Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:55 09 Jan 2025
 
* Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningShort Run
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
Delayed
15:40 Weymouth to Frome
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 15:57:39 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[167] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[114] Thumpers for Dummies
[96] Railcard Prices going up
[57] Outstanding server / web site issues
[33] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[21] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 41
  Print  
Author Topic: Campaign for Tavistock reopening  (Read 329216 times)
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6552


View Profile
« Reply #240 on: September 19, 2010, 19:28:45 »

I know things move slowly in this country but 2026?!?!?!
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19089


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #241 on: September 19, 2010, 19:31:55 »

Sorry - I should have mentioned that it was my highlighting in that quoted article!  Roll Eyes Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #242 on: September 21, 2010, 10:31:04 »

I know things move slowly in this country but 2026?!?!?!

To be fair,i think 2026 is the projected end date for the house building programme in Tavistock-the housing is going to be gradually built over the period until then and not in one fell swoop.I seem to remember 2014 being mooted by Kilbride as the proposed year for the railway to reopen.I don't know if the public inquiry will affect this date at all or indeed if it will scupper the whole project,certainly hope not.I don't really know how far Public inquiries can influence these matters,i believe that a proposal to build a new Sainsbury's was thrown out after a PI in Tavistock a couple of years ago,whether something as far reaching and important as this could go the same way remains to be seen.
Logged
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #243 on: March 31, 2011, 20:37:53 »

Update on the Tavistock situation;

http://www.westdevon.gov.uk/doc.asp?doc=17785&cat=983

I presume that Kilbride can now proceed with obtaining parliamentary approval? I'm not familiar with these matters,maybe someone has deeper knowledge and can advise better as to what happens next.Whatever,it certainly would appear to be good news.
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 554



View Profile
« Reply #244 on: April 01, 2011, 14:05:25 »

Is the reason noone's suggested extending Gunnislake/Tavistock services through North Road and around to a new station at the end of the Plymouth Friary stub that it's such an off-the-wall proposition?


Logged
RichardB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1011


View Profile
« Reply #245 on: April 01, 2011, 16:21:06 »

Is the reason noone's suggested extending Gunnislake/Tavistock services through North Road and around to a new station at the end of the Plymouth Friary stub that it's such an off-the-wall proposition?




I think the main thing is to get to Tavistock, Andy.  Having said that, it's hard to see why going through to a station close to the Friary station site would be worth all the time and expense to make it happen, and I speak as one of the beneficiaries if it did happen as I live just around the corner from there.

Good news about the inspector's report.   The next step wil be West Devon Borough Council's full Council meeting on 18 April - the revised Core Strategy is being taken to this for adoption.
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 554



View Profile
« Reply #246 on: April 01, 2011, 19:08:38 »

Thanks for your answer, Richard.

Re Friary, it's just that I get frustrated seeing this line unused yet with the potential of giving Plymouth a more geographically comprehensive urban rail service.

You're right to refocus the posts on Tavistock project  Embarrassed  and the positive news about the inspector's report. It will be great when the earth actually starts moving on this (as an actress might once have said to a bishop!).

 
Logged
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #247 on: April 01, 2011, 22:29:56 »

Thanks for your answer, Richard.

Re Friary, it's just that I get frustrated seeing this line unused yet with the potential of giving Plymouth a more geographically comprehensive urban rail service.

You're right to refocus the posts on Tavistock project  Embarrassed  and the positive news about the inspector's report. It will be great when the earth actually starts moving on this (as an actress might once have said to a bishop!).

 

As Richard says,i couldn't see any advantage in extending the Tavistock [or any other] service to a new station at Friary.It would add 10 minutes to the journey time and would be further away from the city centre than North Road.I suppose if a new railway age came to fruition,the Yealmpton and Turnchapel branches would be routed quite close to Friary,but bearing in mind the destruction of a lot of the line,especially around Plymstock/Pomphlett,i don't think any reinstatement is likely anytime soon.

