Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:55 08 Jan 2025
 
* Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
* Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:30 Looe to Liskeard
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 20:05:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[82] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[69] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[54] senior railcard
[52] Coastal walks - station to station
[28] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
  Print  
Author Topic: Additional Trains to Weymouth during the Olympic Weeks  (Read 54817 times)
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: April 08, 2012, 19:17:09 »

Nice to see the return of limited stop services on the Bristol-Weymouth line allbeit only for a short while this summer.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: April 09, 2012, 12:02:13 »

I hope they are 5 car! I doubt they'll be double voyagers due to the platform at Reading.


The normal platforming at Reading doesn't prevent existing Bournemouth trains being doubled up, because they usually use P9 to reverse, (although they are infrequent they do occur in the normal timetable). 

Therefore your assumption that there's a platforming reason to prevent the Weymouth extensions being 8,9 or 10 car 22x is wrong.   If you said they'd be unlikely to have enough stock I'd go along with that.

Paul 
Logged
MrC
Full Member
***
Posts: 45


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: April 09, 2012, 20:01:18 »

Therefore your assumption that there's a platforming reason to prevent the Weymouth extensions being 8,9 or 10 car 22x is wrong.   If you said they'd be unlikely to have enough stock I'd go along with that.

Because they won't fit at Wareham? ISTR (I seem to recall/remember) the max there is 8x20m.

There's also the question about where you'd berth stuff during their extended layovers at Weymouth - I'm not sure what you can fit down the quay tramway as far as the Melcombe Regis L/C. Putting a longer XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) down Jersey sdgs might also cause problems with SWT (South West Trains)/FGW (First Great Western) berthings and shunts.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: April 10, 2012, 17:04:37 »

Btline's point made in his post was about platforming longer XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) trains at Reading being an issue - and that's all I was responding to.

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: April 10, 2012, 17:12:51 »

I think the best we can hope for is that all the Bournemouth/Weymouth diagrams use 5-car Voyagers throughout the sailing events.  Might mean the routes to the South West suffer slightly, but if XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) are serious about providing the best service perhaps all their HSTs (High Speed Train) can be out and about as well?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #50 on: April 10, 2012, 17:30:53 »

Sorry, I was sure that XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) used the bay platform at Reading, not long enough for a double Voyager.

Yes, hopefully all stock will be in use. Nevertheless, I wouldn't be surprised if XC run 3 car Tubostars TBH (to be honest). Roll Eyes
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #51 on: April 10, 2012, 18:39:35 »

I think the best we can hope for is that all the Bournemouth/Weymouth diagrams use 5-car Voyagers throughout the sailing events.  Might mean the routes to the South West suffer slightly, but if XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) are serious about providing the best service perhaps all their HSTs (High Speed Train) can be out and about as well?

I've heard rumour elsewhere that XC will indeed be re-jigging their HST diagrams and utilising all sets.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #52 on: April 10, 2012, 19:34:47 »



I've heard rumour elsewhere that XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) will indeed be re-jigging their HST (High Speed Train) diagrams and utilising all sets.
[/quote]

You are correct as it is looking like this is crosscountrys plan to release some class 220/221 units to provide the extra capacity for services to be extended to Weymouth.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: April 11, 2012, 11:20:20 »

You'd need at least two extra 22x units just to extend the existing services to Weymouth - but that doesn't actually provide additional capacity on the overall route.   As shown in the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) May 2012 timetable despite being referred to as 'additional services' they are just the normal services from Man Picc and New St for the relevant time of day extended beyond Bournemouth (arr BMH 0914 and 1012), so the real problem is providing a couple of extra units ready at Bourmnemouth to form the corresponding north bound departures from Bournemouth (dep BMH 0945 and 1045). 

Paul

« Last Edit: April 11, 2012, 11:26:34 by paul7755 » Logged
Steve44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 100

I quite like thames turbos...


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: April 11, 2012, 12:12:30 »

Sorry, I was sure that XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) used the bay platform at Reading, not long enough for a double Voyager.

I've seen Bmouth bound journeys from the bay platform at Reading, so you're not imagining it  Wink
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #55 on: April 11, 2012, 12:47:35 »

Immediately before the old P7 was closed (nominally at last December's timetable change) the standard platforming was that Bournemouth trains used the old P8 (current P9); Newcastle - Readings used the old P7, and the Newcastle - Southamptons used P3 southbound and P7 northbound.

The current standard usage is that nearly all the Newcastle/Rdg/Southampton services use P3, and nearly all the Manchester - Bournemouths use P9.  However if there are delays they can use any of the through platforms or P3 as available.

Paul
Logged
SapperPsmith
Full Member
***
Posts: 40


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: April 12, 2012, 10:21:59 »

Surprised no one has commented that SWT (South West Trains) cannot provide additional capacity to Weymouth because of a shortage of 'juice'.  The third rail power supply is limited and restricts length and number of trains on the route.

I am not convinced that trains will be seriously overcrowded - most of the sailing types will go and stay in the vicinity of Weymouth for the duration and watching sailing from the shore is not a mass activity.  Those with boats will arrive from a variety of locations along the south coast.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: April 12, 2012, 10:35:20 »

Surprised no one has commented that SWT (South West Trains) cannot provide additional capacity to Weymouth because of a shortage of 'juice'.  The third rail power supply is limited and restricts length and number of trains on the route.

It's been covered in a previous discussion on the same subject:

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=7656.0

Paul
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19083


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #58 on: April 12, 2012, 11:27:18 »

Thanks, paul7755.

I've taken the opportunity to merge that previous discussion with this topic, as it covers exactly the same subject.

Chris.  Smiley
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
dorsetbeachcomber
Full Member
***
Posts: 38


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: April 20, 2012, 18:47:12 »

Surprised no one has commented that SWT (South West Trains) cannot provide additional capacity to Weymouth because of a shortage of 'juice'.  The third rail power supply is limited and restricts length and number of trains on the route.

It's been covered in a previous discussion on the same subject:

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=7656.0

Paul

I've heard that SWT will have a spare 158/159 if required
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page