Am i confusing myself here...
why would London Midland be bidding for 150s when they're getting rid of theirs when the 172s are complete? sorry if that's a silly question...
It isn't a silly question at all, because the new fleets for
LM▸ were only ever intended to be like for like replacements - there are economies of scale in allocating all of a new fleet to one operator, and splitting the cascade of older ex
BR▸ stock around the country, hopefully to operators who are already familiar with the unit type in their incoming share of the cascade.
As the Dft rolling stock plan read, LM's 172s basically replaced a very similar number of 150s, (on a near one for one basis) and all the released 150s would go to other
TOCs▸ (always understoood to be
FGW▸ and Northern). If nothing changed in the meantime, there'd be no 150s 'spare' for LM to be considering.
AIUI▸ the catch in the plan was that although Northern were initially allocated a large proportion of the 150s, this remained subject to the
DfT» agreeing business case - in hindsight the DfT plan had a get out. So now there are a number of unallocated units - and they could go anywhere - even though they are currently in LM's hands.
Likewise, the small print of the recent announcement mentions that the 7 142s that FGW have 'on loan' from Northern won't necessarily go back into service - as DfT need to see yet another business case to supoport their reintroduction.
There is an
EMU▸ analogy on LM as well. The DfT rolling stock plan had them getting 37 Desiro 350/2s to replace their 37 older 321s on a one for one basis. The theory was that the older fleet would be split 3 ways between
FCC▸ (10),
NXEA▸ (17), and c2c (10). As things turned out the 10 for c2c didn't happen, and eventually 7 units were retained by LM. In a recent DfT announcement these were considered 'additional stock' for LM - even though they had never physically left...
Paul