northwesterntrains
|
|
« on: September 29, 2011, 15:54:28 » |
|
http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/imagelibrary/downloadMedia.ashx?MediaDetailsID=5067Plans include: * Electrification of Valley Lines, North TransPennine Express (exc. Scarborough), Gospel Oak line and Manchester-Cardiff to replace Pacers on Valley Lines and to release DMUs▸ to replace Pacers from other routes. * Truncation of South West-Manchester services at Birmingham, together with new order of electric units for XC▸ for better utilisation of OHE▸ and to allow Voyagers to strengthen other XC services. * Replacing 3rd rail with OHE in South East. * Possible MML» electrification. Plans dependant on government funding at this stage.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2011, 16:02:58 » |
|
For anyone else who has trouble downloading/reading the file from that link, it's a pdf.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2011, 16:17:47 » |
|
Manchester - Cardiff, nothing wrong with the class 175's although i suppose a emu could reduce journey times.
That said what will happen to the sevrices which run from West wales?
Perhaps the 2 carriage class 175's could be used to boost services elsewhere on the ATW▸ network, perhaps if there are enough units & paths available an express service from West Wales to Cardiff.
Those class 172's from london overground if they are displaced by electrification would be very welcome in west wales as long as they are fitted with a toilet
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2011, 16:20:58 » |
|
Truncation of SW-Manchester to just Brum-Manc?....
Oh the hoardes of holidaymakers'll love changing in Brum!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2011, 16:23:16 » |
|
Perhaps a Cardiff/Swansea - Manchester service if the wires reach Swansea.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
northwesterntrains
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2011, 16:40:45 » |
|
Perhaps the 2 carriage class 175's could be used to boost services elsewhere on the ATW▸ network, perhaps if there are enough units & paths available an express service from West Wales to Cardiff. It seems to suggest that ATW would lose some of their units to Northern, who would then use them to replace Pacers. The plan certainly seems to be ordering new electric units to replace diesel units and cascade them to replace Pacers opposed to ordering new diesels as Pacer replacement. Could Holyhead-Cardiff become exclusively 175s if they were no longer required on Manchester-South Wales? The draft electrification RUS▸ a while back suggested a Manchester to Swansea EMU▸ service, with Milford Haven and Carmarthen losing direct Manchester services - possibly gaining direct Holyhead services instead. Those class 172's from london overground if they are displaced by electrification would be very welcome in west wales as long as they are fitted with a toilet
I imagine they would go to LM▸ who would then release their remaining 150s unless another 172 order is placed.
|
|
« Last Edit: September 29, 2011, 17:10:36 by northwesterntrains »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
northwesterntrains
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2011, 16:47:57 » |
|
Truncation of SW-Manchester to just Brum-Manc?....
Oh the hoardes of holidaymakers'll love changing in Brum!
Maybe they should divert XC▸ services between Devon and Birmingham via Hereford to give a more direct option between Manchester and Devon, albeit with a change.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2011, 16:53:16 » |
|
Perhaps the 2 carriage class 175's could be used to boost services elsewhere on the ATW▸ network, perhaps if there are enough units & paths available an express service from West Wales to Cardiff.
I hadn't fully appreciated this until fairly recently, but capacity between Swansea and Carmarthen is actually quite restrained by two factors: firstly there's the single-line stretch through Gowerton, and second is the single-lead junction north of Swansea station that puts services arriving from the west into conflict with departing trains.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 29, 2011, 17:18:17 » |
|
I am hoping that the go ahead is given sooon to double track through Gowerton and remodel the junction at Swansea
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2011, 19:06:33 » |
|
Truncation of SW-Manchester to just Brum-Manc?....
Oh the hoardes of holidaymakers'll love changing in Brum!
