Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 08 Jan 2025
 
* Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:22 Reading to Shalford
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 21:08:32 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[154] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[114] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[72] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[56] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[47] senior railcard
[46] Coastal walks - station to station
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
  Print  
Author Topic: First Great Western announces extra capacity across network  (Read 54555 times)
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1264


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2011, 13:19:50 »

HMm, som,ewhere I have read that the Adelantes are only for use on weekdays.
Yep. But I'm told the CLPG» (Cotswold Line Promotion Group - about) is pressing for at least one of them to be allowed out to do the notorious Sunday Hereford run.
Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: November 22, 2011, 14:34:20 »

Good to see this going ahead, all this additional rollowing stock is badly needed.

Now all I am waiting for is rumoured annoucement about IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) etc according to reports on WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes).
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: November 22, 2011, 14:48:06 »

Are you sure about that? Both the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) & FGW (First Great Western) have referred to this being the case....I thought the DfT (or was it the SRA» (Strategic Rail Authority - about)?) specified both TT and stock....
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: November 22, 2011, 16:53:48 »

HMm, som,ewhere I have read that the Adelantes are only for use on weekdays.
Yep. But I'm told the CLPG» (Cotswold Line Promotion Group - about) is pressing for at least one of them to be allowed out to do the notorious Sunday Hereford run.

Several of the Saturday services would actually be problematic with an Adelante, as growth over the last few years means that on the Oxford to London leg several of them now run as 5/6 car Turbos.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: November 22, 2011, 17:23:18 »

Which equates to a 10car double-180....hmmm
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2011, 17:30:58 »

nothing specific about cardiff-pompy then?

a friend of mine traveled last weekend on a 5 car formation between bristol and salisbury and it was full and standing
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #21 on: November 22, 2011, 17:31:38 »

DfT» (Department for Transport - about) Press release online at  http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/press-releases/dft-press-20111122 (I don't think anyone's posted the link yet)

Generally to be welcomed - I certainly had the journey from Hell last week, but that that was a service that was a carriage down even on what is should have been - "this train has no coach A ..."

It seems - exclusively as far as I can see - to be about making existing trains longer.  No new services AT ALL, right?

The total cost of providing these services until the expected end of the First Great Western franchise in April 2013 is ^28.9m. And how much extra income will be raised from extra ticket sales?

The carriages providing additional capacity to Falmouth, Truro and Torbay are being part funded by Devon and Cornwall County Councils as well as a contribution from the Devon & Cornwall Community Rail Partnership. Does that mean that their allocation is based on the highest bid rather than the greatest need?

The extra carriages will create a total of 2,266 seats in the morning three hour peak and 2,233 seats in the evening three hour peak into and out of London Paddington.  Other locations will also benefit including Reading, which will see 1,483 extra seats in the morning peak and 1,731 extra seats in the evening peak  Some of extra seats that leave Reading are extra seats that will arrive at Paddington, right?

As I say - general welcome, no surprises to me.  Slight disappointment (but heavily pre-warned) that not even a couple of the 48 carriages of extra stock are being used for service enhancements on a certain line which is crying out for fill in trains.  Perhaps the fear is it would generate too much traffic for them to cope?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: November 22, 2011, 17:44:14 »

nothing specific about cardiff-pompy then?

a friend of mine traveled last weekend on a 5 car formation between bristol and salisbury and it was full and standing

What's the shortest platform length on that route. Could you add another vehicle? Although as I said earlier, those RDG(resolve)-BSK (Brake Standard Corridor (carriage)) 150s are in the Bristyol area over weekends, so it may be possible?.....

Re Graham's post.....

Just extra seats, no new services, correct. Those are specified at franchise, or paid for by the TOC (Train Operating Company). Not a chance with 16 months to go.

Why are people equating extra seats with extra sales? Are people going to say - "oh, that train now has an extra coach, I may as well go for a ride now"....? No, of course they're not. So why? All this is going to do in the main is to allow those standing commuters to get a better chance of a seat. Nothing more.

