And here (below) is First Great Western's (pretty standard) response..
Does any one know if this is true or not...the bit about the train ahead experiencing problems that is? - or is this just a standard paragraph I've not seen before now?
I've pretty much seen the rest of the e-mail before tho.. I've still not found the train manager on a turbo (which is
DOO▸ ).. I would love to see the "train manage/aka driver" walking down the train to give the personal touch to his information
.. whilst also driving the train...I'm thinking maybe I should ask about this?
I also like the fact they're still talking about air con even tho it's not needed in November.. They need to update their "what we can cut and paste" directives I think..
Big big sigh from me to
FGW▸ ...
"Thank you for your email of 11 November 2010. I was sorry to hear about the disruption to your journey from Maidenhead to London Paddington on 11 November. We do our best to make sure our customers travel safely and arrive on time so I am very sorry you had a problem. The delay was caused as the train ahead experienced problems, causing the slow running of the service.
I was sorry to learn you were unhappy with the information on this service. Our Train Managers should always give out accurate information, especially when there is any disruption, through a mixture of personal contact and the train's public address system and I am sorry that this didn't happen on your journey.
We should always keep you up-to-date, even if it's to let you know we're waiting for more information ourselves. So I have passed your complaint on to the relevant Train Crew Manager, who I know will investigate what went wrong this time.
I am sorry you felt that the service was uncomfortably hot, we do thoroughly check each train overnight, and put right any problems before the train goes out again. There are times though when faults develop once the train has left the depot, and we do realise how uncomfortable this can be. On the rare occasions it does happen we believe that passengers would rather we kept the train running, than delay or cancel it, or have to send a replacement. So I do apologise that we had the fault, but hope you agree that keeping the train in service was the best course of action in the circumstances.
As a rule, if the air conditioning fails in one carriage we try and move passengers into others wherever possible. Even if the train's whole air conditioning system were to fail, we would normally keep the train running until we could repair the fault. Naturally we'd do that at the earliest opportunity, which may not be until the train returns to the depot that evening.
Some positive news is that we have now modified the air conditioning on our High Speed Trains, and we are also upgrading the system across our Turbo fleet as part of a major refreshment programme. This will mean fewer failures and more comfortable journeys for our customers.
I am sorry you were disappointed with the service you received. Your feedback is very important to us and I have recorded your comments for the attention of our Senior Managers.
Thank you once again for your email.
"