Wouldn't that truncation be the other way round? Brum-Manc to get new electric stock thus current SW-Manc services ending at Birmingham. Still means a change for holidaymakers, but I suspect summer through services would be maintained.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2011, 19:41:55 » |
|
... and of course the Bournemouth - Manchester service through Reading would presumably suffer the same fate? Lots of opportunities to strengthen through XC▸ services to the north east then?
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2011, 23:34:46 » |
|
I can't find any reference to Manchester - Cardiff, so I'm not sure where this suggestion comes from? It seems rather far fetched as I would have thought a lot of lines would have been above it in the pecking order given the relatively low intensity of service.
The IIP identifies investment choices in CP5▸ to extend the network electrification programme in England and Wales to deliver (or begin to deliver) electrification of: the Midland Main Line from Bedford to Corby, Nottingham, and Sheffield via Derby; Gospel Oak to Barking and the associated Thameside Branch and Ripple Lane sidings; the North Trans-Pennine route via Diggle (between Guide Bridge and Leeds, and between Leeds and Colton Junction connecting to the East Coast Main Line for York); and the Cardiff Valley lines.
and also
The case for these schemes is discussed in Chapter 9. Given the strength of the case for electrification, and increasing certainty of the unit costs of delivery from the early schemes, it is anticipated that further schemes identified within the Network RUS▸ : Electrification Strategy as candidate schemes will be developed as part of a rolling programme. This may include schemes such as electrification of Reading to Basingstoke, Walsall to Rugeley or the Chiltern Main Line. It is anticipated that in CP6▸ this may include consideration of key routes from the ports of Felixstowe and Southampton which would make electric traction a more attractive option to freight operators and key schemes to promote electric traction of cross country services and local passenger services in the West Midlands.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
northwesterntrains
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 30, 2011, 09:15:43 » |
|
I can't find any reference to Manchester - Cardiff, so I'm not sure where this suggestion comes from? It seems rather far fetched as I would have thought a lot of lines would have been above it in the pecking order given the relatively low intensity of service.
Yeah I read it on another forum and posted on here before I'd looked through the whole document and I think someone may have misinterpreted the bit about the urban growth additional diesel vehicles for TPE▸ , XC▸ and Manchester-Chester and Manchester-Cardiff that may be changed to additional electric vehicles depending on electrification programs. The additional electrification programs refers to TPE not the whole lot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Andrew1939 from West Oxon
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 30, 2011, 13:45:35 » |
|
It seems to be more of a discussion document for Control Period 5 and beyond.
Interestingly the Cotswold Lines are mentioned together with the rather more high profile lines in a paragraph about better journey times. This reads as follows: Better journey times It is proposed that a fund is allocated to deliver well targeted improvements in rail journey times and connectivity in England and Wales during CP5▸ . Programme development is still in the early stages, and a fund approach is deemed the most appropriate way to deliver the outcomes. Scheme selection could prioritise rail connectivity between urban areas where some of the most productive parts of the economy are located, or alternatively, choices could be influenced by exploiting relatively low cost opportunities arising within CP5. A few candidate schemes have already been identified including opportunities on the Midland Main Line, Maidstone East line, Hastings line, Portsmouth line, West of England line, the North and South Cotswolds lines, and on the line between London Liverpool Street and Norwich. However of interest around here is that it talks of electrification of the Welsh Valleys, The Chiltern Line and the conversion of the south east of England third rail DC▸ electrified lines to AC overhead electrified lines as elsewhere in Britain.
The recent new pedestrian bridges at Charlbury and Honeybourne have received a good deal of criticism over their size and perceived over-engineering but it seems that there will be more of the same across the network as the document suggests that ^step free access^ programme should be continued.
The Western Access to Heathrow Airport also has mention several times.
There is however surprisingly little reference to HS2▸ .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 30, 2011, 14:38:04 » |
|
There is however surprisingly little reference to HS2▸ .
I expect that's because it will probably be funded outside the SOFA/ HLOS▸ system, it isn't really a Network Rail project, and even where there'll be an interface with NR» it will probably not be happening until well into CP6▸ ... Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|