Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [371308/231/28] Posted by chuffed at 09:19, 22nd January 2026 | ![]() |
As a regular user of the X4. I would advise getting off at Portbury footbridge and observing the terrain from there. The top of the road bridge is the highest point for miles around apart from the Portbury footbridge which crosses the M5. How many of you know that the M5 swept away the old Portbury Methodist chapel which had a 1840 broad gauge railway carriage in use as a Sunday school room, which I understand is in store at the NRM in York awaiting restoration. I did a geography degree dissertation on the effect of the M5 on the village of Portbury way back in 1972 !!
| Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [371307/26895/7] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 09:17, 22nd January 2026 | ![]() |
Indeed, I noted that Coffee Shop forum member John D has apparently posted the same wording twice, some 13 minutes apart.
I therefore need to contact him to establish whether that was intentional on his part - for whatever reason - or whether his second post was intended to include different wording.
That 'work needed' may take up the rest of the free time in my evening: you will all have to bear with me while I deal with it.
I therefore need to contact him to establish whether that was intentional on his part - for whatever reason - or whether his second post was intended to include different wording.
That 'work needed' may take up the rest of the free time in my evening: you will all have to bear with me while I deal with it.
The second one needs to be deleted, accidental duplication as internet hung and I clicked save again few minutes later. I couldn't find a delete button, sorry if I am being dumb not locating delete
Thank you, John D - and please, there's no need to apologise for a very understandable error in posting.
I will remove your duplicate post - and encourage you to make others!
CfN. [Image from here is not available to guests]
Everything seems have gone quiet regarding any news of a replacement fleet in 5-8 years time. Although might be something intermittently churning on in the background.
Modern Railways has just released an article on Siemens new Desiro verve. Seems to be a new version of desiro (of which SWR has hundreds of carriages).
23m length, designed to fit any route that can take a 23m mk3 or class 158 / 159 DMU. Normally in 3car or 5car formations (longer may be optional). The illustration suggests pairs of double doors, but nearer the centre (roughly 40% and 60% of carriage length), this is an arrangement common in Europe that allows lower floor in middle for level boarding.
Article suggests some parts come straight from the mireo (which is operating in Europe), batteries, power bogies, cab design (although tweaked to UK loading gauge).
Sounds like a dual voltage version will be available (handy for services to Gatwick, Portsmouth, Weymouth etc. or if SWR wanted them on Waterloo/Southampton - Salisbury services
https://www.modernrailways.com/article/siemens-desiro-verve-battery-electric-train
My own thought is would GWR want 2 versions of a BEMU, a 5 or 6 car regional one with seats suitable for 3+ hour journeys, and a 3car high density one for Bristol suburban (assuming Temple Meads area gets electrified soon). Ideally with few token platform extensions to allow pairs of 3car units (hopefully no more 2car units), which means platforms of at least 142m, perhaps 150m long, although on fully electric routes 165m would be better to allow 2x4car 20m EMUs (and there are lots of spare 350s in store, which would be quicker to arrive than any new fleet). I think the proposed new stations along south wales route are designed with 170m platforms.
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [371305/28982/26] Posted by REVUpminster at 09:08, 22nd January 2026 | ![]() |
Today, 175001 refurbished and 175007 unrefurbished out on training runs with 175001 expected to take up the passenger service at 1340. These two, out of eight, trains seem to be the only trains used in public service.
| Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [371304/26895/7] Posted by John D at 08:42, 22nd January 2026 | ![]() |
Indeed, I noted that Coffee Shop forum member John D has apparently posted the same wording twice, some 13 minutes apart.
I therefore need to contact him to establish whether that was intentional on his part - for whatever reason - or whether his second post was intended to include different wording.
That 'work needed' may take up the rest of the free time in my evening: you will all have to bear with me while I deal with it.
I therefore need to contact him to establish whether that was intentional on his part - for whatever reason - or whether his second post was intended to include different wording.
That 'work needed' may take up the rest of the free time in my evening: you will all have to bear with me while I deal with it.
