Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 06 Jan 2025
 
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
- Works on 'road from hell' to end after 23 years
- 'Second chance at life' after UK's first liver transplant for advanced bowel cancer
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 08/01/25 - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
6th Jan (1968)
Hixon Railway accident (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
20:51 Bristol Temple Meads to Bristol Parkway
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:36 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
21:21 Bristol Parkway to Trowbridge
Delayed
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
19:18 Trowbridge to Cardiff Central
20:22 Reading to Shalford
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:30 Shalford to Reading
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 06, 2025, 20:45:52 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[56] Mining in Cornwall
[43] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[39] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[39] Bath to Bridgnorth and back 4/1/25
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 33
  Print  
Author Topic: Maidenhead station - services, facilities, car parking and incidents (merged posts)  (Read 285345 times)
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 643


View Profile
« Reply #105 on: October 18, 2014, 16:10:38 »

The 0944 TWY (Twyford station)-PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) this morning had 6 cars but I'm currently on the 1521 stopper from PAD which has only 3. Incidentally I've noticed that the 1546 fast PAD to OXF» (Oxford - next trains) was cancelled due to a train failure.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #106 on: October 18, 2014, 16:45:27 »

The 0944 TWY (Twyford station)-PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) this morning had 6 cars but I'm currently on the 1521 stopper from PAD which has only 3. Incidentally I've noticed that the 1546 fast PAD to OXF» (Oxford - next trains) was cancelled due to a train failure.

Yes, the 15:21 would be the return working of the 14:20 I mentioned in the previous post.  How busy is it?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 643


View Profile
« Reply #107 on: October 18, 2014, 17:36:54 »

The 0944 TWY (Twyford station)-PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) this morning had 6 cars but I'm currently on the 1521 stopper from PAD which has only 3. Incidentally I've noticed that the 1546 fast PAD to OXF» (Oxford - next trains) was cancelled due to a train failure.

Yes, the 15:21 would be the return working of the 14:20 I mentioned in the previous post.  How busy is it?

It didn't seem too bad, maybe 75-80% full, certainly not overcrowded.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #108 on: October 18, 2014, 19:37:16 »

I didn't risk it.. I went for Plan B which was drive to Osterley, park all day for ^2 and get the tube in (as I have a monthly travelcard).. Admittedly it was busy at times but not on a FGW (First Great Western) cattle truck scale... Grin
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #109 on: November 09, 2014, 12:53:06 »

Yesterday, as well as a half hourly stopping service there was also a half hourly faster train stopping at Twyford, Maidenhead and Slough only which was a bonus and the (fast) train I got was 6 carriages..

However it wasn't terribly well thought through as a stopping train left Maidenhead 12 minutes ahead of the fast train but it was only 3 carriages.. As you can imagine that train got later and later (13 late by Ealing Broadway) as people would have tried to get on to an already full train at each station which delayed us a bit but not a problem for me since my train wasn't full.. I did feel sorry for people on the stopping service though
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1105


View Profile
« Reply #110 on: November 09, 2014, 13:30:47 »

Oh joy. Due to planned engineering works (I assume), Maidenhead (as I am sure other stations have too) has lost half it's Saturday service tomorrow which is already busy when it's running as planned (four trains an hour usually).. I can hardly wait.. Huh

Network Rail have got to lower the trackbed under some bridges in order for electrification equipment to fit underneath, or that's what they have been doing the past few weekends in the Slough area unfortunately that results in a loss of capacity on the route. 
Logged
froggycat
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 15


View Profile
« Reply #111 on: May 26, 2015, 10:28:46 »

What is it with passengers at Maidenhead station? I sometimes take the 8:19 from Reading for Maidenhead. Getting off that train always feels like such a fight: I have never seen passengers stuck on mass in front of the carriage doors not letting people off the train anywhere else in the country.
Has there been a common-sense bypass for all people getting on trains in Maidenhead? Surely making sure you leave a clear passage for people to get off would ensure a much quicker run of trains. Seems really odd to me. Any explanation welcome.
I read once in a survey that Maidenhead was the second worst station in the UK (United Kingdom). I am sure this is one of the contributing factors for this classification.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #112 on: May 26, 2015, 11:02:57 »

Your first post, Froggycat?     Welcome to the forum!

