Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 19 Apr 2025
 
- Race Across the World winner on 'authentic travel' and how to do it
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
18:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
20:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 21:30:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[108] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[106] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[81] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[71] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[56] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[53] Julia Bradbury: ITV tonight
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 30
  Print  
Author Topic: Stock cascade of class 150s  (Read 178682 times)
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3562

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #225 on: September 26, 2011, 09:36:32 »

Surely another reason why an Unfounded Rumours and Gossip section would be a valuable addition.  That way, possible happenings could be flagged up, but moved to appropriate forum slots when conclusively acknowledged to be fact.



Thats a good idea,

Phile, i am finding your postings informative and interesting, am reading but have no furtheer comments to add, take note of the number of "views" of the thread rather than the number of replies
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43849



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #226 on: September 26, 2011, 09:41:40 »

Surely another reason why an Unfounded Rumours and Gossip section would be a valuable addition.  That way, possible happenings could be flagged up, but moved to appropriate forum slots when conclusively acknowledged to be fact.

Maxwell P .... that *will* be happening very soon.   It's been discussed between the moderators and the ball is in my court ... in which (however) there are lots of other balls bouncing around, some of them which need time-dependent attention.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #227 on: September 26, 2011, 22:10:40 »

Now set up, I notice.   Hope anything dubious will posted on that boards.
Logged
northwesterntrains
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 324


View Profile
« Reply #228 on: September 27, 2011, 09:46:01 »

I would prefer it to be definite information rather than a quote on WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum but it appears that 150202 and 150214 are being prepared at Tyseley for transfer to FGW (First Great Western).   

Seems a bit strange that FGW are getting 2 x LM (London Midland - recent franchise) 150/2s and Northern are getting 6 x LM 150/2s with both Northern and FGW receiving LM 150/1s.

If FGW got all 150/1s I would have thought it would make diagramming easier as the 150/1s would all have higher density seating whereas the 150/2s would all have low density seating but giving FGW 2 x LM 150/2s make two trains an exception to the rule.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #229 on: September 27, 2011, 10:38:16 »


Seems a bit strange that FGW (First Great Western) are getting 2 x LM (London Midland - recent franchise) 150/2s and Northern are getting 6 x LM 150/2s with both Northern and FGW receiving LM 150/1s.

If FGW got all 150/1s I would have thought it would make diagramming easier as the 150/1s would all have higher density seating whereas the 150/2s would all have low density seating but giving FGW 2 x LM 150/2s make two trains an exception to the rule.

When it came to this additional pair of '150s' perhaps FGW had a preference for the /2s, because it gives them through gangways for multiple working.  It isn't unusual to see them operating their existing 150/2s through Southampton paired with 158s.

Paul
Logged
Maxwell P
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 116



View Profile Email
« Reply #230 on: September 27, 2011, 14:56:43 »

I have it on reasonably good authority that the 2+3 seatings on the 1xx series is for the chop and that a more comprehensive internal refurb and CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele-Vision) install is planned.  From a guard's point of view, the sets are great to work non multi'd, as the cab is much more comfortable.  Now that there are intermediate door control panels on most sets, that little hassle is also taken care of.
Logged
northwesterntrains
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 324


View Profile
« Reply #231 on: September 27, 2011, 16:47:07 »

I have it on reasonably good authority that the 2+3 seatings on the 1xx series is for the chop and that a more comprehensive internal refurb and CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele-Vision) install is planned.  From a guard's point of view, the sets are great to work non multi'd, as the cab is much more comfortable.  Now that there are intermediate door control panels on most sets, that little hassle is also taken care of.

FGW (First Great Western) will have around 20 150s with 3+2 seating.  If there are proposing to do one or two at a time to maximise the number of units in service and to do them to something like Wessex Trains standards won't that mean the refurbishment will be completed just as the FGW franchise is finishing?
Logged
Maxwell P
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 116



View Profile Email
« Reply #232 on: September 27, 2011, 17:19:23 »

I have it on reasonably good authority that the 2+3 seatings on the 1xx series is for the chop and that a more comprehensive internal refurb and CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele-Vision) install is planned.  From a guard's point of view, the sets are great to work non multi'd, as the cab is much more comfortable.  Now that there are intermediate door control panels on most sets, that little hassle is also taken care of.

FGW (First Great Western) will have around 20 150s with 3+2 seating.  If there are proposing to do one or two at a time to maximise the number of units in service and to do them to something like Wessex Trains standards won't that mean the refurbishment will be completed just as the FGW franchise is finishing?

As would the mooted 180 refurb, should the units come this way.  All we can do is speculate :-) Perhaps the major part of this thread is a candidate for the new 'Rumour Mill section.   Shocked


Possibly someone on the fleet side knows more?Huh
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13323


View Profile Email
« Reply #233 on: September 27, 2011, 19:43:06 »

The 180s if they come this way, would enter service in May12, after driver trainjng & a refresh. 4 out of 5 a day, with one spare.

Not sure where the idea of any further refurb wprk came from?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #234 on: September 27, 2011, 19:46:01 »

4 out of 5 a day, with one spare.

As I've said before, that's pushing it reliability wise.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13323


View Profile Email
« Reply #235 on: September 27, 2011, 19:58:25 »

Tell that to FGW (First Great Western)!
Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1319


View Profile Email
« Reply #236 on: September 27, 2011, 20:36:46 »

Didnt get the number but i passed 1 of the centro liveried class 150's at Cardiff central while is was on the 17:40 departure to Milford Haven which was  formed of a 3 carriage class 175 but was still overcrowded.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19553



View Profile Email
« Reply #237 on: September 27, 2011, 21:34:55 »

All we can do is speculate :-) Perhaps the major part of this thread is a candidate for the new 'Rumour Mill section.   Shocked

Actually, I agree, Maxwell P - but I'm not inclined to weed through the whole of a 16 page topic, trying to pick out those individual posts which have no apparent foundation in fact!

Please, for the future: if you're just speculating, or repeating rumour - use the new Rumour Mill board?

CfN  Lips sealed
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #238 on: September 27, 2011, 21:52:24 »

Not sure where the idea of any further refurb work came from?

FGW (First Great Western) did issue a tender some months back for a Class 180 refresh.

http://www.publictenders.net/tender/100424
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
northwesterntrains
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 324


View Profile
« Reply #239 on: September 28, 2011, 10:12:45 »

Not sure where the idea of any further refurb work came from?

FGW (First Great Western) did issue a tender some months back for a Class 180 refresh.

http://www.publictenders.net/tender/100424

A repaint, replacement seat covers and new carpets is what you'd expect for 10 year old stock that's never had a refresh.  ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former Train Operating Company)) are doing/have done the same with their 175s.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 30
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page