|
phile
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2011, 17:01:44 » |
|
Just picked an FGW▸ at random and shown until 12 May 2012 not December 2012
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2011, 17:04:26 » |
|
Just picked an FGW▸ at random and shown until 12 May 2012 not December 2012
SWT▸ timetables run through to December 2012. FGW until May.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2011, 17:18:01 » |
|
Odd that XC▸ have gone back to only two timetables for the long distance services again, it means for instance that for Reading to Brum services you need both booklets?
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SandTEngineer
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2011, 19:48:58 » |
|
I think they need to get a new proof reader or else there is a new service from St.Erth via Penryn to Plymouth not calling at Truro
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2011, 20:40:54 » |
|
Not unusually, it appears that proof reading has been non-existent. Same thing twice a year. The Severn Beach Line timetable Sundays has the stations the wrong way round for the times out of Bristol.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
Brucey
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2011, 20:42:18 » |
|
So if the SWT▸ timetables are valid for a year, are the GW▸ and SN times shown within the SWT timetables also valid for the whole year?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2011, 21:05:08 » |
|
So if the SWT▸ timetables are valid for a year, are the GW▸ and SN times shown within the SWT timetables also valid for the whole year?
I'm fairly sure the original Network Rail announcement was that all 2012 timetables would run for 12 months - it was about the time they announced that special games advance fares would be available a year in advance. Perhaps someone in FGW▸ has just accidentally carried on the normal printing routine - the theoretical change date will have been known for some years as normal... OTOH▸ it may just be that something more subtle is going on, such as nothing can actually be changed, but summer only services that are already confirmed now can be left out of the winter version, and added in May? Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2011, 22:24:20 » |
|
OTOH▸ it may just be that something more subtle is going on, such as nothing can actually be changed, but summer only services that are already confirmed now can be left out of the winter version, and added in May?
Paul
Interesting one this as May 13th is a Sunday not a Saturday when the timetable usually finishes. You have Southeastern saying their timetables run until May 19th which is in line with the schedule posted on the Network Rail website saying the summer timetable starts on May 20th but then goes onto to state that on this occasion the printed version of the 'summer' timetable will show this as Monday May 14th! http://www.networkrail.co.uk/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=30064778309Either it starts on Monday May 14th or Sunday May 20th. Make up your mind Network Rail. Which is it to be? And just to throw this in for good measure...East Coast has their timetable running until June 24th. So we have different TOCs▸ appearing to end their timetables at different times throughout the year but the actual content probably changing very little from the start of this December's timetable. I very much suspect Barry Doe with have a good rant about this in the coming days. Only on the railways could something like this happen. PS Just discovered Southern show on their timetables running until May 18th! Crazy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SandTEngineer
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2011, 22:26:33 » |
|
!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2011, 22:34:00 » |
|
Yeah it was a shame that once again Network Rail have failed to post the new complete timetable onto their website one month out. I believe this happened last year or the year before. All the TOCs▸ websites that I have checked all have their timetables posted on their websites apart from ATW▸ which when I last checked had some timetables missing hence me not posting a link for them at the start of this thread. So if they can manage it why can't the publishers of the railway timetable?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheLastMinute
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2011, 09:46:10 » |
|
Not unusually, it appears that proof reading has been non-existent. Same thing twice a year. The Severn Beach Line timetable Sundays has the stations the wrong way round for the times out of Bristol. Worse on the Cardiff/Bristol to Weston-s-Mare/Exeter timetable, all stations in the Bristol to Exeter direction are the wrong way, i.e. they are listed from Exeter to Bristol throughout the whole timetable. Either that or FGW▸ are starting services at Patchway and XC▸ are running a service non-stop from Patchway to Yatton and then Bridgewater then on to Edinburgh. Not good that they could release something that wrong! TLM
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2011, 12:51:15 » |
|
Worse on the Cardiff/Bristol to Weston-s-Mare/Exeter timetable, all stations in the Bristol to Exeter direction are the wrong way, i.e. they are listed from Exeter to Bristol throughout the whole timetable. Either that or FGW▸ are starting services at Patchway and XC▸ are running a service non-stop from Patchway to Yatton and then Bridgewater then on to Edinburgh.
Not good that they could release something that wrong!
TLM
If FGW reads the above observations, I would like to think that someone there would take some time over the next few days to go through the list of timetables to check for errors like those that have been highlighted. Because they are now publishing on the website the versions that became available back in May for those with smartphones rather than pdfs of the printed versions, they should be fairly easy to fix.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2011, 20:28:43 » |
|
Hopefully, FGW▸ will read these observations and comments: I've drawn the attention of certain senior people there to them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
rogerpatenall
|
|
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2011, 14:01:43 » |
|
I've just spent 15 minutes comparing the post December service at Castle cary in the three timetables, and I have a long list of anomalies. In my ignorance I thought the timetable 'books' were compiled from the same data base, so that an obvious mistake or omission would appear throughout, but that is obviously not the situation.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|