Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:15 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
14:35 London Paddington to Paignton
15:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
16:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
16:34 Newbury to London Paddington
16:50 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:13 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
16:31 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 16:57 London Paddington to Swindon
17:33 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 17:34:17 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[103] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[98] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[97] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[87] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[41] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[22] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Siemens gets Thameslink new trains order  (Read 17268 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #30 on: January 29, 2014, 14:51:02 »

From the St Albans & Harpenden Review:

Quote
Thameslink makes Harpenden spelling error to 'Harpenthen' as electric Class 700 train unveiled at Excel Centre


Thameslink makes ^Harpenthen^ spelling error as new train unveiled

While the Government unveiled a new Thameslink train, which will run on the line from 2016 yesterday, tongues were set wagging when it was noticed Harpenden was spelled incorrectly.

During the unveiling of the mock-up of the new state-of-the-art electric Class 700 train, which is to offer more frequent services to St Albans, it appeared Harpenden had been spelled ^Harpenthen^ on the train map.

The typo could not be changed in time for the grand unveiling at the Excel Centre.

Roger Perkins for First Capital Connect said: "This mock-up of the exciting new Thameslink train was shipped over from Germany where it was created. The passenger information screen is just a mock-up of the real thing and its manufacturers were unable to correct the typo in time for the grand unveiling."

The Government said its ^6.5 billion Thameslink programme would provide more frequent services from St Albans and 30 per cent more seats because of a 50 per cent increase in carriages.

On the Thameslink north services Midland Mainline fast trains that run between St Albans and London, over the full three hour AM peak the number of services will increase from 18 to 24. While the Midland Mainline slow train will see services increase from 17 to 24 over the full 3 hour peak.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 29, 2014, 23:59:53 »


Probably correct phonetically for a German speaker.

Just imagine what the Japanese will make of Western names when IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) mock-ups arrive!

OTC
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #32 on: January 30, 2014, 04:26:07 »

Just imagine what the Japanese will make of Western names when IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) mock-ups arrive!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 30, 2014, 09:07:50 »

I presumme the 700s are noraml seating are they 2 by 2 or 2 by 3? With TFL (Transport for London) the main sponsors of Crossrail we'll be lucky to get any 2 by 2 or 2 by 3 seating it will be all 378, S stock longitudinal seating and no loos.

That's why Chiltern are now busier than ever between Amersham and Harrow
The 700s have all 2+2 seating. I'm sure Crossrail seating has been discussed before, from the indicative seating capacity of the Crossrail units it is simply not possible for them to have all longitudinal seating, it just wouldn't mean enough seats to meet the requirements. Chiltern being busier between Amersham and Harrow has more to do with the new Metropolitan line timetable which removes fast services Off-Peak than the new stock.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 30, 2014, 09:27:16 »

Crossrail is specified as 450 seats per 10 car, 200m train.  An average of 45 seats per car, but a slightly lower number in the two end cars and significantly less in the DDA» (Disability Discrimination Act - about) vehicles, of which I believe there are at least two.

So a 'normal' Crossrail carriage should probably have nearly 50 seats.  To fit 50 seats and have increased stand back areas around doors requires a majority of 2+2 seating.  For comparison 378s average 36 seats per car - this must include the 'perch seats' by the doors from what I've seen.

Suggesting Crossrail will be just like 378s doesn't stand up to scrutiny, I'm afraid.

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13033


View Profile Email
« Reply #35 on: January 30, 2014, 11:06:05 »

2+2, with a small area of 2+1 in one coach to provide even more standing area (read bike space off-peak)

Frankly, the trains are built for the short commute. Woe behold anyone wanting Peterborough/Cambridge/Bedford to Gatwick, for example. You will get a very numb bum.

Like the Met S-stock, definitely NOT built for 60+ min commutes....but for the central London part of the route.