The second one needs to be deleted, accidental duplication as internet hung and I clicked save again few minutes later. I couldn't find a delete button, sorry if I am being dumb not locating delete
Possibly splitting this off into a new topic - if the idea takes off - but could we recent posters here possibly meet up to explore the restoration of the Portishead Line together?
I am retired, with no particular calendar or timetable constraints, and I would welcome the opportunity to meet up with any others from the Coffee Shop forum for 'a bit of a jolly', just exploring the Portishead area.
If anyone is interested, please reply here initially: we'll see what potential there might be for such a meeting.
CfN.
| Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [371298/26895/7] Posted by grahame at 22:33, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
Double-talk, CfN? [Image from here is not available to guests]
see above my post...there's work needed... [Image from here is not available to guests]
Indeed, ChrisB - and isn't it great than we have an admin and a moderators who do such an excellent job keeping the place ticking over? These things are far from automatic and done by our keen team of volunteers. Ironically, they do that job so well that there's an unrealistic expectation of immediate answering of issue to a complete conclusion. If I was emailing a business, I would expect to hear back within 5 working days. And if I was dealing with my local TOC, I would have to accept a promise that they will consider fixing it in May.
ChrisB - your posts came across as a bit demanding and impatient. You didn't mean that to be the case, did you?
| Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [371295/26895/7] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:26, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
Indeed, I noted that Coffee Shop forum member John D has apparently posted the same wording twice, some 13 minutes apart.
I therefore need to contact him to establish whether that was intentional on his part - for whatever reason - or whether his second post was intended to include different wording.
That 'work needed' may take up the rest of the free time in my evening: you will all have to bear with me while I deal with it.
| Re: 07:00 Manchester - Euston In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [371294/31168/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:15, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Decision on Manchester-London 'ghost train' was uninformed, regulator admits
[Image from here is not available to guests]
The rail regulator has admitted it "did not have all the facts" when it decided to not allow passengers on a peak-time train service between Manchester and London.
The Office of Road and Rail (ORR) said it was missing "critical points" when it made a decision that would have turned the service into a 'ghost train' running daily for months.
ORR chief executive John Larkinson said his organisation did not know the train would be "fully crewed", would leave from Manchester Piccadilly rather than a depot, and that it had to get to Euston to become the 09:30 GMT service to Glasgow.
"The information that later became available to us meant that our assumption turned out to be incorrect," he said. It comes after the ORR in November faced a backlash over its decision to allow the popular 07:00 train to run, but carrying only staff.
The decision, which would have taken effect from mid-December, was quickly reversed after significant criticism, including from Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander.
The ORR had justified the decision by saying the service had to run empty so its slot could be used as a firebreak - a planned gap in the timetable in case of delays. But, in a letter to the chair of Parliament's Transport Committee, Ruth Cadbury, Larkinson said the facts which later came to light meant the slot could no longer be considered an effective firebreak.
Larkinson said the ORR team assessing the application didn't ask Avanti for further information, which would have made the points clear. He said if the ORR team had contacted Avanti, its decision "may have been different, but they were stretched and trying to close out multiple interacting decisions".
He added that the ORR was dealing at the time with 82 "complex and competing" applications for track access. Even when the train operating company complained in early November, the points they made were not "escalated appropriately", his letter said.
Larkinson described it as "an unusual case, but nevertheless one we will learn from". He added: "I take full responsibility for what happened and we are strengthening our processes to reflect the lessons we have learned."
A statement in response from Cadbury, the Labour MP for Brentford and Isleworth, said: "The public was understandably baffled by the ORR's decision not to allow the 7am fast service from Manchester to London to carry passengers when a fully crewed train was running anyway. On the face of it, this was a strange decision - especially when the train was popular and profitable - and one that the Transport Committee had a number of questions about. Now we have some answers, a detailed explanation for why this happened and a welcome recognition of responsibility."
She said the committee will look for ways to avoid similar instances in the future as the government establishes Great British Railways.
[Image from here is not available to guests]
The rail regulator has admitted it "did not have all the facts" when it decided to not allow passengers on a peak-time train service between Manchester and London.
