Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 09 Jan 2025
 
- Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningShort Run
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:56 Exmouth to Paignton
19:15 Paignton to Exmouth
19:17 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:25 Exmouth to Paignton
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
18:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 20:28:22 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Railcard Prices going up
[126] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[97] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[36] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Linked Events
  • Gunnislake Line Closed: April 07, 2008 - April 11, 2008
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
  Print  
Author Topic: Gunnislake Line - Tamar Valley Line - ongoing discussion, merged posts  (Read 90264 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #120 on: August 16, 2022, 04:31:25 »

Wonderful statistics but I live in the real world.

Yeah ... real world micro-example ... 90 minute wait at Trowbridge for a taxi because an infrequent train has been cancelled is far more painful than a 30 minute wait at Exmouth for the next train.


Or this morning at Melksham - single northbound train at 07:53 cancelled, next train 10:02, journey check only offers delay / repay as a "sop".  Still no offer here to use an alternative bus service ...

Quote
Further Information

If you hold a valid single, return, or weekly ticket, you will be able to claim compensation for delays of 15 minutes or more. Please keep your ticket and visit GWR (Great Western Railway).com/DelayRepay
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 400


View Profile
« Reply #121 on: August 17, 2022, 00:23:59 »

Five round trips wiped off the timetable - out of 35 (there are 7 trains on that circuit, running at 30 minute intervals. So average delay to random passengers is 30 minutes / 7 = 4.5 minutes.  A frequent service can withstand it.

Sorry, but I don't think that's a meaningful way of analysing it.  A random passenger has either no delay or a 30 minute one so talking about an average delay is meaningless as no-one is delayed by 4.5 minutes.  As you say, you can prove anything with statistics!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #122 on: August 17, 2022, 05:19:27 »

Five round trips wiped off the timetable - out of 35 (there are 7 trains on that circuit, running at 30 minute intervals. So average delay to random passengers is 30 minutes / 7 = 4.5 minutes.  A frequent service can withstand it.

Sorry, but I don't think that's a meaningful way of analysing it.

OK - suggest better alternative please.

Quote
A random passenger has either no delay or a 30 minute one so talking about an average delay is meaningless as no-one is delayed by 4.5 minutes.  As you say, you can prove anything with statistics!

Yeah - I should have said "mean" rather than "average".  Definitely the mean - median extra delay if the majority of trains are running is zero.

This is the old "average family has 2.4 children but you'll never find an average family" thing; still (IMHO (in my humble opinion)) a useful measure in terms of overall planning such as number of school spaces.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2101


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #123 on: August 17, 2022, 07:19:17 »

Quote
old "average family has 2.4 children

That is old, as the average family size is nearer 2.4 persons now.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #124 on: August 17, 2022, 08:29:00 »

Quote
old "average family has 2.4 children

That is old, as the average family size is nearer 2.4 persons now.

Indeed ...

https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2019/08/02/whatever-happened-to-2-point-4-children/

Now perhaps 1.9 children. Many more people live alone these days, and that's a driver behind the need for house building just as population increase and the need for housing stock renewal ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10167



View Profile
« Reply #125 on: August 17, 2022, 17:27:08 »


Just two round trips wiped off the timetable our of 8 (that's just a quarter or one train) on a line like Swindon-Westbury which runs at intervals of about 2 hours and 15 minutes. Average delay to passengers = 34 minutes. So an infrequent service does wipe out practical use at a far lower number of cancellation - if the average holdup for passenger is one half an hour not less that five minutes, that's darned serious -and it's with less than half the cancellations that Exmouth suffered today.


I must admit I am struggling to get my head around this.  If I go to catch a train I aim to be on the platform a minimum of five minutes before it is due to leave.   However I am not actually delayed until the train is late or cancelled.   That applies to everyone aiming to catch that train.  So even if they arrive at the station 20 minutes before me they will be delayed by the same amount of time as I am if the train is late or cancelled.  No one is delayed by a lesser or greater amount - so I don't understand the validity of the 34 minutes.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #126 on: August 17, 2022, 18:10:55 »


Just two round trips wiped off the timetable our of 8 (that's just a quarter or one train) on a line like Swindon-Westbury which runs at intervals of about 2 hours and 15 minutes. Average delay to passengers = 34 minutes. So an infrequent service does wipe out practical use at a far lower number of cancellation - if the average holdup for passenger is one half an hour not less that five minutes, that's darned serious -and it's with less than half the cancellations that Exmouth suffered today.


I must admit I am struggling to get my head around this.  If I go to catch a train I aim to be on the platform a minimum of five minutes before it is due to leave.   However I am not actually delayed until the train is late or cancelled.   That applies to everyone aiming to catch that train.  So even if they arrive at the station 20 minutes before me they will be delayed by the same amount of time as I am if the train is late or cancelled.  No one is delayed by a lesser or greater amount - so I don't understand the validity of the 34 minutes.

