Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 01 Jan 2025
 
- Bus passengers in England face £1 fare cap rise
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Railway 200 'Whistle Up' UK
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
1st Jan (1948)
Foundation of British Railways - nationalisation (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:20 Truro to Falmouth Docks
16:20 Falmouth Docks to Truro
16:50 Falmouth Docks to Truro
17:20 Truro to Falmouth Docks
17:50 Falmouth Docks to Truro
18:20 Truro to Falmouth Docks
19:06 Falmouth Docks to Truro
19:41 Truro to Falmouth Docks
20:17 Falmouth Docks to Truro
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
Short Run
15:33 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:35 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
19:41 Falmouth Docks to Par
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Salisbury
22:16 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 01, 2025, 16:53:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[179] Looking forward for the Coffee Shop into 2025
[127] The Wider Picture - making it wider, but also clearer, hopeful...
[56] GNER 'Flying Scotsman' Driver's Eye View: York to Edinburgh
[40] Browsers - what are you running? Are you seeing this?
[28] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
[23] Sir Andrew Haines, CEO of Network Rail
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Southern Railway to axe toilets from new train (BBC News 19/09/2010)  (Read 4000 times)
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2259


View Profile WWW
« on: September 19, 2010, 12:22:50 »

Quote
A train company has been branded a "disgrace" by union chiefs after it emerged some of its new fleet will have no toilets on board.

Southern Railway opted to forgo the facilities on its latest trains running on the Portsmouth to Brighton service.

The Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers' union (RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers)) called the decision "unacceptable" because of the one-and-a-half-hour-long journey.

The firm said it was not unusual and other trains did not have toilets.

RMT general secretary Bob Crow called the move "unacceptable" and said it run the risk of turning carriages into "stinking cattle trucks" creating appalling conditions for passengers and staff.

"The route has always had toilets on board in the past," he said.

"This is the main connection between two major cities on the South coast.

"One and a half hours without any toilet facilities on board is unacceptable."

He said RMT was already set to ballot members of Southern Railway for industrial action after cuts to security led to an increase in assaults on staff.

A Southern Railway spokeswoman said its new fleet of trains was to increase passenger capacity.

The Department for Transport said there were no rules on whether or not toilets should be available on trains.

"We expect rail companies to provide a good service," he added.

"However, it is not for the Government to micromanage the industry."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-11358844

Can't find the thread, but lack of toilets was recently discussed elsewhere on this forum.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10359


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2010, 12:38:55 »

These 'latest trains' are presumably the Class 313's transferred from London Overground?  They are 35 years old and were never fitted with toilets, so I presume that retro-fitting them would have been pretty expensive.  However, in this day and age, trains in service for such a length of journey really should have a toilet - even if Crow goes over-the-top with his rhetoric as usual!

This isn't a new story as it was in the following article dating from back in February:  http://www.hastingsobserver.co.uk/news/Rail-group-slams-Southern39s-old.6103806.jp
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10359


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2010, 12:57:25 »

Oh, and the Daily Mail have got hold of it  Roll Eyes

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1313197/Passengers-face-90-minutes-discomfort-train-company-axes-toilets-popular-route.html

Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5334


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2010, 13:47:52 »

The problem with this story, which has been rumbling on since SN first announced they were bringing in the stock, is what you mean by the term 'routes between Brighton and Portsmouth'. 

Being an optimist, my understanding of SN's initial annuncement is that the 313s will mainly be used on the all shacks stoppers in the route area, but the end to end run will still be mainly 377s, except for some positioning moves.  'The route' includes stuff like Brighton - Hove shuttles, Brighton - West Worthings, Bognor - Littlehampton, the Bognor - Barnham shuttle, Littlehampton - Portsmouth stopper, and then east of Brighton the Seafords etc.

Apparently 'The Times' wrote the story up as being on an 'intercity' route...

Paul

 
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2010, 15:11:27 »

I always thought the provison of public toilet facilities whether on trains or land was sign of a civilised country.

One of things that Englishmen abroad always used to comment on was the appalling lack of such facilities even in France and other European countries.

Now with town centre conviniences closing and even shops like Homebase (at least in Slough) closing their provision. We are going backwards.

The 313s were always a poor train for interior comfort but on the relatively short journies on the NLL they at least maintained the service. On the South Coast even on stoppers/short workings  they are really unsuitable/unacceptable. 
 
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5334


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2010, 15:39:11 »


The 313s were always a poor train for interior comfort but on the relatively short journies on the NLL they at least maintained the service. On the South Coast even on stoppers/short workings  they are really unsuitable/unacceptable. 
 

Apart from the lack of toilets though, which I tend to agree is a bad move on that route, the trains are being fully refurbished internally, so at least the general condition will be much improved over their Silverlink/LO interiors, more like SN's refurbed 455s. 

Presumably it is only a matter of time before the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) (for it is their press release regurgitated everywhere) turn their attention to the toiletless 455s running from Waterloo to Guildford (75 mins)?

Paul
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5334


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2010, 15:52:15 »

This isn't a new story as it was in the following article dating from back in February:  http://www.hastingsobserver.co.uk/news/Rail-group-slams-Southern39s-old.6103806.jp

It also seems to me that Mr Crow has raised this more in support of his proposed industrial dispute over late night security for SN traincrew - it sneaks in half way down most versions of the story...

Paul
Logged
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2010, 15:53:33 »

Quote


The Department for Transport said there were no rules on whether or not toilets should be available on trains.

"We expect rail companies to provide a good service," he added.

"However, it is not for the Government to micromanage the industry."

Funniest thing I have read in ages Cheesy
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2010, 17:36:45 »

Perhaps somebody should alert the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) of the truly appaling conditions that travellers from West Ruislip to Epping have to put up with the torrid and quite frankly disgusting interiors of the Central line stock where cash strapped commuters are forced to stand for 87 minutes in stinking cattle trucks without toilets.


On an aside note; do I get the job in the RMT press office?
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19055


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: December 26, 2024, 23:15:26 »

On another 'aside note': rather than apparently get a lumberjack in to 'axe the toilets', couldn't they just get a plumber in, to 'disconnect' them?  Grin

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5631



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2024, 14:16:18 »

This looks to me like another example of "what down grades can we get away with" when introducing new trains or "improving" old ones.
Toilets should be required on all new trains, even for what are intended to be very short journeys. Signalling failures, security alerts, windy weather.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10359


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 29, 2024, 15:00:13 »

This looks to me like another example of "what down grades can we get away with" when introducing new trains or "improving" old ones.

Given the story is from 14 years ago, and the trains being talked about (Class 313s) were over 30 years old even then and had never been fitted with toilets, they must be getting really old now?  Scrap that, they were scrapped last year!  Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page