Electric train
|
|
« Reply #2535 on: December 29, 2013, 19:16:43 » |
|
I think, and I not an OLE▸ engineer, they are mid-span anchor points and / or fixed anchor points for the wire runs for the crossovers in this area. On the Mk3 Headspan the mid-span and fixed anchor tail wires are fed through the adjacent roads to a structure (normally) in the cess, each time they fly through an adjacent road they have to have insulation cut in and the piece of wire passing through bonded to the OLE of the road its flying through ............. gets messy and prone to failure and a pain if the wire needs re-running.
Why 2 portal booms upper one for the catenary wire the lower for the contact wire, between these 2 structures there will be a contact wire over lap
In addition to the (now) two on the station side of gantry 1, I counted about nine on the other side. There's a concentration of them near Kennet Bridge, which supports the idea that they are to deal with the extra wires for crossovers. There must be a specific reason for having a second rigid mounting, and I can think of a few possibles. One is for simpler mid-point or end anchoring. Another is to allow a sharp change of direction of the tensioned contact wire, to get it out of the way of live stuff, which needs a significant transverse force. The last is to mount a cable tensioner - I believe there are some that go on the gantry, and do not rely on dangly weights. But, as ever, we'll see if we wait. You are thinking of the "PFISTERER Tensorex" units
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
lbraine
|
|
« Reply #2536 on: December 30, 2013, 09:07:50 » |
|
Two pictures from Reading yesterday on the way through
First is platform 9 showing the small gap left in the edging before completion
Second is the new and old temporary P7
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SandTEngineer
|
|
« Reply #2537 on: December 30, 2013, 10:52:43 » |
|
I travelled up on a diverted WC▸ express last Saturday (28 December 2013) and took the following photographs of the Viaduct works: West End Image (c)2013 SandTEngineerWest Curve Box 1 Image (c)2013 SandTEngineerWest Curve Box 2 Image (c)2013 SandTEngineerBetween West and East Box 1 Image (c)2013 SandTEngineerBetween West and East Box 2 Image (c)2013 SandTEngineerEast (Feeder Lines) Box Image (c)2013 SandTEngineerEast End 1 Image (c)2013 SandTEngineerEast End 2 Image (c)2013 SandTEngineer
|
|
« Last Edit: December 30, 2013, 11:00:18 by SandTEngineer »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #2539 on: December 30, 2013, 11:43:23 » |
|
Thanks for posting that. I just love the photograph on Page 2 of the document................. I'll show it to a few people at work That working practice was still quite common even as recently as the WCML▸ electrification of the 60's even in the early 90's working from ladders installing insulators was common (a ceramic insulator is not a light weight)
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6594
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #2540 on: December 30, 2013, 16:19:53 » |
|
Such disregard for Elfan ap Safety. Shouldn't that chap be wearing orange?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #2541 on: December 30, 2013, 18:04:10 » |
|
Two pictures from Reading yesterday on the way through
First is platform 9 showing the small gap left in the edging before completion
Second is the new and old temporary P7
When was that picture taken? It can't be yesterday=Sunday, since the scaffolding was all gone by 15:45 Saturday (as shown). The "new" P7 now looks all ready for use, apart from the hoardings.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #2542 on: December 30, 2013, 18:44:18 » |
|
I wonder if they'll eventually adjust the curvature of the track towards P7, i.e. to a smoother curve? To me it just looks 'wrong', but I think it might have been aligned specifically to allow for the temporary platform - and the remainder of the 'proper' P7 won't go that far.
We'll see in due course...
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #2543 on: December 30, 2013, 19:31:04 » |
|
Regarding the drainage, I think the bottom of the steps will still be higher than the bottom end of Greyfriars Road, so presumably it will drain in that westerly direction...?
In the interminable time that RBC‡ spent in preparing the dug-out Station Hill area, they appeared to put a good number of chunky looking drains in...
