Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Bristol Parkway
21:28 Weymouth to Frome
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 22:09:03 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[189] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[101] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[64] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[49] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[42] senior railcard
[40] Coastal walks - station to station
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 203 204 [205] 206 207 ... 230
  Print  
Author Topic: Reading Station improvements  (Read 1458210 times)
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 753


View Profile
« Reply #3060 on: January 09, 2015, 15:43:45 »

I did suggest a year or two ago that once the layout was completed all XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise))^s would run ML between Didcot and Reading and vv to make the best use of route capacity, and this indeed seems to be the case after Easter.  The main reason that XC^s terminating/starting at Reading used the RL^s before was because the old P7 was a convenient place to put them.

As regards the signalling going west from P3 and P7/8/9 towards the viaduct, I was at Reading one evening last week and watched XC 1E68 ex Southampton leave P3 at 1848 via Festival line and DM for York.  Just afterwards 1B76 left P9 via DM for Swansea.  It left P9 with a yellow at T1709 and ran up towards T1733 which was still on red as 1E68 hadn^t cleared.  This demonstrates that there are sufficient overlaps (as you would expect) for a westbound train to run up to either T 1731 (on the Festival line) or T1733 (on the DM) protecting High Level Junction while a train precedes them from the other line through High Level Junction.

Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #3061 on: January 09, 2015, 16:21:07 »

I've seen the similar situation with a XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) leaving P3 on a yellow, heading down the Festival line towards the red signal protecting the junction with the down main; at the same time a down HST (High Speed Train) was leaving P9 with a clear run.   So it seems there are no special procedures in use to ensure a clear path over the flyover for either type of service.

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #3062 on: January 09, 2015, 16:51:54 »

I did suggest a year or two ago that once the layout was completed all XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise))^s would run ML between Didcot and Reading and vv to make the best use of route capacity, and this indeed seems to be the case after Easter.  The main reason that XC^s terminating/starting at Reading used the RL^s before was because the old P7 was a convenient place to put them.

If they do, then that puts more pressure on Didcot East Junction, the new GWML (Great Western Main Line) pinchpoint now Reading is nearly sorted.   Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 753


View Profile
« Reply #3063 on: January 09, 2015, 17:32:15 »

Well, at present there are 3 tph (2  X Oxford/Cotswolds,1 X Cross Country) that cross from DM to DR (ie crossing UM) at Didcot East, so we^re talking about 1 more.  There are 4-5 tph ( 2 X  Bristol, 2 X S Wales, .5 X Cheltenham) on the UM.   So that^s 8-9 movements per hour through the short length of the UM they all need to use, which at first sight doesn^t seem to be an unduly onerous level of conflict.  Obviously a grade separated junction would be better for reliability etc but could it be justified with the current (or planned) level of train movements?

I^ve been trying to think of other junctions with comparable levels of conflict on 100+ mph lines and how many are flat or grade-separated, but haven^t got very far yet.  Are say Hitchin or Stafford or Woking comparable with Didcot East?  Hitchin in particular is worth looking at, as the new viaduct has just been built and the business case  must have been there.

Sorry if this is straying off topic.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #3064 on: January 09, 2015, 18:14:37 »

Well, at present there are 3 tph (2  X Oxford/Cotswolds,1 X Cross Country) that cross from DM to DR (ie crossing UM) at Didcot East, so we^re talking about 1 more.  There are 4-5 tph ( 2 X  Bristol, 2 X S Wales, .5 X Cheltenham) on the UM.   So that^s 8-9 movements per hour through the short length of the UM they all need to use, which at first sight doesn^t seem to be an unduly onerous level of conflict.  Obviously a grade separated junction would be better for reliability etc but could it be justified with the current (or planned) level of train movements?

You certainly can't squeeze much more through there and with one move needed every seven minutes or so that doesn't give much leeway for trying to ensure those up expresses don't have to throw the brakes on from 125mph as something crosses over in front.  And, don't forget, that from the new IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) based timetable that 4-5 trains is probably going to become 7 trains per hour (4x Bristol, 2x South Wales, 1x Cheltenham).

Also to consider is the Down Relief line being blocked by movements from the Up Relief to Up Main which wouldn't happen if the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise))'s stayed on the Up Relief.  That potentially blocks the 2tph stoppers and the ever increasing number of freights coming Down Relief, a few of which need to access (very very slowly!) Didcot Yard.

My hunch is that we'll see grade separation being constructed within CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024), or early CP7.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #3065 on: January 09, 2015, 18:59:55 »

Hello, new to the forum, I've been keeping up to date with users posts over the past couple of weeks and found many subjects to be an interesting read and hope over time I can contribute to that.