The Office of Road and Rail (ORR) said it was missing "critical points" when it made a decision that would have turned the service into a 'ghost train' running daily for months.
ORR chief executive John Larkinson said his organisation did not know the train would be "fully crewed", would leave from Manchester Piccadilly rather than a depot, and that it had to get to Euston to become the 09:30 GMT service to Glasgow.
"The information that later became available to us meant that our assumption turned out to be incorrect," he said. It comes after the ORR in November faced a backlash over its decision to allow the popular 07:00 train to run, but carrying only staff.
The decision, which would have taken effect from mid-December, was quickly reversed after significant criticism, including from Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander.
The ORR had justified the decision by saying the service had to run empty so its slot could be used as a firebreak - a planned gap in the timetable in case of delays. But, in a letter to the chair of Parliament's Transport Committee, Ruth Cadbury, Larkinson said the facts which later came to light meant the slot could no longer be considered an effective firebreak.
Larkinson said the ORR team assessing the application didn't ask Avanti for further information, which would have made the points clear. He said if the ORR team had contacted Avanti, its decision "may have been different, but they were stretched and trying to close out multiple interacting decisions".
He added that the ORR was dealing at the time with 82 "complex and competing" applications for track access. Even when the train operating company complained in early November, the points they made were not "escalated appropriately", his letter said.
Larkinson described it as "an unusual case, but nevertheless one we will learn from". He added: "I take full responsibility for what happened and we are strengthening our processes to reflect the lessons we have learned."
A statement in response from Cadbury, the Labour MP for Brentford and Isleworth, said: "The public was understandably baffled by the ORR's decision not to allow the 7am fast service from Manchester to London to carry passengers when a fully crewed train was running anyway. On the face of it, this was a strange decision - especially when the train was popular and profitable - and one that the Transport Committee had a number of questions about. Now we have some answers, a detailed explanation for why this happened and a welcome recognition of responsibility."
She said the committee will look for ways to avoid similar instances in the future as the government establishes Great British Railways.
| Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [371293/26895/7] Posted by ChrisB at 21:01, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
see above my post...there's work needed... [Image from here is not available to guests]
| Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [371292/26895/7] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:57, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
Ehh [Image from here is not available to guests] [Image from here is not available to guests]
Nothing to do with me! [Image from here is not available to guests]
| Jet Lag The Game, YouTube. In "Media about railways, and other means of transport" [371291/31488/49] Posted by JayMac at 20:54, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
Anyone else here watch the travel games produced by Wendover Productions on YouTube?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_Lag:_The_Game
They play hide and seek, tag, region (state, country) acquisition games and even a circumnavigation game, using public transport. Two teams compete against each other and they use game specific cards to get clues and add jeopardy; with tasks, forfeits, curses, challenges and time bonuses. Sixteen seasons of various games across the world. Each new episode is shown first on the content creator owned streaming platform Nebula. Then on YouTube a week later.
Their current series is a game of hide and seek across the UK, mostly using the rail network. And very good it is too.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB7ZcpBcwdC5V7encRbWQdst2keI78jyL&si
| Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [371290/26895/7] Posted by ChrisB at 20:41, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
Double-talk, CfN? [Image from here is not available to guests]
| Hampshire County Council plans charges for roadwork lane closures In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [371289/31487/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:36, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Charges planned to curb peak-time roadworks
A proposal to charge utility companies up to £2,500 a day for carrying out roadworks has been submitted to the Department for Transport (DfT).
Hampshire County Council says the lane rental scheme, if approved, could generate around £1.6m annually to be reinvested in maintaining the county's road network, including pothole repairs.
The council wants to implement a daily charge of £2,500 for a full road closure and £1,500 for lane closures or the use of temporary traffic lights.
The plan was signed off by the local authority on 19 January and if the DfT gives the scheme the go-ahead, it could be introduced later this year.
Under national rules, councils can apply lane rental charges only during the busiest traffic periods, with exemptions at other times.
Based on data from recent works, officials estimate the scheme could bring in around £2.8m in gross income each year. Of that, roughly £1.2m would cover administrative costs, leaving £1.6m for road maintenance.
