Super Guard
|
|
« on: October 24, 2010, 15:58:19 » |
|
Off topic, but one commitment FGW▸ appear to have failed getting anywhere near complete is: Other revenue protection measures
7.6 The Franchisee shall:
(b) introduce Zifa ticket checking stampers for all revenue protection staff, conductors and train managers within six months of the Start Date;
Unless there is an amended document somewhere which has substituted the words 'Zifa ticket checking stampers' for 'any old biro'. In all seriousness, I was told by a comp manager on a ride recently that they were going to be cracking down on this, as it was a franchise requirement. Edited to fix quote. bignosemac
|
|
« Last Edit: October 24, 2010, 16:03:04 by bignosemac »
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
SDS
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2010, 16:31:59 » |
|
Zifa's are not cheap. But you can get them here. http://www.zifferndruck.de/en/index.shtml
|
|
|
Logged
|
I do not work for FGW▸ and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC▸ including First Great Western.
|
|
|
standclearplease
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2010, 18:10:37 » |
|
The problem is with those stampers is the fact that they can be easily wiped away, as its ink based and doesn't really make much of an indent in the card.
Same with the stamps they use on the Heathrow Express.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2010, 19:14:11 » |
|
My impression is that staff are all issued with the stampers, but many don't bother to use them, or if they do won't necessarily set the correct details for each train they're working.
Re the ink wiping off, there are quick-drying ink ribbons available for the glossy thermal tickets, but for some reason (cost maybe?) FGW▸ don't seem to use them. But even having said that, I don't think it's possible to wipe off the impression completely: if the ribbon's a bit dry then the impression tends to be clearer and won't rub off, and if it's a new ribbon then you'll leave a large and obvious purple smear!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Super Guard
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2010, 20:02:59 » |
|
My impression is that staff are all issued with the stampers, but many don't bother to use them, or if they do won't necessarily set the correct details for each train they're working.
Re the ink wiping off, there are quick-drying ink ribbons available for the glossy thermal tickets, but for some reason (cost maybe?) FGW▸ don't seem to use them. But even having said that, I don't think it's possible to wipe off the impression completely: if the ribbon's a bit dry then the impression tends to be clearer and won't rub off, and if it's a new ribbon then you'll leave a large and obvious purple smear!
Correct re: All staff are issued with them. The ink is a pain in the backside, especially when changing the numbers etc, ink gets everywhere - I know a few staff who don't bother getting the ink refilled and they just grip hard to make the indent. The XC▸ ones appear to use the better ink which doesn't smudge so much.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
SDS
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2010, 20:48:03 » |
|
I know of another TOC▸ issuing staff with sharpie pens because the ink was not drying. Also heard of some punters putting a recently inked ticket into a top pocket of a White shirt.
|
|
|
Logged
|
I do not work for FGW▸ and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC▸ including First Great Western.
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2010, 21:27:17 » |
|
What is so wrong with a good old ticket clipper?!??! Miles better than a scruffy scribble from a biro.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
standclearplease
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2010, 23:23:46 » |
|
I believe it's because they were renowned for cutting through the magnetic strip, thus making them useless on a gateline.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chrisoates
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2010, 01:01:23 » |
|
What is so wrong with a good old ticket clipper?!??! Miles better than a scruffy scribble from a biro.
Someone who works St Ives branch has one of them - cut's various shapes.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chrisoates
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2010, 01:03:08 » |
|
My impression is that staff are all issued with the stampers, but many don't bother to use them, or if they do won't necessarily set the correct details for each train they're working.
Re the ink wiping off, there are quick-drying ink ribbons available for the glossy thermal tickets, but for some reason (cost maybe?) FGW▸ don't seem to use them. But even having said that, I don't think it's possible to wipe off the impression completely: if the ribbon's a bit dry then the impression tends to be clearer and won't rub off, and if it's a new ribbon then you'll leave a large and obvious purple smear!
Correct re: All staff are issued with them. The ink is a pain in the backside, especially when changing the numbers etc, ink gets everywhere - I know a few staff who don't bother getting the ink refilled and they just grip hard to make the indent. The XC▸ ones appear to use the better ink which doesn't smudge so much. The plastic window in my rail card wallet is so inked up that the card is not visible any more.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2010, 20:20:01 » |
|
The problem with a hole punch is that it doesn't mean anything, same with a biro! Apparently there will be a crack down on it soon as the ziffa stamper is part of the member of staff's working equipment!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SDS
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 27, 2010, 20:35:45 » |
|
So whats the difference between writing a number (such as the day) as opposed to a ziffa? Ones cheap, the others expensive. They both do the same job. The ziffa may imprint the headcode (thats if its got that particular letter on its cogs, it doesn't have every letter on them).
|
|
|
Logged
|
I do not work for FGW▸ and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC▸ including First Great Western.
|
|
|
Brucey
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2010, 20:39:18 » |
|
The problem with a hole punch is that it doesn't mean anything, same with a biro! But does Zifa-ing a ticket actually mean anything? On tickets that are valid for a single day, journeys can still be broken, so fare evaders could use the ticket again for a slightly shorter journey. Same with tickets valid for longer periods. Am I correct in saying that a whole journey doesn't need to be completed in a single day, in which case a date/headcode is pointless. The only benefit I can see to punching/scribbling/Zifa-ing tickets is that it prevents them being returned for a refund.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2010, 20:57:06 » |
|
Well obviously it means something because, assuming it's set correctly, it identifies the date, train and guard The principal reason as far as I'm aware is that the date/headcode combination can be used by customer relations to verify claims regarding delays, thus making fraudulent applications for refund much less easy. The control number printed at right-angles to the main impression also identifies the member of staff who gripped it. Zifa is also quicker and more consistently legible than writing the date with a pen, not that staff with biros generally bother to do that. When BR▸ introduced stampers towards the end (big, blue, plastic, unwieldy, cheap and nasty things made by Dormy for the most part) they used a three-letter route code following the date, which identified the section of route on which the ticket had been inspected. Ticket examiners' handbooks from the early 1990s have long lists of these codes in the back. Again though, that assumes that the guard had the print wheels set correctly and it must have been a royal PITA▸ , especially on long-distance XC▸ services, for the staff to have to look up the right code and reset their kit every few stops.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|