Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:55 28 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
28th Apr (1996)
GNER franchise (Sea Containers) starts on ECML (*)

Train RunningCancelled
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:30 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
17:49 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:06 Reading to Newbury
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
18:48 Newbury to Reading
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
Short Run
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
16:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:01 Severn Beach to Salisbury
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:28 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:00 Newbury to London Paddington
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:27 Newbury to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 28, 2025, 18:08:21 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[143] Chiltern Railways: an update on rolling stock / services
[80] Driving licences and tests - ongoing discussion, merged topics
[56] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[49] North Cotswold line - driver route knowledge
[38] Stop orders as cover for cancelled services
[34] Doublebagging, Rawdoggers, Barebackers
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Rail Regulator seeks views on on-rail competition  (Read 2384 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13343


View Profile Email
« on: October 04, 2011, 13:56:56 »

From an ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) emailshot....

Quote
The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has today published a consultation seeking views on the potential for more 'on-rail competition' - the direct competition between train operators for passengers - to help meet the rail industry^s value for money challenge.

The consultation considers whether more on-rail competition would be desirable, taking account of its potential benefit for passengers but also exploring how to ensure that such competition does not lead to significant additional costs for the taxpayer.

The consultation requests views on:
  • the benefits that existing on-rail competition has delivered;
  • the potential benefits of competition generally;
  • the role that further on-rail competition could play in driving value for money;
  • the implications of more on-rail competition for the flow of funds through the industry, particularly the impact on government and taxpayer expenditure; and
  • options for encouraging more on-rail competition, including how any impact on taxpayer expenditure could be mitigated.

The consultation forms an important part of the rail regulator's periodic review (PR13). In February 2012, the rail regulator will review Network Rail's access charges - the charges that the company is permitted to levy on train operators for their access to its network - factors that are critical to on-rail competition. This consultation will help inform future views and policy.

Cathryn Ross, ORR's director of railway markets and economics, said:

"It is essential that the railways provide value for money for passengers and taxpayers, and that the potential for the railways to drive economic growth is fulfilled. As the economic regulator we are determined to help drive improvements that will benefit passengers and taxpayers.
"Greater on-rail competition is one means by which the challenge of making significant efficiency savings could be addressed. As part of our next periodic review, we must therefore consider whether and how to move towards greater on-rail competition and the benefits this could bring for customers, taxpayers and train operators."
The consultation, The potential for increased on-rail competition, can be found at:
http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/pr13/consultations/orr017.php

The consultation closes on 4 December 2011.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2011, 00:15:59 »

I tend to think on-rail competition is a bit of an oxymoron.

As there are usually on set of rails between most places on the Network it is very difficult to have two 08:00 Padd Bristol trains run by different operators.

Whilst I agree Hull trains and Grand Central offer some competition for East Coast to York say it is really only on Advanced tickets that there is any real differnce. Off PEak and anytime fares being valid on all services.

When I recently went to Selby via York using an Off Peak I went down by EC and Up by GC» (Great Central Railway - link to heritage line). The sole reason being they were the TOCs (Train Operating Company) that ran a train at the time I wanted to travel. For instance on the way back the GC train happened to be in teh station waitng as we arrived from selby so we got straight on rather than wait for teh next EC train.   

I agree that in theory Hull trains and GC have provide some competition to EC but it would be jut as easy for the Hull, Sunderland and Bradford direct services to be specified in the next East Coast franchise.

Elsewhere there was the debacle of Wrexham and Shropshire whose service was hampered by poor pathing across Birmingham and not being able to pick up at Wolverhampton because it would breach Virgin'as agreement with DaFT» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about) regarding revenue from Wolverhampton. The service was withdrawn with a week's notice.

I think W&S (Wrexham and Shropshire (Open Access Operator)) illustrates the real problems of true on-rail commercial competition.

Who gets the best paths, how is the revenue distributed, how are delay mnutes atributed etc. It's a "Bean Counters" dream and there are too many of those on the railway already!
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19308



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2011, 00:32:17 »

What 'on-rail competition' can I expect on my local line from Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach?

These beauracrats at the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) need to realise that the rail network doesn't start and end with the flagship InterCity lines....  Roll Eyes
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2011, 08:37:35 »

Exactly bignosemac, front coach FGW (First Great Western) back coach Arriva. Different fares catering in one coach with pretty/handsome hosts/ess, cattle crush in cheapest end.
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2011, 16:00:22 »

you have 2 options from yeovil to bristol :-)
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19308



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2011, 16:51:04 »

you have 2 options from yeovil to bristol :-)

One of which is a bleddy long way round and only offers 3 connecting trains a day if you wish to stick to the one operator (SWT (South West Trains)).
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2011, 16:55:01 »

you have 2 options from yeovil to bristol :-)

One of which is a bleddy long way round and only offers 3 connecting trains a day if you wish to stick to the one operator (SWT (South West Trains)).

unless its a sunday during winter when you have more options via salisbury

but your correct not the best example

how about exeter-weymouth  Grin
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page