The council said the primary aim was not to raise revenue but to encourage faster completion of works and to deter companies from scheduling disruptive activity at peak times.
Approving the plans, Councillor Lulu Bowerman, the cabinet member for highways and public transport, said she was "really pleased to see it coming forward", adding that residents regularly experienced congestion caused by roadworks. "This is about encouraging behavioural change," she said. "The sooner we can bring this in, the better."
Tim Lawton, the council's assistant director, told a committee meeting that officers had "high confidence" the proposal met all national requirements.
During the decision session, Councillor Kirsty North noted that the maximum charges allowed by government had not changed since the scheme became possible in 2012. She said it would be "fair" to highlight that the council was limited by outdated legislation, adding she hoped the DfT would approve the scheme so the county could "reduce congestion and repair potholes".
An application to run a similar scheme was made by Southampton City Council in 2025.
A proposal to charge utility companies up to £2,500 a day for carrying out roadworks has been submitted to the Department for Transport (DfT).
Hampshire County Council says the lane rental scheme, if approved, could generate around £1.6m annually to be reinvested in maintaining the county's road network, including pothole repairs.
The council wants to implement a daily charge of £2,500 for a full road closure and £1,500 for lane closures or the use of temporary traffic lights.
The plan was signed off by the local authority on 19 January and if the DfT gives the scheme the go-ahead, it could be introduced later this year.
Under national rules, councils can apply lane rental charges only during the busiest traffic periods, with exemptions at other times.
Based on data from recent works, officials estimate the scheme could bring in around £2.8m in gross income each year. Of that, roughly £1.2m would cover administrative costs, leaving £1.6m for road maintenance.
The council said the primary aim was not to raise revenue but to encourage faster completion of works and to deter companies from scheduling disruptive activity at peak times.
Approving the plans, Councillor Lulu Bowerman, the cabinet member for highways and public transport, said she was "really pleased to see it coming forward", adding that residents regularly experienced congestion caused by roadworks. "This is about encouraging behavioural change," she said. "The sooner we can bring this in, the better."
Tim Lawton, the council's assistant director, told a committee meeting that officers had "high confidence" the proposal met all national requirements.
During the decision session, Councillor Kirsty North noted that the maximum charges allowed by government had not changed since the scheme became possible in 2012. She said it would be "fair" to highlight that the council was limited by outdated legislation, adding she hoped the DfT would approve the scheme so the county could "reduce congestion and repair potholes".
An application to run a similar scheme was made by Southampton City Council in 2025.
| Re: Engineering overrun - to Gatwick, 19th January 2026 In "North Downs Line" [371288/31476/16] Posted by Surrey 455 at 19:48, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
Again - perhaps GBR will bring the automatic ability to use the next train in the event of disruption - however it's painted (though I understand that there's a lot of swapping of 387 units been going on, and the paint job does not confirm who's running it these days!
Indeed, yesterday I saw two trains joined together at Clapham Junction. The side displays were showing Gatwick Express to Victoria. The front train appeared to be black but I eventually realised it was dark GWR green. The rear train seemed to be white with blue doors. Previously Great Northern maybe?
| Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [371287/26895/7] Posted by John D at 19:30, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
Duplicate, please delete
| Re: New Forest trainline closed for emergency repairs after landslip In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [371285/31464/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:23, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
Noting that the BBC have now reverted to the rather more common usage of the terminology 'branch line' ... [Image from here is not available to guests]
From the BBC:
Brockenhurst - Lymington branch line service to resume after track repairs
[Image from here is not available to guests]
A full service is expected to resume on a branch line after a small landslip.
The track between Brockenhurst and Lymington Pier in Hampshire was closed from Friday to Sunday after heavy rain. The line then reopened with one train per hour - rather than two - in each direction and a reduced speed limit.
Network Rail said it hoped to restore a full service on Thursday, although it said further work would be carried out on the weekend of 21/22 February. The recent three-day closure was caused by heavy rain that shifted an embankment near Battramsley. Engineers found a further track defect nearby, which is due to be repaired on Wednesday night, the track operator added.
