Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 08 Jan 2025
 
* Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 20:38:22 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[82] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[69] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[54] senior railcard
[52] Coastal walks - station to station
[28] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 30
  Print  
Author Topic: Stock cascade of class 150s  (Read 173391 times)
TJ
Full Member
***
Posts: 92



View Profile
« Reply #285 on: October 19, 2011, 00:14:27 »

Confirmation that two of the seven have departed would be great news.

Out of interest does anyone know which route they take and who (which operator) drives them?

TJ
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3489

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #286 on: October 19, 2011, 01:18:32 »

What^s the capacity like comparing to a two car 165? The rush hour services on this route are rammed as it is. Be interesting to see what happens, are they planning on strengthening other TV services then? As for being on a 150 all the way from Reading to Gatwick...... no comment!

reading to gatwick is less time than penzance to plymouth....let alone Penzance to Bristol services we the 150s on!
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
hornbeam
Full Member
***
Posts: 90


View Profile
« Reply #287 on: October 19, 2011, 13:57:50 »

I forgot how some of you travel on them for such long services sorry.

The fact they want to run them so close to the depot does concern me, as they cant have much faith!

but on the plus side, least they are trying.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #288 on: October 19, 2011, 14:08:30 »

The fact they want to run them so close to the depot does concern me, as they cant have much faith!

As stated earlier in the thread, it's got nothing to do with the proximity of the depot, but the fact they are not suitable for Driver Only Operation, which precludes them from most of the other LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) routes, and the other bonus is that the Basingstoke route is operated by 2 units which form a simple, self-contained shuttle service, with drivers and guards that are only supplied from one depot, so training costs would be as little as possible.

Maybe nothing will come of this, but it's an interesting idea.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
northwesterntrains
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 324


View Profile
« Reply #289 on: October 19, 2011, 17:12:03 »

As for being on a 150 all the way from Reading to Gatwick...... no comment!

reading to gatwick is less time than penzance to plymouth....let alone Penzance to Bristol services we the 150s on!

In the 1980s tripled up 150s were used on Scarborough-York-Leeds-Manchester-Chester-Holyhead services.

Reading-Gatwick Airport is shorter than some Pacer operated services never mind 150 operated services.
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #290 on: October 19, 2011, 21:33:36 »

Confirmation that two of the seven have departed would be great news.

Out of interest does anyone know which route they take and who (which operator) drives them?

TJ
Via Lickey, Landor St, Derby, Hope Valley and GuideBridge.    Detailed timings on The Messroon Forum
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #291 on: October 19, 2011, 21:37:35 »

Has anybody got any sighting reports recently of "Alien" livered 150/1s in far away places.   Or perhaps of 150202 and to confirm it's livery.
Logged
Jonathan H
Full Member
***
Posts: 55


View Profile
« Reply #292 on: October 20, 2011, 07:14:48 »

The fact they want to run them so close to the depot does concern me, as they cant have much faith!

As stated earlier in the thread, it's got nothing to do with the proximity of the depot, but the fact they are not suitable for Driver Only Operation, which precludes them from most of the other LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) routes, and the other bonus is that the Basingstoke route is operated by 2 units which form a simple, self-contained shuttle service, with drivers and guards that are only supplied from one depot, so training costs would be as little as possible.

Maybe nothing will come of this, but it's an interesting idea.

Do not Redhill guards also have some duties on Reading to Basingstoke services?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #293 on: October 20, 2011, 07:49:23 »

The fact they want to run them so close to the depot does concern me, as they cant have much faith!

No - it's logical to keep the oddball units on a line that's close to the depot whatever their MTBFs (Mean Time Between Failure)s are - i.e. faith or not. If a unit that was different to the rest of the "pack" were to require attention (even rarely) a long way from home, it would potentially mean a long trip for one of the handful of people who knew about it, whereas a failure of a regular unit at a far outpost wouldn't be so much of a problem - chance would be that one of the local fitters out there would know what to do. 

This has been thought through rather carefully, and seems a sensible way to add some extra capacity onto the line in question and at the same time release capacity for use elsewhere. Good heavens - we could do with those extra carriages on the TransWilts where 600 people have said they want to use the line to commute to their place of work, and of course there are many other contenders where they could be used to relieve overcrowding ... it looks like they'll get them as existing customers can shout louder than potential customers, even though the impact on each individual user would be far greater on the TransWilts.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #294 on: October 20, 2011, 10:37:59 »

Do not Redhill guards also have some duties on Reading to Basingstoke services?

