Bmblbzzz
|
|
« Reply #60 on: November 30, 2015, 21:26:56 » |
|
Know Your Place is also interesting as a more local source. It doesn't have the same range of maps but it does have some fairly old ones (far older than railways).
|
|
|
Logged
|
Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6594
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #61 on: November 30, 2015, 22:13:39 » |
|
Both. A bit further apart.
An ideal solution, but not under diesel power. This could be Bristol's prototype tram-train route. The Sheffield ones (first one just been delivered) are dual voltage, so the line could be electrified to 25KV AC to please ElectricTrain (and me). With the blank canvas of the airfield, which I hate to see, a spur could be taken off at the level crossing behind what was Apron F to the Mall. Houses could be built around that instead of one of the many streets that may be found there shortly, with esoteric names like Concorde Close, Trubshaw Meadows, Brabazon Breach, and PA28-150 Place. (OK, the last one doesn't sound right, but my first solo should be commemorated). In the way I suggest, the vehicles could act as trams around the houses. There could be a Cribbs terminal, a stop at the northern end of the airfield, round about where the Automatic Direction Finder kit was situated, another at the junction just before the level crossing, and maybe at Filton North Platform. Alternate trams could continue along to Avonmouth, stopping at roughly the old Henbury station, maybe even in Hallen, should the possibility of development be found there. All of these, after passing Filton North inbound to Bristol could take advantage of a Four Track, Now! line to Temple Meads, stopping with the briefest of dwell times at Abbey Wood, a new Horfield station by Constable Road, Ashley Down, Stapleton Road - a resurgent station since the SVB services were augmented and the WSM to BPW» services introduced - Lawrence Hill, then Temple Meads. From there, a circuit via the Centre, Cabot Circus, and Old Market back to the rail hub would provide direct travel from any A to any B that most commuters may want to take. Unless it was priced prohibitively, it would suffer overcrowding from Day One.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #62 on: November 30, 2015, 22:23:19 » |
|
I agree with almost all of that latest very erudite post - except that I rather thought we wanted that station to be renamed 'Filton', rather than have it possibly confused with the other 'Abbey Wood'?
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #64 on: November 30, 2015, 22:33:00 » |
|
I agree with almost all of that latest very erudite post - except that I rather thought we wanted that station to be renamed 'Filton', rather than have it possibly confused with the other 'Abbey Wood'? I think the name "Filton Abbey Wood" was applied to avoid confusion with Filton Junction - a.k.a. Filton - which closed 2 days before Filton Abbey Wood opened. ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filton_Abbey_Wood_railway_stationAfter around 20 years, I suspect the current station could be renamed. If there's a Filton North to be built too - Filton Busless to emphasise that not one bus connects up to the station there, even though many pass on the main road?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5452
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #65 on: November 30, 2015, 22:42:51 » |
|
I agree with almost all of that latest very erudite post - except that I rather thought we wanted that station to be renamed 'Filton', rather than have it possibly confused with the other 'Abbey Wood'? I think the name "Filton Abbey Wood" was applied to avoid confusion with Filton Junction - a.k.a. Filton - which closed 2 days before Filton Abbey Wood opened. ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filton_Abbey_Wood_railway_stationAfter around 20 years, I suspect the current station could be renamed. If there's a Filton North to be built too - Filton Busless to emphasise that not one bus connects up to the station there, even though many pass on the main road? I caught the last train from Parson St to North Filton Platform. Just sayin'.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6594
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #66 on: December 02, 2015, 23:07:38 » |
|
I agree with almost all of that latest very erudite post - except that I rather thought we wanted that station to be renamed 'Filton', rather than have it possibly confused with the other 'Abbey Wood'? Pah! Away to the Pedants' thread with you, and collect your coat on the way! Actually, you have a point...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #67 on: January 29, 2018, 11:52:47 » |
|
From The Bristol PostNorth Bristol to get new rail station as part of Henbury line reopening
The station will cost up to £10million and will be open by May 2021
Residents in north Bristol are set to get a brand new train station as part of the reopening of the Henbury spur.
The new station – which will cost between £9million and £10million – will be built at a site just east of the A4018 in Henbury and is expected to open in May 2021.
The former Henbury station site – referred to as Henbury west – was rejected due to a higher cost and a similar levels of public support for both sites.
The station will form part of the Metro West Phase Two project, which will see a section of line between Bristol Parkway and Henbury reopen and an increase in the number of services on the Yate corridor.