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Previously, South Western Railway said a reduced service was expected until 23 February due to the complexity of the work. However, some of the repairs were brought forward due to the damage from Storm Goretti, according to Network Rail. The ground beneath the track was rebuilt and sheet piles were driven in to hold the embankment in place.
Infrastructure director Tom McNamee from Network Rail said: "I would like to thank our passengers for bearing with us. The recent wet weather and Storm Goretti left us with no choice but to get our teams to come in and carry out these vital repairs."
[Image from here is not available to guests]
A full service is expected to resume on a branch line after a small landslip.
The track between Brockenhurst and Lymington Pier in Hampshire was closed from Friday to Sunday after heavy rain. The line then reopened with one train per hour - rather than two - in each direction and a reduced speed limit.
Network Rail said it hoped to restore a full service on Thursday, although it said further work would be carried out on the weekend of 21/22 February. The recent three-day closure was caused by heavy rain that shifted an embankment near Battramsley. Engineers found a further track defect nearby, which is due to be repaired on Wednesday night, the track operator added.
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Previously, South Western Railway said a reduced service was expected until 23 February due to the complexity of the work. However, some of the repairs were brought forward due to the damage from Storm Goretti, according to Network Rail. The ground beneath the track was rebuilt and sheet piles were driven in to hold the embankment in place.
Infrastructure director Tom McNamee from Network Rail said: "I would like to thank our passengers for bearing with us. The recent wet weather and Storm Goretti left us with no choice but to get our teams to come in and carry out these vital repairs."
| Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens In "London to Reading" [371284/26895/7] Posted by John D at 19:17, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
Twyford has 1,754,790 journeys in latest annual station figures, virtually double the figure 25-30 years ago
Using Mr Jupps dataset it is highest year of the 25-30 years
If the park car is full by 7am (as BBC reports) then clearly isn't big enough, no debate. If there is a debatable item it is why expansion wasn't started months (or couple of years) ago.
Yes people are going back to office (it was well known 6+ months ago that many companies demanded it no later than start of 2026), so is not a surprise. After all staff continuity, training and mentoring grinds to a halt when staff can't learn from their colleagues.
This seems like classic case of someone taking their eye off the ball (for months) and not reacting earlier to spot the impending problem.
| Re: Preventing suicide on the railways In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [371282/6100/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:00, 21st January 2026 | ![]() |
This update is not specific to the railways, but it does reference the Samaritans and other organisations who are available to provide support to those who need it.
From the BBC, with the linked heading 'Northern Ireland woman bereaved by suicide calls for greater funding to prevent deaths':
'I don't want anyone else to die by suicide'
[Image from here is not available to guests]
"I'm just this wee girl who wants to make a difference, who wants to help people, who doesn't want anyone else to die by suicide," says Claire Curran
A woman who has lost several members of her family to suicide has said more funding is needed for suicide prevention.
Claire Curran now uses her loss to help other families bereaved through suicide.
It comes as it was announced a new cross-party inquiry will examine how suicide prevention services are funded in Northern Ireland and how best to tackle the rising numbers.
New figures confirm that 290 deaths by suicide were registered in Northern Ireland in 2024.
The inquiry was launched by the All-Party Group (APG) on Suicide Prevention on Tuesday.
MLAs, community groups and charity leaders gathered at Stormont for the launch. Many of the intendees like Curran, had firsthand experience of losing a loved one to suicide.
She works with the Families' Voices Forum and Samaritans and believes such community groups could face closure unless more funding is allocated. "It's really difficult for services, community and voluntary, who don't have sustainable funding, so they don't know that they're going to be there," she said. "They're taking clients, they're working with them, they're helping and supporting them, but they don't know whether they're going to be there if they need more. They don't know what's going to happen next year."
"Services are closing, and when services close, they don't reopen. Our health service, our mental health service, has waiting lists. They are struggling to cope," she added. "If we lose our community and voluntary sector, what happens to all of those people who are struggling, who need help and support? We have to be able to provide that for them."
