Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:55 08 Jan 2025
 
- Boy, 14, stabbed to death on London bus
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:57 Liskeard to Looe
06:00 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
06:10 Slough to Windsor & Eton Central
06:20 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
06:30 Looe to Liskeard
06:40 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
07:20 Liskeard to Looe
07:54 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
05:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 06:13:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[192] Coastal walks - station to station
[169] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[74] Fatal Oxfordshire train crash remembered 150 years on
[67] Warnings of snow, wind and rain across the UK for New Year
[45] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[34] Senior Railcard - ongoing issues, merged posts
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 168 169 [170] 171 172 ... 230
  Print  
Author Topic: Reading Station improvements  (Read 1456335 times)
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4495


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2535 on: December 29, 2013, 19:16:43 »

I think, and I not an OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") engineer, they are mid-span anchor points and / or fixed anchor points for the wire runs for the crossovers in this area.  On the Mk3 Headspan the mid-span and fixed anchor tail wires are fed through the adjacent roads to a structure (normally) in the cess, each time they fly through an adjacent road they have to have insulation cut in and the piece of wire passing through bonded to the OLE of the road its flying through ............. gets messy and prone to failure and a pain if the wire needs re-running.

Why 2 portal booms upper one for the catenary wire the lower for the contact wire, between these 2 structures there will be a contact wire over lap

In addition to the (now) two on the station side of gantry 1, I counted about nine on the other side. There's a concentration of them near Kennet Bridge, which supports the idea that they are to deal with the extra wires for crossovers.

There must be a specific reason for having a second rigid mounting, and I can think of a few possibles. One is for simpler mid-point or end anchoring. Another is to allow a sharp change of direction of the tensioned contact wire, to get it out of the way of live stuff, which needs a significant transverse force. The last is to mount a cable tensioner - I believe there are some that go on the gantry, and do not rely on dangly weights. But, as ever, we'll see if we wait.
You are thinking of the "PFISTERER Tensorex" units
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
lbraine
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 143


View Profile
« Reply #2536 on: December 30, 2013, 09:07:50 »

Two pictures from Reading yesterday on the way through

First is platform 9 showing the small gap left in the edging before completion

Second is the new and old temporary P7
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #2537 on: December 30, 2013, 10:52:43 »

I travelled up on a diverted WC (Wiltshire Council (Unitary Authority)) express last Saturday (28 December 2013) and took the following photographs of the Viaduct works:

West End

Image (c)2013 SandTEngineer

West Curve Box 1

Image (c)2013 SandTEngineer

West Curve Box 2

Image (c)2013 SandTEngineer

Between West and East Box 1

Image (c)2013 SandTEngineer

Between West and East Box 2

Image (c)2013 SandTEngineer

East (Feeder Lines) Box

Image (c)2013 SandTEngineer

East End 1

Image (c)2013 SandTEngineer

East End 2

Image (c)2013 SandTEngineer
« Last Edit: December 30, 2013, 11:00:18 by SandTEngineer » Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #2538 on: December 30, 2013, 11:05:56 »

This presentation by a F&F engineer summarises the work involved.
http://www.cifi.it/UplDocumenti/torino12/35%20Rico%20Furrer%20%20%20Furrer%20Frey.pdf

Thanks for posting that.  I just love the photograph on Page 2 of the document................. Roll Eyes Tongue   I'll show it to a few people at work Grin
« Last Edit: December 30, 2013, 11:19:57 by SandTEngineer » Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4495


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2539 on: December 30, 2013, 11:43:23 »

This presentation by a F&F engineer summarises the work involved.
http://www.cifi.it/UplDocumenti/torino12/35%20Rico%20Furrer%20%20%20Furrer%20Frey.pdf

Thanks for posting that.  I just love the photograph on Page 2 of the document................. Roll Eyes Tongue   I'll show it to a few people at work Grin

That working practice was still quite common even as recently as the WCML (West Coast Main Line) electrification of the 60's even in the early 90's working from ladders installing insulators was common (a ceramic insulator is not a light weight)
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #2540 on: December 30, 2013, 16:19:53 »

Such disregard for Elfan ap Safety. Shouldn't that chap be wearing orange?
Logged

Now, please!
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7369


View Profile
« Reply #2541 on: December 30, 2013, 18:04:10 »

Two pictures from Reading yesterday on the way through

First is platform 9 showing the small gap left in the edging before completion

Second is the new and old temporary P7

When was that picture taken? It can't be yesterday=Sunday, since the scaffolding was all gone by 15:45 Saturday (as shown).
The "new" P7 now looks all ready for use, apart from the hoardings.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #2542 on: December 30, 2013, 18:44:18 »

I wonder if they'll eventually adjust the curvature of the track towards P7, i.e. to a smoother curve?  To me it just looks 'wrong', but I think it might have been aligned specifically to allow for the temporary platform - and the remainder of the 'proper' P7 won't go that far.

