Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 10:55 03 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 15/04/25 - End, Rail Future consultation
15/04/25 - Everything Electric
16/04/25 - Walk from Chetnole
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury

On this day
3rd Apr (1944)
Wick and Lybster Railway closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
09:49 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
05:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 03, 2025, 11:14:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Daily Mile - coming to Melksham for April
[103] [OTD] Senior Railcard launched 1st April 1975
[53] Nottingham to Bristol TM open access service proposed
[49] On this day. South Australia's triple decker train experiment.
[47] [OTD] 2nd April 1962 - First Panda Crossing
[46] It's not the train that's the problem...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Linked Events
  • Long Rock Open Day: April 13, 2019
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8
  Print  
Author Topic: Long Rock depot, Penzance - facilities, improvements & incidents (merged posts)  (Read 91592 times)
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3556

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #45 on: July 03, 2014, 21:52:14 »

I wonder if the Long Rock upgrade will include re doubling the line from Marazion to Penzance. This would be very useful if there are to be extra services on the main line in the future plus some through trains from St.Ives to Penzance.

Is it even wide enough with the depot in the way, certainly not wide enough at the level crossing into the beach car park at the end of the depot.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
chrisoates
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 286


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: July 03, 2014, 22:45:31 »

I wonder if the Long Rock upgrade will include re doubling the line from Marazion to Penzance. This would be very useful if there are to be extra services on the main line in the future plus some through trains from St.Ives to Penzance.

Is it even wide enough with the depot in the way, certainly not wide enough at the level crossing into the beach car park at the end of the depot.

Some great diagrams of the original layout here.

http://www.cornwallrailwaysociety.org.uk/cornwall-railway-gallery---1-main-line-penzance-to-redruth.html
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 559



View Profile
« Reply #47 on: July 03, 2014, 22:53:19 »

I don't think it is possible with the current layout, the main pinch points being those mentioned. I never quite understood why the yard was redesigned to preclude any reinstatement when allowing a bit more space would have left the option open.

It must be about 40 years since the singling happened. The early-mid 70s were very traumatic for this young lad, with the end of the Warships, the singling of the line, the demolition of the water tower and remodelling of the depot and then the end of the Westerns. 
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: July 04, 2014, 20:34:35 »

It must be about 40 years since the singling happened.

It was 22-24 June 1974.  The mechanical signals in the Penzance station area were retained at that time but everything else out to Marazion was made colour-light and power points http://www.s-r-s.org.uk/pullfree.asp?FilePath=ArchiveSignals\Downloads\brwr&FileName=1974-43w2711.pdf
Logged
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: July 04, 2014, 21:31:09 »

Well that's great news for the sleeper, looks most impressive, but what about the motive power?
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1109


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: July 05, 2014, 21:26:59 »

North Pole is the replacement for Old Oak Common as it's currently being refurbished in preparation for IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.). I'm not sure what happens to the HEX fleet, is there room for their site to remain? Obviously the HEX fleet isn't going to be maintained at Long Rock anyway!

North Pole isn't really a replacement for Old Oak Common as it's technically not a Great Western depot but owned by Hitachi.  I would imagine that if FGW (First Great Western) wanted to stable HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) or Turbo's at North Pole they would be charged by Hitachi.
It is rumoured that HSTs may end up being stabled during the daytime at Reading.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19465



View Profile Email
« Reply #51 on: December 30, 2014, 22:10:04 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
'Fatal' Penzance level crossing is permanently closed


Jan Nicholls, 73, died after being hit by a train at the crossing in 2011

A railway crossing where a woman was hit by a train and killed is to be permanently closed.

The Planning Inspectorate ruled the Mexico Inn pedestrian crossing near Penzance should be closed for safety reasons.

Jan Nicholls, 73, died after being hit by a train at the crossing in 2011.

The Open Spaces Society said it was "dismayed" at the decision to close the path which it described as "extremely important".

In response to the decision Network Rail chief executive Mark Carne said: "In my view the safest level crossing is a closed level crossing."

However, Mr Carne said he accepted the "vital role" played by level crossings in "connecting communities".

"In this particular case it's somewhat inconvenient to have to walk a little bit up the road in order to use the barriered crossing," he said. "But given that most people are going for a recreational walk I don't think the risk increase associated with the Mexico crossing justifies it remaining open."

The crossing was closed on a temporary basis in December 2012 after advice from the coroner.

The decision to close the crossing permanently was taken following an inquiry held in October 2014.

