Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 08 Jan 2025
 
* Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:22 Reading to Shalford
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 20:39:48 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[82] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[69] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[54] senior railcard
[52] Coastal walks - station to station
[28] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 33
  Print  
Author Topic: Maidenhead station - services, facilities, car parking and incidents (merged posts)  (Read 285650 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #375 on: January 08, 2020, 14:15:34 »

I’ve encountered these guys too. Proper overkill.
On Tuesday, when the 7.02 and 7.07 were cancelled and several hundred passengers were crammed on to Platform 4 in the cold, their role appeared to be enforcing the yellow line to prevent encroachment.

I’d love to know who pays for these guys, what their actual job is, and why maidenhead is deemed to be under such imminent threat.

Probably a darned sight more to do that this security guard I came across ...



To be fair, I chatted with her and learned that they were overstaffed that day and so she was taking a "reeky" to learn more about the area she and her colleagues covered ... this was a station she had never visited before.

Perhaps the guys at Maidenhead are under training for tougher assignments such as Taplow  Cheesy
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8450



View Profile
« Reply #376 on: January 13, 2020, 05:32:02 »

0702, 0732, 0831 fast services all non stopping at Twyford and Maidenhead this morning according to Journeycheck.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #377 on: January 13, 2020, 06:14:49 »

0702, 0732, 0831 fast services all non stopping at Twyford and Maidenhead this morning according to Journeycheck.

Not running inward of Reading at all ...

Quote
06:21 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington due 07:22
06:21 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington due 07:22 will be terminated at Reading.
It will no longer call at Twyford, Maidenhead and London Paddington.
This is due to a speed restriction over defective track.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8450



View Profile
« Reply #378 on: January 13, 2020, 07:11:16 »

0702, 0732, 0831 fast services all non stopping at Twyford and Maidenhead this morning according to Journeycheck.

Not running inward of Reading at all ...

Quote
06:21 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington due 07:22
06:21 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington due 07:22 will be terminated at Reading.
It will no longer call at Twyford, Maidenhead and London Paddington.
This is due to a speed restriction over defective track.

0735 cancelled too.
Logged
Sixty3Closure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 522


View Profile
« Reply #379 on: January 13, 2020, 08:45:47 »

Another great start to the day.
Logged
Sixty3Closure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 522


View Profile
« Reply #380 on: January 14, 2020, 08:46:03 »

After the fun of getting home last night - Twyford being dropped from a couple of the services was really hoping for a smooth journey in.

Sadly not. Platform at Twyford was rammed so I'm guessing an earlier service was cancelled or ran fast to Paddington. As I couldn't get to my regular spot decided to take the drastic step of trying the rear 4 carriages. Didn't even get close. Was still queuing to get on when the TFL (Transport for London) person told us to move back up the platform as the train was departing. Eventually ended up in carriage 9 which was standing room only.

Is this really the culmination of billions of pounds of investment in trains, track, signals and stations? A service that subjectively feels as bad as any period over the last couple of years. Talking to my fellow commuters we were all quite angry that this appears to be as good as it gets.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #381 on: January 14, 2020, 10:45:43 »

The previous train was indeed cancelled, well, had the Twyford stop removed as it was running 20 minutes late.  The delay was due to a freight train with braking issues.

The culmination comes ones the Elizabeth Line opens I suppose?  At least the train you did get was on time and formed of 12-carriages - I had feared it might be a victim of 'more than the usual number of trains needing repair' syndrome, but I don't think it has been shortformed yet?

I see the 07:07 called at Maidenhead despite being 6 minutes late from Reading, though it lost a further 6 minutes to Paddington.  Perhaps words have been had with those making the decisions?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 727


View Profile
« Reply #382 on: January 14, 2020, 11:50:34 »

I was just about to say thanks/well done for the 7.07 being allowed to stop today at Maidenhead despite being slightly late. 

Tuesday is in my estimation ‘peak unreliability day’ and I feel the freight train that shuffles through is something to do with it.

Personally I’ve abandoned the 7.01/7.07 completely and have moved to the 6.45.  I wouldn’t choose to be getting up even earlier but that choice has been removed from me by GWR (Great Western Railway) and the unreliability of the 7.xx services.  For the record the 6.45 appears quite reliable but was shortformed today so a lot of grumpy standing people at Slough.

Roll on summer timetable changes...


Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7370


View Profile
« Reply #383 on: January 14, 2020, 12:57:23 »

The previous train was indeed cancelled, well, had the Twyford stop removed as it was running 20 minutes late.  The delay was due to a freight train with braking issues.

