A worrying bit of news (If true)

matt473

Hero Member

Posts: 374

A worrying bit of news (If true)

« on: April 21, 2010, 22:53:53 »

http://www.abtn.co.uk/press-releases/1714044-train-services-be-cut-stealth-press-release

Considering many places are trying to bring rail back it makes you wonder what is really going on. That or is this the latest plan to deal with rolling stock problems on the cheap? Undecided


	Logged

Henry

Hero Member

Posts: 369

Re: A worrying bit of news (If true)

« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2010, 09:19:17 »

I always thought as part of a franchise agreement companies had minimum service requirements.
It seems that this is no longer the case - unless someone knows different.

But even the stations I use Newton Abbot,Teignmouth,Totnes it is noted that opening hours have become 'flexible'


	Logged

The SprinterMeister

Hero Member

Posts: 665

Trundling round the SW

Re: A worrying bit of news (If true)

« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2010, 11:41:22 »

Quote from: Henry on April 22, 2010, 09:19:17

I always thought as part of a franchise agreement companies had minimum service requirements.
It seems that this is no longer the case - unless someone knows different.

There is a minimum service requirement. However in some cases the minimum service requirement is set rather lower than the level of service currently provided.

For example Exeter - Exmouth is currently ever half hour. The minimum service level specification is every hour.


	Logged

Trundling gently round the SW

paul7575

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 5335

Re: A worrying bit of news (If true)

« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2010, 21:14:19 »

Reading the DfT^» consultation on new franchises (where this comes from) - all it seems to suggest is that a TOC^▸ can propose to DfT that service patterns may be reduced or increased.

Same as now basically, SLCs^▸ , PSRs^▸ , 'franchise obligations, call them whatever - they are all renegotiable on either side if a case can be made. The only complaint seems to be that a TOC and the DfT can agree to change things. As the DfT seem to publicly consult on every minor detail nowadays, and then do it all again [1] I really don't see what the big news is.

I'm thinking of the recent example in Sussex, where there was an RUS^▸ draft and formal issue, a franchise spec for consultation and then an ITT^▸ . Following ITT SN proposed to alter service patterns on the east coastway, and this was deemed OK in the franchise award. The new timetable then had to go out for more consultation...

Where does it all end?

Paul


	Logged

Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: [1]

« previous next »