Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Bristol Parkway
21:28 Weymouth to Frome
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 22:03:29 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[189] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[101] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[64] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[49] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[42] senior railcard
[40] Coastal walks - station to station
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 41
  Print  
Author Topic: Campaign for Tavistock reopening  (Read 328600 times)
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #465 on: April 13, 2013, 02:24:44 »

Greetings Alex :-)
Logged
RichardB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1011


View Profile
« Reply #466 on: April 15, 2013, 10:41:06 »

Currently no active campaigns, you do get the odd murmuring now and then

Feel guilty abt posting this as it's off-topic but...
   Is the campaign to relay Parkandillack-St Dennis Jcn as part of the eco-towns project a dead duck? There was talk of the incinerator being rail-served as well at one point, wasn't there?



Sadly, Andy, I think it has come in as being far too expensive. 
Logged
alexross42
Full Member
***
Posts: 83



View Profile
« Reply #467 on: April 15, 2013, 15:47:11 »

Hmm.  Roll Eyes

As well as going off at various tangents on this particular topic, we seem to have overlooked our manners.

May I now offer our rather belated customary warm welcome to the Coffee Shop forum to you, alexross42?  Smiley

Thanks for the welcome  Smiley
Logged
swrural
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 647


View Profile
« Reply #468 on: April 15, 2013, 20:30:53 »

From me too Alex, good to see your post.  What I think is signal in this discussion is whether the local councillors have the faintest notion of what you are talking about.  Most drive and get expenses from the Council for doing so.  I was one myself, so believe me  - I know the type.

They think 'social exclusion' is not being invited to the freebies they otherwise enjoy.
Logged
alexross42
Full Member
***
Posts: 83



View Profile
« Reply #469 on: April 17, 2013, 10:23:57 »

I don't think this has been posted already - a Facebook group, about the re-opening of the line. Some interesting photos of old and current developments: https://www.facebook.com/PlymouthToTavistockRailwayTheDrakeLine

There's an interesting old OS (Ordnance Survey) map extract on there, showing the Callington, Plym - Yelverton - Tavistock, and Princetown lines too Smiley
Logged
alexross42
Full Member
***
Posts: 83



View Profile
« Reply #470 on: May 13, 2013, 12:15:54 »

A new news story here today - http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Plans-750-new-homes-Tavistock/story-18970177-detail/story.html

Which eventually led me to this: http://www.westdevon.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=4469&p=0

The most relevant section of which is this:

Quote
5.12 The railway itself is expected to be delivered in phase with the mixed use development to the south west of the town and the intention is that new rail services will be in operation by the time the development is completed. Whilst the railway is a critical piece of infrastructure and is required to achieve the vision for the town, the residential development itself is not dependent on the railway being in place in the early stages of the plan period. The railway scheme is needed to mitigate the impacts of new development on the A386 and any future developments in the town will be expected to contribute towards it in accordance with Core Strategy Strategic Policy 4. The delivery of the railway will be managed by Devon County Council as the Highway Authority for the area.

5.13 A range of studies and surveys have been undertaken which provide information and evidence to support the railway proposals. Devon County Council is continuing to gather and update information as it progresses the project to deliver the railway. These documents are available on the Council^s website at www.westdevon.gov.uk and include:
 Tavistock Route Re-Opening: Option Refinement and Business Case (October 2012)
 Tavistock to Bere Alston Community Rail Project - Evidence of Deliverability (April 2009)
 Tavistock to Plymouth Corridor ^ Analysis of A386 and Proposed Rail Scheme (September 2010)
 Affordable Housing Viability Assessment ^ Strategic Sites in Okehampton and Tavistock (October 2012)

5.14 North of the planned railway station and access road, no further development should take place along the length of the old railway line that would restrict a possible eventual relaying of the line and rail link to Okehampton. However it is important to note that this will be challenging to deliver and is not currently being developed as part of the on-going rail project.



Edit note: Quote marks and quoted text layout amended, for clarity. Chris.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2013, 21:20:45 by chris from nailsea » Logged
Plymboi
Full Member
***
Posts: 94


View Profile Email
« Reply #471 on: May 13, 2013, 13:41:45 »

Woooo!!

Another step to reclaiming a link we never should have lost. I'm glad they are thinking ahead in regards to okehampton, bodes well for the future with thinking like that.

Hopefully this is the catalyst needed to get the ball rolling.
Logged
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #472 on: May 15, 2013, 18:20:49 »

A new news story here today - http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Plans-750-new-homes-Tavistock/story-18970177-detail/story.html

Which eventually led me to this: http://www.westdevon.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=4469&p=0

The most relevant section of which is this:

Quote
5.12 The railway itself is expected to be delivered in phase with the mixed use development to the south west of the town and the intention is that new rail services will be in operation by the time the development is completed. Whilst the railway is a critical piece of infrastructure and is required to achieve the vision for the town, the residential development itself is not dependent on the railway being in place in the early stages of the plan period. The railway scheme is needed to mitigate the impacts of new development on the A386 and any future developments in the town will be expected to contribute towards it in accordance with Core Strategy Strategic Policy 4. The delivery of the railway will be managed by Devon County Council as the Highway Authority for the area.

