LiskeardRich
|
|
« Reply #225 on: September 26, 2011, 09:36:32 » |
|
Surely another reason why an Unfounded Rumours and Gossip section would be a valuable addition. That way, possible happenings could be flagged up, but moved to appropriate forum slots when conclusively acknowledged to be fact.
Thats a good idea, Phile, i am finding your postings informative and interesting, am reading but have no furtheer comments to add, take note of the number of "views" of the thread rather than the number of replies
|
|
|
Logged
|
All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #226 on: September 26, 2011, 09:41:40 » |
|
Surely another reason why an Unfounded Rumours and Gossip section would be a valuable addition. That way, possible happenings could be flagged up, but moved to appropriate forum slots when conclusively acknowledged to be fact.
Maxwell P .... that *will* be happening very soon. It's been discussed between the moderators and the ball is in my court ... in which (however) there are lots of other balls bouncing around, some of them which need time-dependent attention.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
phile
|
|
« Reply #227 on: September 26, 2011, 22:10:40 » |
|
Now set up, I notice. Hope anything dubious will posted on that boards.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
northwesterntrains
|
|
« Reply #228 on: September 27, 2011, 09:46:01 » |
|
I would prefer it to be definite information rather than a quote on WNXX▸ Forum but it appears that 150202 and 150214 are being prepared at Tyseley for transfer to FGW▸ .
Seems a bit strange that FGW are getting 2 x LM▸ 150/2s and Northern are getting 6 x LM 150/2s with both Northern and FGW receiving LM 150/1s. If FGW got all 150/1s I would have thought it would make diagramming easier as the 150/1s would all have higher density seating whereas the 150/2s would all have low density seating but giving FGW 2 x LM 150/2s make two trains an exception to the rule.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #229 on: September 27, 2011, 10:38:16 » |
|
Seems a bit strange that FGW▸ are getting 2 x LM▸ 150/2s and Northern are getting 6 x LM 150/2s with both Northern and FGW receiving LM 150/1s.
If FGW got all 150/1s I would have thought it would make diagramming easier as the 150/1s would all have higher density seating whereas the 150/2s would all have low density seating but giving FGW 2 x LM 150/2s make two trains an exception to the rule.
When it came to this additional pair of '150s' perhaps FGW had a preference for the /2s, because it gives them through gangways for multiple working. It isn't unusual to see them operating their existing 150/2s through Southampton paired with 158s. Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Maxwell P
|
|
« Reply #230 on: September 27, 2011, 14:56:43 » |
|
I have it on reasonably good authority that the 2+3 seatings on the 1xx series is for the chop and that a more comprehensive internal refurb and CCTV▸ install is planned. From a guard's point of view, the sets are great to work non multi'd, as the cab is much more comfortable. Now that there are intermediate door control panels on most sets, that little hassle is also taken care of.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
northwesterntrains
|
|
« Reply #231 on: September 27, 2011, 16:47:07 » |
|
I have it on reasonably good authority that the 2+3 seatings on the 1xx series is for the chop and that a more comprehensive internal refurb and CCTV▸ install is planned. From a guard's point of view, the sets are great to work non multi'd, as the cab is much more comfortable. Now that there are intermediate door control panels on most sets, that little hassle is also taken care of.
FGW▸ will have around 20 150s with 3+2 seating. If there are proposing to do one or two at a time to maximise the number of units in service and to do them to something like Wessex Trains standards won't that mean the refurbishment will be completed just as the FGW franchise is finishing?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Maxwell P
|
|
« Reply #232 on: September 27, 2011, 17:19:23 » |
|
I have it on reasonably good authority that the 2+3 seatings on the 1xx series is for the chop and that a more comprehensive internal refurb and CCTV▸ install is planned. From a guard's point of view, the sets are great to work non multi'd, as the cab is much more comfortable. Now that there are intermediate door control panels on most sets, that little hassle is also taken care of.
FGW▸ will have around 20 150s with 3+2 seating. If there are proposing to do one or two at a time to maximise the number of units in service and to do them to something like Wessex Trains standards won't that mean the refurbishment will be completed just as the FGW franchise is finishing? As would the mooted 180 refurb, should the units come this way. All we can do is speculate :-) Perhaps the major part of this thread is a candidate for the new 'Rumour Mill section. Possibly someone on the fleet side knows more?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #233 on: September 27, 2011, 19:43:06 » |
|
The 180s if they come this way, would enter service in May12, after driver trainjng & a refresh. 4 out of 5 a day, with one spare.
Not sure where the idea of any further refurb wprk came from?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #234 on: September 27, 2011, 19:46:01 » |
|
4 out of 5 a day, with one spare.
As I've said before, that's pushing it reliability wise.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #235 on: September 27, 2011, 19:58:25 » |
|
Tell that to FGW▸ !
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #236 on: September 27, 2011, 20:36:46 » |
|
Didnt get the number but i passed 1 of the centro liveried class 150's at Cardiff central while is was on the 17:40 departure to Milford Haven which was formed of a 3 carriage class 175 but was still overcrowded.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #237 on: September 27, 2011, 21:34:55 » |
|
All we can do is speculate :-) Perhaps the major part of this thread is a candidate for the new 'Rumour Mill section. Actually, I agree, Maxwell P - but I'm not inclined to weed through the whole of a 16 page topic, trying to pick out those individual posts which have no apparent foundation in fact! Please, for the future: if you're just speculating, or repeating rumour - use the new Rumour Mill board? CfN
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #238 on: September 27, 2011, 21:52:24 » |
|
Not sure where the idea of any further refurb work came from?
FGW▸ did issue a tender some months back for a Class 180 refresh. http://www.publictenders.net/tender/100424
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
northwesterntrains
|
|
« Reply #239 on: September 28, 2011, 10:12:45 » |
|
A repaint, replacement seat covers and new carpets is what you'd expect for 10 year old stock that's never had a refresh. ATW▸ are doing/have done the same with their 175s.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|