Timmer
|
|
« Reply #45 on: April 08, 2012, 19:17:09 » |
|
Nice to see the return of limited stop services on the Bristol-Weymouth line allbeit only for a short while this summer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #46 on: April 09, 2012, 12:02:13 » |
|
I hope they are 5 car! I doubt they'll be double voyagers due to the platform at Reading.
The normal platforming at Reading doesn't prevent existing Bournemouth trains being doubled up, because they usually use P9 to reverse, (although they are infrequent they do occur in the normal timetable). Therefore your assumption that there's a platforming reason to prevent the Weymouth extensions being 8,9 or 10 car 22x is wrong. If you said they'd be unlikely to have enough stock I'd go along with that. Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MrC
|
|
« Reply #47 on: April 09, 2012, 20:01:18 » |
|
Therefore your assumption that there's a platforming reason to prevent the Weymouth extensions being 8,9 or 10 car 22x is wrong. If you said they'd be unlikely to have enough stock I'd go along with that.
Because they won't fit at Wareham? ISTR▸ the max there is 8x20m. There's also the question about where you'd berth stuff during their extended layovers at Weymouth - I'm not sure what you can fit down the quay tramway as far as the Melcombe Regis L/C. Putting a longer XC▸ down Jersey sdgs might also cause problems with SWT▸ / FGW▸ berthings and shunts.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #48 on: April 10, 2012, 17:04:37 » |
|
Btline's point made in his post was about platforming longer XC▸ trains at Reading being an issue - and that's all I was responding to.
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #49 on: April 10, 2012, 17:12:51 » |
|
I think the best we can hope for is that all the Bournemouth/Weymouth diagrams use 5-car Voyagers throughout the sailing events. Might mean the routes to the South West suffer slightly, but if XC▸ are serious about providing the best service perhaps all their HSTs▸ can be out and about as well?
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #50 on: April 10, 2012, 17:30:53 » |
|
Sorry, I was sure that XC▸ used the bay platform at Reading, not long enough for a double Voyager. Yes, hopefully all stock will be in use. Nevertheless, I wouldn't be surprised if XC run 3 car Tubostars TBH▸ .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #51 on: April 10, 2012, 18:39:35 » |
|
I think the best we can hope for is that all the Bournemouth/Weymouth diagrams use 5-car Voyagers throughout the sailing events. Might mean the routes to the South West suffer slightly, but if XC▸ are serious about providing the best service perhaps all their HSTs▸ can be out and about as well?
I've heard rumour elsewhere that XC will indeed be re-jigging their HST diagrams and utilising all sets.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #52 on: April 10, 2012, 19:34:47 » |
|
I've heard rumour elsewhere that XC▸ will indeed be re-jigging their HST▸ diagrams and utilising all sets. [/quote]
You are correct as it is looking like this is crosscountrys plan to release some class 220/221 units to provide the extra capacity for services to be extended to Weymouth.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #53 on: April 11, 2012, 11:20:20 » |
|
You'd need at least two extra 22x units just to extend the existing services to Weymouth - but that doesn't actually provide additional capacity on the overall route. As shown in the XC▸ May 2012 timetable despite being referred to as 'additional services' they are just the normal services from Man Picc and New St for the relevant time of day extended beyond Bournemouth (arr BMH 0914 and 1012), so the real problem is providing a couple of extra units ready at Bourmnemouth to form the corresponding north bound departures from Bournemouth (dep BMH 0945 and 1045).
Paul
|
|
« Last Edit: April 11, 2012, 11:26:34 by paul7755 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve44
|
|
« Reply #54 on: April 11, 2012, 12:12:30 » |
|
Sorry, I was sure that XC▸ used the bay platform at Reading, not long enough for a double Voyager.
I've seen Bmouth bound journeys from the bay platform at Reading, so you're not imagining it
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #55 on: April 11, 2012, 12:47:35 » |
|
Immediately before the old P7 was closed (nominally at last December's timetable change) the standard platforming was that Bournemouth trains used the old P8 (current P9); Newcastle - Readings used the old P7, and the Newcastle - Southamptons used P3 southbound and P7 northbound.
The current standard usage is that nearly all the Newcastle/Rdg/Southampton services use P3, and nearly all the Manchester - Bournemouths use P9. However if there are delays they can use any of the through platforms or P3 as available.
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SapperPsmith
|
|
« Reply #56 on: April 12, 2012, 10:21:59 » |
|
Surprised no one has commented that SWT▸ cannot provide additional capacity to Weymouth because of a shortage of 'juice'. The third rail power supply is limited and restricts length and number of trains on the route.
I am not convinced that trains will be seriously overcrowded - most of the sailing types will go and stay in the vicinity of Weymouth for the duration and watching sailing from the shore is not a mass activity. Those with boats will arrive from a variety of locations along the south coast.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #57 on: April 12, 2012, 10:35:20 » |
|
Surprised no one has commented that SWT▸ cannot provide additional capacity to Weymouth because of a shortage of 'juice'. The third rail power supply is limited and restricts length and number of trains on the route.
It's been covered in a previous discussion on the same subject: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=7656.0. Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #58 on: April 12, 2012, 11:27:18 » |
|
Thanks, paul7755. I've taken the opportunity to merge that previous discussion with this topic, as it covers exactly the same subject. Chris.
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
dorsetbeachcomber
|
|
« Reply #59 on: April 20, 2012, 18:47:12 » |
|
Surprised no one has commented that SWT▸ cannot provide additional capacity to Weymouth because of a shortage of 'juice'. The third rail power supply is limited and restricts length and number of trains on the route.
It's been covered in a previous discussion on the same subject: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=7656.0. Paul I've heard that SWT will have a spare 158/159 if required
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|