Any sales that do occur will a) pay for the RPIs (Revenue Protection Inspector (or Retail Price Index, depending on the context))/gates/depot upgrading....or be deducted from the cap 'n collar payments - so revenue will be practically neutral.

NO, it means those coaches wouldn't have materialised if those organisations hadn't put their hands in their pockets. So come on Wiltshire - you missed another opportunity to spend some council tax! I would suggest also that standing, crushed passengers are in greater need of extra seats than a line with few services?

Yes, those Reading extra seats will be included in the Paddington extra seats!



« Last Edit: November 22, 2011, 17:49:26 by ChrisB » Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: November 22, 2011, 17:46:45 »

DfT» (Department for Transport - about) Press release online at  http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/press-releases/dft-press-20111122 (I don't think anyone's posted the link yet)

Er..  reply #2 from Richard Fairhurst?

Paul
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: November 22, 2011, 17:55:50 »

Good to see that the 180s are replacing Thames Turbos and no HSTs (High Speed Train) on Cotswold line. Any idea if this will enable a more frequent service? i.e. hourly to Worcester.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #25 on: November 22, 2011, 18:08:11 »

No, no extra services. This is purely adding seating capacity.
Logged
bigdaz
Guest
« Reply #26 on: November 22, 2011, 19:21:01 »

Does this mean that the turbos no longer used on the Cotswold line could lead perhaps to some 6-coach turbos on the North Downs Line during the morning and evening peak, as once again I notice no proposed improvement to services on this well-used line!
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: November 22, 2011, 19:40:44 »

Grahame ...An HST (High Speed Train) cannot run with out Coach A was it there but locked out of use
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
northwesterntrains
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 324


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: November 22, 2011, 19:50:57 »

Remember, the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) screwed up at the start of this franchise by supplying to little stock within it to satisfy demand.

Hang on. Chris ... each bidder for the franchise was asked to specify how much stock they would require, so the responsibility is surely with the bidder.   If I go into my local Asda and buy a small turkey to feed 20 people at Christmas and they all leave still feeling hungry, I'm the one that's made the mistake for underbuying - I can't blame Asda for tempting me to buy a too-small bird at a lower price than a bigger one.

It's not always the case though.  In their TransPennine bid First and Kelios specified new 3 car DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit), which could be extended to 4 car DMUs, in contrast Arriva specified the more expensive option of 4 car DEMUs (Diesel Electric Multiple Unit).  The First/Kelios bid won.  However, what should have been an order of 56 x 3 car units, finished up as an order of 51 x 3 car units plus 9 cascaded 2 car 170s.  The 4th carriage option was not taken up despite huge growth in passenger numbers.  Then to top it off the Virgin Voyager service between Manchester and Scotland was withdrawn and TPE (Trans Pennine Express) had to use their existing stock to run a Scottish service, so they withdrew their Manchester Airport to Windermere service (except for a token service) and reduced capacity on other TPE routes by using the 170s in 2 car formation instead of 4 car formation.

Then it's accepted Manchester-Bolton-Preston needs more capacity so Northern get told to run additional services, they get the extra stock to run the additional services, then DfT say look we're giving Northern extra carriages.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: November 22, 2011, 19:55:13 »

Just trying to understand the Mk 3 buffet point.  It talks about converting them to standard, and being extra, so am I right to assume that they are taking the off lease vehicles, stripping out the buffets and making them all seating (TSOs (The Stationary Office (now OPSI))).  Or are they simply taking the in service full buffets and converting the seating to standard.

If the former, it'll be a bit ironic that they went to all the trouble of building the micro buffets into existing TSOs and now they are converting full buffets to TSOs. Still, mustn't complain too much.

It appears that the only impact on Bristol commuters is in respect of the HST (High Speed Train) lengthening, as the extra Class 150 vehicles replace Class 153 vehicles?  
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page