Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Bristol Parkway
21:28 Weymouth to Frome
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 21:55:16 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[189] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[101] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[64] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[49] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[42] senior railcard
[40] Coastal walks - station to station
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: My train journey today  (Read 15193 times)
gpn01
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 160


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 03, 2011, 23:20:09 »

Yeah I have thought about that (but ended up using the travelcard portion on bus/tube in London so imagine I won't be allowed).. I'd like to claim my ^6.60 car park ticket back too but imagine that also won't help... It was a very expensive day out in the end...:-(

But it could have been much, much worse!  Am about to write up what happened this evening!
Oh dear.. What has happened now? :-(


See http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=9039.0 for details!
Logged
chemphys
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 13


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: June 04, 2011, 07:04:02 »

Trains still in mess this morning (Saturday). On the stoppers, it looks like they are only currently running the London - Oxford trains, all the Reading ones are cancelled. And the trains that are running are picking up large delays (30+ mins)

Live departure boards and FGW (First Great Western) website saying it is due to vandalism (speculation: cable theft?)

From FGW:
Quote
Important message

Saturday 04 June 2011 06:50

Due to an act of vandalism that occured on Friday 03 June First Great Western train services between London Paddington and Reading will be subject to delays, alterations and cancellations due to ongoing signalling problems in the Taplow area.

Customers travelling on Advance Purchase tickets may travel on the train scheduled before their original or on the next service.

First Great Western Tickets will be accepted by Cross Country trains between Bristol Temple Meads & Bristol Parkway and also between Reading & Oxford.

Have to go to work today, so will have to brave it  Sad
Logged
autotank
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 241


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 04, 2011, 07:55:37 »

I was on the 0446 from Twyford (8 car Turbo!) which was running 10 mins late when I got on. When I did get on there were some drunks smoking which set my alarm bells ringing. We stopped at a red signal just before Brunham which we were talked through (I assume because of the probelms yesterday). At Slough two of the drunk yobos started fighting - luckily they took it on to the platform and the driver pressed the close door button! Unfortunately their mates were not best pleased and pulled the communication cord just after Langley. The driver came down the train with a security guard who had been hiding in 1st class (why employ these people if all they do is sit in the 1st class compartment?!) and had a go at the idiot who did it 'I just fell on it' - yeah right, we all saw you do it! We made an unscheduled stop at West Drayton - for the offenders to be met by the Police. The Poice weren't there and unsurprisingly the yobos used the emergency door handle, ran off down the track and jumped over the fence. Probably would have been better to carry on to Hayes and Harlington which would have given the Police more time to attend.

I know it's not really the fault of the railway, but we ended up arriving at Paddington 30 mins late - thanks to the drunks my first hour at work is going towards paying for a taxi, as if getting up at 0410 isn't bad enough! The driver dealt with the incident very well - he was confident they would be caught as there would be loads of CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) of them.
Logged
chemphys
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 13


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: June 04, 2011, 08:29:50 »

Wow, your journey was much more eventful than mine turned out to be. After posting above, I checked the LDB and realised the 7:05 from West Drayton had got to Slough (running 10 minutes late). So I got my things together and left pronto.

Jogged to the station in 6 minutes for a walk that normally takes 10 (need the exercise anyway  Wink ) and made the train, which then continued as normal to Paddington.

Had hoped they would have extended the trains to 5 or 6 carriages as they are running 2 an hour (normally 4) but no such luck. Wasn't a problem this early but I expect it will be cosy later.

CP
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: June 04, 2011, 10:09:03 »

To be fair to FGW (First Great Western) yesterday and today's problems have been out of their hands. The signalling at Reading and Maidenhead are for Network Rail to sort and the fatality at Castle Cary is beyond anyone on the railways' control.

The incident itself is beyond their direct control, but, and it's a big but, having robust procedures in place to mitigate delays during, and immediately after, the incident certainly can make a huge difference.  For example, I was at Reading last night watching platforms 1 and 2 for a little while and trains from Bedwyn/Basingstoke arrived and then sat there for ages before either departing very late or eventually being cancelled.  None of the platform staff had the faintest idea where the booked driver was or whether one would be turning up.  The trains were loaded with people but no announcements were being made on the train to keep people informed (no driver = no key in the cab = no working PA (Public Address) system!).  Similar situations would have been occurring all over the region I'm sure.

