It is, but that doesn't mean it will do anything about them!
True. Looking wider (beyond
FGW▸ ) I have come across a number of organstaions looking for customer feedback and consultation inputs over time. The range from the "crockodile tears" of "We didn't really want your input - but thank you". Through the "We have noted this and are sorry" which - sometimes - people just want to blow off. And - it seems all too rare - "Good idea, we'll do that".
I run a business. I solicit customer feedback - and I solicit
constructive criticism.
Most of the reviews we get of
our hotel and
our training courses are positive - so positive that we call them "Torvill and Dean"s and they give a warm and fuzzy feeling, put a spring in the step and motivate. But they do NOT help us step forward; they give us nothing to work on.
Reviews that say "have you thought of doing xxx" are great - MUCH more useful. But very rarely do they give us new ideas; chances are that we have already heard in a number of times before, and that we have probably taken a careful look at the idea. Sometimes it will just be impractical. Other times it would cost too much. On further occasions we don't have the resources, or doing "xxx" would mean we would have to stop doing "yyy" and upset far more people. And yet ... frustrating thought it might be for contributors, and much though they might feel they're not being taken seriously ... this input is so valuable. We can and do pick up on fresh good ideas. We do continue to review based on the weight of various requests and a changing balance and market can lead to a change in what we do.
When I was running the technical end of a software company, writing standard software for multiple customers, we had what I called a "WIBNIF" list - "Wouldn't it be nice if". And onto that list we added ideas that came from ourselves and our customers. For sure, some things got deleted quite quickly but ongoing it formed a major reservoir of forward looking thoughts for each new release - not only allowing us to plan the next release, but also to look multiple releases ahead and not put something in place that closed doors that clearly were required to open in a year or two's time. I have always been very impressed by the FGW communications systems - they seem to all speak from the same hymn sheet (or word processor?) and I would be suprised if they didn't have a WIBNIF list too.
