Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 08 Jan 2025
 
* Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 20:19:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[82] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[69] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[54] senior railcard
[52] Coastal walks - station to station
[28] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW get it wrong again  (Read 11883 times)
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« on: June 25, 2011, 00:25:38 »

I was at Hard Rock Calling in Hyde Park this evening with thousands of other people.. It shouldn't have been a surprise to any one (other than FGW (First Great Western) it seems) as it's been planned for ages.. It finished about 22.20 as planned.. So it was bad (but not a surprise as I know FGW don't seem to be that bothered) to see that the 22.59 to Reading was only 2 carriages long.. We just about all squeezed on at Paddington but had to leave people behind at Ealing Broadway.. It was not a pleasant journey at all..

My brother however, travelling north from Kings Cross to Biggleswade, had a nice 8 carriage train..

FGW have got it so wrong again.. Angry

Logged
insider
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 156


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2011, 08:51:52 »

FGW (First Great Western) are bothered and were aware of events in Hyde Park. The previous two nights (Weds&Thurs),Kings of Leon were on as well.

Services were strengthened where possible.

An additional 4 carriage train to Reading at 2332 was also run Weds-Fri of this week.

FCC (First Capital Connect) have a lot more rolling stock than FGW.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2011, 09:40:58 »

Sorry, at that time of night, 15 carriages were possible if infrastructute had allowed! Certainly 9 should have bern used, and were def available!

And if can be done earlier in week, why not last night?

Oh, if heads up are needed, extra stock will agsin be needed tonight (Bon Jovi 3 hour set) and Sunday (Rod Stewart doing a 2 hour set)
Logged
Ollie
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2308


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2011, 09:52:14 »

Unfortunately it seems people got to Pad a bit earlier than expected.

23:29 was strengthened and also had an additional 23:32
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2011, 11:50:23 »

Well it was advertised to finish at 22.20 (for 22.30 curfew).. So it didn't surprise me what train I was on.. It's only a 10/15 minute walk after all.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

I wish I'd known about the later trains though as I would have waited...
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2011, 12:07:38 »

Indeed, they weren't mentioned on the websute news/updstes either.

Hyde Park always has a 2230 curfew. Firgotten how many ^000's fine it is per minute over, but it's many....
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2011, 12:28:32 »

Indeed, they weren't mentioned on the website news/updates either.

Now, why doesn't that surprise me?  Roll Eyes Tongue Wink
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
Hafren
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 327


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2011, 13:30:09 »

Someone must have known the above, and someone must have noticed the crowds. With a bit of communication and a sense of customer service, perhaps an announcement could have been made on the train and the affected stations to reassure passengers that if they chose to wait, extra capacity would be available later.

(I am assuming there weren't any, unless anyone knows differently!)

Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2011, 14:25:27 »

Nothing was said on my train..And I heard nothing at Paddington (I was there 15 minutes or so).. The only announcement we had was at Ealing Broadway where the driver apologised for the overcrowding and said he was going to close the doors so we could leave (although it took several attempts to get the doors closed as people weren't happy at being left behind)..
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2011, 15:20:03 »

Is the 22:59 booked a 2-car or did something go wrong?

Even without any special-eventers running a 2-car train on that sort of service out of Paddington on a Friday night is asking for trouble anyway.  The 23:29 is also booked a 2-car and can just about cope Monday to Thursday, but is always a squeeze on a Friday.

I'm afraid FGW (First Great Western) neglects its late evening passengers from Paddington a little, though to be fair the recent introduction of the 23:42 Fridays Only service has gone some way to correcting issues with the 23:29.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10166



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2011, 18:02:09 »

I remember a few months back coming from Marlow to Maidenhead and arriving at about 21:30. The two car unit on the branch was then replaced with a three car for the next branch service and the old unit ran off empty to Paddington.

Is that a regular occurrence or just a one off?  Seems the three car would be better employed on the "main line".
Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: June 25, 2011, 18:42:01 »

When i was there around the same time back in november it was a 2 carriage class 165 with the  other 2 carriage class 165 running empty stock before crossing back over to the line heading towards reading.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 25, 2011, 22:15:57 »

I haven't emailed FGW (First Great Western) for a while but I have today...

Here is what I said.. I'm starting to guess which of the many cut and paste replies I'll get.... Grin

"I went to Hard Rock Calling in Hyde park last night (Friday 24th June).. Curfew was 22.30 as always is in Hyde Park.. So why oh why was the 22.59 to Maidenhead  not only on platform 14 but also only 2 carriages long?

It was one of the most unpleaant journeys you've created for me, and believe me there have been a few unpleasant ones over the years..

I've heard since that you should may have made trains at approx 23.30 longer and added extra trains in but no one told us that?  I would have waited if  I had known..I had my 12 year old son with me. I wouldn't have put him through what I did had I known...

Please tell me what you are going to do about this?
"
Logged
hornbeam
Full Member
***
Posts: 90


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 27, 2011, 14:24:26 »

My partner was caught up in this from Slough, where it arrived late I recall.

These services tend to be busy at the weekends, and there is no excuse for them being longer as there is the stock. What doesnt help is a few drunk people not moving down inside the train, but doesn't help is the way they are sometimes dealed with. As said its unfair that people are left behind with the attude from FGW (First Great Western) is ' tough wait for the next one'.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 27, 2011, 22:27:55 »

My partner was caught up in this from Slough, where it arrived late I recall.

These services tend to be busy at the weekends, and there is no excuse for them being longer as there is the stock. What doesnt help is a few drunk people not moving down inside the train, but doesn't help is the way they are sometimes dealed with. As said its unfair that people are left behind with the attude from FGW (First Great Western) is ' tough wait for the next one'.

There was definitely no room left for anyone to move down or anywhere on this train.. Unless we sat on other peoples laps.. I think they might have complained...
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page