Rob Nance, chairman of Friends of Long Rock Mexico Crossing, said: "It's more for the people who just want to get across quickly and have a look at the bay, which includes a lot of elderly people who can't really make the other route."

The Open Spaces Society said the crossing was a popular route and needed by the public to gain access to the beach.

Kate Ashbrook, general secretary, said: "This path is extremely important for local people and visitors. With the other objectors we shall study the decision letter carefully and consider whether we can take the matter further."
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 559



View Profile
« Reply #52 on: August 30, 2016, 14:09:59 »

Does anyone know if/where it's possible to see the plans for the new Long Rock depot expansion, work on which is currently underway? I see the old loading bay at Ponsandane has been demolished. Thanks.

Logged
alexross42
Full Member
***
Posts: 86



View Profile
« Reply #53 on: August 30, 2016, 14:25:00 »

This may be way more detail than you wanted and perhaps not the easiest to navigate but all the planning application documents can be found at:
http://docs.planning.cornwall.gov.uk/rpp/index.asp?caseref=PA15/07736
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 559



View Profile
« Reply #54 on: August 30, 2016, 14:50:51 »

This may be way more detail than you wanted and perhaps not the easiest to navigate but all the planning application documents can be found at:
http://docs.planning.cornwall.gov.uk/rpp/index.asp?caseref=PA15/07736

Thank you for this link. There isn't much room to play with there but I was rather hoping that provision would have been made where possible for a reinstatement of the double track to cope with the planned increase in frequency of services on the main line and the extension of more St Ives services to Penzance. In the "down" direction, now that the Mexico level crossing has been closed, double track could be easily extended to the Long Rock level crossing. 
Logged
Kernowman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 104


View Profile
« Reply #55 on: September 02, 2016, 15:30:34 »

This may be way more detail than you wanted and perhaps not the easiest to navigate but all the planning application documents can be found at:
http://docs.planning.cornwall.gov.uk/rpp/index.asp?caseref=PA15/07736

Thank you for this link. There isn't much room to play with there but I was rather hoping that provision would have been made where possible for a reinstatement of the double track to cope with the planned increase in frequency of services on the main line and the extension of more St Ives services to Penzance. In the "down" direction, now that the Mexico level crossing has been closed, double track could be easily extended to the Long Rock level crossing. 

I couldn't agree more
Logged
Kernowman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 104


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: September 24, 2016, 17:23:02 »


I also wonder what the plans are for the Ponsandane sidings. 

At Ponsandane sidings, New bank and Kings road have been disconnected and it looks like they're being filled in. Sandy bank (the one nearest the road) has been disconnected and it looks like that is being filled in too. Shoots, (the short siding) has been completely lifted and Old bank (the one nearest the running lines) has been relaid and reinstated.

At the east end of the depot, Oil road (where the fuel tanks used to be berthed), Shunt spur and Walter's siding have all been disconnected, presumably in preparation for building the new shed.

KM
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19465



View Profile Email
« Reply #57 on: September 25, 2016, 18:58:17 »

Thank you for posting that very detailed 'local knowledge' update here on the Coffee Shop forum, Kernowman.  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 559



View Profile
« Reply #58 on: September 26, 2016, 09:14:56 »


I also wonder what the plans are for the Ponsandane sidings. 

At Ponsandane sidings, New bank and Kings road have been disconnected and it looks like they're being filled in. Sandy bank (the one nearest the road) has been disconnected and it looks like that is being filled in too. Shoots, (the short siding) has been completely lifted and Old bank (the one nearest the running lines) has been relaid and reinstated.

At the east end of the depot, Oil road (where the fuel tanks used to be berthed), Shunt spur and Walter's siding have all been disconnected, presumably in preparation for building the new shed.

KM

Thank you, Kernowman. I hope that the disconnection of Oil road does not mean that no provision will be made for a future reinstatement of rail-borne fuel delivieries. If there is going to be an increase in frequency of services on the main line to Plymouth/beyond, it could follow that larger quantities of fuel will be delivered to Penzance. In this case, a train of fuel tankers should be more economically attractive than before. 
Logged
Kernowman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 104


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: September 27, 2016, 17:14:53 »


Thank you, Kernowman. I hope that the disconnection of Oil road does not mean that no provision will be made for a future reinstatement of rail-borne fuel delivieries. If there is going to be an increase in frequency of services on the main line to Plymouth/beyond, it could follow that larger quantities of fuel will be delivered to Penzance. In this case, a train of fuel tankers should be more economically attractive than before. 

My thoughts exactly, you've hit the nail on the head there.

KM
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page