5.13 A range of studies and surveys have been undertaken which provide information and evidence to support the railway proposals. Devon County Council is continuing to gather and update information as it progresses the project to deliver the railway. These documents are available on the Council^s website at www.westdevon.gov.uk and include:
 Tavistock Route Re-Opening: Option Refinement and Business Case (October 2012)
 Tavistock to Bere Alston Community Rail Project - Evidence of Deliverability (April 2009)
 Tavistock to Plymouth Corridor ^ Analysis of A386 and Proposed Rail Scheme (September 2010)
 Affordable Housing Viability Assessment ^ Strategic Sites in Okehampton and Tavistock (October 2012)

5.14 North of the planned railway station and access road, no further development should take place along the length of the old railway line that would restrict a possible eventual relaying of the line and rail link to Okehampton. However it is important to note that this will be challenging to deliver and is not currently being developed as part of the on-going rail project.



Edit note: Quote marks and quoted text layout amended, for clarity. Chris.

Excellent news that a bit of foresight is being shown at last in protecting the railway east of the proposed new station in the event of a reinstatement to Okehampton.One aspect that is slightly bothersome is the line which says the "the intention is that the new railway will be in operation by the time the development is completed". Does that mean that 2026 is a possible date for the reopening of the railway? Awfully long time to wait if that is so.
Logged
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #473 on: May 22, 2013, 10:18:15 »

Some very intense activity in the Shillamill area. Lots of vans,personnel and diggers [and a Portaloo Grin] have congregated in the past couple of days near the gated road ingress to the line and the trackbed has been scraped and cleared back to the iron skewed bridge which crosses the lower BA» (British Airways - about)-Tavistock road. It could be to do with the cyclepath but interestingly both the up and down trackbed has been cleared. I tried to post a couple of photo's last night but apparently the KB volume of them is too big,4.4 as opposed to the 2.56 stipulated. Is there any way around this? Would appreciate any advice, because the pics are quite interesting.


Edit note: As agreed with 34104, I've now added his pictures to his post here - I'll leave it to him to comment / explain any particular points of interest in them. Chris.  Smiley












« Last Edit: May 22, 2013, 21:46:20 by chris from nailsea » Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5452


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #474 on: May 22, 2013, 10:57:01 »

Some very intense activity in the Shillamill area.

I would think it has more to do with the cycle way than the railway, though they are linked inasmuch as they share a route. The exhibition material for this project makes it clear that work on the cycleway should start in 2013/14, whereas they won't even start the process of acquiring the powers to build the railway until 2014 with a view to delivering in 2015-2020.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #475 on: May 22, 2013, 19:23:25 »

Had another look this evening-they've certainly made some progress,way past the road bridge towards Shillamill viaduct.On the bridge itself,the down line has been covered with a hard packed sand material,maybe a clue that this is indeed the cyclepath being started-i seem to remember from somewhere that the railway will be situated on the up line,that is still just compacted mud on the bridge at the moment.Whatever,the trackbed is clearer now than it has been for probably 40 years and that is good to see.I'll keep an eye on developments,wish there was some way of posting those darned photo's though.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19084


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #476 on: May 22, 2013, 19:24:54 »

I tried to post a couple of photo's last night but apparently the KB volume of them is too big,4.4 as opposed to the 2.56 stipulated.  Is there any way around this? Would appreciate any advice, because the pics are quite interesting.

If you would please send them to me as attachments in an e-mail, 34104, I'll do whatever is necessary to put them out in this topic.  Wink

(My e-mail address is in my profile)
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #477 on: May 22, 2013, 19:56:17 »

Thanks Chris,i'll forward them to you.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19084


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #478 on: May 22, 2013, 21:49:47 »

No problem - I've now added those pictures to your previous post - I'll leave it to you to comment / explain any particular points of interest in them. Chris.  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #479 on: May 22, 2013, 22:53:01 »

Thanks Chris.

Photo 1-taken today looking towards Tavistock from the BA» (British Airways - about) side of the skew bridge which crosses the lower BA-Tavistock road

Photo 2-also today but looking back towards BA from the Tavistock side of the bridge-note the Portaloo in the distance. Grin

Photo 3-taken today to show the limit of how far the work has progressed

Photo 4-taken yesterday,included to emphasise the progress made since-note the skew bridge in the middle distance

Photo 5-taken today -essentially a 50 yards further up the line version of photo 3

Photo 6-taken today,a close up version of photo 2 to give a clearer idea of the difference in treatment of the down line from the up line on the skew bridge-see my earlier post

Hope that makes sense!


Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 41
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page