I suspect the answer might be lie in a dive for seats ... with only some joiners being "lucky".   Thinking about it, I'm far more fussed to get on as soon as I can (London - Bristol services) at Paddington than I am at Bristol.   I know I'll get a seat from Bristol, I know I'll be lucky (or have to be fast) to get a seat at Paddington.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 727


View Profile
« Reply #113 on: May 26, 2015, 12:52:21 »

Yes, as a Maidenhead commuter (not that train though!, although I did take it once last week) its all about the lack of fast services to London and about the trains that are scheduled being short.

The 08.35 Maid->Padd (which I believe is the train you refer to?) is 3 carriages and yet is the first fast train since 8am and the last until 09.08.  Essentialy, if you do a school drop of need to be at work anything near 9/9.30 then this is the train for you.

 
Logged
jane s
Full Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #114 on: May 26, 2015, 14:10:58 »

Hi Froggycat,

If you think that's bad you should try getting on a train home from Ealing Broadway in the evenings! Smiley

The announcer constantly shouts "Please allow passengers OFF the train before attempting to board! Once you are on board, please move right down inside the carriages, do NOT stand near the doors blocking the doors!" but there are always certain passengers that take not a blind bit of notice, barging their way on to the train while people are still getting off, and then proceeding to stand in the lobby blocking the way for the rest of us who do want to move down inside because unlike them, we are not getting off at the next couple of stops!

The best bet at that time at Maidenhead is to wait for the 8:41 (which usually leaves from Platform 5) - yes it is only a semi-fast, stopping at Slough & Southall, but you will at least get a seat.

No idea why they only have 3 cars on the fast trains from Maidenhead in the mornings, IMO (in my opinion) it is completely ridiculous.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #115 on: May 26, 2015, 14:52:45 »

No idea why they only have 3 cars on the fast trains from Maidenhead in the mornings, IMO (in my opinion) it is completely ridiculous.

Too many people wanting to travel at the same time and a National shortage of rolling stock especially DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit).
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8449



View Profile
« Reply #116 on: May 26, 2015, 15:49:42 »

No idea why they only have 3 cars on the fast trains from Maidenhead in the mornings, IMO (in my opinion) it is completely ridiculous.

Too many people wanting to travel at the same time and a National shortage of rolling stock especially DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit).

......and too many regularly breaking down!

I don't think you can really blame "too many" people wanting to travel, there tends to be a correlation with when their employers expect them to turn up at work! Blame the people who got the estimates for demand hugely wrong in the first place!

Agree re both Maidenhead and Ealing B when it comes to people getting on/off though, I've commuted to/from both over the years and 'twas ever thus, seems to be worse than anywhere else.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #117 on: May 26, 2015, 16:47:02 »

People getting on before allowing people off are breaking the byelaws
Railway Byelaws:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/4202/railway-byelaws.pdf

Quote
10.1 No person shall enter through any train door until any person leaving by that door has passed through.

and

Quote
Any person who breaches any of these Byelaws commits an offence and, with the exception of Byelaw 17, may be liable for each such offence to a penalty not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

Any person who is reasonably believed by an authorised person to be in breach of any of these Byelaws shall leave the railway immediately if asked to do so by an authorised person.

So you could get the railway staff to throw the early borders off the train and out of the station!  In theory, of course!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4504


View Profile
« Reply #118 on: May 26, 2015, 17:34:54 »

I don't think you can really blame "too many" people wanting to travel, there tends to be a correlation with when their employers expect them to turn up at work! Blame the people who got the estimates for demand hugely wrong in the first place!

Further questions come to mind:

1) was there not a time when they all did fit into a 3 car dmu?
2) why so many more people want to travel that journey to work than previously? 
3) I am sure several different bodies made estimates.
     a) Were they wrong?
     b) Could any of them have actually done something about making more capacity?
     c) If so who?


Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #119 on: May 26, 2015, 17:45:24 »

3) I am sure several different bodies made estimates.
     a) Were they wrong?

Estimates for the 2005 - 2012 franchise period were based on 0.8% growth compound, whereas 8% growth compound was what happened (ball park figures across the South West).  Follow on shorter term franchises have been based on "carry on with the same".

To give you an idea, 100 passenger at 0.8% over 8 years will take you up to 108 passengers, but at 8% growth takes you up to 215 passengers - in other words trains are carrying twice what was planned for.   For sure, the Adelantes have come back and 2+7 have become 2+8;  Cardiff - Portsmouth has been re-increased from 2 to 3 cars and more stock brought into the area, but certainly there's not been a doubling.   Something IS being done - Crossrail, electrification - but that's not yet on stream.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 33
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page