Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:55 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:35 London Paddington to Paignton
14:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
15:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:45 Twyford to Henley-On-Thames
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
16:00 Henley-On-Thames to Twyford
16:23 London Paddington to Oxford
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
Short Run
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
14:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
14:53 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
15:08 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:12 London Paddington to Newbury
15:14 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
15:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:55 Newbury to London Paddington
16:05 London Paddington to Newbury
16:07 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
16:34 Newbury to London Paddington
16:50 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:05 London Paddington to Newbury
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:31 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
17:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 16:08:54 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[110] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[98] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[53] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[52] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[46] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[25] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Council will consider road bridge over railway (Wokingham Times 28/06/2011)  (Read 6908 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« on: June 29, 2011, 16:19:56 »

From The Wokingham Times:

Quote
A traffic campaigner has earned an assurance from council bosses that they will examine the costs of building a road bridge to ease town centre congestion.

Steve Bacon attended a meeting of Wokingham Borough Council^s executive earlier this month to press councillors to reconsider the plan for the new link road at Wokingham railway station.

Mr Bacon, a former councillor, is urging the council to instead build a bridge over the railway line which he maintains will improve the traffic flow.

He claims the current proposal to build a ^6 million link road will continue to put drivers at the mercy of a level crossing, where waiting times can be up to seven minutes.

In a written question to the executive at the meeting on June 2, Mr Bacon asked councillors to investigate the comparative costs and benefits of the link road between Station Road and Reading Road with those of a road bridge.

He urged them to take into account time and fuel savings and the improved air quality in Wokingham town centre from fewer idling cars, as well as the value of increasing line capacity and doing away with the staffing of the level crossing.

After the meeting, Mr Bacon, who lives in Aborfield, said: ^I have asked for a cost and benefit analysis. This should include looking at the costs of staffing the level crossing 24 hours a day, seven days a week and maintaining it.^

Mr Bacon said he believed that a road bridge would enable increased train flow and could qualify for Network Rail funding under its discretionary scheme for one-off payments of projects up to ^5million.

Mr Bacon, who failed in his bid to be re-elected on to the council in May^s elections, said the unpredictability of the level crossing was a serious problem for Wokingham^s drivers.

He joked: ^On election night both myself and my opposition candidate were accosted by two voters who were held up at the crossing for seven minutes and lost their vote. I like to think they would have voted for me!^

On Wednesday, June 1, Mr Bacon conducted a six-hour survey on the level crossing, recording the length of time the barriers were closed.

He said: ^The key issue for motorists approaching the level crossing from Barkham Road is the sheer unpredictability of the barrier down-time which the link road won^t alleviate. I observed that the average ^red time^ when the red lights were flashing was two minutes 41 seconds if only one train crossed, but four minutes and 40 seconds if two passed when the barriers were still down. One sequence took more than seven minutes.^

Mr Bacon said that during the morning peak time the red lights were flashing for 44 per cent of the time and for 40 per cent during the evening rush.

He added: ^It^s obvious that any extra train movements ^ or multiple train movements ^ could easily push the down-time to well over 50 per cent, even if the proposed link road were built.^

Councillor Angus Ross, executive member for local and regional planning, confirmed that the council would look at the cost and practicality of the bridge plan.

He said: ^The council will be undertaking a simple investigation. We are not going to be spending a lot of money.^

The council is working on plans for the link road, along with a redevelopment of the station, with Network Rail.

Further details on the project are expected to be released later this year.

Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2011, 20:16:26 »

From The Wokingham Times:
Quote
He urged them to take into account time and fuel savings and the improved air quality in Wokingham town centre from fewer idling cars, as well as the value of increasing line capacity and doing away with the staffing of the level crossing.

I can't believe I'm the only person who adopts the simple solution of turning off the engine for a few minutes when detained at a level crossing...
Logged
Ollie
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2308


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2011, 00:14:05 »

I'd be interested to see how Mr Bacon suggests a bridge is put over the railway line in this area

I refer you to a picture posted in a thread a while back: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=6404.msg63692#msg63692 (Street View Challenge)
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10167



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2011, 00:32:48 »

Things could be a lot worse at the crossing. The current timetable means the half hourly Waterloo/Reading trains cross at Wokingham and most of the Guildford line trains also cross. Meaning the gates are only down once for two trains to pass. Unfortunately the signalling means the gates can be down for up to four minutes for a train coming from Gatwick/Guildford.

The situation isn't helped by the two low bridges in the town which forces lorries to use the crossing and it's exacerbated by the lack of double yellow lines outside the shops in Barkham Road where parked cars effectively make it single lane and restrict the flow of traffic when the gates are up.

With the road layout either side of the crossing i think it would be very hard to automate the crossing or convert it to remote CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision).
Logged
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2011, 09:36:09 »

I'd be interested to see how Mr Bacon suggests a bridge is put over the railway line in this area

I refer you to a picture posted in a thread a while back: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=6404.msg63692#msg63692 (Street View Challenge)

I don't think you could do it within the existing road alignment, but if they are considering a link road across what is currently the station car park to Reading Road (is that right?) then it would be possible to put a bridge over the station platforms to Oxford Rd. At very great cost of course, and the business units would need to be relocated...
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2011, 12:13:59 »

It's not impossible to bridge the line at the current location of the level crossing. Lots of compulsory purchases, demolition, the raising of Wellington Road to meet the new bridge and traffic chaos while the work is carried out. It would cost shedloads, but at least it would be one more for Bob Crow to tick off his list....

Impractical? Yes. Impossible? No.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10167



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2011, 13:02:55 »

If Bob Crow's in favour of it that would be a very good reason NOT to do it.  Grin

Seriously though this conversation has been going on for years locally. I'm just about to move away from the area to be nearer the heart of the GWR (Great Western Railway) ( Cheesy) but I bet if I go back in five years it will still be at the talking stage!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page