When things go badly wrong, whatever the answer is, we all know it's not integrated control centres nowhere near the action with an over reliance on computer systems and an ever-decreasing number of front-line staff able to make decisions on a local basis.  The few ladies and gentlemen sitting on the desks at Control at Swindon, despite working flat out, simply can't keep up.  Nobody can get through to them on the phone when the various computer systems reach meltdown, and you get the kind of chaos last night dragging on for far longer than it should do.  It's time FGW management woke up to this fact.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10167



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 04, 2011, 10:32:22 »

I totally agree with you and it was the point I was making in the paragraph after the one you quoted. I sometimes get the feeling that frontline staff know they can't get any answers from higher up so largely give up on phoning and to an extent who can blame them.

As you say FGW (First Great Western) need to work on their systems and break that culture.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: June 04, 2011, 10:35:55 »

Yes, I kinda floated past your second paragraph when I read your post.  The answer was 'badly!'  Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
adc82140
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 183


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: June 04, 2011, 10:38:43 »

I understand entirely, IndustryInsider. However it would be much better at Paddington to just switch off the screens during times of disruption, rather than give out misinformation, seeing as their software is so limited. A while ago (I think it was winter 2009) there was a major problem one evening, with complete service suspension. All trains were delayed, but the 17:12 Henley showed as on time at platform 12. The whole of the Thames Valley tried to pile on this 3 carriage train that wasn't actually going anywhere. I had to call BTP (British Transport Police) to sort this out as the scenes were getting quite ugly. If the screens had been off, this would never have arisen.

For some reason FGW (First Great Western) are stubbornly refusing to admit they have a problem getting information out. SWT (South West Trains) had this problem as well during the early years of their franchise, but have addressed it successfully. FGW need to do the same. In the absence of information, front line staff need to be empowered to make some decisions ie ask for the boards to be turned off, make PA (Public Address) announcements, advise passengers to seek alternative routes and help them to do this etc.
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10167



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: June 04, 2011, 11:03:50 »

In the absence of information, front line staff need to be empowered to make some decisions ie ask for the boards to be turned off, make PA (Public Address) announcements, advise passengers to seek alternative routes and help them to do this etc.

I have seen the displays at Reading revert to a generic "First Great Western Passenger Information System" at times of disruption. Although given that message it would be better to have them blank altogether. They do also make manual announcements. The problem is they can only act on the information they are given.

In the past announcers were based in Reading Panel Box which obviously gave them an advantage. Now the reliance on computerised/automated systems means when it all goes wrong you are going to struggle however good the people on the ground are.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: June 04, 2011, 22:11:45 »

Regarding efforts to crack down on cable theft, the following signs have started appearing warning potential criminals.  This one is at Honeybourne, an area targeted a lot over the last year or two.

Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10167



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: June 16, 2011, 00:39:54 »

According to the latest issue of Rail Magazine two FGW (First Great Western) trains came "close to colliding" while repair work was being carried out on June 4th. The trains are only identified by the reporting numbers 1Z08 and 1Z31. It seems the safeguards in place when a driver is authorised to pass a red/failed signal worked correctly. The driver of the second train saw the first one stationary ahead and because he was proceeding at slow speed was able to stop in time.

It also reports that two trains were trapped for two hours after Network Rail started work at two sites ahead and behind them thus stranding them in the middle.

All told there were 9,000 minutes of delays and compensation to train operators amounted to ^924,000.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: June 18, 2011, 05:53:21 »

From the limited details available, it sounds as though "close to colliding" may be an exageration.
It would appear that the driver of the second train had been permitted to pass a signal at danger.
Under such circumstances the driver must proceed cautiously such that they may stop short of a train or other obstruction.
It would appear that the driver proceeded correctly and stoped well short of the preceeding train. Press reports mentioned 200 yards, that would be worryingly close at line speed, but seems acceptable at the very low speed involved.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #27 on: June 18, 2011, 06:47:14 »

Can snyone identify 1Z08 & 1Z31? Which trains are they?
Logged
Ollie
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2308


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: June 18, 2011, 12:00:30 »

Can snyone identify 1Z08 & 1Z31? Which trains are they?
They were additionals for Cardiff.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: July 23, 2011, 19:31:19 »

Today felt very deja vu to me  Grin

Here is what happened....

Today I was taking my daughter to London and this is how it went..

Firstly I decided to travel from Slough not Maidenhead as Slough gets half hourly fast trains all day.. Maidenhead has no fast trains off-peak

1. Drive to Slough
2. Park but don't pay to park (I decided to wait till I was actually on a train this time and pay via my mobile phone)
3. Queue for ticket machine and just before it's my turn I glance up at the indicator board to see my train says "delayed" (which usually means it's not made it through Reading yet)
4. Go back to car and drive...

At least this time I found somewhere to park on the street which was ^8 and free after 1.30pm and no congestion charge.. but still.. Next time.. I'll remember just to stay on the M4  Roll Eyes Grin
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page