Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:35 08 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:57 Liskeard to Looe
06:20 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
06:30 Looe to Liskeard
06:40 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
07:20 Liskeard to Looe
07:54 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
05:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 06:44:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[192] Coastal walks - station to station
[169] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[74] Fatal Oxfordshire train crash remembered 150 years on
[67] Warnings of snow, wind and rain across the UK for New Year
[45] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[34] Senior Railcard - ongoing issues, merged posts
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 163 164 [165] 166 167 ... 230
  Print  
Author Topic: Reading Station improvements  (Read 1457424 times)
ironstone11
Full Member
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
« Reply #2460 on: December 03, 2013, 14:17:54 »

Those waiting sections can only go on P7, as it's the only platform left canopyless. Were there 12 of them? If so, that looks like them. As you say, we now sadly lack the means to check up on how it was done (or even count them).
There were nine of them on Oct 27.
Checked via the old frontend.
Logged
Jason
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 543


View Profile
« Reply #2461 on: December 03, 2013, 18:19:08 »

~18:00. Supporting elements of the P7 roof waiting to go up, laying further along the platform.
Much of the surface is already finished in brick. This view gives an idea of the greatly increased space that will form the new P7
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #2462 on: December 03, 2013, 20:11:19 »

Given the progress reported earlier on the P3/7 canopy west of the transfer deck; I can see them easily having the bulk of P7 back in use by the New Year at the rate they're going.

Then the short section currently occupied by the temporary platform will presumably happen much more quickly - and of course there are no platform buildings to fit out on P7, unlike the other two main islands.

Added a couple of daytime photos of the P3/7 canopy below:

Paul
« Last Edit: December 04, 2013, 15:57:08 by paul7755 » Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #2463 on: December 04, 2013, 16:00:25 »

Obvious really - it's not long since we were commenting on the old track being buried and (by me anyway) forgotten. The rails have already been dragged along, and are waiting to be clipped. There seems to be a short extra length at the London end too.

Lunchtime today saw the old and new rails about to be joined, they are just about fully clipped up on the section heading in the up direction.

Paul
« Last Edit: December 04, 2013, 16:37:27 by paul7755 » Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #2464 on: December 04, 2013, 18:11:44 »

Another picture, from a slightly different viewpoint, of progress on the last main roof girder.

Mr Ainscough's little crane remains outside the Three Guineas, so I assume there'll be more progress tonight.

Paul
Logged
Jason
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 543


View Profile
« Reply #2465 on: December 04, 2013, 18:22:19 »

Mr Ainscough's little crane remains outside the Three Guineas, so I assume there'll be more progress tonight

The crane looks most impressive from my vantage point with a pint Wink

One of the supporting risers also went up last night and yet more bits waiting this evening.

Ps apologies for my phone's lack of sense of orientation.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4495


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2466 on: December 04, 2013, 18:44:09 »

Mr Ainscough's little crane remains outside the Three Guineas, so I assume there'll be more progress tonight

The crane looks most impressive from my vantage point with a pint Wink

One of the supporting risers also went up last night and yet more bits waiting this evening.

Ps apologies for my phone's lack of sense of orientation.

Pint of what though  Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked  Grin
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7369


View Profile
« Reply #2467 on: December 04, 2013, 18:46:07 »

Those waiting sections can only go on P7, as it's the only platform left canopyless. Were there 12 of them? If so, that looks like them. As you say, we now sadly lack the means to check up on how it was done (or even count them).
There were nine of them on Oct 27.
Checked via the old frontend.
And there still are nine of them. So we are running out of suitable places to put that many plain sections - most of the rest of P7's canopy abuts something else (the polybag skylight spanning to P3, the "heritage" station, Apex (Advanced Purchase Excursion (fare)) Plaza) or is sharply tapered (up by P6). I imagine the sections installed on P7 (eleven plus the end frame) were put there by a crane just outside, as those on P3 were, but could not see direct evidence of it.

I know we already have pictures of that roof support, but here's a somewhat clearer one anyway.
Logged
ironstone11
Full Member
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
« Reply #2468 on: December 04, 2013, 19:38:43 »

Those waiting sections can only go on P7, as it's the only platform left canopyless. Were there 12 of them?
There were nine of them on Oct 27.
And there still are nine of them. So we are running out of suitable places ...
These will be for P7 and could go anywhere on the sloping section between the canopy above the transfer deck and the new supports running the length of the platform. I hadn't noticed before, but an unfinished canopy end is visible above the transfer deck with it's left hand end obscured by some temporary covering. 
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7369


View Profile
« Reply #2469 on: December 04, 2013, 19:46:23 »

These will be for P7 and could go anywhere on the sloping section between the canopy above the transfer deck and the new supports running the length of the platform. I hadn't noticed before, but an unfinished canopy end is visible above the transfer deck with it's left hand end obscured by some temporary covering. 

It's true I'd forgotten that bit - but I expect that to be joined onto the existing sloping concourse roof, as it is over the top of the deck. There's a cross-section drawing of that bit that shows it is not a symmetrical shape like the sections in the stack - in effect it only has one free edge.
Logged
CCTV99
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #2470 on: December 05, 2013, 09:40:25 »

Is there any possibility that these roof sections are going to be used in the northern forecourt area, hence their positioning?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7369


View Profile
« Reply #2471 on: December 05, 2013, 09:56:33 »

Is there any possibility that these roof sections are going to be used in the northern forecourt area, hence their positioning?

Well, only if there is a new or extended platform somewhere there ... and it's not been made public ... so probably not. And, if for some reason they were scheduled to be made and delivered months too early for the build as it has happened, that is a sensible enough place to store them where they do not get in the way.

My best guess at the moment is that they do go on P3/7 at the station end, and some of the sections below the top in the stack have modified edges to support the polybag skylight spanning to P1's canopy. But then I've guessed wrong before, so we'll just have to wait and see.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #2472 on: December 05, 2013, 10:51:49 »

My best guess at the moment is that they do go on P3/7 at the station end, and some of the sections below the top in the stack have modified edges to support the polybag skylight spanning to P1's canopy. But then I've guessed wrong before, so we'll just have to wait and see.

I'd agree - and it is all that is left to do (for sections broadly symmetrical about the centre line) by a process of elimination. 

I'd say that comparing the overall shape and the number of longitudinals protruding at the end, (that are visible on the roof sections in the stack at the north entrance - available on the old webcams), with the end view in my second photo in post #2462 above suggests they are almost certainly the same basic cross section.

Paul 
Logged
ironstone11
Full Member
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
« Reply #2473 on: December 05, 2013, 12:33:06 »

I'd say that comparing the overall shape and the number of longitudinals protruding at the end, (that are visible on the roof sections in the stack at the north entrance - available on the old webcams), with the end view in my second photo in post #2462 above suggests they are almost certainly the same basic cross section.
Yes, I agree, that does look like to most likely home for them.
Logged
Jason
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 543


View Profile
« Reply #2474 on: December 06, 2013, 08:39:50 »

Pint of what though  Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked  Grin

It was a very pleasant pale ale from the 3G's Smiley

Three pictures to follow
1. I didn't realise the P7 canopy support was going to kink out of line like that
2. The remaining P3/P7 canopy supports are in
3. The first piece of canopy arrived on P7 overnight
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 163 164 [165] 166 167 ... 230
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page