Curran is hopeful that the inquiry will ensure that funding is made available to keep suicide prevention services open. "I'm no one special. I'm just this wee girl who wants to make a difference, who wants to help people, who doesn't want anyone else to die by suicide. I know that we can't stop everyone, but we can greatly reduce the numbers," she said. "Everyone needs to get behind this because suicide is everybody's business. We all have a role to play, so actually let's step up and do that. Let's make sure that those who are making the decisions step up to do that too."
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Sarah O'Toole of Samaritans Ireland said: "What we would really like to see is suicide prevention policies that exists across departments"
The Samaritans say those phoning their helpline call for many different reasons - reasons that do not sit in the health portfolio. Callers have reached a crisis point because of problems with housing, the criminal justice system or social services.
Sarah O'Toole of Samaritans Ireland believes a joined-up and cross-departmental approach by Stormont could be the answer. "The large proportion of funding around suicide prevention does go into the health budget, but unfortunately some of the actions around the mental health strategy have been paused or stopped due to financial constraints," she said. "What we would really like to see is suicide prevention policies that exists across departments, working together, but within those policies you have plans that are fundable and are actioned as well."
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Órlaithí Flynn MLA said politicians must come together to support community groups
APG chair Órlaithí Flynn MLA has praised the work of community groups, but said politicians need to come together to support them. She said there is "so many wonderful suicide prevention groups that are constantly doing life-saving work out in our local communities". She added that "many of them aren't in receipt of any core funding from the Department of Health because that pot of money is very, very small and many of them are surviving on local fundraising initiatives".
"What we hope is to highlight the importance - the life-saving importance - of these groups and the work that they're doing and potentially to look at any cross-departmental options that are available."
Health Minister Mike Nesbitt MLA, who officially launched the inquiry, said suicide prevention could not be delivered by one department alone. "The factors that place people at risk span health, housing, education, justice, community safety and economic pressures," he said. "I welcome this inquiry and the opportunity it creates to strengthen how government works together to support prevention, early intervention and community resilience."
Latest figures from statistics agency Nisra show that 290 suicides were registered in Northern Ireland in 2024. The average number of registered suicides for each year between 2014 and 2017 was 205. That number jumped to an average of 238 each year between 2021 and 2024.
Suicide remains the leading cause of death in men under 50. In 2024, almost eight in 10 of the suicide deaths registered were men.
For support and more information on emotional distress, help is available on the BBC Action Line.
[Image from here is not available to guests]
"I'm just this wee girl who wants to make a difference, who wants to help people, who doesn't want anyone else to die by suicide," says Claire Curran
A woman who has lost several members of her family to suicide has said more funding is needed for suicide prevention.
Claire Curran now uses her loss to help other families bereaved through suicide.
It comes as it was announced a new cross-party inquiry will examine how suicide prevention services are funded in Northern Ireland and how best to tackle the rising numbers.
New figures confirm that 290 deaths by suicide were registered in Northern Ireland in 2024.
The inquiry was launched by the All-Party Group (APG) on Suicide Prevention on Tuesday.
MLAs, community groups and charity leaders gathered at Stormont for the launch. Many of the intendees like Curran, had firsthand experience of losing a loved one to suicide.
She works with the Families' Voices Forum and Samaritans and believes such community groups could face closure unless more funding is allocated. "It's really difficult for services, community and voluntary, who don't have sustainable funding, so they don't know that they're going to be there," she said. "They're taking clients, they're working with them, they're helping and supporting them, but they don't know whether they're going to be there if they need more. They don't know what's going to happen next year."
"Services are closing, and when services close, they don't reopen. Our health service, our mental health service, has waiting lists. They are struggling to cope," she added. "If we lose our community and voluntary sector, what happens to all of those people who are struggling, who need help and support? We have to be able to provide that for them."
Curran is hopeful that the inquiry will ensure that funding is made available to keep suicide prevention services open. "I'm no one special. I'm just this wee girl who wants to make a difference, who wants to help people, who doesn't want anyone else to die by suicide. I know that we can't stop everyone, but we can greatly reduce the numbers," she said. "Everyone needs to get behind this because suicide is everybody's business. We all have a role to play, so actually let's step up and do that. Let's make sure that those who are making the decisions step up to do that too."
