More Oxfordshire folk let the train take the strain in 2008/09

[whole diary]

[Chris from Nailsea]

From the Oxford Mail:

The number of people travelling by train in Oxfordshire grew even as the recession first began to bite, according to newly-released figures.

In 2008-9, Oxford station was the start or end of 5,491,802 journeys, up 16.5 per cent on 2007-8, when 4,076,814 journeys were recorded, according to the Office for Rail Regulation.

The biggest percentage increase in custom came at Appleford station, just as train operator First Great Western was preparing to make controversial cuts ^ since reversed ^ in off-peak trains calling there from last May.

In 2008-9, 10,814 journeys were recorded, up 32.8 per cent on the previous year, while at nearby Culham, where cuts were also made last May, 60,146 journeys began or ended there, up 28.4 per cent from 2007-8.

Dr Angela Jones, one of the passengers who campaigned against the cuts at Appleford, said: ^The figures show a very high usage of the station, given the village^s population, and people^s commitment to the train service.

^I would be very surprised, given the numbers I see on the platform each morning, if we didn^t get a similar rise in the current year^s figures.

^It^s clear there was no justification for the cuts. Appleford, Culham and Radley are all well used, usage is up at all three, and this strengthens the argument for maintaining and increasing the number of trains calling.^

FGW^▸ (First Great Western) spokesman Dan Panes said: ^The services we initially reduced at Appleford were at specific times of the day, while the ORR^» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) figures are for all passengers passing through the stations, so it^s impossible to make direct comparisons.

^When we made the decision, fewer customers had been using Appleford since 2005 and, at the time, the ORR figures backed up these findings.

^Even with the sharp increase in custom we saw last year, only 200 more people per year are using the station than in 2005. By speaking to the local community, we were able to pinpoint increases in demand, even before the figures were available, and reverse the decision.^

Booming business on the Oxford-Bicester Town branch line will be used by the Oxford-Bicester Rail Action Group to help press the Government to increase the minimum guaranteed number of trains serving Bicester Town and Islip when the line transfers from FGW to Chiltern Railways next year to become part of a second Oxford-London route.

Bicester Town saw 60,638 journeys, up 17 per cent from 51,902 a year earlier, in part thanks to extra trains funded by the county, reversing cuts made in 2006.

At Islip, custom was up by 20 per cent, to 17,062 journeys from 14,120, though still short of the 18,988 seen in 2004-5.

OBRAG chairman Dr Ian East said the growth had been maintained after the end of the counting period, with FGW telling the group that in the 12 months to last September, there were 19,833 journeys at Islip and 77,258 at Bicester Town. He said: ^These figures show the remarkable effect of the four extra trains a day.^

[ChrisB]

The County Council have offered Chiltern the same deal as they have with FGW^▸ (First Great Western) to subsidise extra services. The ball is firmly in Chiltern's court to to the deal.

[paul7575]

The County Council have offered Chiltern the same deal as they have with FGW^▸ (First Great Western) to subsidise extra services. The ball is firmly in Chiltern's court to to the deal.

The advantage Chiltern have is that any stops at the minor stations will be in through services that will be passing anyway, at 2 tph.  In principle, the costs of a decent Chiltern service at say Islip should be pretty marginal compared to extra stops in FGW's existing service to Bicester Town?

Paul

[ChrisB]

No extra trains at Islip (they'll all drive to Water Eaton anyway, more's the pity!), but extra trains to Bicester Town.