturated ground has meant that the Exeter to Barnstaple line has been closed.
-
The flood water has not receded, and much of the surrounding area is under water. Further forecast rain means that the line will remain closed until the end of the day on Monday 16th February at the earliest.
Train services between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple have been suspended.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
Flooding brought on by Storm Chandra and subsequent rain on saturated ground has meant that the Exeter to Barnstaple line has been closed.
-
The flood water has not receded, and much of the surrounding area is under water. Further forecast rain means that the line will remain closed until the end of the day on Monday 16th February at the earliest.
Also extended the Looe branch close to end of Monday 16th at earliest
All these 3 were showing until end of Monday 9th early yesterday evening, and not clear why they waited until early Monday to realise needed 7 extra days.
This isn't a very customer friendly way of doing updates, waiting until last day of closure to update info.