We'll see in due course...

Paul
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7369


View Profile
« Reply #2543 on: December 30, 2013, 19:31:04 »

Regarding the drainage, I think the bottom of the steps will still be higher than the bottom end of Greyfriars Road, so presumably it will drain in that westerly direction...?

In the interminable time that RBC(resolve) spent in preparing the dug-out Station Hill area, they appeared to put a good number of chunky looking drains in...
Is that a big enough drain?

I tried looking at an old (1900) map, but there's no spot height by the station entrance and the only nearby benchmark is on the SER station. But, remember that the railway line is almost level, and Caversham Road goes under it, and is above the river. Mind you, it's not much above the river, as you'll know if you've seen pictures of the 1894 flood.
I assume that will also be the ground floor level for the new Station Hill development.
There's no sign of any preparation of the raised level (between the new "hole" and the buildings) so it can be demolished. Quite the reverse, if you look at the new drains underneath it.

The other picture shows the base of the steps in more detail. Given the lack of any foundations, presumably the upper section of the ramp will be cast onto the pillars.
Logged
DidcotPunter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 166


View Profile Email
« Reply #2544 on: December 31, 2013, 16:22:45 »


Thanks for posting that.  I just love the photograph on Page 2 of the document................. Roll Eyes Tongue   I'll show it to a few people at work Grin

The picture is a still from one of the videos in the East Anglian Film Archive.  The first one covers the 1500V DC (Direct Current) electrification from Liverpool St to Shenfield - without viewing it again, I think this is where the still came from.  Without spoiling it there's a graphic demonstration of the hazards of working on the OHLE on a steam-worked line. There's also a fascinating bit towards the end where they have to replace a portal structure at Shenfield (it was slipping down the bank) on what looks a "live" railway.

The second video covers the extension of electrification from Shenfield to Southend. All good stuff.

You can view both of them here:-

http://www.eafa.org.uk/search.aspx#&&page=1&navid=&psize=10&text=electrification

Enjoy  Grin
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4495


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2545 on: December 31, 2013, 16:57:53 »


Thanks for posting that.  I just love the photograph on Page 2 of the document................. Roll Eyes Tongue   I'll show it to a few people at work Grin

The picture is a still from one of the videos in the East Anglian Film Archive.  The first one covers the 1500V DC (Direct Current) electrification from Liverpool St to Shenfield - without viewing it again, I think this is where the still came from.  Without spoiling it there's a graphic demonstration of the hazards of working on the OHLE on a steam-worked line. There's also a fascinating bit towards the end where they have to replace a portal structure at Shenfield (it was slipping down the bank) on what looks a "live" railway.

The second video covers the extension of electrification from Shenfield to Southend. All good stuff.

You can view both of them here:-

http://www.eafa.org.uk/search.aspx#&&page=1&navid=&psize=10&text=electrification

Enjoy  Grin

Excellent  Grin Principles are the same just the 'elf n safety is a little different  Grin
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #2546 on: December 31, 2013, 17:00:57 »

Couple of camera snaps of the re-opened P7 taken earlier today.   They've left the scaffolding alongside the P3 platform face in position.   Also seemed to me that the scaffolding area under the main roof has stopped people realising that there's a lot of space further along, including a decent waiting room they could have been using rather than standing in the open!   I dare say temporary signage will be improved over the next few days...

Paul

 
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7369


View Profile
« Reply #2547 on: January 02, 2014, 23:48:37 »

I'm sure that many of you will be reassured to see the arrangements that have been made to conduct rainwater from both interrupted downpipes over P7 into the drains. This avoids the alternative route via the lining of a passenger's coat.

You can also see (part of) the scaffolding needed to put the wiring etc. into the canopy/roof as it sweeps upwards. This is the same as was done on the other platforms, but I don't think they were done with passengers on the platform almost underneath. The edge part, which is directly over the passengers, will presumably need to be done out of hours - off cherry-pickers?
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19081


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #2548 on: January 03, 2014, 00:41:09 »

I'm sure that many of you will be reassured to see the arrangements that have been made to conduct rainwater from both interrupted downpipes over P7 into the drains. This avoids the alternative route via the lining of a passenger's coat.

Thanks for that, stuving - it made me splutter into my coffee!  Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7369


View Profile
« Reply #2549 on: January 03, 2014, 18:18:26 »

You can also see (part of) the scaffolding needed to put the wiring etc. into the canopy/roof as it sweeps upwards. This is the same as was done on the other platforms, but I don't think they were done with passengers on the platform almost underneath. The edge part, which is directly over the passengers, will presumably need to be done out of hours - off cherry-pickers?

OK boss - plan B it is. Just as long as you don't want me to go out on that thing with Wally as well - you'll have to find me someone lighter to help on this one. Oh, and the site safety rules don't allow us to work up there with punters walking about underneath, do they?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 168 169 [170] 171 172 ... 230
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page