Nicknamed the ‘Henbury spur’ campaigners originally wanted the line to be fully reopened and link with the current Severn Beach track to reinstate the former ‘Henbury loop’.
While this was not agreed under the original MetroWest programme, talk of building the Bristol Arena on Filton Airfield has given new hope to the 'loop' campaign.
New platforms will also be built at North Filton and Ashley Down as part of the project.
Details of the location of the new station are contained within the latest West of England Joint Committee papers and the recommendation for Henbury east is expected to be waived through at the next meeting on Friday, February 2.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6594
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #68 on: February 05, 2018, 23:42:37 » |
|
My punt for the sweepstake: December 2022, costing £24 million.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5452
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #69 on: February 06, 2018, 11:29:05 » |
|
I'm not volunteering, but it would be interesting to get a ratio of number of times announced : number of pounds spent, and compare this to other spheres of activity.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
metalrail
|
|
« Reply #70 on: April 27, 2018, 15:44:37 » |
|
Has the decision actually been made now re Henbury loop vs Henbury spur, or is it still under consultation does anyone know? Every time i've tried to find out what the final decision on it was I come up with something along the lines of 'a spur service was agreed but this was rejected and sent back to parliament for reconsideration', and the latest Metrowest phase 2 plans i've found highlighting it as a spur service are dated November 2015 (there may obviously be more updated ones out there) Obviously things have moved on now as the Filton Bank four tracking is heading for completion this year which was a precursor to this being able to happen, and is great, along with passive provision for the new Ashley Hill station which was part of the phase 2 Henbury plans. Also the site of the new Henbury station has also now been confirmed I know there's pros and cons with both options, mainly the BP» freight service plus the idea of SVB being left as a branch line if it runs as a loop. People must be literally kicking themselves for pulling up that last mile of track between SVB and PIL years ago, as then we'd still have a full loop via PWY too! SVB would no longer be a branch, AVN could run either round the Henbury loop or to PIL and onto PWY / BPW» / YAE or back down Filton Bank to BRI» . Just 1 mile of track lost (and then built over with the new M49 link) stopped what would have been an amazingly flexible service But would be so great to be able to access AVN & CFN▸ from BPW / YAE which won't be possible with the spur option, neither will access to AVN / CFN etc for all the new homes built on the old Filton airfield who will only be able to travel eastwards, travel down Filton Bank and change to a Northbound SVB service - hardly likely to get anyone out of their cars! At least if the spur option is the one that's been agreed for now, then there's the semi silver lining that at least the line west of Henbury is still in tact double track and will remain connected to AVN, so there's still a possibility to extend in the future
|
|
|
Logged
|
Oh for the day when I can catch a train from Mangotsfield to the Centre, Bath and Yate! ;-)
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6594
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #71 on: April 27, 2018, 22:25:49 » |
|
I wouldn't go so far as to say a decision has been made, at least not in the traditional sense of the inevitable next step being the reopening of the line. The latest announcement of a resurgent Henbury seemed to me to be a reaction to the latest estimate for the cost of rebuilding the line to Portishead. Almost "Good grief, we can't afford that! But we must do something."
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
metalrail
|
|
« Reply #72 on: April 28, 2018, 09:55:52 » |
|
Haha... wondered if that was the reason the response was being kept so ambiguous!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Oh for the day when I can catch a train from Mangotsfield to the Centre, Bath and Yate! ;-)
|
|
|
martyjon
|
|
« Reply #73 on: April 28, 2018, 10:50:34 » |
|
West of England Mayor hosts Heathrow Airport visit. https://www.westofengland-ca.gov.uk/west-england-mayor-hosts-heathrow-airport-visit/WTFI thought the idea of having a Metro Mayor was to get the area moving, not to promote and build production facilities for other areas to use to get themselves moving and then when they've done p*** off. Henbury Loop, tongue in cheek, Portishead re-opening, MetroWest ought to be the Metro Mayors priorities NOT THIS.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
metalrail
|
|
« Reply #74 on: April 28, 2018, 10:59:04 » |
|
The two sites being considered are well-connected by road and freight links, as well as Bristol Port ...for access from outside Bristol perhaps, but that's completely missing the point for those of us who actually live here and struggle daily with our LACK of well-connected railway links and ever more congested roads!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Oh for the day when I can catch a train from Mangotsfield to the Centre, Bath and Yate! ;-)
|
|
|
|