The culmination comes ones the Elizabeth Line opens I suppose?  At least the train you did get was on time and formed of 12-carriages - I had feared it might be a victim of 'more than the usual number of trains needing repair' syndrome, but I don't think it has been shortformed yet?

I see the 07:07 called at Maidenhead despite being 6 minutes late from Reading, though it lost a further 6 minutes to Paddington.  Perhaps words have been had with those making the decisions?

But what about the one before that? The 06:26 (1P92) was on time, yet it too non-stopped at Twyford and then stopped at Maidenhead. Maidenhead's 06:45 doesn't have a Twyford stop to not do. So Today Maidenhead got the sweeties, and Twyford the empty packet - and probably loads of people saying "if I'd known how late I'd be I'd have got on the TfL» (Transport for London - about) train".
Logged
Sixty3Closure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 522


View Profile
« Reply #384 on: January 14, 2020, 13:10:50 »

The previous train was indeed cancelled, well, had the Twyford stop removed as it was running 20 minutes late.  The delay was due to a freight train with braking issues.

The culmination comes ones the Elizabeth Line opens I suppose?  At least the train you did get was on time and formed of 12-carriages - I had feared it might be a victim of 'more than the usual number of trains needing repair' syndrome, but I don't think it has been shortformed yet?

I see the 07:07 called at Maidenhead despite being 6 minutes late from Reading, though it lost a further 6 minutes to Paddington.  Perhaps words have been had with those making the decisions?

Thanks for the update. Hasn't been shortformed yet but I think allowing a bit more time for boarding would make a big difference but then we know the timetable is very aggressive on timings. I'm not going to try using the back 5 coaches again.

Has a review date for the new timetable been set as I think there are a few issues with Maidenhead/Twyford as well as the London centric issues mentioned by other posters?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #385 on: January 14, 2020, 14:08:15 »

But what about the one before that? The 06:26 (1P92) was on time, yet it too non-stopped at Twyford and then stopped at Maidenhead. Maidenhead's 06:45 doesn't have a Twyford stop to not do.

Are you sure?  I can find no reference to any alterations to 1P92 today?

Just for clarification the freight train that was the cause of the delay to the train that definitely didn’t stop at Twyford wasn’t the one that has got in the way of trains at that time on the morning before.  This was a Whatley Quarry to Appleford service that doesn’t go east of Reading at all, but caused the delay in the Newbury area.  Though it’s not even booked to go that way as it should go via Melksham!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #386 on: January 14, 2020, 14:18:04 »

Just for clarification the freight train that was the cause of the delay to the train that definitely didn’t stop at Twyford wasn’t the one that has got in the way of trains at that time on the morning before.  This was a Whatley Quarry to Appleford service that doesn’t go east of Reading at all, but caused the delay in the Newbury area.  Though it’s not even booked to go that way as it should go via Melksham!

Goodness knows what was going on this morning ... the 06:12 Frome to Paddington which serves stations via Newbury got diverted via Melksham ... 7 late from Westbury, 8 late by the time it got to Reading and probably near as darn it empty by the time it had skipped all the stops from Pewsey to Theale on its normal route.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7370


View Profile
« Reply #387 on: January 14, 2020, 14:36:24 »

But what about the one before that? The 06:26 (1P92) was on time, yet it too non-stopped at Twyford and then stopped at Maidenhead. Maidenhead's 06:45 doesn't have a Twyford stop to not do.

Are you sure?  I can find no reference to any alterations to 1P92 today?

Well, no, I can only go by what's reported. I based that on RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) showing the actual arrival time as "pass", the same as it does for 1K03. But looking wider, in this case RTT's in the minority - OTT (Open Train Times website) shows a call and so does liverail. Mind you, they all show slightly different times, as does RTT for the departure - and not just rounding the fractions either, it's whole minutes. Maybe that's telling me something about the data feeds, though I've no idea what.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #388 on: January 14, 2020, 17:47:20 »

If anyone returns on the 17:37 to Maidenhead (9-car Paignton IET (Intercity Express Train)) it was absolutely crush loaded in the back part of the train.  Coaches B and A much quieter though - two people stood up and a handful of seats available.  I know where I’d rather position myself!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #389 on: January 14, 2020, 19:12:46 »

"if I'd known how late I'd be I'd have got on the TfL» (Transport for London - about) train".

Isn't that the idea? Cancel the big bad GWRs (Great Western Railway) services, so that the oh-so wonderful Crossrail to Reading can be justified...  Wink
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 33
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page