I've been looking over the RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) for the 7th/8th April and have noticed that no trains at all use the Festival line all the way to RW Jn, yet the whole idea of this section was to segregate XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) services from the main lines, wether that be at RDG(resolve) or at Didcot East Jn.

I have also noticed that most of the XC services for these days are VAR and are only scheduled until the 10th meaning possibly a minor change thereafter. Maybe most XCs will use the whole Festival line route from the 13th April onwards?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3066 on: January 09, 2015, 19:12:05 »

Hello, new to the forum, I've been keeping up to date with users posts over the past couple of weeks and found many subjects to be an interesting read and hope over time I can contribute to that.

I've been looking over the RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) for the 7th/8th April and have noticed that no trains at all use the Festival line all the way to RW Jn, yet the whole idea of this section was to segregate XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) services from the main lines, wether that be at RDG(resolve) or at Didcot East Jn.

I have also noticed that most of the XC services for these days are VAR and are only scheduled until the 10th meaning possibly a minor change thereafter. Maybe most XCs will use the whole Festival line route from the 13th April onwards?

Welcome to the forum .... I'm not a Reading expert, but as I understand it only the start of the Festival line is in place yet

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7370


View Profile
« Reply #3067 on: January 09, 2015, 19:46:48 »

Hello, new to the forum, I've been keeping up to date with users posts over the past couple of weeks and found many subjects to be an interesting read and hope over time I can contribute to that.

I've been looking over the RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) for the 7th/8th April and have noticed that no trains at all use the Festival line all the way to RW Jn, yet the whole idea of this section was to segregate XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) services from the main lines, wether that be at RDG(resolve) or at Didcot East Jn.

I have also noticed that most of the XC services for these days are VAR and are only scheduled until the 10th meaning possibly a minor change thereafter. Maybe most XCs will use the whole Festival line route from the 13th April onwards?

Welcome to the forum from me ... and I think you may be generally right.

Since I said this in my post -
So I don't think you can tell whether a train uses the Festival Line all the way from Reading West, or only the eastern part and the Mains over the western part of the viaduct. (Or not unless not showing the Reading West timing point on the Reliefs means it is pathed on the Main Lines (i.e. on the viaduct)).
I've looked at some other examples in RTT, and it does seem that if a train did move over from the UM to the UR at Tilehurst East Jn, it would show a timing point at Reading West. So even the inbound trains to P3, which I gave the benefit of the doubt, are staying on the UM to Reading High level Jn. But note that this is true for the ones shown as WTT (Working Time-Table), valid until 15/4/2015, too.

Why that should be is a puzzle. The note against the relevant possessions in the EAS (2/4/15 to 03330 on 7/4/15)  is this:
Quote
Note: when this possession hands-back, the Festival, Feeder and Passenger Loop lines are brought into use.

As to whether the Festival Line was meant to take all XC trains, both ways, I'm not sure it was. Or, rather, that the importance of doing that depends on the direction.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7370


View Profile
« Reply #3068 on: January 09, 2015, 20:13:56 »

Well, at present there are 3 tph (2  X Oxford/Cotswolds,1 X Cross Country) that cross from DM to DR (ie crossing UM) at Didcot East, so we^re talking about 1 more.  There are 4-5 tph ( 2 X  Bristol, 2 X S Wales, .5 X Cheltenham) on the UM.   So that^s 8-9 movements per hour through the short length of the UM they all need to use, which at first sight doesn^t seem to be an unduly onerous level of conflict.  Obviously a grade separated junction would be better for reliability etc but could it be justified with the current (or planned) level of train movements?

You certainly can't squeeze much more through there and with one move needed every seven minutes or so that doesn't give much leeway for trying to ensure those up expresses don't have to throw the brakes on from 125mph as something crosses over in front.  And, don't forget, that from the new IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) based timetable that 4-5 trains is probably going to become 7 trains per hour (4x Bristol, 2x South Wales, 1x Cheltenham).

Also to consider is the Down Relief line being blocked by movements from the Up Relief to Up Main which wouldn't happen if the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise))'s stayed on the Up Relief.  That potentially blocks the 2tph stoppers and the ever increasing number of freights coming Down Relief, a few of which need to access (very very slowly!) Didcot Yard.

My hunch is that we'll see grade separation being constructed within CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024), or early CP7.

I did mention before that some of the smart money in Network rail is on Didcot as the next big flyover. And it is an option in the Western Route Study, but combined with other capacity increases to and through Oxford. The point of that is that more that half the trains go that way, not along the main line, a lot more when you count freight and East-West rail too.