When I can find time, I'll pr^cis the hand-out given to me yesterday - you had to ask as they were removed from the public time.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: January 30, 2014, 16:00:06 »

THe interesting piece from the Cabinet Office above includes -

Quote
In addition, the new generation of trains will release existing rolling stock for use elsewhere on the network, particularly as further routes are electrified, for example in the north west of England and the Thames Valley commuter lines.

So, first confirmation direct from Government that refurbed (hopefully!) 319s will be used in the Thames Valley.....

Is it though?  There are Class 377s that will be released, not just Class 319s.  I reckon that 319s will go up north and you may well see Class 377s cascaded to the GWML (Great Western Main Line).
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13033


View Profile Email
« Reply #37 on: January 30, 2014, 16:06:10 »

that's true. Do we know roughly how many of each there are currently?

Possibly able to work out which as FGW (First Great Western) won't want to maintain both unless they absolutely have to....
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 30, 2014, 16:18:31 »

There are exact numbers of what has to be released, and when (at least in terms of pure numbers of AC, DC (Direct Current) or dual voltage stock), in table 5.4.3 on page 76 in the TSGN franchise ITT (Invitation to Tender).   There is also a planned transfer of 25 x 4 car EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) from the combined franchise to Southeastern.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/245041/invitation-to-tender.pdf

The plans include the release of the class 387 trains (29 units/116 vehicles) that are only recently ordered and are known to be with Thameslink for only a short time, possibly around 2 years, these have  early cascade planned.  Reading between the lines in various other stuff such as RUSs (Route Utilisation Strategy), and because they are 110 mph capable, I think it more likely that they will come to FGW (First Great Western), and the 319s will all go up north.

There is also an option for another 30 or more four car 387s.

NB I think the 387s were generally referred to as '377/8's before the ITT was published - I think they are probably the same trains as the '377's mentioned by IndustryInsider above.

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13033


View Profile Email
« Reply #39 on: January 30, 2014, 16:29:58 »

I didn't think that the 387s were going to be ready in time to come to the GW (Great Western) after electrification?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: January 30, 2014, 17:43:47 »

I didn't think that the 387s were going to be ready in time to come to the GW (Great Western) after electrification?

Some will be available by the end of 2016 - I suppose it depends on whether we should expect enough EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) of a single type to be available to the GW routes to work the entire relevant timetable from day 1, or if there will be some sort of DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)/EMU transition over a couple of years...

They may also yet order more 387s to be used on the GW from new of course...

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13033


View Profile Email
« Reply #41 on: January 30, 2014, 17:49:34 »

I don't expect an immediate switch-over - more a move over to EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) as whole routes become available, such as PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-RDG(resolve). Although FGW (First Great Western) could decide to wait until say, the whole TV area is complete.

What they won't want, I'm sure is a mixture of EMUs - they'll want all one variety - whether 319s, 377s or 387s
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: January 30, 2014, 20:09:15 »

I didn't think that the 387s were going to be ready in time to come to the GW (Great Western) after electrification?
I believe the 387's will be available in 2015, so I don't see the 2016 date being an issue, unless it's the delivery of the Class 700s which is the constraining factor.

With regard to the Thameslink stock, I thought I read somewhere that there will be two internal configurations, effectively metro and outer suburban?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13033


View Profile Email
« Reply #43 on: January 31, 2014, 09:54:27 »

definitely not, according to the staff at the event. All the same, either 8car or 12car fixed formation.

So adding a car when the 8cars need start to need them isn't going to be easy.
Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #44 on: January 31, 2014, 10:05:38 »

Chris, I am curious as to why you think adding extra cars to the 8 car class 700s is going to be hard? Siemens make a song and dance that the Desiro City (which this train is) that it can be reconfigured as part of their "single car concept". Secondly, the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) said in their techincal spec for Thameslink that the 8 cars must be able to be upgraded to 12 cars.

Meanwhile there are quite a few photos from a user of the Flickr site of the internal mock-up. In another album there are also photos of the seating plan.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page