Is that a big enough drain? I tried looking at an old (1900) map, but there's no spot height by the station entrance and the only nearby benchmark is on the SER station. But, remember that the railway line is almost level, and Caversham Road goes under it, and is above the river. Mind you, it's not much above the river, as you'll know if you've seen pictures of the 1894 flood. I assume that will also be the ground floor level for the new Station Hill development.
There's no sign of any preparation of the raised level (between the new "hole" and the buildings) so it can be demolished. Quite the reverse, if you look at the new drains underneath it. The other picture shows the base of the steps in more detail. Given the lack of any foundations, presumably the upper section of the ramp will be cast onto the pillars.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DidcotPunter
|
|
« Reply #2544 on: December 31, 2013, 16:22:45 » |
|
Thanks for posting that. I just love the photograph on Page 2 of the document................. I'll show it to a few people at work The picture is a still from one of the videos in the East Anglian Film Archive. The first one covers the 1500V DC▸ electrification from Liverpool St to Shenfield - without viewing it again, I think this is where the still came from. Without spoiling it there's a graphic demonstration of the hazards of working on the OHLE on a steam-worked line. There's also a fascinating bit towards the end where they have to replace a portal structure at Shenfield (it was slipping down the bank) on what looks a "live" railway. The second video covers the extension of electrification from Shenfield to Southend. All good stuff. You can view both of them here:- http://www.eafa.org.uk/search.aspx#&&page=1&navid=&psize=10&text=electrificationEnjoy
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #2545 on: December 31, 2013, 16:57:53 » |
|
Thanks for posting that. I just love the photograph on Page 2 of the document................. I'll show it to a few people at work The picture is a still from one of the videos in the East Anglian Film Archive. The first one covers the 1500V DC▸ electrification from Liverpool St to Shenfield - without viewing it again, I think this is where the still came from. Without spoiling it there's a graphic demonstration of the hazards of working on the OHLE on a steam-worked line. There's also a fascinating bit towards the end where they have to replace a portal structure at Shenfield (it was slipping down the bank) on what looks a "live" railway. The second video covers the extension of electrification from Shenfield to Southend. All good stuff. You can view both of them here:- http://www.eafa.org.uk/search.aspx#&&page=1&navid=&psize=10&text=electrificationEnjoy Excellent Principles are the same just the 'elf n safety is a little different
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #2546 on: December 31, 2013, 17:00:57 » |
|
Couple of camera snaps of the re-opened P7 taken earlier today. They've left the scaffolding alongside the P3 platform face in position. Also seemed to me that the scaffolding area under the main roof has stopped people realising that there's a lot of space further along, including a decent waiting room they could have been using rather than standing in the open! I dare say temporary signage will be improved over the next few days...
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #2547 on: January 02, 2014, 23:48:37 » |
|
I'm sure that many of you will be reassured to see the arrangements that have been made to conduct rainwater from both interrupted downpipes over P7 into the drains. This avoids the alternative route via the lining of a passenger's coat.
You can also see (part of) the scaffolding needed to put the wiring etc. into the canopy/roof as it sweeps upwards. This is the same as was done on the other platforms, but I don't think they were done with passengers on the platform almost underneath. The edge part, which is directly over the passengers, will presumably need to be done out of hours - off cherry-pickers?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #2548 on: January 03, 2014, 00:41:09 » |
|
I'm sure that many of you will be reassured to see the arrangements that have been made to conduct rainwater from both interrupted downpipes over P7 into the drains. This avoids the alternative route via the lining of a passenger's coat.
Thanks for that, stuving - it made me splutter into my coffee!
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #2549 on: January 03, 2014, 18:18:26 » |
|
You can also see (part of) the scaffolding needed to put the wiring etc. into the canopy/roof as it sweeps upwards. This is the same as was done on the other platforms, but I don't think they were done with passengers on the platform almost underneath. The edge part, which is directly over the passengers, will presumably need to be done out of hours - off cherry-pickers?
OK boss - plan B it is. Just as long as you don't want me to go out on that thing with Wally as well - you'll have to find me someone lighter to help on this one. Oh, and the site safety rules don't allow us to work up there with punters walking about underneath, do they?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|