Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:15 09 Jan 2025
 
* Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 22:18:29 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[124] Railcard Prices going up
[87] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[77] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[67] Thumpers for Dummies
[46] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[25] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Station Usage for 2008/09  (Read 5959 times)
marky7890
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 149


View Profile Email
« on: March 25, 2010, 12:22:03 »

Hi,
Just to let everyone know today the latest station usage stats have been released by the Office of Rail Regulation for April 2008 - April 2009.

The files can be downloaded here: http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/server/show/nav.1529

I have however noticed that the total entries and total exists (and full, reduced and season) for most stations are the same figure.

Mark
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2010, 13:04:17 »

The point re entries and exits is mentioned in the Report (5.2) so is not a mistake.

A quick look shows significant increases for many stations in the West, eg North Somerset line stations aggregate an increase of over 13%. Bear in mind that at least half of the period in question was after the recession started and it is a startling result.

It appears to make a mockery of the projections built into the RUS (Route Utilisation Strategy) re growth and the number of additional carriages required in the West.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2010, 13:21:03 »

I note the availability of this data ... which I will build into our comparator here in the near future.   I have a lot on my plate with a major meeting tomorrow evening and other things too that must take priority.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10363


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 25, 2010, 13:21:44 »

Thanks for the link, Marky7890

Always an interesting read, even if the figures are always open to interpretation - especially with grouped stations and, ever increasingly, stations that accept Oyster (Smartcard system used by passengers on Transport for London services) cards.

Still, here's a snapshot of some of the noticeable changes from FGW (First Great Western)-land since last years report:

Avonmouth from 44000 to 62000
Bicester Town from 51000 to 60000
Bodmin Parkway 203000 to 285000
Falmouth (Town and Docks combined) from 159000 to 210000
Hanborough (spelt Handborough in the file!) from 84000 to 105000
Melksham from 38000 down to 27000 - no doubt Graham will provide some reasons for the decline!
Newquay from 87000 to 126000
Saltash from 32000 to 50000
Severn Beach from 54000 to 75000
Tiverton Parkway from 304000 to 451000

I'll be interested to see Bicester Town's figures for next year after the full impact of the 'Bicester Link' branding has taken effect, as numbers have swelled considerably since then!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2259


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2010, 13:35:43 »

I'm very pleased with the Severn Beach Line figures.  Just goes to show that if an improved service is offered, people are willing to use it:

Lawrence Hill 55730 to 67702
Stapleton Road 72182 to 104348
Montpelier 60629 to 86406
Redland 61394 to 88214
Clifton Down 204397 to 284220
Sea Mills 33222 to 36878
Shirehampton 30893 to 34742
Avonmouth 44468 to 62400
St Andrews Road 3183 to 3616
Severn Beach 54034 to 74864

Total for all these stations 620,132 to 843,390.  An increase of around 36%.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2010, 17:49:10 »

The Severn Beach Line figures are interesting with as brucey say around a 36% increase in usage over the 07/08 figures.

Although it's worth bearing in mind that the increase in frequency was 60%, from 15 return weekday trips to 24, as far as Avonmouth.

Of course that 36% increase could potentially be a lot higher if all fares were able to be collected. Just yesterday 3 people who sat in seats near me from Redland to Stapleton Road got away with no tickets issued, one even commented to another that there was a good chance they'd travel for free as their return journey would be on a busy evening service.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2010, 18:58:37 »

More thoughts:-

The overall increase of 8% is stated to be largely attributable to inclusion of PTE (Passenger Transport Executive) tickets which were not included in previous years. Without that the increase would have been less than 2%. Given the increase on West Country services appears well in excess of 8% on many routes, (with no inclusion of PTE to distort our figures), surely it follows that the west has significantly outperformed the national picture. So why do we get so little of the crumbs available for additional rolling stock (bearing in mind that the forthcoming cascade won't result in any additional stock once other stock is handed back).
« Last Edit: March 25, 2010, 19:58:36 by John R » Logged
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 662


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2010, 19:06:28 »

Have analysed from extracted data Cornwall's figures, See the relevant thread in the Local Forum. If I'm at a loss over the weekend, I'll do Devon as well.

Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2010, 20:13:10 »

Melksham from 38000 down to 27000 - no doubt Graham will provide some reasons for the decline!

As the GW (Great Western) RUS (Route Utilisation Strategy) put it, "This is due to an earlier discrepancy with ticket purchases at Melksham station for travel between Trowbridge and Bath which was rectified in September 2008."
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2010, 20:30:22 »

Thanks, Lee!  Wink Cheesy Grin

There's an acknowledgement of this point on page 11 in the RUS (Route Utilisation Strategy).
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2010, 20:33:18 »

And also on Pages 85 and 86 - http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=8080.msg13089#msg13089
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 662


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2010, 21:19:57 »

Have now done Devon CC, Plymouth UA and Torbay UA.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: March 25, 2010, 21:22:47 »

Thanks very much for that, RailCornwall!  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: March 25, 2010, 21:34:06 »

page 250 Appendix G ^ Stakeholder Aspirations... interesting!
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2010, 21:45:04 »

Quote
Line Reinstatement / Conversion

Exeter - Okehampton - Tavistock - Plymouth

... by any chance?

Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page