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Sarah O'Toole of Samaritans Ireland said: "What we would really like to see is suicide prevention policies that exists across departments"
The Samaritans say those phoning their helpline call for many different reasons - reasons that do not sit in the health portfolio. Callers have reached a crisis point because of problems with housing, the criminal justice system or social services.
Sarah O'Toole of Samaritans Ireland believes a joined-up and cross-departmental approach by Stormont could be the answer. "The large proportion of funding around suicide prevention does go into the health budget, but unfortunately some of the actions around the mental health strategy have been paused or stopped due to financial constraints," she said. "What we would really like to see is suicide prevention policies that exists across departments, working together, but within those policies you have plans that are fundable and are actioned as well."
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Órlaithí Flynn MLA said politicians must come together to support community groups
APG chair Órlaithí Flynn MLA has praised the work of community groups, but said politicians need to come together to support them. She said there is "so many wonderful suicide prevention groups that are constantly doing life-saving work out in our local communities". She added that "many of them aren't in receipt of any core funding from the Department of Health because that pot of money is very, very small and many of them are surviving on local fundraising initiatives".
"What we hope is to highlight the importance - the life-saving importance - of these groups and the work that they're doing and potentially to look at any cross-departmental options that are available."
Health Minister Mike Nesbitt MLA, who officially launched the inquiry, said suicide prevention could not be delivered by one department alone. "The factors that place people at risk span health, housing, education, justice, community safety and economic pressures," he said. "I welcome this inquiry and the opportunity it creates to strengthen how government works together to support prevention, early intervention and community resilience."
Latest figures from statistics agency Nisra show that 290 suicides were registered in Northern Ireland in 2024. The average number of registered suicides for each year between 2014 and 2017 was 205. That number jumped to an average of 238 each year between 2021 and 2024.
Suicide remains the leading cause of death in men under 50. In 2024, almost eight in 10 of the suicide deaths registered were men.
For support and more information on emotional distress, help is available on the BBC Action Line.
Worth pointing out that the last couple of hundred metres of Sheepway as you approach old Portbury Station from Portishead are really nasty to walk along, with some blind bends and fairly fast traffic. Most motorists I met were very courteous, but one of two were on me before either party had much chance to react.
Worth pointing out indeed and I'll definitely take that into account in my planning....a train would be a preferable future transport option to an ambulance.
An update, from the BBC:
One of two missing Christmas Day swimmers found
The body of a 47-year-old man has been recovered after two swimmers went missing on Christmas Day, police have said.
Officers said they found the man at Sandy Bay near Exmouth on Tuesday after two swimmers went missing in stormy seas at Budleigh Salterton, Devon, on 25 December.
Formal identification is yet to be carried out, but officers said they believe the person to be a 47-year-old man. His next-of-kin have been informed. One of the swimmers was named as 64-year-old local antiques dealer Matthew Upham.
Supt Ryan Doyle, from Devon and Cornwall Police, said the discovery was "very sad news". He added: "We have spoken with his family and we are continuing to support them through this difficult time. Understandably they have asked for their privacy to be respected. The family of the second missing man has also been informed and are being supported."
(BBC article continues)
The body of a 47-year-old man has been recovered after two swimmers went missing on Christmas Day, police have said.
Officers said they found the man at Sandy Bay near Exmouth on Tuesday after two swimmers went missing in stormy seas at Budleigh Salterton, Devon, on 25 December.
Formal identification is yet to be carried out, but officers said they believe the person to be a 47-year-old man. His next-of-kin have been informed. One of the swimmers was named as 64-year-old local antiques dealer Matthew Upham.
Supt Ryan Doyle, from Devon and Cornwall Police, said the discovery was "very sad news". He added: "We have spoken with his family and we are continuing to support them through this difficult time. Understandably they have asked for their privacy to be respected. The family of the second missing man has also been informed and are being supported."
(BBC article continues)














