tramway
|
|
« Reply #360 on: December 13, 2011, 09:56:22 » |
|
150001 and 150126 moved this weekend from. Pretty sure that is now the completed transfer. SWT▸ 158 no longer working the afternoon Brighton.
swt 158 still on hire, but reverted back to it's former Gol;den Valley Diagram. According to SWT Carriage Workings until December next year !!! Still if this can be agreed between the 2 Companies even taking into accouint hire charges. FGW▸ have an extra Unit unobtainable through DaFT» That might be why the 07.23 Warminster Malvern was only 2 car today, was full and standing from Trowbridge. It normally had the SWT 158 with it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
phile
|
|
« Reply #361 on: December 13, 2011, 21:01:51 » |
|
I am not 100% certain on this one but perhaps the 07 23 Warminster should now be a 3 Coach formation following the forming of 158960 and 158961. Perhaps a member from within could confirm.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #362 on: December 13, 2011, 22:41:59 » |
|
Here is a table I've compiled of the strengthened services operating through Bristol Temple Meads as from 12th December. This information has be gleaned from another rail forum and tidied up by me. The original source for the info was from FGW▸ 's Director of Communications and appeared to have some time errors which I've fixed based on current Journey Planner info. I've no idea of the the actual TOPS▸ numbers for the units though. They would be liable to regular change anyway. Looking at those timings its obvious some other services will also be strengthened. The service out to Severn Beach that forms the inbound 0720 will logically also have 3 carriages. I also can't see that the return working of the 1700 Cardiff - Taunton is likely to leave a carriage behind at Taunton. I make no claims to the 100% accuracy of the table above.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
phile
|
|
« Reply #363 on: December 14, 2011, 18:25:52 » |
|
I hope that we are not going to see another Dec 2006 scenario as a result of the Cascade. I believe that the 07 23 Warminster to Great Malvern mentioned earlier was for med by 158960 but with a Carriage missing, i.e. 2 08 23 Portsnouth Harbour to Cardiff today observed with 2 coaches only (158766)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #364 on: December 14, 2011, 18:39:03 » |
|
How? The Dec 2006 problems were caused by the withdrawal and storage of a large amount of rolling stock. I'm really not sure how you propose that FGW▸ will achieve a similar result with a net increase in vehicles.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
phile
|
|
« Reply #365 on: December 14, 2011, 18:56:53 » |
|
Day to day availabity issue, probably.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tramway
|
|
« Reply #366 on: December 16, 2011, 09:40:00 » |
|
I am not 100% certain on this one but perhaps the 07 23 Warminster should now be a 3 Coach formation following the forming of 158960 and 158961. Perhaps a member from within could confirm.
158950 this morning. Not my favorite service due to the innordinate amount of time it sits in BRI» for, so any further info on this diagram will be quite limited.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
phile
|
|
« Reply #367 on: December 16, 2011, 19:47:56 » |
|
I should just like to know if 07 23 Warminster is now booked a 3 Car 158 or not following the formation of 158960 and 158961 as it appears to have created some controversy. Anybody got the answer, please ? Thanks in anticipation
|
|
« Last Edit: December 16, 2011, 19:56:07 by phile »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #368 on: December 16, 2011, 20:14:31 » |
|
Surely that would rely on this newly formed 3 car Class 158 always being diagrammed on that particular service?
Should the question not be whether the 0723 from Warminster is be a 3 car service regardless of the stock used?
To answer that I can only refer you to the table upthread, where the 0723 from Warminster is not included in the list of strengthened services. Maybe it's one that FGW▸ should've considered strengthening. I don't know, not having travelled on it. You can of course ask FGW.
It should be remembered that rolling stock provision on a particular service is always going to be at the mercy of what is and isn't available on a particular day. That holds true even in the case of the services FGW have said are to be strengthened.
|
|
« Last Edit: December 16, 2011, 21:06:27 by bignosemac »
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
phile
|
|
« Reply #369 on: December 16, 2011, 20:58:51 » |
|
Thanks. Seems strange though to have been reduced a previous 4 coach well loaded train.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
phile
|
|
« Reply #370 on: December 17, 2011, 20:03:24 » |
|
On furthet reflection, even if Units are allocated on the day according to availability, the 3 Coach and 2 Coach 158s are diagrammed separately to services so that is why I have been wondering about the actual diagram itself. Or just a "clanger" in reducing the formation as has been indicated.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatcontroller
|
|
« Reply #371 on: December 18, 2011, 16:41:46 » |
|
The 0723 goes on to form the 1051 Great Malvern - Brighton hence the formation being 3-cars in order to strengthen the Brighton service.
There are no 2-car 158 diagrams anymore as they should all have been 3cars by now.
The 0723 may be a coach short but there are other services around the same time that are now a lot bigger.
|
|
|
Logged
|
former FGW▸ Staff now working for the People's republic of ScotRail Anything I post is my own personal view and not that of FGW, FirstGroup, ScotRail or Transport Scotland. Anything official from these sources will be marked as such.
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #372 on: December 18, 2011, 17:19:54 » |
|
The 07:11 Gloucester to Swindon, now 3 carriages. 150 + 153, I believe.
Question - what happens to the second unit from Swindon - does it strengthen the Stroud Valley all day, or get taken off somewhere to come back into play in the evening peak?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #373 on: December 18, 2011, 17:51:10 » |
|
The 07:11 Gloucester to Swindon, now 3 carriages. 150 + 153, I believe.
Question - what happens to the second unit from Swindon - does it strengthen the Stroud Valley all day, or get taken off somewhere to come back into play in the evening peak?
If it sits in Swindon all day then perhaps it could be used to provide a regular service between Swindon & Westbury providing there are paths etc available.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dog box
|
|
« Reply #374 on: December 18, 2011, 17:57:49 » |
|
Nothing sits in Swindon , and not strictly true 2O00 is diagrammed 2 car 158 utilising the SWT▸ Hired set
|
|
|
Logged
|
All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
|
|
|
|