No, I don't think so.

Graham makes a very valid point about how those Class 150/1's could be used to provide the enhanced TransWilts service he is so interested in, but I guess the obvious answer is that something has to be done to relieve overcrowding on a network that, according to the Dft's latest (highly subjective) figures, has the 10 worst overcrowded services in/out of London each day.  It's such a pity that adequate carriages aren't available to supply everyone's needs.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #295 on: October 20, 2011, 16:50:29 »

I cant really see much happening with the TransWilts service  til FGW (First Great Western) get more DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)'s which isnt likely to happen til at least 2016 whan the class 165/166's are displaced by the class 319's from Thameslink.

The only other possible ways to get more trains to worr the route is for FGW to get those 11  4-carriage  dmu's which were planned for the Cardiff - Portsmouth Hbr route to displace the class 158's or hope GOCO (Previous name for Go-Op Train - ) can start up running some service soon.

Either that or bring back the loco hauled sets for the Cardiff - Taunton route to free up a class 150/158.

Its a shame that a better service can't be offered for this route at the moment. I did eventually manage to travel the route from Swindon to Trowbridge before getting a cardiff train a few weeks ago and the train (a class 150) was very well full of passengers, some of whom had come off the HST (High Speed Train) from London Paddington/Reading. This just goes to show what could happen if more trains are run along the route.

I think if GOCO can get a service up and running with some suitably timed peak hour services to/from Swindon they could do well in terms of passenger numbers etc.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #296 on: October 20, 2011, 18:03:52 »

The only other possible ways to get more trains to worr the route is for FGW (First Great Western) to get those 11  4-carriage  dmu's which were planned for the Cardiff - Portsmouth Hbr route to displace the class 158's...

I just cannot see why you keep flogging this dead horse.  The proposal is DEAD, the ITT (Invitation to Tender) was ripped up the day the last government announced the NW and GW (Great Western) electrification projects.  It isn't on the back burner, it isn't even down behind the cooker, and it isn't in the room...

Quote
Either that or bring back the loco hauled sets for the Cardiff - Taunton route to free up a class 150/158.

The LHCS (Locomotive Hauled Coaching Stock) was a temporary solution until the 15 x 150s arrived.  It was over and done with once the 6 units arrived from LO.  They won't be coming back - because they are significantly more expensive to operate than DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit).

Paul
Logged
Kingfisherdart
Full Member
***
Posts: 61



View Profile
« Reply #297 on: October 20, 2011, 22:56:51 »

150202 was sighted at Plymouth's platform 3, a week ago. It is in Central Trains lime green livery - without the white 'Cs' at each end. The interior is the original 2+3 seating, complete with orange doors and 'BREL (British Rail Engineering Ltd), Trainmakers for the World' lettering on the door steps.

L
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #298 on: October 21, 2011, 09:19:29 »

The basingstoke & Gatwick turns are covered by the same teams swapping turns - Union rules mean only so many Basigstoke turns can be done before the crews have to move to other work. Boredom sets in apparently, and that's a safety worry. So they go off & do a GTW turn...and that crew replaces them. Not every turn, but a fair number
Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #299 on: October 21, 2011, 09:56:45 »

The only other possible ways to get more trains to worr the route is for FGW (First Great Western) to get those 11  4-carriage  dmu's which were planned for the Cardiff - Portsmouth Hbr route to displace the class 158's...

I just cannot see why you keep flogging this dead horse.  The proposal is DEAD, the ITT (Invitation to Tender) was ripped up the day the last government announced the NW and GW (Great Western) electrification projects.  It isn't on the back burner, it isn't even down behind the cooker, and it isn't in the room...

Quote
Either that or bring back the loco hauled sets for the Cardiff - Taunton route to free up a class 150/158.

The LHCS (Locomotive Hauled Coaching Stock) was a temporary solution until the 15 x 150s arrived.  It was over and done with once the 6 units arrived from LO.  They won't be coming back - because they are significantly more expensive to operate than DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit).

Paul

Yes I know that what I meant was it's a shame the government scrapped it the same with the loco hauled set's.

I suspect FGW will be waiting for a while to get more dmu's now that thameslink 's new stock is being delayed adding to the fact that the class 319's are also needed up in the north west to work teh routes that are currently being electrified.

Perhaps the government could look at  ordering additional class 377's like they are doing with southern to  work the routes in the north west so that more of   the class 319's can  come to FGW although they would needd to do some more electrification.

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 30
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page