One outcome of the reinstatement of the Tavistock line and the associated house building programmes must surely be,in years to come,to put pressure on for the reopening of the entire Southern main line from Exeter to Plymouth.The population of Tavistock and Okehampton is going to expand greatly from now until 2026 and Tavistock is already a bigger town than Totnes,which seems to have no problem in maintaining a mainline station on the other route.I was reading Richard's figures on another thread about the increase in traffic on the west country branch lines last year and can see no reason why this trend [which will not decrease in the foreseeable future] should not be applied to two large towns,especially if direct services to Exeter and beyond,and Plymouth and Cornwall,were provided.Even prior to closure the line was still reasonably well used and must surely rank as one of the more ridiculous excisions performed by Beeching,which is actually quite an accolade.Hopefully in the not too distant future,budget and vision will combine to ensure the reopening of the full Dartmoor line.I won't hold my breath,though!
Logged
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #248 on: April 20, 2011, 16:59:52 »

Is the reason noone's suggested extending Gunnislake/Tavistock services through North Road and around to a new station at the end of the Plymouth Friary stub that it's such an off-the-wall proposition?

I think the main thing is to get to Tavistock, Andy.  Having said that, it's hard to see why going through to a station close to the Friary station site would be worth all the time and expense to make it happen, and I speak as one of the beneficiaries if it did happen as I live just around the corner from there.

Good news about the inspector's report.   The next step wil be West Devon Borough Council's full Council meeting on 18 April - the revised Core Strategy is being taken to this for adoption.

Strategy duly adopted;

http://www.westdevon.gov.uk/doc.asp?doc=16591&cat=2385

Six week period for any legal challenges now. Presuming this period is overcome without any mishaps, what would be the next steps, Richard?




Edit note: Quote marks amended, for clarity. CfN.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2011, 23:20:16 by chris from nailsea » Logged
RichardB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1011


View Profile
« Reply #249 on: April 20, 2011, 17:10:59 »

Thanks for this, 34104.  I knew the meeting was in fact yesterday and hadn't heard the outcome.  It's very good news.

It'll be interesting to see if it made tomorrow's Tavistock Times.

I don't know exactly what the next steps are but as soon as I hear anything I can pass on, I will do so.

Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 554



View Profile
« Reply #250 on: April 20, 2011, 18:44:36 »

Thanks 34104 for posting the good news.
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #251 on: April 22, 2011, 22:24:54 »

Is the reason noone's suggested extending Gunnislake/Tavistock services through North Road and around to a new station at the end of the Plymouth Friary stub that it's such an off-the-wall proposition?



After the end of the 2nd World War Plymouth Corporation asked the government to re-route the main line through Plymouths bomb ravaged city centre which was largely in ruins by linking Plymouth Friary station to Millbay station with a newly constructed line so taking the main line through the heart of the city centre and bypassing todays route via Mutley tunnel and North road station.If that scheme had happened Plymouths local rail network would be very different now.But alas we are where we are.
Logged
RichardB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1011


View Profile
« Reply #252 on: April 23, 2011, 22:55:32 »

Is the reason noone's suggested extending Gunnislake/Tavistock services through North Road and around to a new station at the end of the Plymouth Friary stub that it's such an off-the-wall proposition?



After the end of the 2nd World War Plymouth Corporation asked the government to re-route the main line through Plymouths bomb ravaged city centre which was largely in ruins by linking Plymouth Friary station to Millbay station with a newly constructed line so taking the main line through the heart of the city centre and bypassing todays route via Mutley tunnel and North road station.If that scheme had happened Plymouths local rail network would be very different now.But alas we are where we are.

Where did you get that from, Woody?  I have a copy of the Abercrombie plan for the rebuilding of Plymouth here and he was focused entirely on North Road station (as advised by the GWR (Great Western Railway)).
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #253 on: April 24, 2011, 22:14:51 »

Is the reason noone's suggested extending Gunnislake/Tavistock services through North Road and around to a new station at the end of the Plymouth Friary stub that it's such an off-the-wall proposition?



After the end of the 2nd World War Plymouth Corporation asked the government to re-route the main line through Plymouths bomb ravaged city centre which was largely in ruins by linking Plymouth Friary station to Millbay station with a newly constructed line so taking the main line through the heart of the city centre and bypassing todays route via Mutley tunnel and North road station.If that scheme had happened Plymouths local rail network would be very different now.But alas we are where we are.

Where did you get that from, Woody?  I have a copy of the Abercrombie plan for the rebuilding of Plymouth here and he was focused entirely on North Road station (as advised by the GWR (Great Western Railway)).
Just a remark I heard on local radio a few years ago by a local historian.Probably was an aspiration more than a plan.
Logged
Super Sprinter 150
Newbie
*
Posts: 9


We are sorry for the delay to your service........


View Profile
« Reply #254 on: April 29, 2011, 21:46:27 »

Tavistock will be a popular destination for walkerts, biologists, e.t.c. so they must reopen it. Hopefully, FGW (First Great Western) is thinking about it.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 41
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page