ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #525 on: September 21, 2016, 18:32:31 » |
|
NR» has promised Chiltern that the two bay platforms 1 & 2 will be 6car & ready by 11 Dec. I was present at the time.
There are two 9car & 1 silver LHCS▸ running at the moment in the AM and 1 9car & 1 LHCS in the evening. These will all shunt via Hinksey Yard & likely leave from platform 3 - so an Up train leaving from the down platform.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #526 on: September 21, 2016, 18:47:16 » |
|
NR» has promised Chiltern that the two bay platforms 1 & 2 will be 6car & ready by 11 Dec. I was present at the time.
OK, well - we'll see! When did they promise that? If so I predict the platforms will be held together by blu-tac and sticking plasters! There are two 9car & 1 silver LHCS▸ running at the moment in the AM and 1 9car & 1 LHCS in the evening. These will all shunt via Hinksey Yard & likely leave from platform 3 - so an Up train leaving from the down platform.
Platform 4 you mean. And yes, it joins Exeter St. Davids in being the only GWR▸ stations where London trains will depart in opposite directions from the same station.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #527 on: September 21, 2016, 18:50:49 » |
|
Yes, I meant platform 4....but 3 is possible too, the shunt becomes complicated, but could be done if necessary...it was explained at rhe same time as the promise was made. This was a NR» drop-in session at the Said Business School week before last now, I think
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #528 on: September 21, 2016, 19:11:58 » |
|
Yes, 3 is the quoted platform for the 19:20 with the other four all booked from 4. Certainly going to have a bearing on punctuality having an extra seven trains a day using 3 and 4.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
|
Gordon the Blue Engine
|
|
« Reply #530 on: September 22, 2016, 16:48:53 » |
|
Platform 4 you mean. And yes, it joins Exeter St. Davids in being the only GWR▸ stations where London trains will depart in opposite directions from the same station.
What about Westbury?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #531 on: September 22, 2016, 16:51:11 » |
|
yep, I guess so now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #532 on: September 22, 2016, 17:06:47 » |
|
Westbury's an excellent thought.
How about Yeovil Pen Mill?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #533 on: September 23, 2016, 10:17:30 » |
|
Yeovil Pen Mill? Are there through trains in each direction?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #534 on: September 23, 2016, 10:23:31 » |
|
Through *Up* trains in each direction, that is?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #535 on: September 23, 2016, 10:25:48 » |
|
Westbury's an excellent thought.
How about Yeovil Pen Mill?
I stand corrected on both counts!
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #536 on: September 23, 2016, 13:54:56 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6594
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #537 on: September 26, 2016, 17:02:43 » |
|
Westbury's an excellent thought.
How about Yeovil Pen Mill?
A cheeky one, but how about Termple Meads once IEPs▸ start running via Bath and Parkway?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #538 on: September 26, 2016, 17:13:05 » |
|
A cheeky one, but how about Termple Meads once IEPs▸ start running via Bath and Parkway?
They wouldn't be 'departing (from the platforms) in two different directions', would they? Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #539 on: September 26, 2016, 17:15:44 » |
|
A cheeky one, but how about Termple Meads once IEPs▸ start running via Bath and Parkway?
They wouldn't be 'departing (from the platforms) in two different directions', would they? Paul Indeed - and why wait for the IEP as there's already an HST▸ from Temple Meads to London via Parkway at around 04:47
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
|