It's an interesting one ... here is Melksham to Swindon with 2 trains being cancelled and passenger arriving at the station every 10 minutes.  Of course, in reality on such a thin service they would arrange their timing to arrive for a particular train.

Code:
tats = ["05:33","07:21","07:53","10:02","12:33","14:32","16:41","18:50","20:22"]
tata = ["05:33","07:21","07:53","12:33","14:32","16:41","20:22"]

wt = []
for tat in (tats,tata):
peeps = 0
paws = 0
for hour in range(5,20):
for min in range(0,60,10):
popup = hour*60+min
for service in tat:
(h,m) = service.split(":")
goesat = int(h)*60+int(m)
if goesat > popup:
paws += goesat - popup
peeps += 1
break
avw = paws/peeps
print("passengers {} total wait {} minutes - average {:.1f}".format(peeps,paws,avw))
wt.append(avw)
print ("Extra time waited {:.1f} minutes".format(wt[1]-wt[0]))

passengers 90 total wait 5264 minutes - average 58.5
passengers 90 total wait 8331 minutes - average 92.6
Extra time waited 34.1 minutes

change the first two lines to show 1 in 7 services cancelled on a half hourly pattern (5 in the day)

Code:
tats = ["06:05","06:35","07:05","07:35","08:05","08:35","09:05","09:35","10:05","10:35",
"11:05","11:35","12:05","12:35","13:05","13:35","14:05","14:35","15:05","15:35",
"16:05","16:35","17:05","17:35","18:05","18:35","19:05","19:35","20:05","20:35",
"21:05"]
tata = ["06:05","07:05","07:35","08:05","08:35","09:05","09:35","10:35",
"11:05","11:35","12:05","12:35","13:05","14:05","14:35","15:05","15:35",
"16:05","16:35","17:35","18:05","18:35","19:05","19:35","20:05",
"21:05"]

and you get

passengers 90 total wait 1500 minutes - average 16.7
passengers 90 total wait 1860 minutes - average 20.7
Extra time waited 4.0 minutes
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10363


View Profile
« Reply #127 on: August 17, 2022, 18:17:00 »

Let it go, Graham!  Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #128 on: November 30, 2022, 11:08:55 »

Quote
Cancellations to services between Gunnislake and Bere Alston
 
Due to urgent repairs to the track between Gunnislake and Bere Alston all lines are blocked.

Train services running to and from these stations will be cancelled. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Customer Advice

Network Rail have identified a sink hole on the tracks of the Gunnislake Branch. Specialist geological technicians are heading to the site to assess the situation, but until then, Gunnislake Branch line services can only operate between Plymouth and Bere Alston where they will terminate and return to Plymouth starting from Bere Alston.

Taxis are in operation between Calstock, Gunnislake and Plymouth.

We apologise for the disruption to your journey today.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1478


View Profile
« Reply #129 on: November 30, 2022, 11:13:36 »

This was mentioned on the Spotlight local South West news at 06:25am on wednesday morning
Logged
Pb_devon
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292


View Profile
« Reply #130 on: December 03, 2022, 07:58:15 »

They appeared to have fixed it quite quickly as the 1725 arrival operated that day, plus all subsequent services (per RTT» (Real Time Trains - website)).
Logged
Jamsdad
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 201


View Profile Email
« Reply #131 on: December 13, 2022, 10:59:46 »

The whole of the Gunnislake is riddled with old mine workings. Speaking strictly and geologically,  they are not sink holes, which is a product of limestone weathering, but can be anything from a major abandoned adit to quite small side shafts. Many were poorly filled, and when they open up they need checking,although only rarely do they cause structural problems. But when they do it's a mess!
Logged
plymothian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 848


View Profile
« Reply #132 on: September 13, 2024, 11:11:04 »

Due to rotting timbers found during an inspection last night, Darkey Lane bridge needs urgent repairs.

The Gunnislake line will be suspended.

The current forecast is that services will operate only as far as Calstock on Saturday 14/09 and the whole of next week.  No service at all on Sunday 15/09.
Logged

Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6552


View Profile
« Reply #133 on: September 13, 2024, 11:37:31 »

Quote
Cancellations to services between Plymouth and Gunnislake

Due to urgent repairs to a bridge between Plymouth and Gunnislake the line is closed.

Train services running to and from these stations have been cancelled. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.

Customer Advice
We have been made aware of a bridge in need of repair on our Plymouth to Gunnislake line. Network Rail have deemed it not currently safe to run trains over it. As such, the line is closed while repairs and further inspections are carried out.

Road transport has been requested to provide a regular service in lieu of the train, however at this stage nothing has yet been confirmed. For now, customers boarding at unstaffed stations, please make use of the Help Point to speak with a member of staff for further advice. Devonport, Dockyard, and Keyham stations will continue to be served by our trains running between Plymouth and Penzance.

This is a developing situation, and more information will be provided when we have it.
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1105


View Profile
« Reply #134 on: September 13, 2024, 16:00:24 »

Due to rotting timbers found during an inspection last night

Someone needs to be urgently asking how the structure was allowed to end up in such a poor condition. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page