It always puzzled me about the RSAR that no effort had been spent on reducing conflict on the Relief Lines, as if there could never be enough traffic to make their capacity an issue. That seems to be a common assumption in planning throughout the network. I think the idea is that no line needs more than 2 tph stoppers, or 4tph in cities for "metro" lines, unless it's a Crossrail-type megametro.

Reading West to Didcot East (inclusive) looks to me like a counterexample to that principle. So pushing XC trains onto the Reliefs may not be an answer, or not for the longer term.
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #3069 on: January 09, 2015, 20:46:51 »

Hello, new to the forum, I've been keeping up to date with users posts over the past couple of weeks and found many subjects to be an interesting read and hope over time I can contribute to that.

I've been looking over the RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) for the 7th/8th April and have noticed that no trains at all use the Festival line all the way to RW Jn, yet the whole idea of this section was to segregate XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) services from the main lines, wether that be at RDG(resolve) or at Didcot East Jn.

I have also noticed that most of the XC services for these days are VAR and are only scheduled until the 10th meaning possibly a minor change thereafter. Maybe most XCs will use the whole Festival line route from the 13th April onwards?

Welcome to the forum .... I'm not a Reading expert, but as I understand it only the start of the Festival line is in place yet



Yes, I was referring to the whole line which is due to open in April, just to make sure there's no confusion  Smiley

Also I work next to Cow Lane Bridges so know this area very well
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7370


View Profile
« Reply #3070 on: January 09, 2015, 23:13:46 »

If you stand in exactly the right place on the transfer deck, you can see through a gap* in the obstructions straight down what were the Main Lines until Christmas. With binoculars, I could see reading West Jn quite clearly, so it should be possible to monitor what's being done along there**. The picture is the best my little compact, with its tiny zoom lens, can do - if anyone's got one*** that pokes out further,  that would be useful.

* Medically, it's called the intergantrical lacuna.
** Provided there isn't an outbreak of promiscuous intralacunal polygantria.
*** Zoom lens, obviously.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #3071 on: January 10, 2015, 10:16:34 »

The whole question of how XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) trains will use the post Easter layout on a regular basis (outside perturbations) boils down to the question, are they main or relief services?

As they are operated 100% by 125 mph stock, and despite contrary opinions are definitely allowed to do 125 mph on the relevant route section, then surely the default position is to use the mains?   Should we really expect most XC services to chug along the reliefs in between freights and local stoppers?

So is the Festival Line underpass an essential feature of the layout to be used a few times per hour, or is it there to give flexibility for regulating due to late or early running?  Compare it with the eastern underpass, that gets very little passenger use in the normal timetable.

I've suggested before that various statements made in documents, and inferences drawn from track diagrams do not always 'read in reverse' - remember the original much discussed 'Corus' diagram where particular lines were shown colour coded with light blue as 'Cross Country'.  I got an explanation at one of the public briefings that should be read as 'mainly for use of'.

Hence for a given route to be labelled 'mainly for the use of XC trains' is not equivalent to 'XC trains will always (or mainly) use this route'...

Paul
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7370


View Profile
« Reply #3072 on: January 10, 2015, 10:41:46 »

The whole question of how XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) trains will use the post Easter layout on a regular basis (outside perturbations) boils down to the question, are they main or relief services?
Paul

To be answered, I think, in connection with the talk in various topics on capacity and grade separation at Didcot East and all the way up to Oxford North.

Why do NR» (Network Rail - home page) think capacity runs out at Oxford North before Didcot East? Hardly just on the number of trains. I suspect it depends on running Reading-Didcot as two two-track railways pre-segregated at Reading rather than a four-track railway separated on speed /stops. But that means you have a mix of fast/slower/stoppers (lots of stops, too)/a lot of freight over two tracks for about 25 miles. that's bound to slow down a lot of long-distance (or long travel time) trains that need every minute they can find.

It's probably a result of "we can only solve one problem at a time ('cos they won't give us money to do more)" thinking. Next stop the Didcot East flyover ...
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #3073 on: January 10, 2015, 20:00:38 »

Yes if there was a Didcot East flyover the they would always use the mains, but the difficulty is getting them across the reliefs to the East curve.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #3074 on: January 11, 2015, 13:57:37 »

Why do NR» (Network Rail - home page) think capacity runs out at Oxford North before Didcot East? Hardly just on the number of trains. I suspect it depends on running Reading-Didcot as two two-track railways pre-segregated at Reading rather than a four-track railway separated on speed /stops.

Oxford North is 4-track (two from Didcot & two from the East Curve) joining 2 tracks to/from Oxford.
Didcot East is 4 tracks to 2 tracks but fewer movements per hour onto the curve. So yes, Oxford North is likely to run out at the former first.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 203 204 [205] 206 207 ... 230
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page