Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 10 Jan 2025
 
- Two million discounted tickets up for grabs in rail sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:36 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:23 London Paddington to Oxford
20:50 St Erth to St Ives
21:05 St Ives to St Erth
22:01 Oxford to London Paddington
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
20:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 21:05:22 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[132] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[116] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[71] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[63] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[46] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
[30] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Passenger dislike of class 450s  (Read 5027 times)
caliwag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« on: March 22, 2010, 12:09:24 »

Shock horror...74% of a small sample of pax go out of their way to avoid 450s... Roll Eyes

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Trains-must-be-ditched-survey.6169602.jp?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2010, 13:35:58 »

'Trains must be ditched'?   Huh

That's a change of policy, for the last few years they've wanted them to be replaced with 444s.

Funny thing is though, they never mention what should happen on the lines the 444s would have to be transferred from?

Paul
Logged
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2259


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2010, 14:16:34 »

Surely simply changing the seating would be a more feasible option than "ditching" the trains?

TBH (to be honest), if all the passengers can moan about is the width of the seat then perhaps they should try travelling with another TOC (Train Operating Company) (no names mentioned) where you are lucky to get a seat on certain routes, even with a reservation.  If they are complaining about sitting in a narrow seat for 97 minutes, then they should try standing for 140 minutes in the vestibule area of a Class 150, then they won't be complaining Tongue
Logged
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2061



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2010, 15:53:17 »

If the locals don't like 'em by all means send them up to Wiltshire. I for one would much rather face a little discomfort than have a 12 hour wait between trains. Some people don't know when they're well off!
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2010, 16:06:28 »

if they think the trains down there are bad they want to try a 143 from taunton to cardiff or a knackered/dirty 150/1 from glous-weymouth,then they will realise just how good they have it.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2010, 16:49:00 »

If the locals don't like 'em by all means send them up to Wiltshire. I for one would much rather face a little discomfort than have a 12 hour wait between trains. Some people don't know when they're well off!

Can they be attached to a Thunderbird and have the cab act as a DVT(resolve)?  I quite fancy named locos on trains here - it would certainly help with marketing the line - how great to have a helping hand from Gordon Tracy on your way to Salisbury, or to ride with Lady Penelope from Trowbridge to Swindon!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2010, 16:52:44 »

I do sympathise with them to some extent, afterall they did originally have the far nicer 444 trains whilst the Weymouth line had the simply fantastic "Wessex Electrics"

Yet another one to pin to the DafT...
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2010, 17:03:54 »

I know this has been rumbling on for a few years now, but isn't it a bit far-fetched for Cllr Stagg to be claiming, as she appears to be, that 450s rather than 444s on Pompey services are damaging the city's economy...?

Quote
The survey discovered 74 per cent of passengers went out of their way to avoid the trains, and many complained of sciatica and other back-related problems as a result of the 97-minute journey.

Would be interested to know exactly how the survey was conducted and what the questions were...for example, asking people questions along the lines of "do you agree that the 450s suck?" will always skew the results towards a "yes"!

Quote
The council's survey, conducted on commuters from March 3 to 4 on five early morning trains, also says that many passengers have changed jobs to avoid commuting to London by train, or started driving instead.

I'd also love to know how a survey apparently conducted on-board the trains managed to canvass the opinions of those who avoid them, have changed jobs or are driving instead!
Logged
Henry
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 369


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2010, 17:30:10 »


 Really cannot comment from experience, although perhaps the triple seating plan does seem strange.

 I would have thought this would be more for suburban routes, certainly not comfortable for a 90 minute journey.
 Mind you commuters from Portsmouth to London have the choice of 2 routes, if I remember correctly (via Guildford via Basingstoke). Do they use the same stock on both routes ?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2010, 18:28:31 »


 Really cannot comment from experience, although perhaps the triple seating plan does seem strange.

 I would have thought this would be more for suburban routes, certainly not comfortable for a 90 minute journey.
 Mind you commuters from Portsmouth to London have the choice of 2 routes, if I remember correctly (via Guildford via Basingstoke). Do they use the same stock on both routes ?

Both routes use both types, but no-one from Portsmouth would use the Basingstoke route all the way to Waterloo, it probably only starts to fill up with pax for Waterloo at Fareham.  There is a lot of interworking of EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) stock between various routes out of Waterloo, only the Weymouth trains are almost guaranteed to be 444s (yes there are a couple of 450s make it to Weymouth).  A few months back I checked a whole day's departures from the 'Portsmouth area', including those that started at Havant, and it is about 50% each 444/450 across the weekday.

Interestingly the 350/2s used by LM (London Midland - recent franchise) are practically identical (with the addition of small tables for cups in the bay seating) - and they run through services from Euston to Crewe.

450s have also run to Southampton on semi fasts since their introduction, (now extended to Poole) without people spending four years moaning about it...

Paul
Logged
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2259


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2010, 18:35:20 »

I find the Southern Electrostars from Portsmouth to London Victoria to be a much better experience than SWT (South West Trains)'s fleet.  Most of the sets have 2x2 seating, instead of 3x2.  Not only are the trains less busy but the prices are considerably cheaper, even for walk-up fares.  For leisure trips, the extra 30 minutes is worth it, just so I don't have to use SWT!

Perhaps I just don't like SWT, but it seems that they constantly want to give you a penalty fare (on-board announcements, fussy barrier staff and on-train inspectors) whereas Southern staff are generally more friendly.
Logged
The Grecian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 176


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2010, 19:56:17 »

It's an absolute waste of time demanding they be ditched, since the 442s are now working on the Brighton mainline. The Weymouth-Bournemouth-Southampton route is always going to take priority over the Portsmouth route as it's longer distance and serves more large towns and cities, so I have no idea what solution Portsmouth City Council suggest.

It was actually SWT (South West Trains) who took the 442s out of service as the cost of leasing them was much more expensive than the 444s - it was only a few months after the franchise was renewed in 2006. Southern then decided that they could be rather hnady on Gatwick Express runs.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page