JayMac
|
 |
« on: April 18, 2011, 21:50:23 » |
|
From FGW▸ Live Updates: 18 April 2011
This train has been revised.It will no longer call at: London Paddington, Maidenhead, Reading, Didcot Parkway, Swindon, Kemble, Stroud, Stonehouse, Gloucester and Cheltenham Spa.This is due to not calling at Maidenhead..
Huh? 
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
|
|
|
Ollie
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2011, 21:56:30 » |
|
it was a mistake the train didnt call at Maidenhead, hope Jo weren't on it!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2011, 22:02:32 » |
|
The mistake has been on the website for some time. You'd think someone at FGW▸ Towers would spot it and correct.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
|
|
|
johoare
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2011, 22:10:30 » |
|
it was a mistake the train didnt call at Maidenhead, hope Jo weren't on it!
Nope.. Got a week off..  So.. did it call anywhere? 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob_Blakey
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2011, 22:11:39 » |
|
Would anyone care to provide a translation of the following extract from FGW▸ Disruptions:
19:48 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa due 22:03 This train has been revised.It will no longer call at: London Paddington, Maidenhead, Reading, Didcot Parkway, Swindon, Kemble, Stroud, Stonehouse, Gloucester and Cheltenham Spa.This is due to not calling at Maidenhead.. Last Updated: 18/04/2011 20:58
Surely 'this train has been cancelled' would have been much easier! Or am I missing something?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2011, 22:18:39 » |
|
The mistake has been on the website for some time. You'd think someone at FGW▸ Towers would spot it and correct.
Paging Sue Evans ... paging Sue Evans ... 
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
Ollie
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2011, 23:04:45 » |
|
Only place to my knowledge it didn't call was Maidenhead.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Deltic
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2011, 09:52:03 » |
|
So, if the driver forgot to stop at Maidenhead, from the Maidenhead passenger's point of view it didn't stop anywhere.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ollie
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2011, 10:34:52 » |
|
So, if the driver forgot to stop at Maidenhead, from the Maidenhead passenger's point of view it didn't stop anywhere.
If that was true they would still be on the train 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2011, 11:16:38 » |
|
Straight through Cheltenham, headed north. Last seen passing through Culrain ...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Deltic
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2011, 12:36:18 » |
|
So, if the driver forgot to stop at Maidenhead, from the Maidenhead passenger's point of view it didn't stop anywhere.
If that was true they would still be on the train  I meant the passengers planning to join the train at Maidenhead  Presumably those getting on at Paddington for Maidenhead got off at Reading to come back. I hope they weren't charged an excess fare!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|